logo
X Says Modi Government Has Asked It to Block Over 8,000 Accounts in India

X Says Modi Government Has Asked It to Block Over 8,000 Accounts in India

The Wire08-05-2025

The logo of the social media site X, formerly called 'Twitter'.
New Delhi: X announced on Thursday (May 8) that the Union government has ordered it to block no less than 8,000 accounts on its platform in India and that despite its disagreement with these orders, it has begun complying with them.
It also noted that the government's orders come with potential penalties for itself such as 'significant fines and imprisonment of the company's local employees'.
The Elon Musk-run platform's announcement comes as some journalists and news organisations had their X accounts withheld in India in response to the government's legal demands.
In most of the over 8,000 blocking orders the government issued, it 'has not specified which posts from an account have violated India's local laws', X's Global Government Affairs department posted. It added: 'For a significant number of accounts, we did not receive any evidence or justification to block the accounts.'
'We disagree with the Indian government's demands,' X said, even as it noted that it will withhold the accounts concerned in India in order to comply with the orders.
'Blocking entire accounts is not only unnecessary, it amounts to censorship of existing and future content, and is contrary to the fundamental right of free speech,' it said. 'This is not an easy decision, however keeping the platform accessible in India is vital to Indians' ability to access information.'
While it believes that making the government's blocking orders public is necessary in the interests of transparency, X said it is unable to make the Modi government's orders public due to 'legal restrictions'.
The company, which said it is exploring legal recourse, also advised 'all users who are impacted by these blocking orders to seek appropriate relief from the courts' and went on to provide websites of legal aid organisations in India.
'Maktoob Media' among those whose X accounts withheld
The X account of Maktoob Media, a digital news platform whose coverage focuses on human rights and minority issues in India, is one of several withheld in the country.
An attempt to access its X account from India shows a message saying it has been 'withheld in India in response to a legal demand'. X provides no reason for the ban.
'In our continuing effort to make our services available to people everywhere, if we receive a valid and properly scoped request from an authorised entity, it may be necessary to withhold access to certain content in a particular country from time to time,' a message from X reads on Maktoob 's handle.
'Such withholdings,' it adds, 'will be limited to the specific jurisdiction that has issued the valid legal demand or where the content has been found to violate local laws.'
'Assault on press freedom'
Calling the ban an assault on press freedom, Maktoob 's editor, Aslah Kayyalakkath, wrote on X: 'We have no knowledge of the reason for the government's arbitrary action … Maktoob pledges to continue its crucial work at a time when truth is becoming a casualty.'
Aslah told The Wire that while the reason for the ban is unclear, he has received at least 50 threat calls over Maktoob 's coverage of the hate speech and revenge attacks against Muslims and Kashmiri students.
'We covered over 64 hate speeches, we reported on hate attacks and lynchings including the lynching of a Muslim man in Mangalore.' The man, Kayyalakkath added, 'was falsely accused of chanting pro-Pakistan slogans, but we busted this fake narrative and showed that he was killed for drinking water [belonging to an upper-caste man'.
Kayyalakkath added that Maktoob was the first to publish the list of deaths due to shelling by Pakistan in Poonch. 'We report on facts. We wrote a profile of Lieutenant Vinay Narwal and pony rider Adil Shah. What we didn't pursue is war mongering and jingoism.
'It's hard to get any response or clarity from social sites, but we will challenge this ban,' he said.
Apart from Maktoob, the accounts of deputy editor and senior journalist at the Indian Express Muzzamil Jaleel, news sites like Kashmiryat and influencer Arpit Sharma, who makes videos on social issues, have also been withheld in India.
Force, an India-based magazine that covers defence and aerospace, wrote on X that a recent video posted by editor Pravin Sawhney has been withheld in India.
'Blocking media that raises questions does not increase the credibility of the message the government wants to communicate at this critical juncture. It only raises more doubts,' its statement said.
Sharma feels that there's a pattern of selective targeting at play.
'I made videos against misinformation, asked questions on security lapses, spoke against communal politics post-Pahalgam. My message was no different from foreign secretary Misri's, who was exposing the designs of the terrorists,' he said.
Amid the ongoing conflict between India and Pakistan, a flood of disinformation has surfaced on social media, prompting the Union government to go on a blocking spree against Pakistani accounts targeting India on various social media platforms. The government has also had withheld from India the social media accounts of a number of Pakistani news outlets and celebrities.
However, Sharma feels that the present climate is being misused to silence critics.
'First they filed cases against Dr Medusa and Neha Rathore, then they banned 4 PM News on YouTube. No such action has been taken against right-wing influencers spreading fake news. Instead, this ban came after campaigns and demands by such influencers to ban me and others who ask questions and demand accountability from the government.'
This article was updated with information about X's statement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?
Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?

