logo
New survey about automotive brands yields surprising results for popular model: 'Wins on every metric'

New survey about automotive brands yields surprising results for popular model: 'Wins on every metric'

Yahoo23-04-2025

A survey in the United Kingdom revealed that people rate Tesla as the best overall car brand and the second-most reliable automaker.
As Teslarati reported, the consumer auto site HonestJohn.co.uk polled over 6,000 people about their car brand opinions. The site's results do not appear to be dated and the polling seems likely to have been conducted prior to some of the recent drops in Tesla sales figures in Europe.
But as analysts have pinned much of that sales performance to the public's feelings about CEO Elon Musk, it stands to reason that any earlier polling would at least generate a more unbiased assessment of the cars themselves. Feelings about Musk aside, most who have driven a Tesla have come away impressed with the vehicles.
Participants gave Tesla an 89.41% satisfaction index rating based on the EV company's reliability, efficiency, safety, practicality, performance, and comfort. Lexus earned the No. 2 ranking with 86.32%, and Porsche came in third with an 84.79% rating.
With regard to reliability, Tesla came in second place after Lexus. Tesla's reliability rating was 95.29%, just slightly below Lexus's at 97.01% and Toyota's at 94.65%. Honest John and Teslarati both expressed surprise at how highly Tesla ranked for reliability because critics often claim the brand produces imperfect vehicles made with cheap materials and prone to problems.
"While we were always impressed by the technology within Tesla's range of exclusively electrically powered cars, build quality seemed to be a little hit and miss, to say the least," Honest John wrote. "Evidently, matters have improved significantly in this regard according to our readers' feedback as not only has the brand scored well for reliability across its four-strong range but the Tesla Model 3 was also rated as the most satisfying car to own overall."
These survey results are significant because they indicate a public preference for and greater mainstream adoption of electric vehicles. While there have been recalls and plenty of criticism for Tesla to deal with, the American company has been making strides in improving its vehicles, and it shows in public opinion surveys like this one.
For example, Tesla introduced 4680D batteries to boost the range and efficiency of its EVs. It also released an upgraded Model 3 with a sleeker look and improved interior design.
EV improvements like these generate greater excitement about the potential of clean driving and inspire more people to transition away from traditional gas cars. The more EVs on the road instead of gas-guzzling polluters, the cleaner and more sustainable our future will be.
And while Tesla has been struggling in Europe overall, some reports have indicated that hasn't been as true in the U.K.
If you were going to purchase an EV, which of these factors would be most important to you?
Cost
Battery range
Power and speed
The way it looks
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
In response to a Teslarati post sharing the survey results to X, formerly known as Twitter, one social media user commented, "Way less moving parts than a petrol/diesel car, means less things that can wear out or fail."
In response to an X post to Tesla Owners UK, someone else wrote, "Tesla is the safest brand, cheapest to run, most reliable, most satisfying, and so on. Tesla literally wins on every metric. Shame many don't know. Tell your friends."
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla (TSLA) Raises U.S. Prices on Upgraded Model S and X by $5,000
Tesla (TSLA) Raises U.S. Prices on Upgraded Model S and X by $5,000

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla (TSLA) Raises U.S. Prices on Upgraded Model S and X by $5,000

Tesla (TSLA, Financials) raised prices for its Model S and Model X vehicles in the U.S. by $5,000, the company announced Thursday via its website and official X account. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. All variants of both models are affected. The updated Model S all-wheel drive now starts at $84,990, while the high-performance Plaid version is listed at $99,990. The Model X starts at $89,990, with its Plaid variant rising to $104,990. The price increase comes as Tesla rolls out enhancements to both luxury models, though the company did not specify technical details in its announcement. The move aligns with Tesla's broader strategy of adjusting pricing based on demand, production costs, and ongoing updates to vehicle performance and features. Shares of Tesla were little changed in early Friday trading but have climbed steadily year to date. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Elon Musk's 'No Kings' Post Goes Viral
Elon Musk's 'No Kings' Post Goes Viral

Newsweek

time35 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Elon Musk's 'No Kings' Post Goes Viral

