Chairman of Sheku Bayoh Inquiry decides against recusing himself
Mr Bayoh, 31, a father-of-two, died after he was restrained by around six police officers who were called to Hayfield Road in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on May 3 2015.
After considering the matter, Lord Bracadale has refused the application for his recusal.
In a decision published on Wednesday, he said: 'Having reviewed the facts, the fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was no real possibility that I was biased.'
He said such an observer would note that 'although the meetings with the families of Sheku Bayoh were private, they were not kept secret'.
The application for recusal of the chairman and assessors was lodged on behalf of the Scottish Police Federation, Pc Craig Walker and Nicole Short.
A spokeswoman for the inquiry said: 'The inquiry held a procedure and conduct hearing on June 12.
'After careful consideration of written and oral submissions from core participants, Lord Bracadale has decided not to recuse himself or terminate the appointments of the assessors.
'Having regard to the relevant legal test, he has determined there is no apparent bias.
'Taking into account various considerations in respect of the handling of the inquiry, he has determined having meetings with the families was not unfair.
'There is much important work for the inquiry still to do, not least proceeding with closing submissions and moving towards the writing of the final report. The team is working at pace and will announce next steps in due course.'
The inquiry has been examining the circumstances of Mr Bayoh's death, and whether race was a factor.
In a statement issued on behalf of the Bayoh family, lawyer Aamer Anwar said: 'Lord Bracadale, following an application by the Scottish Police Federation, PCs Craig Walker and Nicole Short to recuse himself and to terminate the appointments of the assessors Raju Bhatt and Michael Fuller, has refused to do so – he has delivered a humiliating and devastating indictment not just on the Federation but also the Solicitor General and Police Scotland.
'Despite their desperate claims, the chair Lord Bracadale has done nothing wrong, he is a judge with over 50 years' legal experience, respected for his impartiality and integrity.
'It comes as no surprise that both the Police Federation and Solicitor General failed to grasp that this inquiry's duty under the Human Rights Act is to conduct a thorough investigation into the death of Sheku Bayoh, having at the inquiry's heart the Bayoh family.
'There is nothing wrong with the chair treating a bereaved family with compassion and respect.'
Scotland's Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'I note the detailed and extensive consideration that has informed Lord Bracadale's decision and hope all parties involved can progress the important work of the inquiry as soon as possible.
'The Scottish Government remains committed to establishing the facts surrounding the circumstances leading to Mr Bayoh's death.
'However, as it is vital all public inquiries operate independently of government, it would be inappropriate of me to comment any further.'
A spokesperson for the Scottish Police Federation said: 'Any fair-minded observer would be concerned when it is revealed that there have been five meetings with a core participant family, without the knowledge of the other core participants.
'The inquiry's legal team asserted that no evidence was discussed at these meetings, it subsequently transpired that was not the case.
'Lord Bracadale has never asked for a meeting with former Pc Nicole Short, who was assaulted in May 2015 in the line of duty and who has been unable to return to work as a result of her injuries.
