The population growth in each south east London borough
Between mid-2023 and mid-2024, Bexley's population increased by 1.71 per cent, rising from 252,124 to 256,434.
This was the fastest growth among Bexley, Bromley, Lewisham, Southwark and Greenwich.
Greenwich followed with a population increase of 1.05 per cent, going from 296,420 to 299,528.
Bromley saw a rise of 0.85 per cent, with the population growing from 332,482 to 335,319.
Southwark's population grew by 0.42 per cent, increasing from 313,485 to 314,786 between mid-2023 and mid-2024.
Lewisham had the smallest increase, with the population rising by just 0.34 per cent, from 300,225 to 301,255.
Of the 318 local authorities across England and Wales, the population is estimated to have increased in 306 and decreased in 12.
The figures are part of the ONS's annual mid-year estimates, which track changes in local authority populations.
Bexley's growth rate placed it in the top third nationally, while Lewisham's was among the lowest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
5 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump fires head of labor statistics after weak jobs report
Cookie Choices for EU, Swiss & UK Residents We and our 914 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting I Accept enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. Selecting Reject All or withdrawing your consent will disable them. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Manage Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy. If you click 'I accept,' in addition to processing data using cookies and similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our surveys and other interactive content for personalized advertising. If you are an EU, Swiss, or UK resident and you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our If you click 'I accept,' in addition to processing data using cookies and similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our surveys and other interactive content for personalized you are an EU, Swiss, or UK resident and you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our Privacy Policy (consistent with law and, if applicable, other choices you have made).
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Air India flight to London aborts take-off due to technical issue weeks after fatal crash
An Air India flight bound for London was forced to abort take-off due to a suspected technical issue. Flight AI2017, which was scheduled to depart Delhi for London on Thursday (31 July) was brought to a halt after the cockpit crew decided to 'discontinue the take-off run'. Passengers on board the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner were asked to disembark as precautionary checks were carried out. Air India later deployed an alternative aircraft to complete the journey to London. An Air India spokesperson said: 'Flight AI2017, operating from Delhi to London on 31 July, returned to the bay due to a suspected technical issue. 'The cockpit crew decided to discontinue the takeoff run following standard operating procedures and brought the aircraft back for precautionary checks. 'An alternative aircraft was deployed to fly the passengers to London.' The incident comes just weeks after an Air India flight bound for London Gatwick struck a medical college hostel in Ahmedabad minutes after take-off, killing 241 people. Indian aviation officials confirmed the pilot issued multiple distress calls before the Gatwick-bound flight crashed in Gujarat state on 12 June, killing 241 people on board and at least 29 more on the ground. 'Thrust not achieved... falling... Mayday! Mayday! Mayday!' the pilot is reported to have said moments before the aircraft lost height and erupted in flames. There were 230 passengers and 12 crew members on board, including 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese citizens and one Canadian, according to Air India. Alongside the formal investigation, the Indian government has set up a high-level committee to examine the causes leading to the crash. The committee will focus on formulating procedures to prevent and handle aircraft emergencies in the future, the Ministry of Civil Aviation said. Air India and the government are looking at several aspects of the crash, including issues linked to its engine thrust, flaps, and why the landing gear remained open as the plane took off and then came down.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should Barlinnie become a listed? Most responders had the same thing to say
Hundreds of people responded to the consultation to have Barlinnie listed. The consultation on the proposal has ended with nearly 80% of the 225 responders saying they strongly agreed the prison should become A-listed. Historic Environment Scotland (HES) launched the bid in December last year to preserve parts of the Victorian building with potential plans to create a museum or tourist attraction. Should Barlinnie become a listed building? Glasgow responds (Image: Newsquest) Dara Parsons, head of designations at HES, said at the time: "Listing is a way of ensuring that the importance of Scotland's most historically, culturally and architecturally significant buildings is taken into account in decisions about their future." An overwhelming majority of the responses were in favour of the proposal, mostly citing how integral the jail is to Glasgow. David Docherty said: "The site of Barlinnie plays an important part in Glasgow and its history. The buildings should be protected as they are of a high standard of workmanship from a very long time ago. "I am a stonemason and I appreciate the work that these men gave. It speaks volumes that they still stand the test of time and are still used today." Dr Edward Stewart added: "I think Barlinnie represents an important monument in Glasgow's social history, representing both the city's at times infamous connection to criminal gangs which formed an important aspect of youth culture both in the 1930s, and 60-90s. "Many Glaswegians will have connections to this monument as a notorious prison looming over the east end of the city used to warn children of the dangers of Ill behaviour and a smaller number will have experienced the prison as inmates or visitors (as I have)." Andrew Kelly responded: "Barlinnie is an iconic building for Glasgow and recognised Scotland-wide, we need to retain the buildings considered for listing. "There is much potential to create an experience unique to Scotland, which could incorporate museums, hostels, workspaces, studios, film and TV sets." (Image: Colin Mearns) READ NEXT: Consultation launched on whether to list Glasgow's Barlinnie Update on Barlinnie prison's potential listed status However, 39 people strongly disagreed with the bid. Allan Munro said: "Knock it down. What else are we going to do with a knackered old prison? Listing the building will just create an expensive albatross around society's neck." Others also called it a waste of money and said housing should be built on the empty land instead. Amongst them was the Scottish Prison Service, who argued the listing "would seriously restrict any future use of the site of HMP Barlinnie and limit the positive legacy the regeneration of the site could have for the local community and the city". Glasgow City Council said: "While the site is of architectural, social and historic interest, the Council questions whether Category A listing of the stated extent of buildings and structures is proportionate, particularly when balanced against the practical implications for redevelopment and reuse of the site."