Known for its pristine beaches, affordable stays and vibrant nightlife, this country received the highest number of Indian tourists among Southeast Asian countries in 2024. Can you guess which one? Also read: 10 million tourists visited Asia's 'most-loved country' in Q1; more than Thailand, Indonesia India is one of Thailand's most significant tourism markets, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said in a press release in December 2024 to celebrate the 2 million-mark of Indian tourists in Thailand. In 2023, Indian tourists generated 61.9 billion Baht in revenue for Thailand. More than 35.5 million foreign tourists visited Thailand in 2024. Of these, 2.1 million were Indians. Indian travellers arrive in Thailand around the year. November to February is typically considered the high tourist season, overlapping with winter vacation for schoolchildren in India. Thailand is a popular tourist destination with both bachelors and families. There are plenty of factors that contribute to Thailand's popularity as India's favourite tourist destination, including accessibility, affordability and distance. In its press release, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said: 'Thailand's strong air connectivity with India has been instrumental in fostering this growth. As of June 2024, 342 weekly flights between the two nations offered 2.9 million seats annually, representing a 92.2% rebound from pre-pandemic levels. Recent additions, including Indigo's Hyderabad-Bangkok route, THAI's Kochi-Bangkok flights, and Thai AirAsia's Vishakhapatnam-Bangkok service, have further enhanced accessibility.' Friendly visa policies are another major factor contributing the footfall. Thailand has visa-free entry for Indians 'until further notice'. Popular tourist destinations in Thailand include Bangkok, Phuket, Chon Buri, Krabi, Chiang Mai and Phang-nga. Places like Phuket and Krabi are known for their stunning beaches and water activities. In Bangkok, tourists can enjoy shopping, visit famous temples like Wat Phra Kaew and Wat Arun, or drop into one of the city's famous rooftop bars. Chiang Mai, located in northern Thailand, is famous for its historic temples, night markets, and mountain landscapes. It also serves as a base for visiting elephant sanctuaries.

If AI codes all software and even takes away factory jobs, Zoho's Sridhar Vembu says humans will still have no shortage of work
If AI codes all software and even takes away factory jobs, Zoho's Sridhar Vembu says humans will still have no shortage of work

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

If AI codes all software and even takes away factory jobs, Zoho's Sridhar Vembu says humans will still have no shortage of work

As artificial intelligence continues to advance rapidly, concerns about job loss and human relevance in an automated future have grown louder. Addressing these fears head-on, Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu recently shared his views on how society might evolve if AI takes over most or even all kinds of work. AI May Take Over Code, But Not Purpose In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), Vembu presented a hypothetical future where all software development is fully automated and software engineers, like himself, are out of work. However, he stressed that we are 'nowhere close to that goal' right now. Even if AI systems reach a point where they can independently manage all coding tasks, he argued, it doesn't mean human beings will become obsolete. Vembu argued that the core issue wouldn't be the disappearance of work but how the economic benefits of automation are shared. He said the problem would shift from technological capability to political economy—how income and access to goods are redistributed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Cat Lovers Adore This Unique Lamp Graddi Read More Undo Two Possible Paths to a Fairer System According to Vembu, there are two key ways this dilemma could be resolved: Zero-Cost Goods: One scenario involves goods made by robots and AI becoming so cheap that their prices drop to zero, much like the air we breathe. In this world, essential services and products would be accessible to everyone without cost being a barrier. Higher Value for Human-Centric Jobs: The second possibility is that the remaining human roles — such as caring for children, nursing the sick, or restoring ecosystems — may gain higher economic value. These roles, Vembu said, could command greater purchasing power, especially if goods become ultra-affordable. He emphasized that these solutions require intervention, especially through anti-monopoly regulations. Without government efforts to break up tech monopolies, the cost savings from automation may not reach the general public. — svembu (@svembu) Public Reactions Reflect Hope, Concern, and Debate Vembu's comments sparked a wave of responses online. Some users agreed that AI might eventually replace most economic functions, while others warned of risks — including job loss, loss of skills, and monopolistic control of resources. One user pointed out that building and maintaining the robots themselves would still require engineers, energy, and infrastructure. Another suggested the need for an 'AI ombudsman' to oversee the direction AI development takes. Some questioned who would control these technologies, fearing they could become exclusive tools of the elite. The Future of Coding and Legacy Systems In a separate discussion, Vembu earlier questioned the continued relevance of older programming languages like C, JavaScript, and SQL. He argued that these tools, though widely used, might not suit the demands of the next century. Modern web development, he noted, is bogged down by the complexity of using multiple programming languages just to build simple interfaces. He suggested that AI could drive the transition away from these legacy systems by forcing the tech world to reimagine the fundamental principles of computing. Far from making engineers redundant, this shift may redefine their work, pushing them toward innovation rather than maintenance.