'Police officers will continue to call for a fair and transparent hearing, based on the evidence alone.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
22 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Emergency incident at Scots hospital as police lock down scene
999 DASH Emergency incident at Scots hospital as police lock down scene Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) POLICE have locked down a Scottish hotel amid a major ongoing emergency incident. Cops have sealed off an area outside Galloway Community Hospital in Stranraer this morning. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Officers have locked down the scene with blue tape Credit: Supplied 5 Multiple vehicles were spotted at the hospital this morning Credit: Supplied 5 And several officers were seen guarding the area on foot Credit: SUPPLIED Around half a dozen police vehicles were spotted a the car park outside the A&E department. A blue forensic tent has also been erected inside the car park, which is also next to the Waverley Medical Centre. The tent is surrounded by three large police vans, with another police car parked nearby. Officers have cordoned off the area with blue tape, blocking access to the public. Several officers have also been spotted on foot guarding the scene. It is currently unclear what sparked the emergency response. However, it appears that police have been at the hospital since early this morning. Galloway Community Hospital is a small general hospital which provides care to locals in Stranraer and Wigtownshire. It has an on-site A&E department as well as two maternity beds in the Clenoch birthing centre, where there are around 100 births per year. More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Scottish Sun. is your go to destination for the best celebrity news, football news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheScottishSun. 5 A blue forensic tent was erected in a nearby car park Credit: Supplied
The Herald Scotland
41 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Murder in Moffat: The crime that shaped forensic science
On a Sunday morning in late September 1935, she had set off with her mother for a leisurely hike, towards the waterfall and the peaceful countryside on the edge of the town. As they paused on Gardenholm Bridge, Susan glanced over the wall to take in the view of the cascading water. A strange bundle among the mossy rocks below caught her eye. Poking out of it, what appeared – to her horror – was the grotesque shape of a human arm. Onlookers at the bridge on the outskirts of Moffat, overlooking where dozens of body parts were found (Image: Newsquest Media Group) Before long, a search of the scene revealed not just the arm, but in the stream and the waters feeding the nearby Annan River, more body parts tied up in fabric and newspaper. There were two human heads – one had been wrapped in a child's romper suit – and four bundles of mutilated and decomposing remains: thigh bones, legs, a torso, pelvis and slices of flesh. In all, there were 70 separate sections of human remains. As police picked over the distressing evidence, it became clear the killer had done their utmost to clinically remove any trace of features that might solve the mystery of their victims' identities – fingers, teeth, eyes were all mutilated. Laid before detectives was a puzzle that would push them into new and ground-breaking areas of forensic science. Now, as the 90th anniversary of the so-called Jigsaw Murders looms, events of September 1935 are being revisited for a fascinating backwards glance at how efforts to pin down a killer helped lay foundations for modern forensic science. A new University of Dundee Inside Forensic Science podcast series – the fourth to explore a notorious Scottish crime – and forthcoming Royal Society of Edinburgh 'Curious' presentation will examine events near the quiet Dumfriesshire town and how, despite the killer's desperate efforts to obscure his victims' identities, he ignited new methods of solving crimes. Ground-breaking at the time, some methods kickstarted by the crime remain almost unchanged nine decades later. Rooted in suspicion and domestic violence, the 'Moffat Murders' is also a gripping true crime story that illustrates the worst of human violence and deviousness, set against a 1930s landscape when detective work was the stuff of notebook and pen, legwork and without modern benefits of DNA and push-button technology. 'The case involved a number of elements of forensic science where people of the day were really breaking boundaries in new techniques and technology,' explains Professor of Forensic Science Niamh Nic Daéid FRSE, Director of the University's Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science (LRCFS). 'They were real pioneers in terms of some of the types of evidence – in particular, cranial facial reconstruction.' Read more by Sandra Dick: The killer's efforts to remove the identities of his victims left investigators facing a difficult task, she adds. 'Hands were removed so they couldn't find fingerprints, the bodies were dismembered, facial features were damaged. 