
World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat
Donald Trump orders U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia after Medvedev's warning sparks global tension- In a dramatic turn of global events, President Donald Trump has ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to be strategically deployed near Russian waters. This powerful move comes after Russia's Dmitry Medvedev, former president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council, made what Trump called 'foolish and inflammatory' threats, evoking Cold War-era nuclear rhetoric. The decision is not just a military maneuver—it is a strong geopolitical message amid rising global tensions and ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Tensions between the U.S. and Russia are reaching a boiling point after President Donald Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to reposition closer to Russian waters. This dramatic military maneuver was a direct response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's alarming nuclear rhetoric, where he warned of retaliatory measures over Trump's Ukraine ceasefire deadline. Trump framed the move as a "precaution," yet it marks one of the boldest nuclear postures by a U.S. president since the Cold War. His administration is sending a clear signal: America won't tolerate escalatory threats from Moscow.
But Trump's move isn't just about deterring Russia militarily—it's part of a broader pressure campaign that includes punishing economic measures. Alongside the submarine deployment, Trump is ramping up tariffs and trade restrictions, directly tying them to global alliances and behavior, especially countries with growing ties to Russia. This includes India, a key member of the BRICS alliance, which has continued importing discounted Russian oil and weapons. With NATO on edge and global markets rattled, Trump's military and economic posture is designed to reassert American dominance on multiple fronts. Trump, reacting via his Truth Social account, stressed that the U.S. cannot afford to ignore such escalatory language. Calling Medvedev's rhetoric 'provocative,' Trump revealed that two nuclear-powered submarines have been moved to undisclosed locations near Russia 'as a precautionary measure.' His words echoed a deepening concern that the world is again walking a tightrope between diplomacy and destruction. The deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia serves a dual purpose—military deterrence and strategic signaling. While Trump emphasized that the move is defensive and meant to 'avoid unintended consequences,' analysts say this marks one of the most visible escalations between the U.S. and Russia in recent years.
The submarines involved are part of the U.S. Navy's Ohio-class ballistic missile fleet, capable of carrying dozens of nuclear warheads. Their undetectable stealth and immense power make them one of the most formidable assets in America's strategic arsenal. This development is especially critical as it comes at a time when U.S.–Russia relations are already strained over the prolonged war in Ukraine, cyber threats, and economic sanctions. Trump's decisive move may shift the global chessboard and intensify calls for diplomatic engagement before the situation spirals further. At the center of this high-stakes exchange is Dmitry Medvedev, who has increasingly taken on a more hawkish and aggressive tone in recent months. In his latest statement, Medvedev dismissed Trump's suggested Ukraine ceasefire plans and instead referenced Russia's massive nuclear arsenal.
He also mentioned the 'Dead Hand' system—a Cold War legacy technology rumored to automatically launch Russia's nuclear weapons if national leadership is wiped out. This chilling detail sent shockwaves through Western governments and likely played a major role in Trump's rapid military response. Medvedev's public comments appear designed to demonstrate Russia's refusal to be bullied or coerced into surrendering geopolitical ground, especially in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. Yes, and the message is loud and clear. President Trump has slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports, followed by a penalty tied to India's continued trade with Russia. His administration is increasingly frustrated with BRICS nations—including India, Brazil, and China—who've maintained or deepened economic ties with Moscow despite the ongoing war in Ukraine. India's position is particularly sensitive: while it maintains strategic autonomy, its oil purchases from Russia and growing defense partnerships have drawn Trump's ire. U.S. officials even suggested India is being "made an example" to deter other nations from ignoring Washington's red lines.
