‘I'm really starting to dislike my husband... I am exasperated and I dread spending time with him'
I'm really starting to dislike my husband. We are nearly a decade married and have small children. We have always got on so well – similar sense of humour, seeing the lighter side of life, and our values used to align in terms of raising our children.
I know he's very unhappy in his job and I have been encouraging him to leave, but he presents with an attitude of, 'why should I'. He has become so negative that I am completely drained. He's bitter and resentful. What is really troubling me and causing me to dislike him is that he has become extremely interested in and angry about immigration/emigration issues. He is constantly sending me videos from dubious sites with the most negative accounts of asylum seekers, many of which I'm sure are fake. He is subscribing to all sorts of conspiracy theories around matters not being reported in the media and the dangers of people seeking international protection.
He also is harbouring all this stuff about male roles and that I emasculated him by not taking a married name. This has never come up before now. We travelled extensively in our 20s, we lived and worked abroad (sometimes illegally). We weren't fleeing war, we were travelling and improving economic circumstances. He has always loved meeting people of different cultures and travelling.
I don't agree with his new views on matters, I feel quite strongly about helping others when they need it and being compassionate. He used to feel the same. I know this is a massive topic at present, I just don't want this topic in my home where I raise my kids. I used to debate with him on this and I've given up because I was becoming upset. I have asked him not to bring up his views with me or the children and he has kept to this with the exception of online and when we have company. He enjoys nothing more than sparking a debate when friends and family are over. It is mortifying. A number of my friends have stopped visiting because they find the debates awkward. I should be ashamed to admit, but I'm not that I have blocked my husband off all of my social media because he kept tagging me in ridiculously fake discriminatory tripe.
READ MORE
I am exasperated and I dread spending time with him. I married a gorgeous, funny, kind, adventurous man and over the past two years he has developed into something else. I love him so much and keep drumming into myself that he's not himself and [is] feeling resentful because he's unhappy at work. I'm exhausted, I don't want my children exposed to such views and, honestly, I'm ready to walk out.
How do I get through to him? I can live with agreeing to disagree, I can't cope with the goading and, to be frank, I find his online presence an embarrassment.
Where is my lovely man gone?
Answer
Your husband is unhappy at work and perhaps his confidence and self worth has suffered as a result. He seems to be finding support and meaning in groups that are blaming others for all the ills of the world and this points to his need for validation and purpose.
We all need this and perhaps he feels very let down by what he believed would provide structure in his life, namely his career. However, it is very hard to live with someone who has very opposite views to you on fundamental issues and two years is a long time for patterns and habits to form and become solid.
Can you ask him to come to couple counselling with you?
He probably agrees with you that your relationship needs attention and you could offer him the option of choosing the therapist you might see (only chose from accredited sites such as the
Irish Council for Psychotherapy
, the
Psychological Society of Ireland
or the
Irish Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy
). He may refuse and, if so, you know that your relationship is in serious trouble.
[
'My sister-in-law will never organise or contribute to family events, she won't offer to help in any way'
Opens in new window
]
Your resentment will fuel his protective mechanisms, which at the moment are to identify even more with reactive groups and this will create an even bigger rift in your relationship. Seeking support from your wider system is another option to consider. Could you speak to his family or old friendship group and see if there is anyone he might have respect for and listen to? You may also be able to appeal to his parenting role, ask him how his parents influenced him and which parts he wants to implement in his own parenting. If you are taking this route (of talking), you will need to take all the accusation and bewilderment out of your voice, so that he is not triggered into defensiveness. This is extremely hard to do so you might need your own support system (individual counselling, friends, relatives) to back you up in this endeavour.
You have a long history of connection, love and adventure in this relationship and you might invoke these memories as a stable backdrop to your future together. You might talk about how to source career advice for your husband to see a bigger picture in terms of his career, and this might shift the focus of his attention. If he sees you are genuine in your interest in, and your support for, his future he may be more open to hearing what your concerns are.
However, there may also come a time when nothing can be salvaged and you need to separate. If it comes to this, try to use a mediation service to help you through what is a very difficult process (see
Citizens Information
for more on these services).
