Wales tourism tax timeline as proposals for changes get voted on
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Senedd members have been debating amendments to the Wales tourism tax - with a number of proposals shot down. If the bill completes its passage through the Welsh Parliament, £1.30 a person before VAT could be charged on overnight stays in hotels, B&Bs and self-catering accommodation.
A lower rate of 80p would apply to hostels and campsites. The 22 Welsh councils would be given the powers to decide whether to introduce a local levy from 2027 at the earliest.
The Welsh Tories wanted a 10-night cap on the levy as well as exemptions for educational trips, charities, members of the armed forces and veterans.
They also wanted to exempt yachts and other boats from plans for a £1.30 a night visitor levy in the future. All these were voted down by members. A Plaid Cymru amendment to exempt all under 16s was also defeated.
But Senedd members were able to agree other amendments, including an exemption for under 18s from the lower rate. Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now
Sam Rowlands, the Tory shadow finance secretary, introduced an amendment to the tourism tax bill to remove powers for ministers to extend the levy to berths and moorings in future. He argued extending the bill to marinas would be unnecessarily complicated and burdensome, adding that boating is a leisure and sporting activity.
He said: 'To be clear, those that provide berths and moorings are not providing visitor accommodation in any real sense. By their nature, those vessels… move around.'
Mr Rowlands told Senedd members: 'It's quite clear that boaters have a minimal… impact on local services because they are self-contained within the berth or mooring area.'
But Senedd members voted 3-1 against the Conservative's proposal as the finance committee considered nearly 160 amendments to the bill.
Mike Hedges, who represents Swansea East, said: 'As I tell people quite regularly, we've got a marina there and I can tell you now – when people come in by boat into that marina, they don't stay in the marina… they go into the city centre and they use the services there.'
Mr Hedges said: 'The council taxpayer of Swansea is covering those costs,' as he argued marinas should have been included in the bill from the outset.
His Labour colleague Mark Drakeford agreed: 'It is right that [for] a yacht arriving at Swansea or Cardiff marina… the yacht owner should pay the levy just as somebody staying in a nearby hotel or the Cardiff council campsite in Pontcanna will be.'
The first minister-turned-finance secretary said: 'I can see no case in principle why those visiting in boats and yachts should find themselves not captured by the levy.'
Prof Drakeford explained: 'The bill, as the [Welsh] Government presents it, doesn't have a worked-up scheme for berths and moorings as Mike Hedges would have wished. But the complexity of it is real and was beyond our ability to resolve all that complexity in the bill itself. So, what the bill provides is a power to return to this issue in future when some of those practical challenges can have been more fully discussed.'
Mr Rowlands responded: 'It does feel like an afterthought… for me, without the proper revision and understanding of this in the first instance, it shouldn't be in here at all.'
Prof Drakeford described the Welsh Government's approach as more progressive and targeted, removing a large proportion of educational stays from the levy. He said: 'If you're going to narrow the [tax] base, the only way to compensate in terms of revenue... is by raising the levy charge on those who remain within the scope.'
Members voted to raise the lower and higher rates by 5p to 80p and £1.30 respectively. The bill now moves to the third step: consideration of amendments by the whole Senedd: before a crunch vote on the final version at stage four. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox
Find out what's happening near you
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
BBC Debate Night branded 'farce' as formal complaint made over 'bias'
It comes after there were no representatives from the Scottish Greens on a 'Glasgow Special' episode of Debate Night on Wednesday evening. Instead, the show – on the eve of the crucial Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election – featured the SNP's Glasgow Council leader Susan Aitken, Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells, artist David Eustace as well as both Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney and Labour peer Willie Haughey. This led to some anger, including an SNP source telling The National that Debate Night appears to have 'thrown the BBC's proposed guidance on balance out of the window' by including two Labour representatives. But now, the Glasgow Greens have also branded the panel makeup as a 'farce', highlighting that their party are 'by some distance' the third largest in Glasgow in terms of the number of councillors and vote share in last year's General Election. READ MORE: Increasing UK defence spending is just about the worst way to support jobs The Scottish Greens have 11 councillors on Glasgow City Council compared with just one Tory, for example. Now, they have made a formal complaint to the BBC. Glasgow Greens councillor Anthony Carroll (below) said that it was clear the BBC are balancing only between the 'parties of the past'. (Image: Supplied) 'For the Conservatives to have a representative while they can barely hold on to any deposits in Glasgow any more, while the Greens - who surged to third place across the city - are ignored once again by the BBC, shows just how out of touch they are with the electorate,' he said. Carroll, who is also the party's democracy spokesperson, added: 'I urge the BBC to address this in any future political broadcasts and avoid another farce. To not is a disservice not just to the BBC, but to the growing number of voters who are clearly not being represented in their political debate broadcasting shows.' Councillor Jon Molyneux, who is Glasgow' Green group co-leader, added: 'Green representatives are significantly shaping the future of Glasgow, whether that's by working to end rip off rents, by making our streets and public spaces safer, or by delivering new powers, like the Visitor Levy, which can raise tens of millions more for local services.' He added: 'It's a shame - but perhaps not a surprise - that the BBC won't platform Green voices which challenge the status quo, but is happy to conceal the well-documented political affiliation of an unelected Labour Lord.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why it feels like there are more f-words in Shetland