Trump's trade strategy is deeply intertwined with his foreign policy objectives. He's not only seeking better deals for the U.S. but also using tariffs as leverage to isolate Russia and disrupt emerging multipolar alliances like BRICS. Some U.S. lawmakers have gone as far as proposing 500% secondary tariffs on countries that continue to fund what they call "Putin's war machine." The timing is no coincidence—Trump's submarine deployment near Russia and economic pressure on India are part of the same high-stakes chess game. By linking military deterrence with aggressive trade tactics, Trump is reshaping the global order on his terms. The announcement came as a shock to many international leaders, with NATO allies quickly convening emergency briefings to assess potential fallout. Several European nations have voiced concern about the dangerous path being carved by nuclear saber-rattling on both sides. Financial markets also reacted with caution. Global stocks dipped, oil prices surged, and defense stocks rallied as investors priced in the risk of growing military conflict. Analysts warned that such volatile moves could create long-term instability unless world leaders return to diplomatic channels. The United Nations issued a statement urging both the U.S. and Russia to exercise restraint and avoid inflammatory actions that could further escalate nuclear tensions. The Ukraine–Russia war, now in its third year, remains a core source of global instability. President Trump has repeatedly insisted that Russia must agree to a ceasefire and begin peace talks, warning of strict deadlines and harsher consequences. However, Moscow has resisted U.S. pressure, and the Kremlin continues to frame the conflict as a defensive effort against NATO expansion. Trump's latest move underscores just how intertwined the nuclear issue has become with the broader Ukraine war. Experts fear that any misstep—verbal or strategic—could ignite a new, more dangerous chapter in this long-running conflict. Nuclear policy experts across the globe have raised alarms, cautioning that any military escalation involving nuclear assets, especially submarines, could be misinterpreted as a preparation for attack. 'This is a very delicate moment,' said Dr. Elena Petrov, a nuclear strategy analyst at the Atlantic Institute. 'By publicizing the submarine deployment, Trump is both deterring aggression and potentially increasing the likelihood of misunderstanding or miscalculation by the Russians.' She added that in a world where communication can be instantaneous but filtered through political rhetoric, leaders must be especially cautious. 'What's said online or in speeches can spark real-world consequences—especially when nuclear weapons are involved.' In the face of mounting criticism, President Trump defended his decision. He emphasized that the U.S. had no plans to initiate conflict but could not sit idle while a senior Russian official made what he termed 'reckless threats.' Trump insisted the move was not just about protecting American interests but also about showing strength in the face of intimidation. 'Words matter,' he wrote. 'When someone threatens nuclear retaliation, we must take it seriously.' This response plays into Trump's broader strategy of projecting American strength on the world stage, particularly in matters involving national security, energy dominance, and great power competition. The current climate raises difficult questions about the future of international diplomacy. With both Washington and Moscow hardening their stances, and with war still raging in Eastern Europe, the room for peaceful resolution appears to be narrowing. Analysts warn that mutual threats and weapons deployments only serve to erode what little trust remains between the superpowers. The absence of formal arms control talks, especially after the collapse of key nuclear treaties in recent years, makes these moments even more dangerous. Whether this incident becomes a turning point for reengagement—or the beginning of a new era of nuclear brinkmanship—remains to be seen. Trump's bold decision to deploy nuclear submarines close to Russian territory has transformed a war of words into a potential flashpoint. His warning to Medvedev—combined with the reality of submarine positioning—sends a clear message that the U.S. is ready to defend its interests and allies, even at great risk. At the same time, the move has rattled the international community, highlighting the urgent need for renewed diplomacy, strategic calm, and nuclear de-escalation. For now, all eyes are on what happens next—because in a world with nuclear weapons, miscommunication can become catastrophe in a matter of minutes.
Q1: Why did Donald Trump deploy nuclear submarines near Russia? To respond to Medvedev's nuclear threats and rising tensions over Ukraine.
