Morocco's Constitutional Court Rejects Key Parts of Civil Procedure Reform
Although much of the proposed text was approved, the Court struck down a number of critical articles, saying they undermine judicial independence, legal clarity, and the right to a fair trial. The decision marks a setback for Justice Minister Abdellatif Ouahbi, whose ministry spearheaded the reform process. Article 17 – Undermining legal finality
The Court rejected the first paragraph of Article 17, which allows the public prosecutor to request the cancellation of final court rulings. The court said this violates the principle of legal certainty, which is a core element of the right to a fair trial. Letting prosecutors reopen closed cases, they argued, 'harms the principle of legal certainty.'
The Court added that it would unjustifiably interfere with the stability of judicial decisions. Article 84 – Delivery of court summonses
The Court also rejected the fourth paragraph of Article 84, which allows court summonses to be delivered based on assumptions, like someone simply claiming to be the recipient's agent or a family member appearing to be over 16. The Court said this created legal uncertainty and could harm the right to a fair trial. It ruled that such vague rules violate the Constitution, so this part and other related articles were declared unconstitutional.
Article 90 – Remote hearings without clear rules
The last paragraph of Article 90 allows for remote court hearings, such as through video conferencing. While the Court acknowledged the usefulness of such tools, it said the article did not include enough guarantees to protect the rights of defendants and litigants, particularly their ability to participate fully and understand proceedings. Articles 107 and 364 – Gagging lawyers
The Court found that the last paragraph both of Articles 107 and 364 because they said parties have the right to get a copy of the Royal Commissioner's legal opinions without being allowed to respond to them.
The Court explained that the right to defend oneself is essential in a fair trial, and parties must be able to comment on all opinions affecting the case. Blocking any response to these opinions unfairly limits the defense and violates the constitutional right to equal defense, so these parts were ruled unconstitutional. Article 288 – Technical error with legal consequences
Article 288 was declared unconstitutional because it referred to the wrong legal article. It pointed to Article 284, which deals with who is responsible for keys to sealed doors, instead of Article 285, which explains the proper procedures to follow when a will or other documents are found sealed. This mistake made the law unclear and confusing, violating the constitutional requirement that laws must be clear and understandable. Article 339 – Silent rulings are not acceptable
The Court invalidated Article 339, which would allow judges to issue decisions without providing written reasoning in certain cases. The Court firmly stated that all judicial decisions must include a legal explanation, as required by the Constitution, to allow for transparency and possible appeal. Articles 408 and 410 – Ministerial overreach on case transfers
One of the most strongly worded rejections concerned Articles 408 and 410, which give the Minister of Justice the power to transfer cases between different courts or regions. The Court said this violates the principle of judicial independence and could be used to pressure judges or manipulate outcomes.
The Court stressed that case management decisions must remain in the hands of the judiciary, not the executive branch, which includes the government and the Minister of Justice. Only judicial authorities, like the Prosecutor General at the Court of Cassation, have the right to oversee the proper conduct of trials and request such referrals.
Giving this power to the Minister of Justice, a member of the executive, violates the independence of the judiciary and goes against constitutional principles. Articles 624 and 628 – Digital justice must remain judicial
Finally, the Court struck down Articles 624 and 628, which would have given the Justice Ministry control over the digital infrastructure used by courts and the authority to assign judges to use it. The Court ruled that these responsibilities belong to the Higher Council of the Judiciary (CSMJ), not the Ministry.
While the constitution allows cooperation between branches of government, judicial work must remain fully independent, the court says.
'The mere 'coordination' with the mentioned governmental authority (the ministry of justice) regarding it is considered a violation of the principle of separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary, as established by Articles 1 and 107 of the Constitution,' says the court. Tags: civil procedureouahbipolitics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
a day ago
- Morocco World
Activist Ibtissame Lachgar Arrested Over Blasphemous T-Shirt
Morocco's judicial police reportedly arrested activist Ibtissame Lachgar after a photo of her wearing a T-shirt with words blasphemous to God spread online. Lachgar appeared posing in a photo that reads: Allah is a lesbian.' Lachgar, a controversial feminist and activist, appeared in a photo wearing a shirt that read:' Allah is a lesb***.' The photo sparked uproar in Morocco and beyond, with many calling for a thorough investigation and her immediate arrest. Converging reports said that judicial police quickly responded to online reports, stating that all necessary legal measures would be applied. Former Minister of Justice Mustapha Ramid was among the Moroccans who reacted to the controversial and heinous act. In a post on Facebook, Ramid said that he is not in favor of 'excessive censorship.' While he is not in favor of over-monitoring speech, Ramid recalled that there should be zero tolerance for insults and offensive remarks toward a religion. He added that Morocco has laws and institutions to protect its sacred values. 'I recall the provisions of Article 267.5 of the Penal Code, which protects the unifying constants enshrined in Article 1 of the Constitution,' he said. The law punishes anyone involved in offending Islam with a prison sentence of between six months and two years in prison as well as a fine.
