Indonesia pardons hundreds of prisoners
The first group of 1,116 will begin leaving prisons next week and includes prominent rivals of previous president Joko Widodo who were jailed during his term, as well as Papuan independence activists.
House of Representatives Deputy Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad and Law Minister Supratman Andi Agtas made the announcement late on Thursday after a consultation between the government and party factions in the legislature.
Subianto surprised the nation barely two months after he took office in October when he said he planned to grant clemency to 44,000 inmates nationwide. Past Indonesian leaders have rarely used their amnesty powers, which require the approval of parliament.
Analysts have cautiously welcomed Subianto's sweeping plan, which could see the release of thousands of inmates as Agtas said it would prioritise political prisoners and inmates with mental and chronic health illnesses, older people, juveniles and those convicted of blasphemy or insulting the country's leader.
Among the prisoners set to be released are several prominent opposition figures, including Hasto Kristiyanto, the secretary general of the country's only formal opposition party, the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle.
Kristiyanto, a former Widodo ally who turned to harshly criticise the former president and his family, was sentenced last week to 3 1/2 years in prison for bribery in a 2019 legislative seat appointment scheme.
Agtas said parliament also approved an end to criminal proceedings against former Trade Minister Tom Lembong, a onetime Widodo ally who broke with him during the 2024 presidential election to support political rival Anies Baswedan.
Lembong was accused of abusing his authority as minister and sentenced to more than four years in prison. He had been preparing to appeal before Subianto proposed him for clemency.
'Both have demonstrated service to the nation, and our priority now is to strengthen the unity of the nation,' Agtas said.
The group also includes six Papuan independence activists serving prison sentences for treason. Agtas said they were released as the government considers their movement unarmed.
Authorities are expected to submit a second list of 1,668 inmates to parliament in the near future, he added.
Hundreds of supporters on Friday afternoon flocked to Cipinang Prison in eastern Jakarta where Lembong is serving his sentence, demanding authorities release him immediately.
Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
2 days ago
- Filipino Times
Bill filed in House to require annual SALN disclosure of top officials
Lawmakers from the Liberal Party and the ML party-list have filed a bill seeking to require the annual public disclosure of the Statements of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) of the President, Vice President, and other high-ranking government officials. House Bill No. 2897, also known as the proposed 'People's Freedom of Information Act of 2025,' was filed Monday at the House of Representatives. Under the measure, SALNs of Cabinet members, senators, House lawmakers, justices of the Supreme Court, commissioners of constitutional bodies, and generals of the Armed Forces of the Philippines must be published yearly on the official websites of their respective offices. The bill also mandates all branches of government to publish and update monthly a register of 'public interest transactions' on their websites. These include itemized collections and disbursements, summaries of income and expenditures, procurement plans and contracts, agreements involving public-private partnerships, and public funding extended to private entities. All Filipino citizens would be granted the right to request and access any record held by government agencies. The proposed law obligates public officials and agencies to disclose information on official acts, transactions, decisions, and research data used in policy-making. 'We would want to push for more transparency and accountability sa gobyerno natin, lalo na na maraming mga usapin tungkol sa korapsyon at laganap 'yung ating mga disinformation,' ML party-list Representative Leila de Lima said.
