Mandatory Biometric Update of Aadhaar to be launched in Telangana Inter Colleges
Officials from DoP and UIDAI met Board of Intermediate Education Secretary Krishna Aditya on Tuesday (July 15, 2025) and confirmed that they would conduct special camps to complete this exercise.
According to DoP, the Mandatory Biometric Update (MBU) ofAadhaar is a critical requirement for students to ensure accuracy in their biometric data in the age group of 15-17 years. It is done free of charge.
As Aadhaar is a mandatory document for applying to major national-level entrance examinations, the update prevents issues related to authentication and ensures seamless digital verification during application and admission processes, it reasoned.
The DoP further said that Telangana circle through its network of trained Aadhaar operators and available Aadhaar kits is fully prepared to conduct these enrolments and the camps for updation in a phased manner in coordination with the respective colleges. The field units are being mobilised to ensure maximum coverage before the commencement of application timelines for national-level exams.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: Unexpected notes in India, Gaza, and global affairs
There's a moment of betrayal we've all known: biting into what you thought was a tender chunk of biryani, only to find the sharp, soapy sting of elaichi. It throws you off and then lingers, long after the meal. But sometimes, in hindsight, that odd cardamom shock adds complexity. It makes the whole thing more memorable. Today's writeups are much the same: unexpected, textured, and full of moments that stick, even if they weren't what we signed up for. Let's dive in. Take inflation. At first glance, June's 2.1 per cent reading seems like a win, a bite of soft, fragrant rice. The RBI's Monetary Policy Committee followed through with a 50-basis-point rate cut. But dig deeper, and you find something sharper: a new RBI study shows that what really shapes India's inflation story is not food prices, but household expectations, especially among the over-45s. Flexible inflation targeting may have anchored some of that sentiment, but clumsy moves like export bans could undo the gains, notes our first editorial. Across the globe, diplomacy is wrestling with a different kind of aftertaste. Ahead of the UN General Assembly, countries like France, the UK, and Canada have offered conditional recognition to Palestine, a symbolic but striking move that leaves the US isolated in its stance on Israel. With growing civilian deaths in Gaza, even Germany has begun recalibrating. But until Washington alters its course, the road to a real two-state solution remains as elusive as biting into biryani and finding only rice, highlights our second editorial. On the trade front, India just got its elaichi moment from the US, a surprise 25 per cent tariff on key exports. This puts India at a disadvantage to regional peers. But Sonal Varma writes that New Delhi is playing the long game: no hasty deals, a watchful eye on GDP, and a policy mix aimed at strategic patience. Still, SMEs in sectors like textiles and gems might not have the luxury of waiting. Meanwhile, our prized digital infrastructure — Aadhaar, UPI, Jan Dhan — is also chewing on its own bitter spice. RS Sharma notes that convenience fees and outdated GST norms are turning digital payments into a more expensive option than cash. If the government doesn't realign incentives, the DPI story might end up as one of India's more undercooked dishes. And if you're in search of a more pleasant surprise, Devangshu Datta reviews Blueprints: How Mathematics Shapes Creativity by Marcus du Sautoy — a book that reveals how mathematics quietly shapes art, music, architecture, and literature. Think of it as finding the elaichi and realising it was the best part all along. Stay tuned!
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
No ‘suspicious voters' category under law, EC tells Rajya Sabha
Amid the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, the Election Commission of India (ECI) on Thursday informed the Rajya Sabha, through the law ministry, that there is no separate category of 'suspicious voters' under the Representation of People Act, 1951. No 'suspicious voters' category under law, EC tells Rajya Sabha In a written response to a query raised by Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman on whether electors classified as 'suspicious' had cast votes in the 2024 general elections, the Union minister of state for law and justice Arjun Ram Meghawal said, 'The Election Commission of India (ECI) has informed that there is no category of suspicious voters as per the Representation of People Act, 1951.' The poll body's clarification comes amid concerns raised over the SIR exercise in Bihar, which started on June 24. ECI had cited the inclusion of 'foreign illegal immigrants' in the electoral rolls as one of the reasons for conducting the revision, alongside other factors like rapid urbanisation and migration. ECI also pointed out that during the revision process, illegal immigrants from countries such as Nepal, Myanmar, and Bangladesh had been identified. In a separate response to a question by RJD MP Manoj Kumar Jha who inquired about the status of Aadhaar-Voter ID linkage and related discrepancies, Meghwal confirmed that the linking process has not yet commenced. He said, 'The Election Commission vide its instruction dated 4th July, 2022, has launched the programme to collect the Aadhaar number of existing and prospective electors on a voluntary basis from 1st August, 2022, in all States and Union territories. The linking of Aadhaar with Election Photo Identity Card has not yet started.' Further clarifying the legal position, Meghwal stated that the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021, allows Electoral Registration Officers (ELOs) to request voters to voluntarily provide their Aadhaar numbers for linking with their voter ID cards. He added that the linkage process is still pending. Due to the delay in the Aadhaar-Voter ID linkage, the poll body mentioned that Jha's other questions regarding the number of voters whose Aadhaar details were mismatched or who were removed from the voter list did not arise.