India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs
India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs

Mint

time26 minutes ago

  • Mint

India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs

India's National Manufacturing Mission (NMM), announced in the Union budget this year, was much awaited. While the sector has grown over the years in size, its contribution to our economy has not gained share. The need to increase manufacturing as a proportion of GDP has always been emphasized and this mission-mode approach announced by the government should make a difference. An ambitious, empowered and inclusive framework is expected to be the hallmark for this mission. It must target a share of at least 12% in global manufacturing output for India, as against the current 3%. Let me share a few thoughts on a framework that could help propel India as a manufacturer. Also Read: Time to re-imagine Indian manufacturing from the ground up The first aspect is the structure of the mission, which could determine the success or failure of the initiative. The NMM can consider a three-tier structure. At the initial level, the government could consider having inter-ministerial task-forces. These should focus on the five key areas spelt out by the finance minister in her budget speech for 2025-26: namely, the ease of doing business; a future-ready workforce; micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs); technology adoption; and quality. These five task-forces could be under the concerned ministries with various stakeholders as members. They should recommend policies, propose roadmaps and drive implementation. The NMM could be headed by a senior industry leader. This can be the second tier. Its main members could be secretaries of key government departments related to manufacturing; they can provide policy and strategic direction. In addition, CEOs from industry associations could be members, while state chief secretaries can be special invitees. This high-level private-public partnership model will be crucial for driving this mission. At the pinnacle of this structure could be a high-level committee headed by the Prime Minister. Its members could be the NMM chairperson, finance minister, commerce and industry minister, cabinet secretary and a representative of the Niti Aayog. This three-tier structure, in our view, would be inclusive and empowered to drive reforms and take the steps required to achieve our goals. Also Read: Think ahead: India's electronics manufacturing must go up the value curve The second aspect is whether the NMM should have a sectoral focus or address sector-agnostic issues. In this, the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci) has suggested that its dominant focus should be on sector-agnostic areas, like regulatory reforms, cost competitiveness, the overall investment climate, skilling, quality, productivity and the like. The mission should also make strategic interventions in frontier-technology fields—such as electronics, batteries, defence, space, renewables, AI, quantum computing, etc—by boosting domestic design capability and value addition. Last year, the government announced an allocation of ₹1 trillion to encourage research and development (R&D) in sunrise domains by the private sector. We need to leverage this fund now to take a lead in the frontier technologies. The NMM's priorities are the third aspect. A sine qua non list would include macro-level policies, be it logistics, monetary, fiscal, tariffs or trade. These should be fully aligned with the mission's needs. It would also cover technology, which needs to be the key driver of manufacturing. A focus on value addition by way of design, key components and so on must also feature as a priority. So also export competitiveness, global value chain integration and import substitution in critical areas of dependency. As its fourth aspect, the mission will lay emphasis on MSMEs, which have been the main driver of manufacturing growth in several countries. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check Ficci has suggested six areas of intervention: Training for MSME promoters to grow into mid-sized or large firms in the future; an impetus to family-owned businesses; the development of urban MSME zones, non-polluting MSME malls or urban industrial clusters within city limits to reduce logistical costs and enhance market access for small enterprises; support for environment, social and governance capacity among MSMEs; a catalyst for digital adoption across MSMEs to drive efficiency and growth; and light-touch regulations for three years for MSMEs in strategic areas to help them take off. For India to become a global manufacturing powerhouse, quality cannot be ignored. The mission should collaborate with industry consortiums to set Indian standards and India should take an active part in such processes at international standard-setting bodies. We need to promote and push Indian standards alongside our exports. Apart from the NMM, a high-level committee for regulatory reforms was also announced by the government. Ficci has suggested some broad terms of reference for its institutional structure, urging the adoption of a regulatory impact assessment framework to ensure transparent and consistent policy implementation across regulators. Overall, the two structures should lead to seamless communication and interaction between all stakeholders at every level—from central and state functionaries to experts and leaders of academia and industry—with everyone focused on one mission: manufacturing. The author is president, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store