As Trump targets Brics, Indonesia's autonomy hangs in the balance
Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, marked a pivotal moment that reflects shifting global power dynamics. By consolidating into a stronger multipolar bloc, emerging economies are effectively challenging the long-standing dominance of a Western-led order.
Advertisement
Brics released a joint statement, criticising unilateral tariffs and non-tariff measures that disrupt global trade. The statement called for reforms of institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Brics leaders also condemned recent attacks on Iran, albeit without naming the US and Israel.
Nonetheless, the US has responded with confrontational threats, including the potential use of tariffs. On his Truth Social account, US President Donald Trump declared that, 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL
10% Tariff ', emphasising that there would be no exceptions.
Trump not only threatened a 10 per cent tariff on Brics members but also sent a letter to Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto threatening to impose a
32 per cent tariff on all Indonesian exports starting on August 1. Trump justified the threat based on the US' trade imbalance with Indonesia, the latest
full member of Brics
In the letter, Trump stated the tariffs could be reconsidered if Indonesia agreed to establish manufacturing operations in the US.
Advertisement
This not only intensifies tensions between Washington and Brics, but also puts countries like Indonesia under significant pressure. Jakarta now faces the challenge of balancing geopolitical independence with the short-term interests of trade and investment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
French wine and cheese makers say Trump's 30% tariffs would hit agriculture industry hard
French cheese and wine producers have warned of the damaging impact that US President Donald Trump's threatened 30 per cent tariffs on imports from the EU would have on the country's agriculture industry. A 30 per cent duty would be 'disastrous' for France's food industry, said Jean-François Loiseau, president of food lobby group ANIA, while François Xavier Huard, CEO of dairy association FNIL, said: 'It's a real shock for milk and cheese producers – this is an important market for us'. 'It's a new environment we will have to get used to – I don't think this is temporary,' Huard said on Sunday, referring to shifting rules and flaring trade tensions. He noted the industry may have to rethink its strategy relating to the markets in which it operates. France's dairy sector exports nearly half of its production, including to the United States, which imports mostly cheeses such as Brie but also fresh products like yogurt and butter. It risks losing annual sales worth tens of millions of euros, said Huard, noting the sector sells €350 million (US$409 million) worth of dairy products to the US annually.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Inexcusable' failures led to Trump assassination attempt: Senate report
A congressional inquiry into the attempt to assassinate US President Donald Trump at a campaign rally a year ago on Sunday lamented 'inexcusable' failures in the Secret Service's operations and response, and called for more serious disciplinary action. Advertisement On July 13, 2024, a gunman shot the then-Republican presidential candidate during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, grazing his ear. One bystander was killed and two other people in addition to Trump were wounded before a government sniper killed the gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks 'What happened was inexcusable and the consequences imposed for the failures so far do not reflect the severity of the situation,' said the report released by the US Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The dramatic incident energised Trump's bid to return to the White House, with his campaign using a photo of him bloodied and pumping his fist to woo voters. Advertisement The report did not shed new light on the gunman's motive, which still remains a mystery, but accused the Secret Service of 'a cascade of preventable failures that nearly cost President Trump his life'.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Degraded Nobel Peace Prize standards could mean Trump deserves one
Given the long-degraded state of the Nobel Peace Prize, I say Donald Trump probably does deserve one, or three. It may also be jointly awarded to the US president's Israeli partner-in-crime, the suspected war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu with an outstanding arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity issued by the International Criminal Court. Eventually, Netanyahu will have to end his war on the Palestinian civilian population, which ought to make him a peacemaker of sorts. Advertisement If Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho could win the Nobel, why not Trump and Netanyahu? Incidentally, Trump has sanctioned the court's chief prosecutor for daring to try to arrest his mate, as well as the chief UN monitor on Palestinian rights for issuing a report on the complicity of multinational corporations in Israel's 'genocide' in the Palestinian Terroritories. But never mind; Pakistan, Ukraine, and now Israel and a group of African leaders have taken turns to nominate Trump for the big prize, which the US president has openly admitted he covets. Imagine that: the US has been arming Ukraine and Israel to the teeth, and they in turn nominate its president for the peace prize. That's the kind of world we live in now. Ok, Ukraine has withdrawn the peace nomination after Washington temporarily halted weapon supplies. You can't say Kyiv wasn't being consistent! But now that the weapon pipelines have been restored, perhaps Kyiv should resume the nomination. Advertisement Remember how Barack Obama won the 2009 peace prize just for being elected president? That was what everyone had suspected at the time, and it was subsequently confirmed in the autobiography of a former Nobel Institute director, in his own words, to 'strengthen the president'. Compared with the just-elected Obama, Trump actually did some things, though critics can't agree on what they are or their implications.