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
Nudges from the Court, silence from the commission
The Supreme Court of India speaks in questions. Sometimes softly, sometimes sharply. In its hearings on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) conducted by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in Bihar, the Court has asked what many in the country were thinking: Why was there a sudden need for fresh documentation? Why now? And what happens to the millions who cannot comply? Yet, the Court got a response from the ECI that did not address the underlying concern. The ECI insists that this is a technical revision. But the reality on the ground, and the implications of its policy, tell a very different story. The SIR in Bihar requires every voter to submit new proof of citizenship — within one month — or face removal from the voter list. The stated intent is accuracy. But the effect is exclusion. This is not administrative housekeeping. It is an ideological shift in the treatment of citizens: from presumed inclusion to presumptive exclusion. This shift marks a deep departure from the constitutional vision of universal adult franchise. Also Read | Mass inclusion, and not exclusion, should be the goal of the Bihar SIR, says Supreme Court Turning away from constitutional promises When India became a republic, it did something radical: it gave the vote to all adults, regardless of literacy, income, caste or gender. The Constituent Assembly debated this extensively. Many Members doubted whether the country was ready. But Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, among others, insisted that political equality must come first as a prelude to achieving social and economic equality. That principle was translated into practice by the first Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), Sukumar Sen (March 21, 1950-December 18, 1958). Faced with 173 million potential voters, most of them illiterate, he innovated. He introduced voting symbols and designed processes that made participation easy, not difficult. India's first elections were not perfect, but they were inclusive. In contrast, the revision in Bihar by India's 26th CEC, Gyanesh Kumar, is the opposite. By demanding rare documents such as birth certificates and passports — held by only a small fraction of the population, the ECI is setting a bar that millions cannot meet. Aadhaar cards and ration cards, widely held by the poor, are not accepted. In Bihar, over 65 lakh people may now be at risk of disenfranchisement. This is not an isolated event. We saw a similar exercise in Assam. The classification of lungi-wearing, Bengali-speaking Muslim inhabitants as 'D-voters' (doubtful voters) by the officers of the Election Commission, turned thousands into stateless persons. Many found themselves pleading before foreigners' tribunals, facing hostile bureaucracies and with no real opportunity to prove citizenship. With tribunals declaring them as foreigners and with no country ready to accept them, many have been just forcibly thrown away across India's borders, as unwanted human detritus. Bihar is at risk of repeating that mistake. The State is poor, flood-prone, and infrastructurally weak. A rigid document deadline during the monsoon season is not just poor planning. It is a barrier, intentionally or otherwise, for the poor and the marginalised to access the ballot box . The burden of proof has now shifted. Citizens must prove that they belong, rather than the state proving they do not. This reversal may seem technical, but its moral and democratic cost is immense. Also Read | In Bihar SIR challenge, Supreme Court refers to 1977 verdict on Election Commission's powers Historical lessons and warnings There are disturbing echoes here of the Jim Crow era in the United States (late 19th century to the mid-20th century), where African-American voters were disenfranchised through literacy tests, poll taxes and administrative obstructions. The veneer was legal; the purpose was political. It took federal intervention and landmark rulings such as Reynolds vs Sims (1964) and the Voting Rights Act 1965 to restore the right to vote as a true universal right. India has similar legal protections. Supreme Court rulings such as Md. Rahim Ali vs State of Assam (2024) and Lal Babu Hussein vs Electoral Registration Officer (1995) have made it clear: disenfranchisement without due process is unconstitutional. Citizenship cannot be revoked or denied arbitrarily. Yet, here we are again — requiring the most vulnerable to navigate a process stacked against them. The Court, during its hearing, asked pointed questions about the humanitarian consequences of the ECI's actions. But the ECI's response has been administrative, not empathetic. It continues to insist on timelines and technicalities, without addressing the social reality. The ECI's constitutional mandate is not merely to maintain clean lists. It is to ensure free and fair elections. This means enabling the right to vote — not erecting barriers to it. In this, the ECI is failing. And the Court, while alert, must decide whether it will continue nudging it or start directing it. A soft caution is not enough when millions face disenfranchisement. If this continues unchecked, we are entering dangerous territory. Voting could become a privilege of the documented middle class — urban, salaried, tech-savvy — while the poor, the displaced, and the undocumented are left behind. We risk creating two Indias: one with voting rights and one without. Political parties will then cater only to those who count — literally. Those without votes will be ignored in policymaking, welfare and justice. We are not just talking about voter lists here. We are talking about power — Who gets it. Who keeps it. And who is kept out of it. Also Read | The need to safeguard the right to vote A quiet Emergency There is no need for tanks on the street to declare an emergency. A quiet one is already here. It arrives through missing names, unmet deadlines and unanswered questions. It arrives when state machinery treats citizenship as a favour, not a right. This moment calls for resistance — not just from the Court, but from citizens, civil society and Parliament. We must reclaim the principle that the right to vote belongs to the people, not the paperwork. Sadak, samaj and Supreme Court must loudly proclaim that Mother India belongs to all her children and that she does not discriminate on a religious or economic basis when her protection is sought. As historian Ornit Shani reminds us in the book, How India Became Democratic, universal franchise was not an administrative accident, it was an imaginative leap. Bureaucrats and citizens together transformed a colonial mindset into a democratic one. That achievement must not be undone in the name of vigilance. The ECI must remember that elections are not entrance examinations. They are acts of belonging. And in a democracy, you do not have to prove you belong. You vote because you are a citizen. And you are a citizen because the Constitution says so, not because you can find your birth certificate. The vote is not a mere document. It is a declaration: that we are all equal. That one man has one vote and one vote has one value. That even if I have one vote out of 1.4 billion votes, it is an equal share in the republic, in which I and every Indian are equal participants. That right of ownership and participation is what is now at stake. Sanjay Hegde is a Senior Advocate designated by the Supreme Court of India
