Revised GR makes Hindi default third language in Maharashtra schools
The amended GR updates a previous directive issued in April, which had made Hindi mandatory as the third language. That order was subsequently withdrawn following strong opposition from regional language advocates, and political parties who termed it an attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi-speaking students.
Despite the revision, the latest resolution has triggered fresh controversy. Critics argue that the 20-student threshold makes it impractical for most schools to offer alternatives effectively, cementing Hindi as the default third language.
The Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) has criticized the move, accusing the state government of pursuing the backdoor imposition of Hindi in schools. Party chief Raj Thackeray has threatened to launch protests against schools implementing the new policy and continuing to teach Hindi under the revised guidelines.
The new GR states that based on the recommendations of the State Curriculum Framework (SCF) 2024, Hindi will generally be the third language for classes 1 to 5. It, however, adds a caveat for students who can opt out of this rule.
'However, if students wish to study any other Indian language instead of Hindi as their third language, they will be permitted to do so. However, in order to offer an alternative language in place of Hindi, a minimum of 20 students from the same class in the same school must express interest in learning that particular language. If at least 20 students express the desire to study a language other than Hindi as their third language, a teacher will be provided to teach that language. Otherwise, the language will be taught through online methods.'
As per the original GR, Hindi was mandatory as a third language in Classes 1 to 5 of Marathi and English Medium schools of Maharashtra State Board. Following a widespread backlash, it was declared by the school education minister Dada Bhuse that Hindi will no longer be mandatory and alternatives will be provided for those interested to learn other Indian languages. In fact, Bhuse has also stated that introduction of a third language from Class 1 will be on hold, until a detailed policy with alternatives to Hindi will be ready.
The revised order, however, has sparked a fresh row over Hindi in Maharashtra schools. Educationists and political parties have claimed that by limiting choices through restrictive conditions, state is subtly imposing Hindi when there is absolutely no such demand from stakeholders.
'They had promised that they will provide options to Hindi along with curriculum design for them, as it is already fixed for Hindi. In fact, it was also stated that the three-language formula will not be implemented in the absence of curriculum guidelines for alternatives to Hindi. But the revised order is indirectly leaving no option for schools to opt out of Hindi.' senior educationist from Maharashtra, Vasant Kalpande, said.
Kalpande highlighted that there are over 80 percent schools in Maharashtra which are not going to meet the condition of having minimum 20 students. 'There is a huge number of government-run schools having total enrolment of students which is less than 20. The number of schools having 20 in one class to opt for an alternative is also going to be very few. Furthermore, with no curriculum, no textbooks and no teachers, how the government plans to allow alternatives to Hindi as third languages?' he asked.
The revised order states that in case of students demanding an alternative are less than 20, the said language can be taught in online mode. But Girish Samant, chairman, Shikshan Mandal Goregaon, which runs a very popular Marathi medium school in suburban Mumbai, said, 'This is very unclear as government is asking schools to seek online platforms to teach languages alternative to Hindi; without providing curriculum, textbook or any other support for the same. Furthermore, the government does not justify how language can be taught online to Class 1 students.'
Samant highlighted that there is immense opposition by academicians to bring three languages in curriculum as early as in Class 1. 'It is inhuman to force young children in Class 1 to learn three languages,' he said.
But according to Sushil Shejule, coordinator of the Marathi School Management Association, 'State government seems to be politically motivated to implement three languages from Class 1, despite the original SCF recommendations of only two languages until Class 5. And their insistence on learning Hindi is illogical as students in Maharashtra are anyway learning spoken Hindi.'
Shejule also highlighted procedural gaps when he pointed out that the government's assurance that it will provide a teacher if there are minimum 20 students opting for the alternative, is impossible. 'With no teacher recruitment, this statement by the government is unclear in explaining how it will provide teachers. And more so, what if in big schools there are two groups of 20 students each demanding two different languages to be taught as third language,' said Shejule.
Many academicians are also highlighting that introduction of third languages is contrary to SCF recommendations, as opposed to what is being explained by the state government.
Mahendra Ganpule, former head of Maharashtra School Principals' Association, said, 'The SCF for Foundational Stage (FS) which includes pre-primary and Class 1 to 2, recommended only two languages. Accordingly, the school time-table for these two classes was already prepared. The introduction of a third language from Class 1 was later decided without any required amendment to SCF-FS. There is no clarity on how a third language will now be adjusted in the already set time table which is as per the SCF-FS.'
Educationist Kishore Darak highlighted that the state government has conveniently overlooked a key aspect of the National Curriculum Framework for School Education, 2023 (NCFSE) developed by NCERT under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which recommends introducing a third language only from Class 6. 'It makes no academic sense for Maharashtra to introduce a third language to children as young as the first graders,' said Darak, further questioning the idea of introducing the third language in schools in Maharashtra without having any discussion around it.
