On 39th Anniversary of Mizo Peace Accords, MNF Erects Hoarding of Article 371G in Aizawl
Through the 53rd amendment to the Constitution, that Article was a promise by Indian Parliament to the people of the border state of Mizoram to protect their customary laws, religious and social practices, land ownership, etc, as consigned in the Mizo Accord, signed between the Mizo National Front (MNF) and the Rajiv Gandhi government on June 30, 1986.
This June 30, marking its 39th anniversary, the youth wing of MNF, installed a hoarding of Article 371G of the Constitution in front of the party's office in Aizawl. That peace accord had brought the curtains down on two decades of insurgency in what was then called the Lushai hills. The Accord had facilitated the birth of Mizoram on February 20, 1987 with MNF founder and respected Mizo leader the late Pu Laldenga as its first chief minister.
Besides Laldenga, the other two signatories to that Accord were the then Home Secretary R. D. Pradhan and the then Mizoram chief secretary Lalkhama. This June 30, Lalkhama, the only surviving signatory to that peace Accord with Centre, unveiled the hoarding in the presence of many including MNF youth wing president and legislator Robert R Royte.
Speaking on the occasion, Royte recalled the sacrifices made by the MNF cadres and their leaders to get that peace agreement with New Delhi. According to the Mizoram Post, Royte also stated that the Constitutional provision ensures that 'the Mizoram assembly has the constitutional power to accept or reject the Acts passed by Parliament in matters concerning Mizo religion, customary law and land as per Article 371G.'
'Only Mizoram and Nagaland assemblies have such powers,' he added.
'Mizo peace accord was not with MNF but between India and the Mizoram'
Later, addressing a public meeting on the occasion at Saitual, Zoramthanga, former chief minister and top MNF leader and a former associate of Laldenga, said, 'Some vested interests may devalue the Mizo peace accord as only the accord between India and the MNF. However, it was an accord between Mizoram and India. It was signed by Laldenga on behalf of the MNF and Lalkhama (former chief secretary) on behalf of the Mizo people, who did not go underground.'
He also said, 'Unlike Nagaland, which was given special protection (Article 371A) on compassionate ground, and can easily be abrogated (by Parliament), Article 371 (G) or special protection was brought about by the Mizos, and it therefore, can't be easily abrogated.'
After the Narendra Modi government read down the Article 370 of the Constitution, which gave special powers to Jammu and Kashmir, there has been apprehensions in several northeastern states including Sikkim, Nagaland and Mizoram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
New GST regime will be consumer-centric, says Centre
The new GST regime previewed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Independence Day address would be consumer-centric, with particular emphasis on the poor, the MSMEs, the middle class and the farmers, senior government sources said on Sunday (August 17, 2025). The new two-tier Goods and Services Tax (GST) structure of 18% and 5% rates will have the twin objective of making rates and processes simpler and more rational, as it was originally intended to be, the sources said. 'More equitable taxation' 'This has been in the making for a while. Our learning from the last eight years is going into this, and this will be a fundamental change in the template of taxation,' one senior functionary said. 'The new GST regime will make our taxation more equitable, and will see reduced taxes on what these four categories consume. The template will be more from the consumers point of view, and it will be put to and explained to the States from the consumers point of view.' The Centre expects any reduction in revenues that this may cause to be soon offset by a new buoyancy in the economy expected from rate rationalisation and process simplification. 'Reduced rates will not lead to reduced revenues, and we expect compliance and collection going higher,' an official said, adding that the forthcoming tax regime will be 'fiscally sustainable'. Most of the items in the 28% rate of GST will move to 18% and 'a few' will go to 40%, which will apply to exceptional items, termed 'sin goods', sources said. 'Revenues may fall in the very short run but we expect change in consumption and ease of compliance to make up for it. Thus, it will be a fairly fiscally sustainable exercise,' said a source. Deepavali deadline The Centre expects the States to be on board with the proposals in time for the Deepavali — October 20 — deadline it has set for itself to set them in motion. In a press release following the PM's speech, the Ministry of Finance said the Centre would be engaging with the State governments in the subsequent weeks, in the run-up to the next GST Council meeting. Two Groups of Ministers (comprising representatives of the State governments) — one on rate rationalisation and another on compensation cess — will have to approve the details before they go to the GST Council for approval. GST has been an ongoing topic of conflict between Opposition-ruled States and the Centre, but the latter does not expect resistance to its revamp proposals. 'The concerns regarding any potential revenue losses are not theirs (Opposition-ruled States) alone to tackle. The Centre and the States should all work together to expand the revenues, using this opportunity. I do not think anyone will or can oppose the proposed reduction in rates,' the functionary said. They also added that, since the Centre does not have any representative in the GoM on rate rationalisation, if the GoMs decide against the Centre's proposal, it would look like the States are deciding against lowering taxes for the common man. Both GoMs, followed by the GST Council, are expected to meet in the coming weeks. One source said the compensation cess will soon cease, before its legal end-date of March 31, 2026. While it was originally set to cease in 2022, its duration was extended thereafter to repay the loan taken to compensate States as the cess collections themselves had been hit by the COVID-19 pandemic. That loan will be repaid before time. However, this also creates a problem for the Centre as the cess also applies on sin goods like tobacco. 'If the cess ends, then this would substantially lower the effective rate of tax on tobacco, gutka, and other sin goods,' the source explained. 'And this is something the Centre cannot be doing. So, this was yet another reason why the GST revamp needed to be done soon.' That the GST reforms are happening amid global uncertainties and tariff threats by the United States is mere coincidence, according to the sources.
