
Hindi made mandatory as 3rd language in Maharashtra schools; Marathi outfits slam 'backdoor' move
Mumbai, The Maharashtra government has issued an order making Hindi a compulsory third language for students in Marathi and English medium schools from classes 1 to 5.
The Marathi language advocates have accused the government of reintroducing the policy through the "backdoor" after initially backtracking on it.
The Maharashtra School Education Department on Tuesday issued the order as part of the implementation of the 'State Curriculum Framework for School Education 2024', aligned with the National Education Policy 2020.
According to the order, all students in classes 1 to 5 in Marathi and English medium schools will now mandatorily study Hindi as the third language "generally".
"Those who wish to learn any other language as an option to Hindi, should meet the expectation of 20 students from each standard in a school. In such a situation, a teacher for that particular language will be made available or the language will be taught online," the order stated.
Critics claim the government's latest move contradicts earlier statements of School Education Minister Dada Bhuse that Hindi would not be mandatory for the primary classes.
Though the government order provides a conditional option for students to opt for another Indian language instead of Hindi, it stipulates that a minimum of 20 students per school must opt for the alternative.
If a such demand arises, either a teacher will be appointed or the language will be taught online, the order added.
The directive also mandates that in schools following other mediums of instruction, the three-language formula must include the medium language, Marathi and English.
Earlier this year, the state government faced widespread backlash for its proposal to introduce Hindi from class 1.
On April 22, Bhuse said Hindi would no longer be compulsory in classes 1 to 5.
Last month, the minister at an event in Pune said, "The decision to introduce Hindi from class 1 as a third language was taken earlier. However, many parents have suggested it be introduced from class 3 instead. We will consider these suggestions before taking any further decision."
He also said at the time that the three-language formula was "on hold" and schools would continue with the existing two-language system for now.
But the latest order appears to contradict that assurance, prompting a fresh wave of opposition.
"This is nothing but the backdoor imposition of Hindi," claimed Deepak Pawar of the Mumbai-based Marathi Bhasha Abhyas Kendra, working to preserve the Marathi language.
"The government has betrayed the Marathi people. If we remain silent now, it will pave the way for dismantling the federal structure and the legacy of the Samyukta Maharashtra movement," he charged in a social media post, urging people to protest.
Vasant Kalpande, former chairman of the Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, said it is unlikely to find 20 students in a class opting for a non-Hindi language.
"The provision to make teacher available online is also an attempt to discourage opting for any other language than Hindi. Although, Marathi and Hindi have similar scripts, it will be too much for students of such young age to learn the nuances and differences between the scripts," he claimed.
Hindi as a third language is not mandatory in Gujarat and Assam, Kalpande pointed out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
An age for worrying about age
Most global reports on demographic patterns often glaze over issues that are of significance to large countries like India. For its flagship annual report of 2025, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) conducted a survey along with YouGov of more than 14,000 men and women across 14 countries that, together, are home to more than 37 percent of the world's population. The aim was to learn about the fertility aspirations and achievements of individuals, and to understand the challenges they have experienced, if any, and the way forward. India was one of the countries studied. Let me begin with what I believe to be India's most important demographic concerns today, which are mostly not highlighted in the UNFPA report. First, a couple of years ago, India became the world's most populous country, from being the second most populous since 1947. India's population at independence was 350 million, against China's 550 million in 1951. China's leaders invested heavily in women's education and the health of its population in the first three decades after 1949. They reaped the benefits when their country became the world's second-largest economy and a veritable superpower. Had India's policymakers understood the importance of education and health (including nutrition) for its population, especially in the Hindi belt, our population would not be expected to peak in 2065 at over 1.65 billion. It will continue exacerbating the vicious cycle of population growth, environmental degradation and poverty unless policy corrections occur faster.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Three-language row: MNS defaces Hindi textbooks at Balbharti; Sena (UBT), AAP oppose policy
Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) workers tore Hindi textbooks and defaced them with ink at Maharashtra state publisher Balbharti's building on Wednesday to protest against the three-language policy in primary education. The Shiv Sena (UBT) and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) units in Pune also put out statements against the policy. A Government Resolution (GR) issued June 17 by the state government amended a previous GR that made Hindi the compulsory third-language in the state board for classes 1 to 5. According to the new amendment, students can choose Hindi or any other Indian language as their third-language as well. However, political parties and literary organisations like the Maharashtra Sahitya Parishad have expressed their opposition to this policy, saying that it introduces Hindi as a compulsory subject in a backhanded way. Protesting at Balbharti, MNS city president Dhananjay Dalvi said, 'This is an anti-Marathi move by the Maharashtra government and we can't accept it. The government is lying that it has not made Hindi compulsory. If you go to schools, this Hindi textbook by Balbharti is being published and distributed among students. The students are being taught Hindi. We will not let any Hindi textbooks published at Balbharti be distributed among students.' MNS workers raised slogans against the Maharashtra government and 'Hindi imposition' at the entrance of the Balbharti building. After marching towards the printing house, they shredded Hindi language textbooks of Balbharti and defaced them with black ink. Also opposing the three-language formula, Kalpesh Yadav, joint secretary of the UBT's Youth Sena, said, 'Why is the Mahayuti government so obsessed with Hindi? The Education Minister has announced the implementation of the CBSE pattern in Maharashtra. But it is clear that he has not understood CBSE's language policy… now the Education Department has issued an ordinance that students can take Hindi if they want to learn it.' He remarked, 'If the number of students who want to take other subjects instead of Hindi is 20, a teacher will be provided for teaching or the relevant language will be taught online… This is misleading and an attempt is being made to impose Hindi on Marathi people. I publicly condemn this ordinance of the government. Also, CBSE gives only two language options. Still, why insist on Hindi? If more than 20 children want to learn Marathi, will it be taught in Baroda, Indore and some other cities? Hindi lover Education Minister Dada Bhuse should answer.' Mukund Kirdat, spokesperson for the AAP said, 'Since the beginning, the Aam Aadmi Party has strongly demanded that the three-language formula should not be implemented from Class 1. But even after that, the order to teach three languages has been issued from Class 1 and Hindi will have to be accepted by Marathi people… Although it is necessary to adopt the three-language formula as per the new education policy, there is no insistence to implement it from Class 1.' He added, 'Despite this, the coalition government in Maharashtra had issued an order that Hindi language is mandatory. Now it has removed the word 'mandatory', and has made a verbal deception that Hindi will be the third language 'in general'…The administrative lobby in the education department and the North Indian Hindi speaking leaders in the BJP are responsible for this. This is a conspiracy of the cow belt to take over Maharashtra.' Soham is a Correspondent with the Indian Express in Pune. A journalism graduate, he was a fact-checker before joining the Express. Soham currently covers education and is also interested in civic issues, health, human rights, and politics. ... Read More


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Revised GR makes Hindi default third language in Maharashtra schools
The Maharashtra government has issued a revised Government Resolution (GR) stating that Hindi will be taught as the third language in Marathi and English medium schools across the state for Classes 1 to 5. The revised order, released on Tuesday, includes a provision allowing students to opt for another Indian language in place of Hindi provided at least 20 students from the same class in a school make such a request. The amended GR updates a previous directive issued in April, which had made Hindi mandatory as the third language. That order was subsequently withdrawn following strong opposition from regional language advocates, and political parties who termed it an attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi-speaking students. Despite the revision, the latest resolution has triggered fresh controversy. Critics argue that the 20-student threshold makes it impractical for most schools to offer alternatives effectively, cementing Hindi as the default third language. The Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) has criticized the move, accusing the state government of pursuing the backdoor imposition of Hindi in schools. Party chief Raj Thackeray has threatened to launch protests against schools implementing the new policy and continuing to teach Hindi under the revised guidelines. The new GR states that based on the recommendations of the State Curriculum Framework (SCF) 2024, Hindi will generally be the third language for classes 1 to 5. It, however, adds a caveat for students who can opt out of this rule. 