Filipino Times
2 days ago
- Filipino Times
House files motion to reverse SC ruling on Sara Duterte impeachment
The House of Representatives has formally asked the Supreme Court (SC) to reconsider its decision declaring the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional. House Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez confirmed that the motion for reconsideration was filed through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), emphasizing that the move was not meant to challenge the Court's authority but to uphold constitutional processes. 'With utmost respect for the Constitution, in defense of institutional balance, and in the name of the Filipino people whom we are sworn to represent, the House of Representatives today filed a Motion for Reconsideration before the Supreme Court of the Philippines,' Romualdez said in a video message. 'This is not an act of defiance or disrespect. It is an exercise in constitutional stewardship—an affirmation that every branch must act with fidelity to the Charter that gives us all our power,' he added. Romualdez maintained that the Constitution grants the House the exclusive power to initiate all impeachment proceedings, a power he said the Supreme Court disregarded in its ruling on G.R. No. 278353. 'Let us be clear: The Constitution says: 'The House of Representatives shall have the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment.' That power is not shared. Not subject to pre-approval. And not conditional,' he said. He cited the SC's own precedent in Francisco v. House of Representatives, saying the decision affirmed that only one impeachment may be initiated against the same official within a year, and that initiation begins with either a one-third endorsement or referral to the House Committee on Justice. On July 25, Supreme Court spokesperson Camille Ting announced the High Court's decision voiding the articles of impeachment sent to the Senate, citing a violation of the 1987 Constitution's one-year bar rule. The articles stemmed from the fourth impeachment complaint against Duterte, which was endorsed and signed by 215 House members on February 5, 2025. The complaint accused Duterte of misuse of confidential funds, threats against government officials, and possible constitutional violations. The complaint was immediately transmitted to the Senate, fulfilling the constitutional requirement that mandates a Senate trial once a complaint gains support from at least one-third of House members. Earlier, two petitions were filed before the Supreme Court seeking to stop the impeachment proceedings, including one from a group of Mindanao-based lawyers who argued that the House failed to act on earlier complaints within the required 10 session days. The House, however, maintained that it met the constitutional deadline and clarified that 'session days' should not be confused with 'calendar days' or 'working days.'
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
DoJ is demanding states hand over election information
Ariana Baio, The Independent The Department of Justice is on a mission to collect election information, including sensitive voter information, from states as part of President Donald Trump's executive order cracking down on voting accessibility — but it's left state officials concerned. Over the last three months, the DoJ's Voting Section has reached out to at least 15 states seeking their voter roll, information about individuals who may have violated federal voting laws, and questions about the state's process for identifying and removing ineligible voters, the Associated Press reported. Traditionally, the Voting Section's main focus is to protect citizens' right to vote, but under Trump's direction, it's cracking down on voter fraud — a rare occurrence that Trump has mischaracterised as a major problem in the United States. But some state officials have flagged concerns with the swath of information being requested, saying voter rolls contain private information about individuals and cannot be shared without congressional notification. Utah's Lieutenant Governor Deidre Henderson, the state's top election official, said she refused to provide expansive information on the state's 2.1 million voters to the DoJ. "We've offered the public voter list. If they want protected data, there's a process for government entities to request it for lawful purposes," Henderson told The Salt Lake Tribune. "We'll address that if it comes," she continued, "but so far we haven't identified any federal or state statute that would justify handing over to the federal government the personal identifying information of 2.1 million Utah voters," Henderson added. Officials in at least four California counties told the Associated Press that DoJ officials requested information about the number of people removed from rolls for being noncitizens, including their ID numbers, dates of birth, and voting records. Trump has sought to conduct the largest deportation of undocumented immigrants, in part by targeting individuals using government information. In Colorado, DoJ officials demanded the state hand over "all records" pertaining to the 2024 election — a massive trove of documents that includes ballots and voting equipment information, as well as records retained from the 2020 election. Last year, the Colorado state Supreme Court tried to bar Trump from appearing on the presidential ballot, claiming he was ineligible because he violated the Fourteenth Amendment by inciting the January 6 attack on the Capitol. The US Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of Trump, declaring that states did not have the authority to determine a federal candidate's eligibility. In Maine, Secretary of State Shenna Bellows said she was denying the DoJ's request for the state's voter registration list, the names of officials who maintain the list, and the number of ineligible voters due to noncitizenship status. Officials had sent multiple requests for information, one of which insinuated that Maine had an unusually high number of registered voters, the Maine Morning Star reported. "The nature of these questions suggest that the DOJ is more interested in keeping people that they don't like from voting than promoting voter registration and participation," Bellows told Maine Morning Star. Already, DoJ officials had spoken to Bellows about a potential "information-sharing agreement" to provide the department with information on registered voters who are ineligible to vote. Similar requests were made to Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin. "Why on Earth does the Department of Justice need the voter information from all 50 states?" Bellows asked. "If Congress thought it was appropriate that there be a national voter file, Congress could have authorised the Department of Justice to do that, but they have not." The DoJ's motivation in collecting such information appears to be to assist its efforts to identify and prosecute those who violate federal election laws. Trump has directed the attorney general and DoJ to collect election information from states to add extra safeguards to elections. Despite no evidence of mass voter fraud or noncitizen voting in the last several elections, Trump has continually claimed the 2020 election was rigged with mass voter fraud and that undocumented migrants voted in the 2024 election.