All of a sudden, people were phoning up the broadcaster to say there were 'lots more' f-words in the Sunday night police drama. 'So I went through the compliance forms from the previous series,' Allen said — in remarks first reported by comedy site Chortle — 'and it was the same [amount]. But it's just that this series there was a female detective, and people get worked up more about a woman swearing.' DI Jimmy Perez, played by Douglas Henshall, was replaced by Ashley Jensen as DI Ruth Calder. And that, for some viewers, made all the difference. I thought of that — though without the underlying current of misogyny — when I read a recent blog by former Labour MP Tom Harris. He was in the party for 34 years, joining under Neil Kinnock, becoming a minister under Tony Blair, and staying loyal (if sometimes uneasily) through Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband. It was Jeremy Corbyn who finally broke him. In 2017, he quietly voted Conservative. By 2019, he was publicly backing Boris Johnson — to the horror of some of his family. This year, he is back voting Labour — though it is fair to say his support is hardly enthusiastic. It's weird that this is worth noting, but it is. Parties and, to be fair, we political hacks often forget this: most voters are not like activists. They do not pick a team and stick with it no matter what. They switch. They weigh up who makes sense. They ask: Has this party fixed the thing I care about? Are they listening? Do they seem like they know what they are doing? Are they better than the other lot? While there may not have been more f-words in Shetland, one word I've heard a lot more of recently — especially in relation to Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse- is scunnered. It has been the word of the by-election campaign. How much Thursday's vote tells us about the 2026 Holyrood election is hard to say. It is a snapshot of where people in South Lanarkshire are just now. We should be careful about overanalysing. There has been relatively little scrutiny of the SNP's long record in government — something they will not be able to avoid next year. And by then, Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government will have been in office for two years, making more of their tough choices - the Chancellor's spending review next week might tell us more than anything said in this campaign, about their chances in Holyrood. All that said, if there is one clear message from the battle in South Lanarkshire, and from Tom Harris' blog and from the TV exec in Belfast, it's this: There might not be more f-words. But sometimes, it feel like there are. Right now, voters feel like there are. The party who wins next year, will be the one who convince the scunnered that they're on their side.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer makes crucial vow after free school meals boost
Keir Starmer said expanding free school meals to more than half a million more pupils next year was a 'down payment' on the Governments plans to drive down child poverty Keir Starmer has insisted his Government will tackle the child poverty crisis affecting millions of kids. The Prime Minister said his decision to expand free school meals to more than half a million more pupils next year was a "down payment" on driving down hardship. He signalled there was more to come, saying: "I was very proud of the last Labour government for driving down child poverty. "This is a down payment on what we will do on child poverty, which needs to be seen in the round." Speaking to the Mirror at a primary school in Harlow, Mr Starmer said he was determined to make driving down child poverty part of his Government's legacy. Major change to free school meal rules unveiled - saving parents up to £500 But he refused to say whether he would scrap the Tory two-child benefit limit, which has been blamed for pushing families into hardship. Pressed on the two-child limit, he said: "I am very proud that we have done it in relation to child poverty. I don't think there is a silver bullet. "Everybody who has looked at it will say there is no one thing that you can say if you do that, then all else follows. So that's why we're looking at a range of measures." He added: "I do very much want to get to the root causes of this, because if you're really going to tackle child poverty in a sort of sustained way, you have to get to the root causes." Pressure is mounting on the Government to do more to help the 4.5million children growing up in poverty in this country. Yesterday, the PM announced a major change to free school meal rules - in a major victory for the Mirror's campaign to end hunger in classrooms. From September 2026, all children in families claiming Universal Credit will be eligible for free dinners, saving parents up to £500 a year. Around 500,000 more pupils will be able to get a school lunch as part of a £1billion package. The PM spoke to the Mirror after serving up school dinners to hungry kids at Down's Primary School in Harlow, Essex. He said: "What sat behind this is a real sense of Labour values, of showing what a difference a Labour government makes. "My primary focus was on the attainment of children. All the evidence is clear that if children have proper meals, particularly at school, then it helps them attain. "But also on the impact on parents because for parents, this is a saving of the best part of £500 pounds per child in a cost of living crisis. That is a huge difference for them." The PM also praised the Mirror for its long running campaign on free school meals. He said: "I do pay tribute to the mirror and the campaign that you have run for a number of years, because it is the first time ever that any government has done this. "I'm really proud that this Labour government has done it." He added: 'People often say, what's a Labour government for? "Well, today is a part of our answer to that question, which is giving every child the best opportunity in life.'
