Nightmare aboard Delta Boeing 757 after passenger's rechargeable battery burst into flames
The unidentified passenger's device caught fire while on Delta Flight 1334, a Boeing 757 traveling from Atlanta, Georgia, to Fort Lauderdale, Florida on Monday.
Crew was able to extinguish the fire and keep all 185 passengers and six crew members safe, but the pilots still made an emergency landing in Fort Myers 'out of an abundance of caution' due to the 'residual smoke' left behind.
'Flight attendants worked quickly to extinguish a probable burning personal battery belonging to a customer while pilots followed procedures to safely divert the flight,' Delta told Daily Mail in a statement.
'We appreciate the quick work and actions by our people to follow their training, and we apologize to our customers for the delay in their travels.'
The aircraft is being evaluated, and passengers are being rerouted to their destination.
Video from inside the cabin showed a load of firefighters come onboard to check everything out before the passengers were allowed to offload.
'We have to wait for the fire department to clear the plane,' passenger, D'Andra, said in a TikTok.
D'Andra said she was sleeping when the flames broke out, but was awoken by someone screaming: 'Fire! Fire! Fire!'
'I turn around it's pure smoke,' she said in a follow-up video. 'They had to use a fire extinguisher, it was a whole mess.'
It is unclear what caused the personal battery to catch fire.
Portable chargers contain lithium batteries and are allowed in passengers' carry-on luggage.
The devices can experience thermal runaway, when the battery overheats rapidly and can cause a fire or explosion.
Passengers are limited to two grams of lithium per battery and can have up to four devices with these batteries onboard.
'These incidents are on the rise, but the good news is they are largely preventable,' Jeff Marootian, a safety expert, told 11 Alive.
'Passengers should be aware of what they're packing, especially when it comes to lithium-ion battery-powered devices.'
Marootian advises fliers to make sure to follow directions and keep these batteries in carry-on bags only.
'It's critical to keep these devices within arm's reach. If a fire were to happen in checked luggage, the outcome could be very different.
'Thankfully, in today's situation, the flight crew knew how to respond, and a major catastrophe was averted.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
I ditched ‘miserable' UK for sunny Croatia – bills are 33% less & I rent a posh villa for same price as 2-bed back home
A MAN has quit the "miserable" UK for Croatia, and is on a mission to encourage others to do the same. Scott McClure, from Scotland, made the decision to up-sticks and relocate to the Balkans nation six months ago, and has no regrets about his decision. 2 He revealed that the sunny country is "so much safer" than Britain, claiming that the crime rate is "double" back home. "You feel way safer when walking home at night", he said, in a TikTok video, posted to his account @thecreatoroperator. "Whereas when you're in the UK, you don't know what could happen". The cost of living is another reason why Scott is head over heels for Croatia with his bills costing 33% less than they did in the UK. "You can rent villas like this for the same price as a two bedroom flat in the UK", he beamed, proudly showing off his posh pad. Of course, the baking heat was also a major factor in Scott's move, with the content creator stating that "you're guaranteed 30 degrees plus in the summer. "In the UK, it's miserable all year around." Another of Scott's qualms with his home country is that it is "run terribly." "And it's only going to get worst", he said. He added that people don't treat the country with respect, citing the example of people throwing litter out of their cars. I ditched the UK & bought a house for the same price as a summer holiday "You don't see this in Croatia!", he claimed. Scott's video has likely left many people intrigued as it has gone viral, racking up 30,000 views and hundreds of likes and comments. TikTok One person said: "Whoa! You had me at the villa rentals! How easy is it to move abroad? Brexit means British citizens now have to apply for visas to move to countries within the EU. While some countries residency restrictions are easier than others, here's what you need to do at home before moving: Notify HMRC about your upcoming move. Let your local authority know and provide a forwarding address. Contact your mortgage and utility providers and bank before leaving. If you have paid enough UK national insurance contributions, you can qualify for a state pension abroad - contact the International Pension Centre. You can sign up to the Royal Mail's redirection service. If you have outstanding student loans, contact the Student Loans Centre. If you have children, give due notice to childcares and schools. "Great breakdown. I arrive next week and I'm thinking of getting a Croatia digital nomad visa!" A second person said: "It's the best place to live!" "The authentic living culture is more attractive than the UK."