'However, if students wish to study any other Indian language instead of Hindi as their third language, they will be permitted to do so. However, in order to offer an alternative language in place of Hindi, a minimum of 20 students from the same class in the same school must express interest in learning that particular language. If at least 20 students express the desire to study a language other than Hindi as their third language, a teacher will be provided to teach that language. Otherwise, the language will be taught through online methods.' As per the original GR, Hindi was mandatory as a third language in Classes 1 to 5 of Marathi and English Medium schools of Maharashtra State Board. Following a widespread backlash, it was declared by the school education minister Dada Bhuse that Hindi will no longer be mandatory and alternatives will be provided for those interested to learn other Indian languages. In fact, Bhuse has also stated that introduction of a third language from Class 1 will be on hold, until a detailed policy with alternatives to Hindi will be ready. The revised order, however, has sparked a fresh row over Hindi in Maharashtra schools. Educationists and political parties have claimed that by limiting choices through restrictive conditions, state is subtly imposing Hindi when there is absolutely no such demand from stakeholders. 'They had promised that they will provide options to Hindi along with curriculum design for them, as it is already fixed for Hindi. In fact, it was also stated that the three-language formula will not be implemented in the absence of curriculum guidelines for alternatives to Hindi. But the revised order is indirectly leaving no option for schools to opt out of Hindi.' senior educationist from Maharashtra, Vasant Kalpande, said. Kalpande highlighted that there are over 80 percent schools in Maharashtra which are not going to meet the condition of having minimum 20 students. 'There is a huge number of government-run schools having total enrolment of students which is less than 20. The number of schools having 20 in one class to opt for an alternative is also going to be very few. Furthermore, with no curriculum, no textbooks and no teachers, how the government plans to allow alternatives to Hindi as third languages?' he asked. The revised order states that in case of students demanding an alternative are less than 20, the said language can be taught in online mode. But Girish Samant, chairman, Shikshan Mandal Goregaon, which runs a very popular Marathi medium school in suburban Mumbai, said, 'This is very unclear as government is asking schools to seek online platforms to teach languages alternative to Hindi; without providing curriculum, textbook or any other support for the same. Furthermore, the government does not justify how language can be taught online to Class 1 students.' Samant highlighted that there is immense opposition by academicians to bring three languages in curriculum as early as in Class 1. 'It is inhuman to force young children in Class 1 to learn three languages,' he said. But according to Sushil Shejule, coordinator of the Marathi School Management Association, 'State government seems to be politically motivated to implement three languages from Class 1, despite the original SCF recommendations of only two languages until Class 5. And their insistence on learning Hindi is illogical as students in Maharashtra are anyway learning spoken Hindi.' Shejule also highlighted procedural gaps when he pointed out that the government's assurance that it will provide a teacher if there are minimum 20 students opting for the alternative, is impossible. 'With no teacher recruitment, this statement by the government is unclear in explaining how it will provide teachers. And more so, what if in big schools there are two groups of 20 students each demanding two different languages to be taught as third language,' said Shejule. Many academicians are also highlighting that introduction of third languages is contrary to SCF recommendations, as opposed to what is being explained by the state government. Mahendra Ganpule, former head of Maharashtra School Principals' Association, said, 'The SCF for Foundational Stage (FS) which includes pre-primary and Class 1 to 2, recommended only two languages. Accordingly, the school time-table for these two classes was already prepared. The introduction of a third language from Class 1 was later decided without any required amendment to SCF-FS. There is no clarity on how a third language will now be adjusted in the already set time table which is as per the SCF-FS.' Educationist Kishore Darak highlighted that the state government has conveniently overlooked a key aspect of the National Curriculum Framework for School Education, 2023 (NCFSE) developed by NCERT under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which recommends introducing a third language only from Class 6. 'It makes no academic sense for Maharashtra to introduce a third language to children as young as the first graders,' said Darak, further questioning the idea of introducing the third language in schools in Maharashtra without having any discussion around it. Meanwhile, school education minister Dada Bhuse issued a statement on Wednesday evening stating that Marathi language is mandatory and Hindi and other Indian languages are optional. Apart from reiterating the revised GR, Bhuse clarified that, 'Marathi will be a compulsory subject in all schools, regardless of the medium of instruction. Strict action will be taken against schools that do not teach Marathi.'