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
File affidavit in seven days or apologise: ECI ultimatum on Rahul Gandhi's Karnataka vote theft allegations
The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Sunday (August 17, 2025) doubled down on its demand that Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi submit an affidavit stating his allegations of voter roll manipulations in a Karnataka Assembly constituency. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar also refused the Opposition's demands to publish a machine-readable voter list and to provide CCTV footage of the voting process, claiming that both measures would violate voter privacy. In his first press conference since assuming office, the CEC did not name the Congress leader, but issued him an ultimatum to submit a signed affidavit within seven days or apologise to the nation for his allegations. CEC hits back This comes ten days after Mr. Gandhi alleged deliberate, large-scale discrepancies in the voter rolls of the Mahadevapura Assembly segment of the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency, which was won by the BJP in the 2024 general election. Following his explosive allegations made in a press conference, the offices of the Chief Electoral Officers of Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Haryana had asked Mr. Gandhi to submit his allegations under oath, which he has refused to do. Asked why the ECI has not taken suo motu cognisance of the allegations made by the Congress, a combative CEC said, 'If accusations are made against 1,50,000 people, then should all these voters be given notices without any evidence?' 'You have to give an affidavit or apologise to the nation. If within seven days affidavit is not given, then it means allegations are wrong,' he said. What are the challenges confronting the EC? | Explained 'No discrimination between parties' However, Mr. Kumar did not reply to a question on why BJP MP Anurag Thakur — who has made similar allegations of voter roll discrepancies in the Rae Bareli Lok Sabha constituency, which is represented by Mr. Gandhi — was not asked to submit an affidavit as well. To another question on why a complaint filed by the Biju Janata Dal in Odisha about last year's Lok Sabha election had not been probed, Mr. Kumar clarified that the complaint was not made under oath, adding that the 45-day limit for complaints has also passed. He had a similar response to a complaint filed by Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav. The CEC began the press conference by asserting that the ECI cannot discriminate among political parties, insisting that it considers ruling and Opposition parties as equal. 'Insult to the Constitution' He said that it was an insult to the Constitution if election petitions are not filed within 45 days, but allegations of 'vote chori' (vote theft) are later raised. 'According to law, if errors in the voter list are not reported in time, if an election petition is not filed in the High Court within 45 days of a voter choosing their candidate, and then misleading attempts are made to confuse people by using wrong words such as 'vote theft', then what else can this be if not an insult to the Constitution of India?' he asked. 'More than one crore employees are engaged in the election exercise. Can 'vote chori' happen in such a transparent process?' he added. Mr. Kumar sought to dismiss any doubts about the 2024 election. 'How can someone steal votes' in such a scenario, he asked, adding that 'neither the ECI nor any voter is afraid of such baseless accusations'. On the accusations made by the Opposition regarding the Maharashtra Assembly election, he said, 'When the results came, suddenly they remembered that the rolls were wrong? No objection with evidence has been filed against any voter with the Maharashtra CEO. The elections happened eight months ago. Why no election petition was filed? It was said, 'Why so much polling in the last hours. Every hour, there was 10% polling, and in the last hour, there was less than 10% polling. Telling something repeatedly does not mean it will become true. Sun rises in the east and it will not rise in the west just because someone says so.'
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Lahar Singh petitions ECI on audio clip in which a Congress MLA allegedly speaks on cash distribution to voters
BJP Rajya Sabha member Lahar Singh Siroya has urged the Election Commission of India (ECI) to investigate an audio clip allegedly featuring Congress MLA for Arsikere K.M. Shivalinge Gowda discussing cash distribution for voters during the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. Citing his earlier complaint on former Union Minister C.M. Ibrahim's admission of buying 3,000 votes to ensure Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's victory in the 2018 Assembly elections from Badami, Mr. Lahar Singh said: 'These repeated revelations expose the Congress' deep-rooted vote chori culture, even as its leader Rahul Gandhi accuses others of electoral malpractice.' 'Now, there is another audio making news in my State (I have not independently verified the authenticity of the audio). In this clip, Mr. Shivalinge Gowda is heard speaking, apparently to a Congress Rajya Sabha MP, on how much money should be distributed per voter in the Hassan Lok Sabha seat to ensure their candidate's victory. This was in connection with the 2024 Lok Sabha polls,' he said. Taking a dig at Mr. Rahul Gandhi, he said: 'The irony is that Mr. Rahul Gandhi is shouting vote chori unaware that his own partymen are masters in the game. The fact that Mr. Rahul Gandhi makes wild allegations without worrying about what his party and partymen are all about is proof that he is desperately trying to remain relevant in the Indian political landscape.' Mr. Lahar Singh appealed to the ECI to probe the audio clip along with his earlier complaint related to purchase of 3,000 votes.