Ya Biladi
2 days ago
- Ya Biladi
Moroccans abroad still waiting for a voice in Parliament, over a decade after 2011 Constitution
This August, Interior Minister Abdelouafi Laftit began consultations with political parties ahead of the 2026 legislative elections, following royal directives from the Throne Speech on July 29. In his address, King Mohammed VI stressed the need to hold elections on their constitutional date and to adopt a specific Electoral Code for the House of Representatives before the end of the year. Yet, among parties represented in Parliament, the issue of political participation for Moroccans living abroad (MRE) rarely makes it onto the agenda. Even before these consultations began, Laftit reminded the House of Councillors that Moroccans abroad enjoy the same rights as citizens living in the country. As he had in 2024, he underlined that the current electoral system gives MREs «the right to register on the general electoral rolls, as well as the right to vote and run for all elections held on national soil». He added that legislators had «expanded the possibilities for registration on the general electoral lists», including direct voting in Moroccan polling stations or voting by proxy from their country of residence. To boost MRE representation in the House of Representatives in 2021, political parties were required to place a candidate residing abroad at the top of at least one regional list, or risk losing public funding. The minister reiterated that the government remains «open to any constructive proposal aimed at strengthening the electoral participation of MRE, in compliance with the framework established by the Constitution». However, members of Moroccan civil society abroad say the issue remains unresolved. Salem Fkire, founding president of the Cap Sud MRE association, told Yabiladi that the project has stalled despite repeated appeals to political parties. Following the adoption of the 2011 Constitution, the NGO signed agreements with four major parties, the PPS, the PJD, the PAM, and Istiqlal, two from the governing majority and two from the opposition. A decade later, in March 2021, a bill tabled by Istiqlal for the direct political participation of MREs was rejected in Parliament, just months before the September 8 elections that year. Proposals left unanswered Cap Sud MRE's main proposal, agreed upon with the signatory parties, sought to implement Articles 16, 17, 18, and 163 of the Constitution. It called for creating a dedicated MRE college within the House of Councillors, or establishing a new constituency represented across five continents, with seats proportional to the number of MREs in each region. During the 2021 elections and up until 2025, neither option has been implemented or placed on the public debate agenda. «It would be a shame if the issue of electoral participation and the creation of constituencies became a bargaining chip in political negotiations, which would explain these years of rejection», said Fkire. «Beyond the political stakes our participation represents, it is also an essential issue for maintaining ties between the third and fourth generations and the mother nation». According to Fkire, «the question today is whether political parties in Parliament, as well as the government, will allow the creation of constituencies abroad, just as Senegal, France, and Italy do for their citizens, proportionally to the size of the community abroad». Cap Sud MRE maintains that «the representativeness of constituencies for Moroccans abroad is a legislative and political mechanism best suited to addressing our issues as MREs, especially since His Majesty has given his directives for full and complete participation». «It's not about making this change at the expense of local representation in national constituencies, but rather about adding around 15% more parliamentary seats to allow Moroccans worldwide to sit alongside other elected officials, participate in parliamentary committees, and join constitutional institutions», he added. Calls for political will Frustration is also mounting among those who have participated in politics in their countries of residence but remain excluded in Morocco. Former socialist deputy in the Catalan Parliament (PCS) and the Spanish Congress (PSOE), Mohamed Chaïb Akhdim, the first Moroccan-origin MP in Spain — is now president of the Ibn Battuta Foundation in Barcelona. «The question of political participation of MRE and their representation through elections must be addressed to the government. We need to know what the head of the executive, the ministers, but also other political parties and elected officials think», Chaïb told Yabiladi. «Having chaired the citizenship and political participation commission at the Council of the Moroccan Community Abroad (CCME), I remember the numerous documents we produced on MRE participation in elections and their access to institutions. It remains to be seen whether the government truly wants MRE to actively participate in the electoral process or not». Chaïb questioned what has been done with these documents, stressing the need to align with the King's directives. He also expressed «incomprehension about the motivations behind spreading the idea, especially as each election approaches, that Morocco is not yet ready for the participation of its citizens abroad». In his view, «the best