
The Hidden Hands Behind Cheap Chinese Goods
In 2012, a woman in Oregon opened a box of Halloween decorations from Kmart. Tucked inside was a scrap of paper, scrawled in broken English with a desperate plea: 'If you occasionally buy this product, please kindly resend this letter to the World Human Rights Organization.' It described long hours, beatings, a brutal Chinese labor camp. The writer, Sun Yi, an engineer and husband, had been jailed for practicing Falun Gong, a spiritual discipline outlawed by the Chinese Communist Party.
I told Sun Yi's story in my documentary '
Today, we are caught up in tariffs, trade wars, and supply chain fixes. It is all about inflation, market access, political leverage. But we are missing the heart of it. Behind those bargain-bin trinkets are lives. While Sun Yi found a way to speak out, most are trapped in factories behind walls, silenced by fear.
I do not mean to paint China with a broad brush. Not every item made in China is through
I am no economist. Whether tariffs are sound trade policies is for others to debate. But I know this: tariffs will not fix what is broken in those camps. They are about numbers. Markets do not feel the prisoner's pain. The threats. The silence. Justice is not a price adjustment.
Related Stories
2/22/2019
12/10/2018
The power is with us. Consumers, businesses, investors. We decide what is acceptable. When we ask where our stuff comes from, when companies demand clean supply chains, when investors value ethics alongside profit, things shift. That is not radical. It is responsible. It says values matter, even in a global economy.
Governments can help. The
It is tempting to think cheaper is always better. But what is the real cost? In that labor camp, Sun Yi knew the risks of his defiance. He believed in us. His letter sparked headlines. His story lives on. Now that we know, the question is not what the market will do. It is what we will do.
Policies will shift. Politics will change. But acting with conscience does not need to wait. It starts here. With us.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Howard Lutnick's ‘insulting' remarks about Nvidia's H20 chips irk China: report
Chinese officials are miffed over Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's 'insulting' remarks about Nvidia's H20 computer chip — and are now pressuring domestic firms not to buy it, according to a report Thursday. During a July 15 appearance on CNBC, Lutnick downplayed the Trump administration's decision to lift an additional set of export controls that would have barred sales of the H20 – a less-powerful version of Nvidia's chips that was made specifically to comply with US export controls on the sensitive technology. 'We don't sell them our best stuff, not our second-best stuff, not even our third-best,' Lutnick said at the time. Advertisement 3 Nvidia's H20 chip was made to comply with US export controls. AFP via Getty Images 'You want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack, that's the thinking,' he added. Shortly after Lutnick's CNBC appearance, Beijing began its regulatory crackdown, the Financial Times reported. Top Chinese officials viewed Lutnick's comments about the H20 chip as 'insulting,' two sources with knowledge of the crackdown told the FT in a story published Thursday. Advertisement Shares of Nvidia, led by CEO Jensen Huang, were down less than 1% in early trading on Thursday. Some Chinese tech firms have scaled back their H20 orders in response to the pressure from Beijing, the report added. 3 Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the US doesn't sell its best chips to China. REUTERS 'Lutnick's speech gives the coalition [of regulators] one more reason to intensify its efforts to push tech firms to use China's own chips,' one of the FT's sources said. Advertisement Agencies involved in the pressure campaign reportedly include the Cyberspace Administration of China, the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'As both governments recognize, the H20 is not a military product or for government infrastructure,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement. 'China won't rely on American chips for government operations, just like the U.S. government would not rely on chips from China. However, allowing U.S. chips for beneficial commercial business use is good for everyone.' The Commerce Department did not immediately return a request for comment. Advertisement 3 Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is pictured. AFP via Getty Images Nvidia's chips have become a hot commodity because they are considered the most advanced in the market — and are crucial for powering artificial intelligence models. Some critics fear that allowing sales of even the H20 chip to China will hurt the US's competitiveness in the AI race. The situation has unfolded during a period of ongoing trade discussions between the US and China, which have yielded some progress but have yet to result in a full-fledged agreement. In order to secure the necessary export licenses, Nvidia and fellow chipmaker AMD have agreed to pay the US government 15% of the revenue from their chip sales in China.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Russia and China Give Iran Nuclear Deal Boost
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia and China are siding with Iran against European threats to reinstate sanctions against Tehran under a United Nations Security Council resolution—a step the U.K., Germany and France have warned that they may take if nuclear talks fail before an upcoming deadline. Newsweek has reached out to the European Commission and the U.S. State Department for comment. Why It Matters The so-called "snapback" clause of U.N. Security Council resolution 2231 could once again place Iran under stringent sanctions for failing to comply with the nuclear enrichment levels dictated by the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the 2015 nuclear deal President Donald Trump quit in 2018. If China and Russia refuse to recognize the mechanism, or move to block its enforcement, the West's ability to compel Iran via diplomacy would be greatly undermined. The resulting lack of sanctions could further weakening Europe's leverage and influence, increase Tehran's dependence on Moscow and Beijing, and raise the possibility that the United States reaches for a military solution to the long-running disagreement—Iran has already signaled to America that it would consider illegitimate any attempt to reinstate sanctions through the snapback mechanism. This handout photo made available by the Iranian Army Office on March 12, 2025 shows navy vessels taking part in a joint Iranian-Russian-Chinese military drill in the Gulf of Oman. The navies of Iran, Russia... This handout photo made available by the Iranian Army Office on March 12, 2025 shows navy vessels taking part in a joint Iranian-Russian-Chinese military drill in the Gulf of Oman. The navies of Iran, Russia and China are holding military drills off the coast of Iran this week in a bid to boost cooperation, according to Iranian media. More Iranian Army