Sabrina Carpenter's racy Brit Awards performance sparks outrage among viewers
Sabrina Carpenter's 2025 Brit Awards performance is causing a wave of debate among viewers.
On Saturday, the former Disney star got a mix of reactions after opening the show with hit songs such as "Bed Chem" and "Espresso." Wearing a red lingerie ensemble, Carpenter's racy performance had U.K. residents threatening the broadcasting company, Ofcom, as the segment was shown ahead of the 9 p.m. watershed. According to the BBC, the 9 p.m. watershed policy is intended to prevent programming unsuitable for children from airing too early.
"What have I just watched Sabrina carpenter," one viewer wrote on X. "WTF That was pure soft porn before the watershed."
"It's cool to be sexy and empowered. Unfortunately, this throw back was none of those things. Cheap and tacky," another wrote.
"The other acts did very creative routines, with impressive sets and costumes. This was lazy and thoughtless. The "dancers" looked as foolish as she did. It wasn't kitch, it was cringe," one viewer wrote.
Despite the outrage among some viewers, others were impressed with the singer's creativity.
"Some people threatening to complain to Ofcom about Sabrina Carpenter's BRIT Awards performance need to get a life. It was a fun show with great energy! If you can't handle a little excitement before 9 pm, maybe it's time to lighten up!" one fan wrote.
"Sabrina Carpenter at the brits doing bed chem before the watershed is absolutely iconic. she's a sexy little lady who wants everyone to feel sexy for themselves not for other people! Go cry about it it ofcom," another wrote.
On Sunday, Carpenter - who won the Global Success award at the UK award show - took to social media to share a series of photos and videos from the Brit Awards, cheekily writing, "i now know what watershed is!!!!"
Representatives for Carpenter did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
A representative for Ofcom told Fox News Digital that they plan to publish an audience complaint report on March 5. If they receive more than 50 complaints about the performance, Carpenter's performance will be documented.
Carpenter has always stayed true to who she is, especially when it comes to expressing herself through her artistry.
"This is my diary," she said in an interview with Vanity Fair in 2024. "Once I put it out there, it's for other people to interpret. I try to not tell people what a song is explicitly about. People don't always know what's going on inside the minds of anyone, let alone a young girl who's navigating love and a lot of things for the first time."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Disney, NBCUniversal sue AI creator Midjourney in copyright dispute
June 11 (UPI) -- Disney and NBCUniversal have joined legal teams in a lawsuit against AI image maker Midjourney over multiple claims of copyright infringement. The lawsuit filed Tuesday in California's U.S. central district claimed that Midjourney, a generative artificial intelligence startup, utilized and distributed proprietary AI-generated characters from NBCU and Disney productions such as the Simpsons, Star Wars, Toy Story, Shrek and others. It marked the first AI-related infringement lawsuit taken on by a Hollywood giant. "This is an extremely significant development," IP lawyer Chad Hummel told Wired. Meanwhile, Universal and Disney have petitioned for a jury trial and argue it risks upending "the bedrock incentives of U.S. copyright law." The two plaintiffs claimed that Midjourney's own website displayed "hundreds, if not thousands, of images generated by its Image Service at the request of its subscribers" they believed infringed on their copyrighted works. "Midjourney's bootlegging business model and defiance of U.S copyright law are not only an attack on Disney, Universal, and the hard-working creative community that brings the magic of movies to life, but are also a broader threat to the American motion picture industry," the complaint continued. The joint suit further says that San Francisco-based Midjourney allegedly ignored prior legal requests to cease and desist and included dozens of examples in the complaint, calling Midjourney a "bottomless pit of plagiarism." In 2023, Midjourney reported more than $200 million in revenue and in 2024 took in an additional $100 million on top of it to beat the prior year. "Midjourney, which has attracted millions of subscribers and made $300 million last year alone, is focused on its own bottom line and ignored Plaintiffs' demands," according to court documents. The two movie studios seek an unspecified amount in monetary damages, and further requested injunctive relief in order to prevent Midjourney from any future copyright violations.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is seeing 'Les Misérables.' It's not clear he understands the irony.