To send your question to Trish Murphy, fill in the form below, click
here
or email
tellmeaboutit@irishtimes.com
.form-group {width:100% !important;}
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
39 minutes ago
- Irish Times
We cannot police the streets if online material is not regulated
Vicious attacks on members of the Indian community recently were jolting. When I was growing up in the 1970s there was no racism here, or so it seemed. There was, apparently, no racism because there were almost no foreigners. Apart from family who came home from England, it was just us, and everyone else was the same as us. Except, on second thoughts, there was more to it. When I think harder, I remember anti-English feeling as a child. We didn't use the word British much. But it was popular to be anti-English. Violence played out on black and white televisions every night from Northern Ireland and that had an underlay of racism. But because it was for and against a united Ireland, it was insisted that the hate was not racial. Odd, given Cromwell had clear views to the contrary. But if Northern Ireland was obvious, what was almost invisible were the very small number of people who did look different. The testimony of the late Christine Buckley and others of colour was of a cruel State. But in the way we were brilliant at segregating out what we did not want to mix with, that uncomfortable truth was unseen. Itinerants – we didn't use the word Traveller then – were in plain sight but ostracised. READ MORE [ President condemns 'despicable attacks' on Indian people Opens in new window ] In the 1980s, I first experienced a multicultural society in the United States. The talk in Irish pubs among the newly arrived often instantly picked up on the outright racism that characterised parts of Irish America. It was bad alchemy. Ireland started to change dramatically in the 1990s and by the early noughties, in what was still an analogue culture, there was feverish talk of a 'them' who were getting everything from free prams to free houses while claiming asylum here. The Citizenship Referendum in 2004 was the answer to that and it largely settled the issue for 20 years. In hindsight, that apparent lull was helped by the economic crash. Now things are at full tilt again economically, immigration is an economic necessity, and right-wing racism is on the rise. Racism in this State is old. What is new is the vile discourse online, and most of it comes from abroad, principally the United States and United Kingdom. We spent a century fantasising about being contaminated by foreign filth in the form of dirty books. Now the reality arrives via algorithms on an extraordinary scale. [ Social media algorithms boosting videos of attacks on asylum seekers, says campaign group Opens in new window ] People correctly look to Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan and gardaí to act in relation to the recent attacks, and they should. It is Minister for Communications Patrick O'Donovan who is at the front line. The Ireland is Full protests are native but copycat the far right globally. Talking down to disaffected people caught up in the anger will serve no purpose. The electronic ether, acted out on protests, is socialising hate in working-class communities. Children and younger teenagers – mainly boys – are picking up hate in stereo on the ground and online. The number who act out these impulses is still small, but the consequences are potentially deadly and inflammatory. [ The Irish Times view on racist attacks: No place for hate on our streets Opens in new window ] Beyond the few who move on from verbal assault to actual violence, there is an ecosystem talking up untruth and legitimising hate. Casual abuse and the feeling of being unsafe are increasing for members of the Indian community, immigrants and Irish people who look different. We could kid ourselves about what sort of society we were in the 1970s, but not now. Schools have been remarkably successful hubs of racial integration, but are not a simple answer. The dilemma about occupying bored teenagers over the long summer holidays is perpetual. There is an open question about whether these attacks were coincidental or copycats. In any event, they were horrific and have blighted the lives of the victims. [ #WeAreIrish and proud, but the online racism is exhausting Opens in new window ] Today marks Independence Day in India and US president Donald Trump is meeting Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Their world, where there are no rules, reflects reality online. It is Trump's world and the base of his power. Global tech platforms are rapidly reversing online moderation in the name of free speech. The ether is a new frontier of dystopian untruth. Government or EU intervention to police it will provoke a US backlash. That presents a difficult challenge for Mr O'Donovan because we can't police the streets if we don't regulate online.
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Pope Leo targeted Maga money in early days as pontiff, says Mary McAleese
Pope Leo XIV has attempted to court Maga money from the US back into the Catholic Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of the political movement's thinking and actions, former president Mary McAleese has said. In a critical article reflecting on the new pontiff, Ms McAleese took issue with various aspects of his brief period in office , seizing on same-sex marriage and his attitude toward women in particular. Her views are set out in an article for the current UK Catholic Tablet magazine to mark the pope's first 100 days on Friday. Leo, she wrote, had followed the agenda of his predecessor Francis in support of migrants and the poor, although with reduced volume, 'as he tries to court Maga (Make United States Great Again) money back into the Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of Maga governmental thinking and acting'. READ MORE One of the main subjects considered by the cardinals before Leo's election was the parlous state of Vatican finances where, according to accounts for 2024, there was an €83 million shortfall, while its pension fund shortfall was estimated at €631 million. On May 16th last, in one of his first statements as pope, Leo affirmed Catholic teaching on marriage as founded on the 'stable union between a man and a woman,' and church teaching banning abortion. Ms McAleese said such 'uncompromising comments' could have been made by previous conservative popes Benedict, John Paul II, Paul VI or Pius XI. 