After questioning by HC, Centre withdraws order for 6 cuts in Udaipur Files
Following this development, the Delhi High Court disposed of two petitions that sought to halt the release of the film. It directed all involved parties to appear before the appropriate revisional authority on Monday and instructed that a decision be made by Wednesday. Udaipur Files is based on the 2022 murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor from Udaipur, who was killed by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous, allegedly over a social media post supporting an ex-BJP leader.
However, the film has drawn sharp criticism. Islamic scholar Arshad Madani and Mohammed Javed—one of the accused in the murder case—petitioned the Supreme Court to stop the film's release, arguing it was inflammatory and communal. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Madani, claimed the film spreads hatred and unfairly targets the Muslim community, warning against allowing hate speech under the guise of free speech.
Earlier, the Supreme Court permitted the government to review the movie. A review panel subsequently recommended changes before release. The film's producers then approached the court to challenge the HC's stay on the release.
Madani contends the movie generalises a criminal act, portraying an entire community as complicit or supportive of terrorism. Meanwhile, the murder case is ongoing in a Special NIA Court, with hearings set to resume after the summer recess.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BJP workers plant saplings in memory of late Sushma Swaraj
On the sixth death anniversary of former External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Wednesday, as a tribute, 501 saplings were planted at Silver Oak Park, Jangpura Extension, said Delhi BJP president Virender Sachdeva. 'Today, on the death anniversary of Sushma Swaraj, we, BJP workers, gathered to offer floral tributes and plant 501 saplings. Swaraj was like a mother to all of us. Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's initiative 'One Tree in the Name of Mother', we planted these saplings in her memory,' said Mr. Sachdeva. 'Swaraj's ideals and personality remain an ongoing source of inspiration for all our workers. From her, we learned how to conduct debate in the House with civility, even while in the Opposition,' he added. Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, who took part in the event, said that thousands of women across India and abroad still remember Sushma as a source of inspiration. 'She was not only a towering personality, but also a motherly politician. Every daughter of the country should draw inspiration from her life,' said Ms. Gupta.
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Quranic justice is restorative, not retributive
The case of the Malayali nurse Nimisha Priya in Yemen has spotlighted the legal and moral complexities of retributive justice in Muslim countries. Nimisha has been in prison since 2017 for the murder of her business associate, Talal Abdo Mahdi. While the Houthi Supreme Political Council dismissed her appeal in November 2023, the appeal court left open a path to clemency through the payment of blood money (diyah) to the victim's family, as provided for under Shariah law. The concept of diyah finds mention in verse 4:92 of the Quran, which states that in cases when a believer kills another believer by mistake (khata'an), then, as compensation, the killer must free a believing slave, and also pay blood-money (diyah) to the family of the slain. The Quran also talks about legal retribution (qisaas) for murder and violent assault as a life-preserving deterrent (lakum fil qisaasi hayaatun) to curb criminal behaviour. (2:178-179 & 194, 5:45) Restorative approach It is essential to recognise that many of the Quranic injunctions concerning homicide and bodily harm were not retributive — they were fundamentally restorative. Legal retribution (lex talionis) and compensation for murder and bodily harm had existed centuries before the advent of Islam. The Book of Exodus in the Hebrew Bible upheld capital punishment for intentional murder, exile for unintentional homicide, and either financial compensation or retaliatory injury for physical harm (Exodus 21:12-36). Similar provisions are found in even earlier laws, such as the Sumerian and Babylonian codes. In Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor, Martha Roth cites an edict from the Hittite Kingdom (1650–1180 BCE), which stipulates that in cases of murder, the decision regarding the offender's fate rested solely with the victim's heir. The Quran made a reformative switch from this sort of retributive punishment to restorative justice, inviting all those impacted by an offence to jointly determine how best to address its consequences and shape future relations. In 2:178, it asked the legal heirs of the victim to pardon (faman ufiya lahu) the killer, even