mechanism of representation for MRE would be to hold elections through the consulates, as other countries do in consular constituencies abroad, including Spain». This, he argued, would ensure that many of the issues facing Moroccans abroad are better represented and addressed. «It's an interesting option to consider, provided there is genuine political will to involve citizens worldwide in the process, whether in government, the majority, or the opposition». «Our various Moroccan consulates abroad are very well placed to ensure the smooth running of such operations. The logistical resources are available, and our human resources in these representations are among the most qualified to ensure this mobilization», he added. For Chaïb, creating constituencies for Moroccans abroad would be «a powerful tool for raising political awareness about issues related to their country of origin, starting with the national cause, which deserves to be championed by a significant political force through elected representatives and institutions». From constitutional principle to legal action University professor and migration researcher Abdelkrim Belguendouz argues that since the 2011 Constitution, the political participation of MREs through electoral representation «remains entirely open». «When it is proposed that to run for office, one must apply in a constituency on national territory, this formula does not take into account the specificity of Moroccans worldwide», he told Yabiladi. «The constitutional principle lays foundations whose details must be defined in organic laws and framework laws, which have yet to address the subject», he said. «Voting by proxy has proven its limits in effectively including MREs in electoral processes. Reports from the National Human Rights Council (CNDH) show that recourse to this option remains extremely minimal». «The royal speech of August 20, 2022, provided guidance in favor of including MREs in political life; it remains to be seen whether legislation has since taken their specificities into account», Belguendouz added. «Not only has the government not responded to this royal appeal, but it also took until the speech of November 6, 2024, for the orientation to be reaffirmed. Even now, it still finds no echo among politicians and the relevant actors». «With the latest Throne Day speech, we can only welcome the start of consultations with political parties for election preparations. This time, the arguments of anti-participation advocates, citing time constraints, logistical hurdles, and human resources, to postpone the MRE question are no longer acceptable», he concluded, stressing that the ball is now in the political parties' court.
Ya Biladi
2 days ago
- Ya Biladi
Moroccans abroad still waiting for a voice in Parliament, over a decade after 2011 Constitution
This August, Interior Minister Abdelouafi Laftit began consultations with political parties ahead of the 2026 legislative elections, following royal directives from the Throne Speech on July 29. In his address, King Mohammed VI stressed the need to hold elections on their constitutional date and to adopt a specific Electoral Code for the House of Representatives before the end of the year. Yet, among parties represented in Parliament, the issue of political participation for Moroccans living abroad (MRE) rarely makes it onto the agenda. Even before these consultations began, Laftit reminded the House of Councillors that Moroccans abroad enjoy the same rights as citizens living in the country. As he had in 2024, he underlined that the current electoral system gives MREs «the right to register on the general electoral rolls, as well as the right to vote and run for all elections held on national soil». He added that legislators had «expanded the possibilities for registration on the general electoral lists», including direct voting in Moroccan polling stations or voting by proxy from their country of residence. To boost MRE representation in the House of Representatives in 2021, political parties were required to place a candidate residing abroad at the top of at least one regional list, or risk losing public funding. The minister reiterated that the government remains «open to any constructive proposal aimed at strengthening the electoral participation of MRE, in compliance with the framework established by the Constitution». However, members of Moroccan civil society abroad say the issue remains unresolved. Salem Fkire, founding president of the Cap Sud MRE association, told Yabiladi that the project has stalled despite repeated appeals to political parties. Following the adoption of the 2011 Constitution, the NGO signed agreements with four major parties, the PPS, the PJD, the PAM, and Istiqlal, two from the governing majority and two from the opposition. A decade later, in March 2021, a bill tabled by Istiqlal for the direct political participation of MREs was rejected in Parliament, just months before the September 8 elections that year. Proposals left unanswered Cap Sud MRE's main proposal, agreed upon with the signatory parties, sought to implement Articles 16, 17, 18, and 163 of the Constitution. It called for creating a dedicated MRE college within the House of Councillors, or establishing a new constituency represented across five continents, with seats proportional to the number of MREs in each region. During the 2021 