Meanwhile, school education minister Dada Bhuse issued a statement on Wednesday evening stating that Marathi language is mandatory and Hindi and other Indian languages are optional. Apart from reiterating the revised GR, Bhuse clarified that, 'Marathi will be a compulsory subject in all schools, regardless of the medium of instruction. Strict action will be taken against schools that do not teach Marathi.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Landmarks of freedom struggle face monumental neglect in Lucknow
The rich history of Lucknow contains a treasure trove of incidents and memories associated with the Independence movement but major sites connected with the freedom struggle in the city present a picture of neglect, so much so that many of them do not even have proper plaques to mark their presence. The Rifa-e-Aam club in Lucknow. (Mushtaq Ali/HT) While some of these structures were razed during colonial rule with only their ruins remaining today, a few were converted into government offices after Independence. Some are protected while the rest are in a pitiful state and continue to face the onslaught of time, waiting for attention from the authorities. The Rifa-e-Aam club in Wazirganj is one such site. One would have to look thrice to find the weathered structure standing tall behind temporary shops run by several carpenters. At the entrance, there are a number of old doors behind shops and there is a pool of stagnant water at the location. The structure, which once witnessed a meeting of Annie Besant's Home Rule League and the first convention of the Progressive Writers' Association chaired by Munshi Premchand, has lost all its doors and windows. Dastango Himanshu Bajpai said, 'The Home Rule League and Progressive Writers' Association both played an important role in the freedom struggle but the Rifa-e-Aam club continues to be in a sorry state. However, there is a misconception among people that the Lucknow Pact was signed at the club. But as per the proceedings of the joint session of Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, it was signed in Qaiserbagh.' The Jhandewala Park in Aminabad was the epicentre of major political activities during the freedom struggle and hosted most of the prominent politicians of that time. Today, it lies in neglect. It would take at least 10 minutes for someone who does not frequently visit Aminabad to figure out where entry gates to the park are. It is encroached on all four sides with garment vendors at its periphery. It is also littered inside. 'It was at Jhandewala Park that Gulab Lodhi, a freedom fighter from Unnao, was shot dead in 1935 for defying the government's order by climbing a tree with a flag. It also witnessed speeches from prominent individuals, including Subhas Chandra Bose,' said former head of the modern history department, Lucknow University, Prof Aroop Chakravarti. The condition of Neil Gate, also known as Sher Darwaza, is no better. The first glance reveals posters of office bearers and runner-ups in the Central Bar Association election. Several vehicles are parked across the gate. A board that has tilted after facing several collisions from vehicles parked everyday around it says 'Centrally Protected Monument' Neil Gate. 'The (Sher) Darwaza or gateway got its name from the statues of a pair of lions installed on top. General Neil, who was leading the colonial forces outside the Residency, was surrounded and killed behind the gateway by the Indian forces led by Mahmood Mirza. With this, Mirza, who was also an officer of the Royal Army of the Nawabs, avenged the death of his son Agha Mirza Kambhalposh, who was hanged by the English forces,' said historian Roshan Taqui. Alambagh Darwaza stood witness to how Indian soldiers prevented the colonial troops from entering the city from November 1857 to March 1858. Today, it is also encroached and vehicles are parked around it. Many buildings in Alambagh were destroyed by the British after the battle, but the Alambagh Darwaza still stands tall. According to historians, it was also called Phansi ka Darwaza for a long time as several rebels were hanged at Alambagh Darwaza. The Qaiserbagh complex (a witness to the siege of 1857) is an example where the structure might be absent but stories of its association with the freedom struggle live on. The Tarowali Kothi was used as the headquarters by Maulvi Ahmmadullah Shah and other leaders of the masses to plan a rebellion against the British rulers. Now, it has no trace of even a plaque outside the building, which is currently the headquarters of State Bank of India in Lucknow. However, the ruins of the Residency, which the Indian forces captured after the Battle of Chinhat during the First War of Independence following an 87-day siege from July to November 1857, have been conserved and restored by the Archeological Survey of India. 'Experts among the Indian forces had dug up several mines from outside the Residency to the buildings inside. Soldiers used these mines to carry out attacks through explosives,' said historian and author Roshan Taqui. Despite attempts to rescue those trapped inside, the siege ended in defeat for the British forces and the death of over 2,000 people, including Henry Lawrence. When one enters the GPO, a cenotaph near the Mahatma Gandhi statue narrates the history of the court proceedings and the death sentence awarded to revolutionary freedom fighters associated with the Kakori Train Action plan. The Rumi Darwaza has also been restored and conserved by ASI. It was at Rumi Darwaza that the British hanged Agha Mirza Kambalposh, the son of Mahmood Mirza, an officer in the Nawab's Royal army, because Kambhalposh and his companions had attacked the force led by Captain Ommanney before the start of the First War of Independence. Musa Bagh, where the Indian forces had put up a brave front but were defeated during the 1857 war, is also undergoing restoration. Begum Hazrat Mahal and her son Birjis Qadar, who was on the throne, left for Nepal. Maulvi Shah killed a couple of British officers and escaped, but was betrayed by the king of Payawan (Shahjahanpur) and beheaded, said historian Roshan Taqui. The Dilkusha garden and Kothi saw a major battle between the Indian and colonial forces in November 1857 where Indian forces lost