logo
'Weak Attempt At Distraction': Obama On Trump's Allegations Of Russian Interference In 2016 Polls

'Weak Attempt At Distraction': Obama On Trump's Allegations Of Russian Interference In 2016 Polls

News186 days ago
Barack Obama's office rejected Donald Trump's treason accusations, reiterating that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election but did not manipulate votes.
The office of US Democratic former President Barack Obama on Tuesday said that a document issued last week by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence does not undercut the conclusion that Russia tried to influence the 2016 US election. The document, however, did not manipulate any votes, it said.
The development came after US President Donald Trump accused Obama of 'treason" on Tuesday, blaming him for leading an effort to falsely tie him to Russia and undermine his 2016 presidential campaign.
'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," Obama's office said in a statement.
'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction," Obama's office said.
While Trump has frequently attacked Obama by name, the Republican President has not, since returning to office in January, gone this far in pointing the finger at his Democratic predecessor with allegations of criminal action, Reuters reported.
She declassified documents and said the information she was releasing showed a 'treasonous conspiracy" in 2016 by top Obama administration officials to undermine Trump, claims that Democrats called false and politically motivated.
'It's there, he's guilty. This was treason," Trump said on Tuesday, though he offered no proof of his claims.
'They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries."
THE DOCUMENT
An assessment by the US intelligence community published in January 2017 concluded that Russia, using social media disinformation, hacking and Russian bot farms, sought to damage Democrat Hillary Clinton's campaign and bolster Trump.
The assessment determined that the actual impact was likely limited and showed no evidence that Moscow's efforts actually changed voting outcomes.
A 2020 bipartisan report by the Senate intelligence committee had found that Russia used Republican political operative Paul Manafort, the WikiLeaks website and others to try to influence the 2016 election to help Trump's campaign.
view comments
First Published:
July 23, 2025, 08:53 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge James Boasberg over anti-Trump remarks, seeks recusal from key case
DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge James Boasberg over anti-Trump remarks, seeks recusal from key case

Mint

time10 minutes ago

  • Mint

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge James Boasberg over anti-Trump remarks, seeks recusal from key case

US Attorney General Pam Bondi on announced that the Justice Department has filed a misconduct complaint against US District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg. The DOJ alleges Boasberg made 'improper public comments' about President Donald Trump and his administration during a closed-door judicial conference. 'Today at my direction, [DOJ] filed a misconduct complaint against US District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration,' Bondi wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter). The complaint was submitted to Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan of the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and was authored by Chad Mizelle, Bondi's chief of staff. According to the document, the remarks were made on March 11 at a Judicial Conference of the United States meeting attended by Chief Justice John Roberts and roughly twelve other judges. Mizelle alleges Judge Boasberg strayed from administrative topics and 'attempted to improperly influence' his colleagues by predicting that the Trump administration would 'disregard rulings of federal courts' and cause 'a constitutional crisis.' 'The Department of Justice respectfully submits this complaint alleging misconduct by US District Court Chief Judge James E. Boasberg… that have undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary,' the complaint reads, as quoted by Fox News. Mizelle further stated: 'Although his comments would be inappropriate even if they had some basis, they were even worse because Judge Boasberg had no basis—the Trump Administration has always complied with all court orders.' The complaint also notes that Judge Boasberg failed to cite any examples of non-compliance, making his 'unprecedented predictions' all the more troubling. The DOJ points out that Boasberg made the remarks just days before presiding over a case involving Trump's use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport suspected Venezuelan gang members. According to the complaint, Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order on March 15 blocking deportation flights—an order that was later vacated by the Supreme Court. 'Within days of those statements, Judge Boasberg began acting on his preconceived belief that the Trump Administration would not follow court orders,' Mizelle wrote. The DOJ is asking for the complaint to be referred to a special investigative committee to determine whether Boasberg's conduct amounts to 'conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts.' Additionally, the DOJ is requesting that Boasberg be removed from the ongoing case involving deportations of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador to 'prevent further erosion of public confidence while the investigation proceeds.' Boasberg, 62, is an appointee of former President Barack Obama and currently serves as the chief judge of the US District Court for the District of Columbia. Mizelle argued that Boasberg's comments and judicial actions reflect 'bias' and violate the Code of Conduct for US Judges, which requires impartiality. 'Taken together, Judge Boasberg's words and deeds violate Canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, and, erode public confidence in judicial neutrality, and warrant a formal investigation,' the complaint concludes. Judge Boasberg has not yet responded publicly to the allegations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store