
Trade Fueled Inequality. Can Trump's Tariffs Reduce It?
At the same time, the wealthiest countries experienced startling rises in inequality at home. In the United States, where the gap between the rich and everyone else is among the highest in the world, some of those hit hardest were working people without college degrees.
Now, free trade believers are swimming against the tide. President Trump has raised tariffs to their highest levels in nearly a century. The president doesn't talk much about inequality. But his animating argument for tariffs — that they will pressure companies to bring well-paid manufacturing jobs back to America — is pitched to those workers who felt left behind and neglected.
So, will the tariffs reduce inequality?
Probably not, and here's why.
Hyper globalization certainly contributed to America's rising inequality. Consumers saved hundreds of dollars on the cost of televisions, shoes and comforters. But many middle-class livelihoods and communities were destroyed when factories either relocated to countries where wages were lower or went bust because they couldn't compete with cheap imports.
China's entry into the global marketplace at the beginning of this century delivered a major wallop. Between 1999 and 2011, Chinese imports were directly responsible for the loss of 2.4 million American jobs, according to researchers. It is true that more jobs were created, but many of them did not pay as well as those that were eliminated, nor were they taken by the workers who lost out.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
Biden's warning about an attack on the Constitution is ‘really rich,' says strategist
Bluestack Strategies founder Maura Gillespie examines the state of U.S. politics, including the Democratic Party's search for direction, on 'Fox Report.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House lobbying for a Nobel prize for Trump takes a farcical turn
Donald Trump's desperate and yearslong desire for a Nobel prize is well documented. In fact, after his defeat in 2020, the Republican president released a weird, campaign-style video that suggested he'd already received a Nobel prize. But as pitiful as this has become, Trump isn't lobbying by himself. Congressional Republicans have tried to please the president by nominating Trump for a Nobel prize, and foreign leaders eager to curry favor with the American leader have done the same thing. And then, of course, there's the White House. The Hill reported: White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said Thursday that President Trump deserves a Nobel Prize for his commitment to 'restructuring' global trade rates. 'I'm thinking that since he's basically taught the world trade economics, he might be up for the Nobel on economics...,' Navarro said during an appearance on Fox Business Network. He didn't appear to be kidding. Just so we're all clear, when economists receive Nobel prizes, it's because of their academic work and the impressiveness of their scholarship. Navarro seemed to suggest that the president should get the same honor for imposing trade tariffs — which as University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers explained, Trump appears to have settled on by 'scribbling numbers with a Sharpie.' Roughly six hours later, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, reading from prepared notes, told reporters that Trump 'has brokered on average about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office.' She added, 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.' She seemed to overlook Trump's vow to end the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza — a promise he apparently doesn't know how to keep. Nevertheless, to recap, the White House called for the president to receive one Nobel prize in the morning and a different Nobel prize in the afternoon. But why stop there? Every year, the Nobel committee awards a prize for medicine — and Trump has presented some groundbreaking ideas about injecting disinfectants into people. Sure, the medical 'establishment' frowns on these sorts of treatments, but that's all the more reason to reward the president's 'outside the box' creativity. There's also a Nobel Prize in literature that could theoretically go to Trump. Has the Nobel committee seen his weird letters to foreign leaders? How about his hysterical tweets filled with misspellings, weird capitalization and enough exclamation points to make an ill-tempered tween blush? Or maybe everyone involved can just cut to the chase and simply rename Nobel prizes and agree to call them 'Trump Prizes'? Given recent events, it seems inevitable that some GOP lawmaker will introduce a resolution along those lines sometime soon. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin: Social Security policy set for mid-August now optional
(NewsNation) — The Trump administration has clarified that a change to the Social Security Administration's phone policy is optional. The new policy, which had a start date of Aug. 18, would have required millions of Social Security recipients to travel to field offices for routine account updates and have to go online to get a security authentication PIN. AARP sent a letter to SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano on Tuesday, saying that the change would create an obstacle for seniors, people with disabilities and those who lack access to a computer or internet. About 3.4 million more people would have been forced to go to a field office, which has recently seen staffing cuts. 85% of parents worry about tariffs affecting back-to-school cost: Survey The SSA later said that any Social Security beneficiaries and account holders aren't required to visit a field office if they choose not to use the authentication PIN, according to Axios. Some Social Security offices had plans to close this year due to federal spending cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). SSA later said the offices would not close permanently, but only from a 'time to time basis' due to weather, damage or 'facilities issues.' More than 68 million people throughout the U.S. receive Social Security benefits, and more people are starting to rely heavily on the monthly payments. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.