'Forensic scientists of the day worked very hard to give that identity back to the victims." While for the despicable killer – once a respectable and well-liked member of his local community – the gallows would await. And that was far from what the Lancaster patients of a certain Dr Buck Ruxton ever expected might happen. Buck Ruxton murdered his wife and nanny (Image: PA) To them, he was a caring medic committed to the community, to his family and tending to their health needs. Behind the polished brass plaque at Number 2 Dalton Square in the heart of the Lancashire town, however, lay a far darker truth. Ruxton, born Bukhtyar Rustomji Ratanji Hakim in Bombay, had met Isabella Kerr while studying to become a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. Before much longer, they had become parents to the first of three children, and had left Edinburgh to set up home in Lancaster. Professor Niamh Nic Daeid, FRSE Professor of Forensic Science, University of Dundee (Image: Stewart Attwood Photography) Family life, however, was blighted by dreadful violence: he was obsessively jealous, frequently accusing his wife of infidelity despite any trace of clear evidence. His fear festered and eventually exploded into violence. Unfortunately, events in September 1935, were witnessed by the couple's maid. Mary Jane Rogerson, just 20 years old, would suffer the same fate as her mistress. Faced with two bodies to dispose of, Ruxton's solution was meticulous and monstrous. A remote waterfall and river in Dumfriesshire might well swallow the evidence, swirling the packages of body parts out to sea never to be seen again. Or so he thought. Instead, the devious doctor would meet his match in Scotland's top minds in the fledgling landscape of forensic science and medicine. Police search the ravine where body parts wrapped in newspaper and material were found (Image: Newsquest Media Group) Led by Prof John Glaister of the University of Glasgow and Sir Sydney Smith at University of Edinburgh, scientists and medical experts from across the country were called in to help unravel the mystery. At first, it wasn't clear if the body parts belonged to men or women, never mind how they had reached their terrible fate. Over several months a range of pioneering techniques spanning three branches of forensic science – dermal fingerprinting, cranial facial 'reconstruction' and forensic entomology – were used to help identify the victims and build the case. A new technique was developed to reconstruct mutilated fingerprints – a delicate process never tried before that even saw one investigator burn his own fingers to remove the top layer of skin in an effort to show how prints could be found on underlying layers. Meanwhile, thoughts turned to whether the victims' skulls – which already offered insight into the ages and sex of the victims – might shed further light on their identities. In another pioneering move, an X-ray of one skull was superimposed on a photograph of Dr Ruxton's wife, Isabella. Carefully positioned at matching angles and forensically analysed, it was revealed to be a remarkable match. As the pieces of the human jigsaw puzzle took shape, Alexander Gow Mearns, an entomologist and public health specialist at the University of Glasgow, was figuring out the time of death based on the life-cycle of bluebottle maggots. Read more by Sandra Dick: It was yet another landmark moment in forensic science and one that remains a feature of such cases today. There was traditional detective work too: clues were unpicked from the fabric and newspapers in which the body parts had been wrapped. One edition of a certain publication, The Sunday Graphic, found at the scene had only been distributed in the Lancaster area. It all helped to join the dots. As the case took shape however, a major issue was how this ground-breaking evidence might be accepted – or not – by the criminal justice system. The new podcast series and RSE talk – part of the Curious programme which spans presentations on artificial intelligence to the 1960s' moon landings – brings together legal and forensic science experts to explain how the case broke barriers. They also examine the case through a modern lens, to consider how it might be handled with the benefits of modern forensic techniques and technology. Professor Nic Daéid, who will be joined at next month's RSE talk by, among others, leading lawyer Alex Prentice KC, says modern forensic science bears the fingerprints of the Ruxton investigation. 'Something that comes across very strongly is the excellence of the police work in those days, how they recorded the crime scenes very carefully and were meticulous when taking notes and recording information. 'The detail in their notetaking is as good as it is now or even better, yet back then they didn't have what we have now.' Indeed, there was not even a specialist forensic laboratory in Scotland at the time, she adds. 'If it happened today, the immediate 'go to' for linking body parts would be DNA, which has revolutionised the way we make use of science in the criminal justice system. 'Of course, they didn't have DNA – they were still dealing with things like blood grouping,' she adds. Perhaps what's also remarkable is how quickly the case came together: by March 1936, Dr Ruxman was in the dock facing murder charges. Although the case saw a range of breakthroughs in the emerging field of forensic science, taken in isolation it's likely that none would have been enough to secure a conviction. Ruxton went on trial five months after his victims' remains were found, and was later hanged (Image: Contributed) However, together they formed enough individual pieces to solve the jigsaw puzzle. 'It was a link in a chain,' Prof. Nic Daéid says. 'Taken separately, each would not stand up but when put in context of other information and how the police used it, we can draw out the tendrils of the rest of the story. 'Forensic science and criminal investigation are very much teamwork,' she adds. 'And this case is a fantastic example of different elements of forensic science and forensic medicine coming together.' RSE Curious event, A case of stolen identity: the 1935 Moffat murders, is on Friday, September 12 at the Royal Society of Edinburgh. The Dundee University Inside Forensic Science Podcast exploring the Moffat Murders, is now available.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
A bit of advice on what Sturgeon should do next