Q2: What did Dmitry Medvedev say that triggered Trump's decision? He warned of Russia's Cold War-era nuclear retaliation system, the 'Dead Hand.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India reacts with outrage to Trump's tariff hike, 'dead' economy remarks
India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath - and not the subject to the very highest rates - but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout Bloomberg By Satviki Sanjay and Swati Gupta Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25 per cent tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticizing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the 'most strenuous and obnoxious,' in a Truth Social post July 30. He added the US may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them 'dead economies' in another post. I don't think any head of state has insulted India as Trump does. I don't know how @narendramodi calls him a friend and doesn't speak up. Tariffs, penalties, and saying 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. — Maheshwer Peri (@maheshperi) July 31, 2025 With no imminent trade deal, the 25 per cent tariffs kicked in as of Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath — and not the subject to the very highest rates — but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. 'Blunt-Force' Message 'Overnight, the US-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai based financial services firm. The levies 'feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message.' Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal — or the lack of it — was the US pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. As the US released rates across the world on Aug. 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. 'The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' V. Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel maker in the south Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur, told Bloomberg News. 'We were expecting something in the 15 to 20 per cent range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbors on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. India has hoped it could do a fair deal with US. But succumbing to bullying is not part of the deal. At the end of the day, a trade deal has to be fair, and it must ensure that lives of Indians become better, not worse. Trump too shall pass. US tariffs are not the end of the… — sushant sareen (@sushantsareen) July 30, 2025 When the tariff rate news first dropped in late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being 'very disturbed.' A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40 per cent of its revenue from the US selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest US customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. 'The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for 'months and months,' he said he'll have to start cutting his workforce. The US is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated $129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25 per cent, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20 per cent tariff, Vietnam got a 20 per cent levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19 per cent duties. 'We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewelry Export Promotion Council. 'We will take it up with the government.' Quite the unravelling of the Delhi - Washington relationship over the past 48 hours... ???????????????? > Trump announces 25% tariffs against India > Trump announces oil deal with Pakistan > US imposes sanctions against Indian petrochem companies for trading with Iran — Kabir Taneja (@KabirTaneja) July 31, 2025 Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'my friend' in a Feb. 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries 'special.' India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports, Bloomberg News reported citing people familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. 'It is a storm in the India-US relationship at this moment but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Programme at Delhi based Observer Researcher Foundation, told Bloomberg News. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a US-India trade deal continue. Negotiating Tactic Jewelry businesses 'are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favorable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. 'The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing 'seems like a knee-jerk reaction,' according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. 'This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said.


Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
India-US trade deal: Top five roadblocks that may arise after Trump's tariffs on India
India-US trade deal: Despite strong strategic ties, a comprehensive India-US trade deal remains elusive. The probability of getting it inked in the near term looks dicey after the imposition of Trump's tariffs on India. In retaliation, the Indian government is also considering levying a digital tax on US companies like Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon, etc. However, both countries, especially US President Donald Trump, remain committed to continuing talks for a possible India-US trade deal. According to experts, Trump's tariff on India is expected to hit Indian exports by $33 billion. The Indian government may compensate by imposing reciprocal taxes on US imports. They said the Indian government may think of reimposing digital tax on US companies after removing it from 1st April 2025. However, they maintained that after Trump's tariffs on India, the Narendra Modi government may go tough on the negotiations, especially on the US government's demand