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
JetBlue flight to Orlando forced to make emergency landing in NYC after engine is ‘completely destroyed and torched out'
A JETBLUE passenger plane with more than 150 people on board was forced to make an emergency landing after experiencing engine issues. The plane, en-route to Orlando, was forced to divert to New York's Kennedy airport just an hour into the flight last Wednesday. 3 3 The jet had left Long Island MacArthur airport in Islip at around 1:45pm but moments after take-off, the captain warned that one of the Airbus A320's engines had gone. They then declared an emergency and requested to land. The plane circled around Long Island before touching down at JFK airport around an hour into the flight. A runway inspector on the ground at JFK said one of the plane's engines was 'completely destroyed,' as reported by Newsday. 'It looks like the entire surface got torched out,' they said. ' I can actually see right through the engine almost.' Around 167 people were on board the aircraft, according to officials. Passengers were evacuated once the aircraft was towed to a stand. No injuries were reported. The cause of the engine failure remains unknown at this time. Flight instructors have hailed the pilot for their response. American Airlines steals march on rivals with first non-stop flight to destination that has little-known Hollywood link "A very impressive outcome to land the aircraft safely, the absolute worst time for engine failure is right after takeoff because the aircraft is heavier with fuel and is full of passengers," Michael Canders told News12. Up to 180 passengers can fit on board the Airbus A320 aircraft and it can reach top cruising speeds of around 520mph. The mid-air scare comes just weeks after a United plane heading to Germany was forced to divert after experiencing engine troubles. The pilot was forced to declare a Mayday emergency after a problem with the left engine arose. The flight, which was carrying 219 passengers, was forced to land at Washington Dulles airport - just 30 minutes after it had taken off. Meanwhile in Montana, two small planes crashed into each other on an airfield, sparking a huge inferno. A single-engine plane with four people on board was trying to land at the Kalispell City airport but the pilot lost control. The aircraft then hit parked planes that were on the runway. The impact of the crash sparked an explosion, leaving locals stunned. "It sounded like if you were to stick your head in a bass drum and somebody smacked it as hard as they could," Ron Danielson, a local inn manager, told the Associated Press. Last month, three people were killed after a private plane crashed off the coast of California. A twin-engine Beech 95-B55 Baron aircraft disappeared from the radar just 20 minutes after leaving San Carlos airport, located near the San Francisco Bay. 3
Reuters
21 hours ago
- Reuters
Delta, United sued for selling windowless 'window seats'
NEW YORK, Aug 19 (Reuters) - Delta Air Lines (DAL.N), opens new tab and United Airlines (UAL.O), opens new tab were sued on Tuesday by passengers who claimed they paid extra money to sit in "window" seats, only to find themselves placed in seats next to a blank wall. Proposed class actions were filed against United in San Francisco federal court and against Delta in Brooklyn, New York federal court, seeking millions of dollars of damages for more than 1 million passengers at each carrier. The complaints say some Boeing 737, Boeing 757 and Airbus A321 planes contain seats that would normally contain windows, but lack them because of the placement of air conditioning ducts, electrical conduits or other components. Passengers said Delta and United do not flag these seats during the booking process, unlike rivals such as Alaska Airlines (ALK.N), opens new tab and American Airlines (AAL.O), opens new tab, even when charging tens or occasionally hundreds of dollars for them. The lawsuits say people buy window seats for several reasons including to address fear of flying or motion sickness, keep a child occupied, get extra light or watch the world go by. "Had plaintiffs and the class members known that the seats they were purchasing (were) windowless, they would not have selected them — much less have paid extra," the United complaint said. The Delta complaint contained similar language. Delta is based in Atlanta, and United in Chicago. Neither immediately responded to requests for comment. Ancillary revenue from seat selection, baggage fees, cabin upgrades, airport lounges and other services help carriers generate more cash when they fly while keeping base fares lower. The Delta lawsuit is led by Nicholas Meyer of Brooklyn, and the United lawsuit is led by Marc Brenman of San Francisco and Aviva Copaken of Los Angeles. Copaken said United refunded fees for her windowless seats on two flights, but not a third. Passengers can use websites such as SeatGuru to find pluses and minuses of specific seats, including those lacking windows. Carter Greenbaum, a lawyer whose firm filed the two lawsuits, said the ability to find information from third party websites doesn't excuse Delta's and United's conduct. "A company can't misrepresent the nature of the products it sells and then rely on third party reviews to say a customer should have known that it was lying," he said in an email. The cases are Meyer v Delta Air Lines Inc, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 25-04608; and Brenman et al v United Airlines Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of San Francisco, No. 25-06995.