As the displays in bookshops and libraries show, crime fiction and crime-based thrillers are ubiquitous. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with reading or writing crime fiction. It should, however, be done in moderation. For purveyors of crime, their publisher's relentless demand for a book every year or two is not just punishing but ultimately bad for the genre. Constantly working with one eye on the clock makes for poorer books and worn-out writers. Readers, meanwhile, devour an author's latest publication in a matter of hours, barely taking time to chew or digest. After which they begin tapping their fingers for the next in the series. Such a treadmill is a consequence of the brutal economics of publishing, which penalises novelists whose work cannot be labelled or who might only produce a new title every few years. For Ms Sturgeon's sake, I hope she does not follow the crime writer's path. For a start, as she will be fully aware, competition in that realm is particularly fierce hereabouts. More importantly, if she wants to make a name for herself she should do something original. Rather than another tale of detectives and sleuths, what is desperately needed is an injection of literary fiction; for novels exploring different elements of the world we live in, whether the setting is today or in the past, approached from an individual perspective, and written in a distinctive, memorable style. In that respect, I see the literary landscape as being like Yorkshire's reservoirs this summer: reduced almost to a puddle, revealing acres of parched earth where once there was water aplenty. Except that, when it comes to literature, we have been living with drought conditions for years, not months. Read more I felt like a voyeur reading this great Scottish writer's love letters Scotland's elite built their wealth on slavery – so what can we do about that now? It's the worst kind of cut any council could make. And yet still they did it It's worth reminding ourselves that this is the home of the three S's: Scott, Stevenson and Spark, who are among the world's finest writers. Sir Walter Scott was father of the historical novel, although none of his tales followed a template, other than being set in a bygone age. Robert Louis Stevenson's books still read so freshly they could be hot off the press. The two of them were master storytellers, their plots and characters illuminating the country, its politics, people and locations so vividly they might have been photographers snapping from real life. For her part, Muriel Spark took fiction in an entirely different direction. Only one of her novels has a Scottish setting, but her Edinburgh attitude and turn of phrase infuse everything she wrote. Each of Spark's 22 novels is the product of an original mind and style, different from all the others, yet unmistakably hers. The same goes for all our great writers. Open a page at random, say, of Lewis Grassic Gibbon, James Kelman or Ali Smith, and their individuality is immediately evident. Try that with almost any crime novel, and I defy you to name the author without looking at the title page. That's why I don't consider William McIlvanney to be a crime writer but a novelist who happened, in some books, to write about crime. He could no more easily be squeezed into a pigeonhole than Alasdair Gray or Janice Galloway, their unique styles and subjects and world view making each of them a one-off. Compared with what one critic described as the 'Scottish efflorescence' of the 1990s, which saw the likes of A L Kennedy, Irvine Welsh, Kathleen Jamie, Don Paterson and Alan Warner rise to such prominence they were photographed for the New Yorker, today's literary scene – poets and genre writers apart – is threadbare. We have a handful of stand-out novelists, beyond those already mentioned, including Lucy Ellmann, James Robertson, Ewan Morrison, Andrew O'Hagan, Jenni Fagan and Douglas Stuart. What puzzles me, however, is why the number is so small, with few earning enough to live on the proceeds of their writing alone. Val McDermid (Image: Newsquest) Sadly, financial hardship in this line of work is nothing new. As Dan Gunn's forthcoming The Letters of Muriel Spark shows, she struggled painfully in her early career to make enough money to provide for herself and her son. What is new, however, is how little readers (and therefore publishers) seem to care about fiction that does not conform to a formula and requires greater concentration than following a police procedural. Or to put it another way: how big a readership genre fiction attracts, while more so-called demanding (and enjoyable and satisfying) books remain a minority interest. None of this, I realise, will encourage anyone who is considering becoming a novelist to step beyond the security of genre fiction. In the case of Sturgeon, however, it is surely the way to go. Kevin was right to imply that nobody knows better what has gone on behind the closed doors of Holyrood. But she doesn't have to write a thriller. Far more interesting would be a novel embracing a broader canvas, with nothing so predictable as a murder at its heart. What would be fascinating would be a scenario that might have appealed to the likes of Anthony Trollope, drawing in a cast of players from all areas of life, each revolving around the Scottish political sphere. It could be a roman à clef, with real events disguised by a veil of fiction – several dramatic incidents instantly come to mind – or it could be drawn entirely from Ms Sturgeon's imagination. Either way, most of us would find that writing worth reading. Dare I say, it has the makings of a bestseller. Rosemary Goring is a columnist and author of history books and novels. Her latest work is Exile: The Captive Years of Mary, Queen of Scots.