'That they also appeal to the constituency of US Catholic voters who distrusted Francis and whose financial support Leo is trying to restore, is noteworthy,' she wrote. [ How a quiet American became pope Opens in new window ] She was also less than enthusiastic about the new pope's stance on women in the church, describing him as 'as bog-standard patriarchal, patronising and prone to tokenism'. Meanwhile, his views on Church teaching where LGBTIQ+ issues are concerned were anything but 'forward thinking,' she said. Noting that Leo recently appointed Rev Thomas Hennen as Bishop of Baker, Oregon in the US, she said the new bishop supported Courage International. [ Pope Leo XIV: what does he stand for? Opens in new window ] It 'advocates celibacy and caters for the spiritual needs of LGBTIQ+ Catholics within existing magisterial teaching which regards homosexuality as intrinsically disordered and homosexual acts as evil. This appointment and its accompanying spin is a worrying straw in the wind.' Overall, she felt the last 100 days showed that 'Leo is more Benedict than Francis though in fairness the latter's reputation as a reformer was well over-egged'. 'We appear at least to have pivoted dramatically from a careless pope to a cautious pope, from a sometimes narky showman to a genial shy man, from an impulsive pope to a measured pope, from a Latin American pope to an American pope.' The first American pope, Leo XIV's election on May 8th last took almost everyone by surprise, mainly due to his nationality. It tends to be Catholic Church tradition that conclaves rarely elect a pope from one of the world's major powers. Pope Leo XIV delivers his Angelus blessing from the window of his studio overlooking St. Peter's Square on August 10th. Photograph: Elisabetta Trevisan - Vatican Media via by Vatican Pool/ Getty Images As surprising was that he had been a member of the College of Cardinals, which elected him, for less than two years. He was on the Roman Curia, as prefect at the Dicastery for Bishops, for a little more than that, since January 2023. Following his election, unlike his predecessor, Pope Leo appeared on the balcony at St Peter's wearing the traditional papal stole and mozzetta. Since when he has decided to reside at the Vatican's Apostolic Palace, unlike Francis, and has already been to the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo twice, a place Francis never visited. Commenting on this, Ms McAleese said 'almost entirely gone from Pope Leo' papacy already are the early self-effacing elements of Francis' papacy which provoked much favourable comment about his perceived modesty'. She asked whether Leo will 'have the courage and faith to be an agent of change or are we already looking at another filibuster pope like Francis, just different in personality not outcome?'
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Spain starts sending hundreds of asylum-seeking children from Canary Islands to mainland
Spain has begun the process of relocating hundreds of asylum-seeking children who have been living on the Canary Islands to the mainland amid a wave of anti-immigrant sentiment led by the far right. Just over 1,000 children, mainly from Mali, have been at the centre of a legal wrangle between Madrid and the Canary Island government in recent months over who should be responsible for them. They are among the many Africans who have made the dangerous crossing by boat to the Canary Islands, which has become one of the main routes from Africa to Europe. In March, the Spanish supreme court ruled that the central government was accountable for their wellbeing. After a series of logistical delays, that order is finally being implemented. READ MORE 'Justice is being done for these unaccompanied boys, girls and teenagers and for [the Canary Islands], which have been exclusively burdened with all the weight of this humanitarian drama,' wrote Fernando Clavijo, president of the Canary Island government, on social media, in advance of the first transfer of children to the mainland. Ten children – nine Malians and one Senegalese – were due to leave the Canary Islands on Monday, although their exact destination was unclear. The central government plans to transfer groups of up to 40 per week in the future and find homes for them with local charity organisations. Mr Clavijo has been demanding greater support from the central government of socialist Pedro Sánchez and from the country's other 16 regional governments to manage the situation regarding unaccompanied minors and adult migrants. As well as the asylum seekers, there are another estimated 4,000 or so migrant children who have been living on the Canary Islands. [ Violent clashes break out between far-right groups and migrants in Spanish town Opens in new window ] More than 100 migrants - 17 of them minors - wait to disembark from a "cayuco" boat that arrived last September, 2024 in the Canary Islands. Photograph: Antonio Sempere/ AFP As minors, their legal status is more complex than that of adult arrivals and they cannot be repatriated. Total migrant arrivals by boat to the Canary Islands this year reached 11,575 as of July 31st. Although that number is almost 50 per cent lower than the equivalent last year, as the Balearic Islands becomes an increasingly common alternative destination for migrants. Mr Clavijo has warned that local services are struggling to manage. The process of transferring the remaining migrant children is also due to get under way in September, following congress approval earlier this year of a new mechanism to manage them. The tight vote, which saw conservatives and the far right oppose the procedure, reflected how immigration has been pushed to the centre of the Spanish political arena. The conservative People's Party (PP) recently closed down a migrant centre in Pozuelo, near Madrid, where 400 minors were due to be taken in. The minister for territorial policy, Ángel Víctor Torres, accused the PP of putting up 'obstacles to the taking in of minors, those who are black'. Last month, the far-right Vox party called for the deportation of millions of migrants 'who have not adapted to our customs'. The party's leader, Santiago Abascal, said unaccompanied migrant minors should be among the deportees. A broader debate about tolerance of cultures and religions has arisen more recently, after the PP – at the instigation of Vox – introduced in the southern town of Jumilla a norm preventing religious festivals from being celebrated in local sports halls. The move was seen as being aimed specifically at the town's Muslim community, which had been holding two annual events in a local sports venue. The PP's mayor of Jumilla, Seve González, said it was important to 'defend our identity and protect the [Catholic] values and religious expressions of our country'. The left-wing central government and the country's Catholic Church have criticised the initiative, with the latter describing it as 'a discrimination which cannot be allowed in democratic society'.