In what may be one of the year's most ironic moments, President Donald Trump will spend Wednesday night attending the opening of the musical 'Les Misérables' at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. No, this isn't some presidential obligation that Trump is reluctantly fulfilling. Rather, as he told Fox News Digital last week: 'I love the songs, I love the play. I think it's great.' For once, Trump seems to be telling the truth. True, none of the numbers from "Les Mis" appeared on his official playlist for his 2024 campaign, unlike other Broadway musicals like 'Cats' or 'Phantom of the Opera.' (His love of Andrew Lloyd Webber is well-known and deeply telling in its own way.) But I'd forgotten until today that during the announcement of his third presidential run in 2022, he walked onstage immediately following the strains of 'Do You Hear the People Sing?' In fact, he's used the song multiple times at events over the years, almost always prompting similar bouts of confusion from people who understand 'Les Misérables.' Which brings us to the other half of his statement to Fox News Digital: that he thinks the show is "great." It's entirely unclear to me whether there's anything about the show's characters, plot, themes, or general vibe that would speak to Trump on any deeper level. For starters, 'Do You Hear the People Sing?' is a wild choice of anthem for someone like Trump who has only known wealth and power. The song calls for a revolutionary uprising against the reestablished monarchy in favor of republican ideals and uplifting the poor and downtrodden. The students who belt the number then build a barricade on the streets before the army crushes their insurrection and dreams of a brighter future for France along with it. Given his eagerness this week to deploy Marines onto the streets of Los Angeles, and attacks on protests on college campuses, I have a hard time picturing Trump either sympathizing with the students' cause or mourning their deaths. Further, am I supposed to believe that the 'law and order president' identifies at all with former convict Jean Valjean's story of the cruelty of the law toward the poor and needy? Or that he feels moved by Inspector Javert hurling himself into the Seine when he realizes that mercy can be more just than the law as written? I wouldn't put it past him to describe Gavroche, the young street urchin shot down mid-song as he aids the rebels, as "no angel." Granted, as The Washington Post noted, there are Trump supporters out there who see the MAGA movement as following in the footsteps of the Friends of the ABC in fighting tyranny. But I'm less convinced that Trump feels similarly. My money is on him being more captivated by the way the sweeping, booming, overwhelming score sounds than any moral that the show might be trying to bestow on the audience. C'est la vie. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Disney, Universal Slam AI Company As 'Bottomless Pit Of Plagiarism' In Scathing Lawsuit
Disney and NBCUniversal joined forces in the first lawsuit of its kind against the artificial intelligence image company Midjourney on Wednesday, accusing it of copyright infringement. 'We are bringing this action today to protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content,' Kimberly Harris, NBCUniversal's executive vice president, told CNBC. The companies' lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleges that Midjourney sought 'to reap the rewards' of Disney and Universal-copyrighted characters by selling an AI image-generating service 'that functions as a virtual vending machine, generating endless unauthorized copies' of their copyrighted works. 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism,' the lawsuit reads. 'Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing.' Midjourney did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. The AI company made $300 million last year from its image service, which allowed subscribers to simply enter a text prompt to request any of the Disney or Universal characters to perform an action, according to the lawsuit. The AI then generates and displays a high-quality image of the character. The lawsuit lists several Disney or Universal-owned characters Midjourney generated, including Shrek, Darth Vader, Thanos from the 'Avengers' series, and the Minions characters from 'Despicable Me.' Horacio Gutierrez, chief legal and compliance officer for The Walt Disney Company, said in a statement to HuffPost that Disney's 'world-class IP is built on decades of financial investment, creativity and innovation—investments only made possible by the incentives embodied in copyright law that give creators the exclusive right to profit from their works.' He added, 'We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity.' The lawsuit contends that 'Midjourney could easily stop its theft and exploitation' of intellectual property since the AI service controls what copyrighted content it selects. However, Midjourney chose not to use copyright protection measures, even when Disney and Universal sent cease-and-desist letters, according to the suit. The lawsuit accuses Midjourney of promoting its AI tools using Disney and Universal characters, and says the AI company has already begun using such characters to train its video service. The companies are now asking for a jury trial to determine damages, which could include some of Midjourney's profits. 'Midjourney's bootlegging business model and defiance of U.S copyright law are not only an attack on Disney, Universal, and the hard-working creative community that brings the magic of movies to life, but are also a broader threat to the American motion picture industry which has created millions of jobs and contributed more than $260 billion to the nation's economy,' the lawsuit reads. College Student Allegedly Created Undressed Images Of Classmates With AI, Then Sold Them Top AI CEO Warns Lawmakers To Prepare For Tech To Gut Entry-Level Office Jobs Chicago Sun-Times Faces Backlash After Promoting Fake Books In AI-Generated Summer Reading List
