Trump's oil tariff plan: Big talk, big problems
Trump says he'll put a 100% tariff (which means doubling the price) on things those countries sell to the US if they keep buying from Russia. But he's giving them 50 days before the rule starts — which gives Russia time to keep doing what it's doing.
Why does this matter? Because countries like India now buy a lot of oil from Russia — about 40% of their oil. Before the war, it was just 1%! China gets 20% of its oil from Russia. If Trump really adds this tax, both countries might have to change their oil suppliers.
The idea behind Trump's plan is to hurt Russia's economy by hitting its biggest moneymaker — oil and gas. Russia earns more than half of its export money from selling fuel. In fact, since the war started, Russia has made almost $1 trillion from selling fossil fuels.
But here's the problem: if countries stop buying Russian oil, oil prices might shoot up. That could make life more expensive for everyone — including people in the US. Also, if the US charges more on products from India or China, things like clothes, electronics, and toys might cost more in American stores.
And here's where the plan feels unfair: the US is still buying nuclear fuel (called uranium) from Russia! Even when it said it would stop, it gave itself extra time and allowed some companies to keep buying it. And Europe is still buying Russian gas until 2027.
So while Trump and other leaders are telling countries like India to stop buying from Russia, they're not stopping completely themselves. That's why this whole thing looks more like politics than true action.
India should watch carefully and do what's best for itself — just like everyone else is doing.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Want higher pay? Don't change jobs
For years, America's job market has rewarded the footloose. The surest route to a higher salary, the usual advice goes, is to string together a series of one- or two-year stints, each paying a bit better than the last. Career gurus on TikTok set videos of their own salary progression to jaunty pop beats, cloaking online bragging as guidance for the uninitiated. On Reddit, posters debate just how little time in a role a job-hopper can get away with before future employers might start to fret about disloyalty. (A year or so is the consensus, though a brave few argue for six months.) Now things are changing. For the first time in 15 years, barring blips in 2012 and 2018, wage growth for 'job-stayers", those who have stuck with their employer, is running faster than for 'job-switchers", those who jumped ship, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (see chart 1). Thus, for America's office drones, hunkering down and impressing the boss may well be a better bet than polishing their CV or at last responding to those LinkedIn messages from head-hunters. The woes of job-hoppers are a particularly visible sign of a wider trend: the softening of America's once rock-solid labour market. Another sign is the rising unemployment rate for fresh university graduates, who are struggling to persuade anyone to take a punt on them. There have been plenty of weak patches in the jobs market over the past few years. Some firms, like the big consultancies, vastly over-hired during the post-pandemic boom, and have since spent years painfully paring back. Coders have complained about poor prospects for a while; first, high interest rates hurt tech-firm valuations, then new artificial-intelligence models turned out to be particularly adept at programming. But a broad jobs slowdown is a fresh development. Even as the stimulus-fuelled excesses of the post-pandemic years cooled, America's labour market remained impressively robust. For month after month, new payrolls data would show that hundreds of thousands of jobs were being added to the economy. Now that motor may be slowing. June's payroll numbers looked strong on the surface—some 147,000 jobs were added across the economy, beating expectations—but half of those were in government, mostly teaching. Private-sector employment, a better measure of the underlying state of the economy, was disappointingly weak. Unusually, over the past few years there have been more job openings than people on the unemployment rolls, an indication of red-hot demand for workers. However, this ratio of vacancies to unemployment, which economists watch closely as a measure of labour-market health, has recently fallen and is back to one, meaning there are about as many job openings as job-seekers (see chart 2). Surveys of bosses tell a similar story of cooling labour demand: the share of small-business owners who are planning to raise hiring or lift salaries is at its lowest since the pandemic (see chart 3). What does all this mean for America's would-be job-hoppers? Once labour markets start cracking, they have a habit of deteriorating further. The Federal Reserve may, in due course, come to the rescue by lowering interest rates—but only after it can be persuaded that tariffs will not set off another round of inflation. If ever there was a time to redecorate your office and invest in a comfier chair, now might be it. You could be there for a while.
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Toyota, Honda, Nissan, other auto stocks rally in Japanese stock market as Nikkei jumps 2%; Here's why
Shares of Japanese car manufacturers soared on Wednesday, with Toyota rising by 11 per cent and Honda climbing 9 per cent, following U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of a trade agreement with Japan that involves a 15% tariff. Meanwhile, other auto stocks like Nissan rose more than 7 per cent, and Mazda Motor saw a sharp jump of over 16 per cent. Mitsubishi Motors also climbed more than 12 per cent. South Korean automaker Hyundai's shares increased by over 5 per cent on the news, while Kia recorded a modest rise of 0.2 per cent. On the other hand, Japan's Nikkei 225 jumped 2.5 per cent to reach 40,731.86 as of 0121 GMT, driven by an 8.4 per cent surge in the Tokyo Stock Exchange's transport equipment index. NHK stated the new 15 per cent tariff rate would apply to Japanese vehicles, though it remains uncertain whether the lower rate will be extended to automakers from other countries. U.S. President Trump had earlier declared a 25 per cent tariff on all imported vehicles on March 26, which took effect on April 2. Auto exports to the U.S. are vital to Japan's economy, accounting for 28.3 per cent of total exports in 2024, as per customs data. On Tuesday, Trump announced on Truth Social that he had struck the 'largest Deal ever' with Japan, which includes 15 per cent 'reciprocal' tariffs on Japanese goods entering the U.S. Trump also stated that Japan has agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S., with America receiving '90 per cent of the Profits.' Additionally, he mentioned that Japan would open its market to more U.S. products, including cars, trucks, rice, and other agricultural items. (With inputs from agencies) Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
Columbia Punishes 80 Students Over Anti-Israel Protests
Columbia University said Tuesday it has issued various punishments, including expulsions and degree revocations, against various students involved in anti-Israel protests on campus. The sanctions, which a student group said targeted nearly 80 people, come as the New York institution negotiates with President Donald Trump's administration to restore $400 million in cut federal funding. Trump has applied intense pressure on the prestigious university and others, accusing them of failing to address alleged anti-Semitism amid nationwide protests last year against Israel's war in Gaza. Columbia, which was the epicenter of the campus protests, has agreed to implement a series of policy reforms in an attempt to regain the federal funding, sparking anger from many students. Fellow Ivy League institution Harvard has also been targeted with billions in funding cuts, but is fighting the pressure campaign in court. The latest sanctions by Columbia stem from a library sit-in this past May, as well as an encampment set up during alumni weekend in spring 2024, the university said in a statement. The library protest disrupted hundreds of students during an exam study period, it said, with punishments including "probation, suspensions (ranging from one year to three years), degree revocations, and expulsions." "The University does not release individual disciplinary results of any student," the statement said. It did not specify which punishments had been issued for the spring 2024 encampment, which occurred after larger protests -- including the occupation of an academic building -- but Columbia said it was "the final set of findings from that period." The student group Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), which calls for the school to cut all financial ties with Israel, said the library-related sanctions "hugely exceed precedent for teach-ins or non-Palestine-related building occupations." "We will not be deterred. We are committed to the struggle for Palestinian liberation," the group said.