Office / AFP/Getty Images What To Know Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's top envoy to the international organizations in Vienna, said the three European powers, sometimes known as the E3, were attempting to "blackmail" and "threaten" Iran into submission via their end of August deadline, according to a post on X. Moscow's opposition to the E3's sanctions option echoed that of China on Friday, when Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said the snapback mechanism "does not help parties build trust and bridge differences and is not conducive to the diplomatic effort for the early resumption of talks." The backing has given Iran further momentum to publicly push back against Western pressure ahead of the JCPOA agreement's expiration in mid-October. This week, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said he had met with Chinese and Russian diplomats on Tuesday to discuss "joint measures to counter the destructive approach" of the E3. After no progress was made at an Iran-E3 meeting in Istanbul in July, the three powers told the U.N. this month: "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution…or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism." Iranian officials have said the country's economy could withstand further sanctions if talks fall through. What People Are Saying Russian Permanent Representative to International Organizations in Vienna Mikhail Ulyanov said Wednesday on X: "In other words, an attempt by #E3 to trigger #SnapBack despite their own non-compliance would contradict the fundamental principles of international law." Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Tuesday on X: "All three countries believe that Resolution 2231 should be terminated at its designated time, and these countries legally have no right to trigger the snapback mechanism and are opposed to reinstating Security Council resolutions." Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said Friday at a regular press briefing: "Any moves taken by the Security Council now should help reach new agreements in talks, instead of the opposite." What Happens Next The E3 have set the end of August as the deadline to trigger the U.N.'s snapback mechanism if nuclear talks with Iran do not proceed positively.


Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
China is expanding into digital currencies, hoping to promote use of its ‘people's money'
BANGKOK — China has been expanding use of digital currencies as it promotes wider use of its yuan, or renminbi, to reflect its status as the world's second-largest economy and challenge the overwhelming sway of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance. However, restrictions on access to Chinese financial markets and limits on convertibility of the yuan, or 'people's money,' are big obstacles blocking its global use. Still, Hong Kong already has stablecoin regulations and some Chinese experts are pushing for regulations to prepare for a possible stablecoin pegged to the yuan. Officials at the People's Bank of China and State Council Information Office in Beijing did not immediately respond to requests for comment on a Reuters report that the State Council, or Cabinet, is preparing to issue a plan for internationalizing the yuan that might include a yuan stablecoin. In the U.S., President Donald Trump has made cryptofriendly policies a priority for his administration. He signed a law, the GENIUS Act, last month regulating stablecoins. Stablecoins are digital currencies whose value is linked to a specific currency such as the U.S. dollar. They can be used as a substitute in situations where currency transactions might be difficult or costly. They are different from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in that their only purpose is to be a means of payment, not an investment meant to be traded to gain value. Dollar stablecoins are typically bought and sold for $1 each. They are based on a reserve equal to their value, but are issued by private institutions, not central banks like the U.S. Federal Reserve. Stablecoins are not Digital Central Bank Currencies, which are digital versions of currencies issued by central banks. They are based on blockchain-based distributed ledgers. They are 'stable' in the sense that their value is anchored to the currency they are based on. Critics of stablecoins say that since they are essentially a proxy for ordinary currencies that can bypass banking systems and safeguards set up to manage traditional financial transactions they may be most useful for illegal purposes. China launched its own digital yuan, the e-CNY issued by its central bank, on a trial basis in 2019, and McDonalds was an early participant in that project. Chinese regulators have banned mining, trading and other dealings in private, decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin, while encouraging use of the digital yuan. The nearly universal use of electronic payments has facilitated use of the e-CNY in the Chinese mainland, with some cities using it to pay wages of civil servants. State media reported that as of July 2024, there were 7.3 trillion yuan worth of transactions using the currency in areas where it is being used on a trial basis. China has also been promoting use of e-CNY in Africa, as it expands business dealings on the continent. But e-CNY are not stablecoins. Experts say regulations are needed to safely manage use of stablecoins and to ensure they could be used smoothly with bank accounts and payment systems. Hong Kong, a former British colony that has its own financial markets, currency and partly autonomous legal system, enacted a stablecoin law that took effect on Aug. 1. Aimed at attracting wealthy investors who want to use digital currencies and other financial products, it requires that a stablecoin linked to the Hong Kong dollar must be equal to the Hong Kong dollar reserves for that digital currency. As a global duty-free port and financial hub, Hong Kong has often served as a base for trying out paths toward liberalizing Chinese financial markets. But new regulations specifically governing yuan stablecoin would be needed if such a digital currency were issued for use in Hong Kong, Liu Xiaochun, deputy director of the Shanghai Institute of New Finance, recently wrote in a report on the Chinese financial website China's currency is not freely convertible in world financial markets and its stringent controls on foreign exchange are the biggest hindrance toward making the yuan a global currency, experts say. According to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT, as of June, the yuan was the sixth most active currency for global payments by value, with a share of 2.88%. Its use peaked in July 2024 at about 4.7%. It's used more often in trade financing, where it accounts for nearly 6% of such dealings, according to that report. The lion's share of yuan transactions take place in Hong Kong. The U.S. dollar's share as a global payment currency was over 47% as of June, followed by the euro, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Japanese yen, the report said.