because they were heavily outnumbered, according to Subhash Kushwaha, a historian and author. Only a few towers and external walls of the Kothi were left after the battle. They are currently in a satisfactory state. Charbagh, a witness to the arrival of several freedom fighters, continues to stand tall though a board about Gandhi and Nehru's meeting is not very visible due to encroachment. Experts suggest there should be bigger boards, which can grab the attention of passers by narrating stories related to various incidents associated with freedom struggle. In the 20th century, Charbagh became a staging ground for the nationalistic forces, said Devesh Pandey, LU research scholar who has researched the role of Charbagh in the freedom struggle, 'Two prominent leaders of the Indian national movement, Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, first met at the Charbagh station in December 1916, when they came to attend the Congress session in Lucknow. When Lokmanya Tilak arrived by a special train to participate in this session, massive crowds swelled at the station to get his glimpse,' Pandey said. It was at the Lucknow station that freedom fighter Ramprasad Bismil saw how the iron boxes containing government funds were taken out unchained, he said. This gave him the confidence to carry out the Kakori Train Action to fund revolutionary activities. 'During the protests against the Simon Commission in 1928, Charbagh had become an important congregation ground for the protestors. In these protests, Dalit members of the Adi Hindu Samaj also raised their voice for securing their community's legitimate demands. The high point was reached during the Quit India Movement of 1942 which generated intense political activity in Lucknow,' Pandey added. Similarly, the Farangi Mahal lacks any cenotaph or plaque at the main entrance about its contribution to the freedom struggle. 'The main figure of the institute, Maulana Abdul Bari, collected grants from Muslims from across the country for the independence struggle and even invited Gandhi quite a few times. The visits of Gandhi to Farangi Mahal helped ease the Hindi-Muslim riots at that time and played a role in decreasing animosity between communities. Other prominent figures, including Jawaharlal Nehru, Sarojini Naidu and Abdul Kalam Azad, also visited it at various times. I have asked the Islamic Centre of India to add a cenotaph related to the contribution of Farangi Mahal outside the main gate,' said Imam Eidgah Maulana Khalid Rasheed Farangi Mahali.
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Independence Day LIVE: PM Modi to address the nation as India marks 79th Independence Day with ‘Naya Bharat' theme
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to hoist the national flag and deliver his 12th consecutive address to the nation from the Red Fort on Friday (August 15, 2025). Also Read | 78 Years of Freedom The theme of this year's celebrations is Naya Bharat, as the nation makes giant strides toward realising the Government's vision of Viksit Bharat by 2047. Upon his arrival at the Red Fort, Mr. Modi will be received by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, MoS Defence Sanjay Seth, and Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh. The Defence Secretary will introduce Lieutenant General Bhavnish Kumar, General Officer Commanding (GOC), Delhi Area, to PM Modi. Also Read | Keep alive ideals for which countless lives were given President Droupadi Murmu, in her address to the nation on Thursday (August 14) on the eve of the country's 79th Independence Day, called on citizens to 'buy and use Indian-made products' to strengthen the spirit of the Swadeshi Movement. Follow the live updates here
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Impose Trump's illogical tariff on China, US importers too: Amitabh Kant
Former NITI Aayog CEO and G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant on Thursday termed the additional 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on Indian goods as "totally arbitrary" and lacking "any logic," urging that India should consider imposing similar duties on other countries, including US, which still imports critical minerals from Russia. "India should never bend. We should look at a long-term perspective. The Prime Minister has invested a lot in this relationship with the United States over the last decade. We should adopt a long-term perspective and ultimately win the game against the United States," Kant told ANI. He pointed out that other major economies, such as Turkey, the EU, and China, also import significant quantities of energy and minerals from Russia or China. "A 25 per cent tariff is arbitrary. It is not comprehensible to me because then you should also be imposing a 25 per cent tariff on China and Turkey. But you should also be imposing it on Europe, which is a very major importer of gas from Russia, and you should also be imposing it on many of the importers in the United States, as the United States is importing a lot of critical minerals from Russia; all critical minerals are still being imported from China. So it doesn't stand to any logic," he said. Kant also urged India to maintain its strategic autonomy and energy security in the face of proposed US tariffs, saying that India should prioritise its national interests and not compromise on its energy security, especially considering that India's oil imports from Russia are significantly lower than those of China or Turkey. The US has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. "I'm a believer that India should not compromise on its energy security or its strategic autonomy. We are here for a long-term game, and we must win the long-term war. My belief is that we built up a relationship with the United States over two and a half decades, which was bipartisan. And this attempt to put a 50 per cent duty does not stand to logic because we import oil," he said. Earlier, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India, citing matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws. He claimed that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had termed the US move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," and said New Delhi will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