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk posted a cryptic message about the "No Kings" protests after activists took to the streets across the U.S. over the weekend. The tech CEO's social media post came after protests were organized in hundreds of cities while a military parade in Washington, D.C, celebrating the anniversary of the U.S. Army's creation took place on Flag Day, which was also President Donald Trump's birthday. Newsweek has contacted Musk via X's press office by email. The Context Demonstrators turned out across the U.S. on Saturday to participate in coordinated "No Kings" protests, aimed at denouncing President Donald Trump's leadership. Many of the events reportedly remained largely peaceful, though several cities saw violent altercations, including a vehicular assault in Virginia and a shooting in Utah. What To Know Late Sunday night, early Monday morning, Elon Musk took to his own social media platform X to discuss the protests. "Anyone else think of this yesterday?" Musk wrote, posting a banner from the video game BioShock, which reads "No Gods or Kings. Only Man." The quote is associated with one of the game's antagonists, Andrew Ryan, the capitalist founder of the underwater city of Rapture, where the game takes place. Ryan's bust can be seen in the image Musk posted, above the quote. Elon Musk speaks alongside U.S. President Donald Trump to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Elon Musk speaks alongside U.S. President Donald Trump to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty Images It is unclear what Musk was suggesting with the post, whether he was criticizing the "No Kings" movement or siding with the protesters against Trump. Musk has previously used images or videos to voice dissatisfaction with the White House. After the Liberation Day tariffs were announced, Musk posted a video of economist Milton Friedman condemning the kind of trade policy that Trump had implemented. While Musk clashed heavily with the president earlier this month over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, going so far as to call for Trump's impeachment, he has since rolled back the rhetoric, and said that he regretted some of the posts he said about his former political ally. Since then, Musk's social media has struck a more conciliatory note. He has shared screenshots of Trump's Truth Social posts, and retweeted several posts from Vice President JD Vance. What People Are Saying The San Diego Police Department said on X, formerly Twitter, following protests on Saturday: "You stayed classy, San Diego. Thank you to the thousands who demonstrated peacefully today. No arrests, and no incidents." Republican congressional candidate Lily Tang Williams said on X, Saturday: "We ran into the first 'No Kings' protest in Fort Lauderdale, FL. It is peaceful so far, police officers are present, traffic is slow. I heard Miami might have bigger one. Be careful out there and stay calm!" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said on X, Saturday: "30,000 people showed up across our city to exercise their constitutional right to peaceful protest today—that's powerful. A curfew is in effect in Downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who do not care about immigrants' rights. Get home safe, LA." What Happens Next Whether more protests are held in response to Trump's policies remains to be seen.

GOP Congressman: U.S. Tax Sovereignty Under Threat
GOP Congressman: U.S. Tax Sovereignty Under Threat

Newsweek

time41 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

GOP Congressman: U.S. Tax Sovereignty Under Threat

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. tax code is subject to continual review by Congress. It's a system that honors merit; tax incentives in the United States aim to reward pro-growth outcomes. Success in the marketplace comes from innovation, productivity, and job creation. That's the American way. The American approach to tax competition isn't a chaotic free-for-all; it's a deliberate engine that drives investment based on real economic potential. Businesses thrive or fail based on market fundamentals—supply, demand, innovation, efficiency—not on the whims of a government handout. Our tax system stands tall in a world where economic freedom is losing ground. It's a beacon of hope, but the global tax deal negotiated at the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) threatens to snuff it out. The OECD's global tax deal includes a new 15 percent minimum corporate tax for countries that have never had one. It's intended to end tax-dodging by multinationals, but its flawed design trades one problem for another. Instead of fostering open, fair, and transparent markets, it will usher in a Hunger Games-style contest for direct state subsidies in the form of direct cash handouts or refundable tax credits. Countries will dangle these incentives to lure businesses to their shores. This shady system favors political connections and authoritarian governments over ingenuity and innovation. WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 24: U.S. Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK) speaks to the media after leaving a House Republican conference meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill on October 24, 2023 in... WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 24: U.S. Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK) speaks to the media after leaving a House Republican conference meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill on October 24, 2023 in Washington, DC. MoreAs currently formulated, the deal will place U.S. multinationals at a disadvantage in two critical ways: (1) they face two layers of minimum taxes—the existing U.S. system and the emerging OECD system—and (2) their traditional income-based tax incentives face stricter scrutiny than the corporate welfare regimes in China and the EU. Under current OECD rules, traditional tax incentives can easily trigger the OECD minimum tax, allowing other countries to siphon away the U.S. tax base. On the other hand, the direct cash handouts or refundable tax credits favored by the OECD are far more likely to be protected from the OECD minimum tax regime. Far from progress, this is cronyism dressed as fairness, and it's being forced on nations worldwide under the OECD's banner. Here's the truth: pushing subsidies out of the income tax system and into the hands of bureaucrats is an inefficient way to energize economic activity. It distorts markets, picks winners and losers, and forces taxpayers to foot the bill for political pet projects that have dismal economic prospects. If other nations want to tie their economies in knots with this nonsense, that's their decision. The U.S. won't play the role of global nanny, dictating domestic policy to sovereign states. Countries around the world are free to determine a domestic policy that meets their political and economic demands. Right? Wrong. This stops being a "mind your own business" issue the moment the OECD's grand plan starts picking American taxpayers' pockets to fund France's social programs or Germany's pet projects. The global tax deal isn't just a friendly suggestion. It's a loaded gun aimed at countries that don't join in. It's taxation without representation on steroids, a direct threat to our economic sovereignty. America's tax sovereignty belongs in Washington, D.C., not Paris. I'm glad that President Donald Trump and Secretary Scott Bessent believe this, too. My colleagues and I are continually working to improve a U.S. tax system built on a principle worth defending: competition should be about economic productivity and value, not favoritism. The OECD's subsidy circus flips that principle on its head, dragging the world toward a future where markets bend to political will and growth and prosperity will stagnate. We've seen that movie before, and (spoiler alert) it doesn't end well. Washington needs to hold the line, reject this global tax trap, and remind the world why economic freedom still matters. Our businesses, our workers, and our taxpayers deserve nothing less. Representative Kevin Hern serves as Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee and sits on the Tax Subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store