
Filibuster takes center stage as GOP tees up vote to nix California EV rule
The filibuster is under the microscope again as Senate Republicans voted to overturn a federal regulation and nix California's vehicle emissions standards, forcing the party to defend the maneuver in the face of Democratic claims they have set a new standard on the 60-vote rule.
Senate GOP members on Thursday voted to strike down federal waivers granted by the Biden administration that would have allowed the state to phase out gas-powered cars over the next decade via the Congressional Review Act (CRA).
They did so despite the Government Accountability Office (GAO) ruling that the waivers don't qualify as rules under the CRA — which the Senate parliamentarian agreed with.
The move allowed Republicans to overturn the waivers with a simple majority, rather than the 60-vote threshold for most legislative items. In the process, it also renewed chatter about the filibuster. But Republicans insist they are not chipping away at the tradition, despite Democratic outcries.
'The Environmental Protection Agency submitted these rules as rules to Congress this year after being released by the Biden administration in its last days in office. That is a fact,' Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said on the floor Wednesday morning.
'Under the Congressional Review Act, that makes them subject to review. Period. End of story. The GAO has no veto power over the Senate. Not from the Congressional Review Act. Not under the Senate Rules. Not under Senate precedent,' Barrasso continued, accusing Democrats of using 'scare tactics' in response to the GOP challenge of the GAO stance.
The battle has been brewing for months, dating back to the Environmental Protection Agency giving California the waivers just before former President Biden left office, leading the House to vote on the CRA earlier this month. Nearly three dozen Democrats voted with every Republican to pass it.
The Senate GOP, however, has been gearing up for this fight for weeks in the face of criticism that it is walking back on its oft-made vows to protect the three-fifths vote figure, which was a hallmark of Senate Majority Leader John Thune's (R-S.D.) bid for leader.
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the Republican leader throughout the filibuster fights in recent years, backed the effort too, telling GOP members that this was different from the Democratic attempt to scuttle it three years ago.
This helped assuage nervous members, leading to the 51-44 vote along party lines on Thursday.
'This is an uncomfortable place to be,' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) conceded, before defending the push and saying that this is about the upper chamber reasserting its authority over the GAO rather than anything to do with the parliamentarian.
'If we don't do this … then we have empowered the GAO more than anybody's envisioned, and you can be damned sure that Democrats and Republicans are going to abuse it,' he said ahead of the vote.
Underscoring that uneasy feeling, Thune made a number of floor maneuvers Wednesday night that allowed the party to avoid a direct clash with the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough. Instead of overruling her, Thune brought the GOP-led electric vehicles resolution to the floor to pose a number of questions to the chamber.
This kept the ruling out of MacDonough's hands and, in the process, boosted members who were uncomfortable with the prospect of a direct confrontation.
Leaders, though, insisted it was a limited and narrow precedent related only to the GAO and has nothing to do with the parliamentarian in this situation.
'The question before the body is, is the GAO going to decide this or not?' Thune told Punchbowl News. 'For the most part, our members feel comfortable saying this is something Congress ought to be heard on.'
Democrats throughout have been accusing Republicans of abusing the filibuster despite their repeated attempts to weaken it in recent years.
'It's going nuclear — plain and simple. It's overruling the parliamentarian,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters. 'What goes around, comes around.'
Every sitting Senate Democrat has thrown their weight behind changing the rules in some way when they win back control, headlined by Schumer, who made a concerted push to change the rules in 2022 to enshrine voting rights.
It's also not the first time Republicans have been accused of sidestepping the parliamentarian in this Congress alone. The party has indicated it believes Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) as Budget Committee chair has the ability to rule on Republicans' use of the current policy baseline to score the pending tax cut package, instead of the parliamentarian.
The filibuster has endured a tortured history throughout the past decade and a half, with both parties chipping away at it in various ways. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) invoked the 'nuclear' option, nixing the 60-vote threshold for most judicial and executive branch nominees after Republicans blocked scores of Democratic appellate court nominees.
McConnell told Democrats they would reap what they sewed — and followed suit four years later by eliminating the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
Most recently, Democrats attempted their voting rights carve-out in 2022, which would have further eroded the rule. That attempt failed, as then-Democratic Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.) and Joe Manchin (W.Va.) declined to side with the conference.
Throughout the week, California Democratic members also made clear their anger over the vote, which they argue targets an individual state and its abilities to govern.
'Today, it is California and our ability to set our own air quality standards. But tomorrow, it can be your own state's priorities made into a target by this vote to open the Pandora's Box of the Congressional Review Act,' Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said earlier last week.
Nevertheless, Republicans made clear they have little appetite to listen to what they view as pure hypocrisy and the minority party talking out of both sides of their mouth.
'They're not the same thing. Everybody knows they're not the same thing. [Democrats] are going to do whatever Democrats do with the filibuster when they take charge,' said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). 'They're all committed to eliminating the filibuster. … We're not eliminating the filibuster.'
'I don't worry about it,' he said about the GOP even giving off the appearance of nipping away at it. 'You can't be afraid of appearances and illusions in this business, or you're too weak to be in this business.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

28 minutes ago
Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud
WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot
J.D. Vance was forced to reaffirm his allegiance to President Trump after Elon Musk backed a call for the vice president to replace his boss. A spat between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big beautiful bill,' which the Tesla CEO denounced as a 'disgusting abomination,' has blown up into an all-out MAGA civil war, with Musk and Trump dramatically trading blows in public. On Thursday, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO replied 'Yes' to a post by an X user who asked: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and Vance should replace him.' Musk publicly mused about starting a political party, and told his followers in a bombshell allegation that Trump was named in the Epstein files, signing off by saying: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He added in a follow-up post, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Vance also features in a conspiracy theory called 'Dark Enlightenment' or Dark MAGA" that suggests a secretive cabal of tech titans is plotting to blow up the government and rule as a giant corporation with a CEO instead of a president. The Silicon Valley plotters, including Musk, chose Vance as the person who would take over when Trump is toppled, according to the theory. Trump has yet to address the latest allegations personally. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a statement saying: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.' As the drama escalated, Vance posted a picture teasing a Friday appearance on the podcast of Trump-friendly comedian Theo Von. 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Vance joked. In a follow-up post, the vice president added: 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him.' Musk and Trump's alliance began to unravel after the GOP-controlled House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's flagship budget proposal last month. Before that, Musk had pushed Trump's agenda by leading his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, an initiative within the administration tasked with cutting government spending and jobs. Musk publicly attacked Trump's bill on the grounds that it would undermine his work with DOGE by adding trillions to the U.S. budget deficit. But on Thursday, Trump claimed that Musk was really upset about the effect the bill will have on his electric vehicle company, Tesla. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president added.