to provide Access to the Indian dairy and agriculture segment. They said that penalties on Russian crude oil imports, an unpredictable trade negotiation environment, mutual mistrust, etc., are some other roadblocks that may arise in the India-US trade deal after Trump's tariffs on India. Speaking on the roadblocks in the India-US trade deal, especially after Trump's tariffs on India, Utsav Verma, Head of Research — Institutional Equities at Choice Broking, said, "India-US trade negotiations are less about tariffs and more about reconciling fundamentally divergent policy philosophies. For any forward movement, establishing a permanent consultative mechanism, calibrated concessions in sensitive sectors, and depoliticized trade diplomacy are prerequisites." Verma said that future progress will likely depend on the outcome of upcoming leadership cycles, alignment on digital trade rules, and a reimagining of economic partnership beyond WTO-era thinking. "Biggest roadblock in the India-US trade deal post-imposition of Trump's tariffs on India is India's loss of around $33 billion in exports. To compensate for those losses, the Indian government may develop reciprocal taxes, which may become a roadblock in the India-US deal. The Indian government may go tough on the US demand for Access to the dairy and agriculture segment. At the same time, the US may not comply with the Indian demands on the Russian crude oil imports," said Avinash Gorakshkar, a SEBI-registered fundamental analyst. On the reciprocal taxes India may levy on the US, Avinash Gorakshkar said, "The way the US government has raised tariffs on Indian imports, the Indian government may also raise tariffs on US imports. They may also think of reimposing the digital tax on income from online digital advertisements from US companies. If they do so, it would be highly detrimental for US tech giants like Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, Google, Amazon, etc." Experts said the most-awaited deal may face some major roadblocks, including mutual mistrust, an unpredictable negotiation environment, US demand for Access to the dairy and agriculture segment, strategic autonomy against geopolitical alignment, and a penalty on Russian crude oil imports. 1] Mutual mistrust: "India-US trade tensions have been shaped by over 90 WTO disputes since 1995 (WTO, 2024). The 2019 end of GSP benefits affected $5.6 billion in Indian exports (USTR, 2020). In 2024, the US reported a $27.4 billion trade deficit with India (US Census Bureau), fueling calls for better Access. India, however, sees these demands as imbalanced. A 2023 Brookings survey found only 41% of Indian policymakers viewed US trade policy as mutually beneficial. Still, trust has grown in defence, pharma, and tech. During COVID-19, both nations collaborated, and US FDI in India reached $8.3 billion in FY23 (DPIIT)," said Utsav Verma of Choice Broking. 2] Russian crude oil imports: "Even though Trump's tariffs have left Indo-Russian crude oil business untouched, the uncertainty around the implementation of penalties due to the import of Russian crude persists. Already, Indian refineries have started to reduce imports, which can increase the cost of crude and impact currency and inflation," said Vinod Nair, Head of Research at Geojit Investments. 3] Unpredictable negotiation environment: "US policy shifts—from Obama to Biden—have made trade negotiations volatile. Tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminium (10%), renewed in 2025, worsened uncertainty. Talks during 2023–25 were delayed thrice due to political cycles. Unlike the EU or ASEAN, India and the US lack a formal negotiation council. Utsav Verma said the Trade Policy Uncertainty Index rose 32% for India-US trade post-2022, compared to 18% for EU-US (EPU Project, 2024). 4] Access to dairy, agriculture segment: "Agriculture supports 58% of India's rural workforce (NABARD, 2023). Opening dairy markets could expose smallholders to subsidized US imports. The US seeks entry for poultry, corn, ethanol, and hormone-treated dairy, raising safety and religious concerns. India's average agri-tariffs stand at 39.5%, with bound rates at 113.1%, against the US's 5.4% (WTO, 2024). A NITI Aayog-CRISIL study shows a 10% US dairy entry could cut Indian prices by 17%. India exported $4.3 billion in agri-products to the US in FY24 but imported only $860 million (APEDA, 2024). Still, partnerships in agritech and sustainable farming—like joint ethanol blending and improved standards —suggest opportunities, said Verma. 5] Geopolitical divergence: Pointing towards the strategic autonomy against the geopolitical alignment, Utsav Verma of Choice Broking, said, "India's $10 billion defence ties with Russia challenge US alignment goals (SIPRI, 2024). India resists being cast solely as a counterweight to China and maintains sovereignty—as seen in its completion of the S-400 deal despite CAATSA threats. Defence trade with the US reached $20 billion in 2024 (US DoD), yet digital cooperation lags due to India's focus on data sovereignty. With elections looming (India in 2029, US in 2028), nationalism may complicate compromise. Nonetheless, shared interests in Indo-Pacific security, climate tech, and resilient supply chains provide buffers that keep strategic engagement intact." Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Deccan Herald
14 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
How the US weaponized Pakistan against India
New Delhi has learned, too late, that it has very little actual leverage in Washington. The Chinese may be granted another extension because they have things that they can threaten the US economy with. The Europeans and East Asians can promise to buy American-made weaponry or invest in the US. India can neither threaten nor bribe.