while instructing the killer to offer fair compensation to the family out of sincere gratitude. The same message is repeated in 5:45 with a compassionate appeal to the victim's family: 'If anyone remits the retaliation by way of generosity, it would be an act of atonement (kaffaara) for him.' What is remarkable about this exhortation is its paradigm shift from retribution to the spiritual healing of the aggrieved party. It introduces a mechanism that not only fosters genuine remorse in the offender but also promotes social harmony and quiet dignity among all parties involved. This is in keeping with the Quran's moral dictum (in 64:14) that God is forgiving and merciful to those who 'pardon, overlook and forgive' (in ta'fu wa tasfahu was taghfiru). The prophet echoed this in a hadith found in Abu Dawud, encouraging Muslims to practice mercy on 'earth' so that mercy may be shown to them from 'the heavens'. Implications for Nimisha It may be noted that the Quran's appeal to give up retaliation pertains to intentional murder. For non-premeditated killing without malice aforethought (qatl khata'), the Quran prescribes only blood money, not a retaliatory death penalty, as stated in 4:92 above. This carries serious implications for Nimisha. If, as reported, she did not sedate Mahdi with the intent to kill him — and this can be proven — then, under the Quranic injunctions in 4:92, his family would not have the right to demand the death penalty. Media reports suggest that Nimisha administered the sedative only to retrieve her passport, which Mahdi had allegedly confiscated unlawfully, and that his death was the result of an accidental overdose. Besides, if Mahdi had previously served time for criminal offences, as alleged, the claim of his complete innocence is open to challenge. Therefore, for justice to be served in Nimisha's case, the Quranic law must prevail. However, what reigns in most Muslim societies in its name is sectarian jurisprudence, which views Islam not as a moral order in which justice and rational logic are intrinsic, but a dogmatic 'religion' defined and dominated by male authority. This internal subversion coincided with the rise of post-Prophetic schools of religious thought during the height of Muslim imperial expansion, when a convenient alliance developed between theologians and the ruling elite: rulers sought religious legitimacy for their authoritarian regimes, while theologians wanted the latitude to impose patriarchal structures. It was the consolidation of this power dynamic that brought about Islam's shift from Quranic deen — a rational, justice-oriented ethical framework — to mazhab - a rigid, clerically dominated theology. Consequently, Islam ceased to be what is plainly stated in the Arabic text of the Quran and the Prophetic understanding of it. This structural transformation remains one of the most significant and unresolved crises in Muslim history, reshaping the course of Islamic thought. Nowhere is this more evident than in criminal law, which often paints Islam as a harsh faith. If Muslim theologians truly believe in the Quran's opening statement that the Islamic god is 'most Gracious' (Al-Rahman) and 'most Merciful' (Al-Raheem), then they must allow the merciful deen of Islam to prevail over their rigid juristic schools. A. Faizur Rahman is Secretary-General of the Chennai-based Islamic Forum for the Promotion of Moderate Thought. E-mail: themoderates2020@ X: @FaizEngineer
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Act on plea for database of repeat sexual offence complainants: HC to authorities
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the police and other authorities in the Capital to expeditiously decide on a plea seeking the creation of a database of individuals who have filed multiple complaints of sexual offences. A Bench of Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed that the petitioner had already submitted a representation to the Delhi police and other authorities concerned. Responding to the petitioner's request for a judicial direction to create and maintain such a database, the court said that the matter falls within the domain of the authorities, adding, 'They know better how policing is to be done.' 'Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issues raised, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the authorities to take an informed decision on the petitioner's representation with expedition,' the court noted. The petition was filed by Shonee Kapoor, represented by advocate Shashi Ranjan Kumar Singh, seeking a directive to the government and the Delhi police to maintain a record at each police district headquarters of complainants who have filed more than one allegation of rape or sexual offences. The plea also called for the mandatory collection of identity proof, preferably Aadhaar, from such complainants. The petition alleged rampant misuse of rape laws by some complainants.