elections and up until 2025, neither option has been implemented or placed on the public debate agenda. «It would be a shame if the issue of electoral participation and the creation of constituencies became a bargaining chip in political negotiations, which would explain these years of rejection», said Fkire. «Beyond the political stakes our participation represents, it is also an essential issue for maintaining ties between the third and fourth generations and the mother nation». According to Fkire, «the question today is whether political parties in Parliament, as well as the government, will allow the creation of constituencies abroad, just as Senegal, France, and Italy do for their citizens, proportionally to the size of the community abroad». Cap Sud MRE maintains that «the representativeness of constituencies for Moroccans abroad is a legislative and political mechanism best suited to addressing our issues as MREs, especially since His Majesty has given his directives for full and complete participation». «It's not about making this change at the expense of local representation in national constituencies, but rather about adding around 15% more parliamentary seats to allow Moroccans worldwide to sit alongside other elected officials, participate in parliamentary committees, and join constitutional institutions», he added. Calls for political will Frustration is also mounting among those who have participated in politics in their countries of residence but remain excluded in Morocco. Former socialist deputy in the Catalan Parliament (PCS) and the Spanish Congress (PSOE), Mohamed Chaïb Akhdim, the first Moroccan-origin MP in Spain — is now president of the Ibn Battuta Foundation in Barcelona. «The question of political participation of MRE and their representation through elections must be addressed to the government. We need to know what the head of the executive, the ministers, but also other political parties and elected officials think», Chaïb told Yabiladi. «Having chaired the citizenship and political participation commission at the Council of the Moroccan Community Abroad (CCME), I remember the numerous documents we produced on MRE participation in elections and their access to institutions. It remains to be seen whether the government truly wants MRE to actively participate in the electoral process or not». Chaïb questioned what has been done with these documents, stressing the need to align with the King's directives. He also expressed «incomprehension about the motivations behind spreading the idea, especially as each election approaches, that Morocco is not yet ready for the participation of its citizens abroad». In his view, «the best mechanism of representation for MRE would be to hold elections through the consulates, as other countries do in consular constituencies abroad, including Spain». This, he argued, would ensure that many of the issues facing Moroccans abroad are better represented and addressed. «It's an interesting option to consider, provided there is genuine political will to involve citizens worldwide in the process, whether in government, the majority, or the opposition». «Our various Moroccan consulates abroad are very well placed to ensure the smooth running of such operations. The logistical resources are available, and our human resources in these representations are among the most qualified to ensure this mobilization», he added. For Chaïb, creating constituencies for Moroccans abroad would be «a powerful tool for raising political awareness about issues related to their country of origin, starting with the national cause, which deserves to be championed by a significant political force through elected representatives and institutions». From constitutional principle to legal action University professor and migration researcher Abdelkrim Belguendouz argues that since the 2011 Constitution, the political participation of MREs through electoral representation «remains entirely open». «When it is proposed that to run for office, one must apply in a constituency on national territory, this formula does not take into account the specificity of Moroccans worldwide», he told Yabiladi. «The constitutional principle lays foundations whose details must be defined in organic laws and framework laws, which have yet to address the subject», he said. «Voting by proxy has proven its limits in effectively including MREs in electoral processes. Reports from the National Human Rights Council (CNDH) show that recourse to this option remains extremely minimal». «The royal speech of August 20, 2022, provided guidance in favor of including MREs in political life; it remains to be seen whether legislation has since taken their specificities into account», Belguendouz added. «Not only has the government not responded to this royal appeal, but it also took until the speech of November 6, 2024, for the orientation to be reaffirmed. Even now, it still finds no echo among politicians and the relevant actors». «With the latest Throne Day speech, we can only welcome the start of consultations with political parties for election preparations. This time, the arguments of anti-participation advocates, citing time constraints, logistical hurdles, and human resources, to postpone the MRE question are no longer acceptable», he concluded, stressing that the ball is now in the political parties' court.
