Bullock cart races to resume in Punjab as state assembly passes animal welfare bill
After the bill was unanimously passed, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann on Friday referred to the occasion as "historic," announcing the resumption of bullock cart races across the state.
The bill, which was passed during the second day of the special session of the Punjab Assembly here, allows the resumption of bullock cart races in Punjab while implementing safety measures for the animals involved in the sport.
Bullock cart races have not taken place at the Kila Raipur Sports Festival in Ludhiana district— often referred to as the 'mini or rural Olympics'— since a Supreme Court ruling in 2014 banned the races for violating the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1960.
"Considering the important role played by bullock cart racing towards promoting the spirit of games and sports, and enriching the cultural heritage and tradition in the state of Punjab, which is also a great source to keep Punjab's youth away from drug addiction and also to improve indigenous cattle breeds of Punjab, the government of Punjab has decided to exempt the conduct of bullock cart racing in Punjab from the provision of the said Central Act 59 of 1960," the official order read.
Therefore, the government has decided to amend the said Central Act 59 of 1960 in its application to the State of Punjab. Accordingly, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Bill, 2025, is being passed, it further stated.
Sharing positive aspects about the race, Mann said cattle have been integral parts of the agrarian economy of the state, and the Punjabi farmers have raised them as their offspring for ages.
Those who keep bullocks consider them as their "own sons", he said. "We have included a clause in the bill stating that bullock cart operators will not be allowed to carry sticks during races," he added.
The chief minister also announced that races would not only take place in Kila Raipur but also across the state, emphasising that these rural games are an essential part of Punjab's cultural fabric. He stressed that the bill aims to promote rural sports like bullock cart racing while ensuring the welfare of the animals involved.
Mann expressed confidence that the bill would aid in the conservation of Punjab's indigenous cattle breeds.
He also mentioned that the state government would flag the issue of tackling the menace of stray animals with the Centre, as they pose a grave threat to the life and property of people.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Amit Shah, Rajnath Singh to head panels for economy, social sector reforms
TWO NEW informal groups of ministers (iGoMs) have been formed by the Centre under Home Minister Amit Shah and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to prescribe reforms in the economic and social sectors, respectively. Shah's panel comprises 13 members, including Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal, with Minister of Railways, I&B and Electronics & IT Ashwini Vaishnaw as the convener. This group will focus on laying out the legislative and policy reform agenda in the technology and economic sectors, including finance, industry, commerce infrastructure, logistics, resources, science and technology, and governance. The second 18-member grouping on social, welfare and security sectors is headed by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. This will examine the scope for reforms in sectors including education, healthcare, defence, skilling, social welfare, housing, labour, public health etc. Others in this panel include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari, Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, with Labour and Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya designated as its convener. The groups have beens set up following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day address where he pressed home the need for next-generation reforms and announced the setting up of a task force. 'Current rules, laws, policies, and procedures must be redrafted to suit the 21st century, to fit the global environment, and to align with the vision of making Bharat a developed nation by 2047,' Modi had said in his address. Both groups have been asked to submit monthly reports on the progress made, followed by a consolidated reforms roadmap at the end of three months. Secretarial support for this would be provided by the Finance Ministry's Department of Economic Affairs. The chairs of the two GoMs are vested with the mandate to invite ministers, secretaries and subject matter experts, as and when required. A government source said these two panels are expected to go beyond just advisory roles and prescribe actionable roadmaps, with measurable outcomes to track these actions. Some of these metrics, sources said, include a calibrated and quantifiable reduction of compliance burden on citizens and businesses; driving employment generation and productivity enhancement, dismantling legacy bottlenecks and identifying reforms at the Central, State and municipal corporation levels. The composition of the two panels suggests the Prime Minister is keen to reflect the criticality of pushing through these small and big decisions that hold back progress both on the social and economic front. It includes many ministers so that quick actions can be taken on recommendations. The panels have also been tasked with suggesting legislative reforms that include repeal or changes to existing laws and readying the draft enabling legislations for futuristic sectors including digital health, fintech, the gig economy etc; identifying policy reforms; highlighting process-focused reform and institutional reforms that span the central, state and local levels. Earlier, in a bid to impart urgency to overhauling the Goods and Services Tax regime, Home Minister Shah is learnt to have been roped in to coordinate with all stakeholders — states as well as Central ministries — to resolve contentious outstanding issues. His intervention in thrashing out the GST consensus was described as 'normal' and was cited by a source as being helpful in resolving 'politically sensitive issues' and 'those that need support from states'. There have been instances in the past when he was part of the meetings, including his involvement in discussions on disinvestment and as the chair of meetings on price rise of staple food items in the past. Also, while a new Bill on real-money online gaming that prescribes sweeping bans and harsh penalties for both platforms and their promoters has been drafted by the IT Ministry, the Union Home Ministry is being viewed by the industry as the driving force behind the move. While the IT Ministry prepared the legislation, key major gaming industry associations sent a letter to the Union Home Ministry saying that the blanket prohibition will 'strike a death knell for this legitimate, job creating industry, and would cause serious harm to Indian users and citizens'.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Can elected govt be at whims and fancies of Governor, asks CJI
The Supreme Court bench hearing the Presidential reference asked the government Wednesday whether an elected government can be placed at 'the whims and fancies of the Governor' by vesting him/her with the power to withhold a Bill forever. 'But then would we not be giving total powers to the Governor to sit in appeals?… The government elected by majority will be at the whims and fancies of the Governor,' Chief Justice of India B R Gavai asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta who appeared for the Centre. The bench said that to interpret that the Bill 'dies' the first time the Governor withholds it 'would be counterproductive to the power of the Governor and counterproductive to the legislative process'. The five-judge Constitution bench is hearing President Droupadi Murmu's reference on timelines fixed by a two-judge bench for the President and Governors to act on Bills sent by state legislatures. Delving into the contours of the Governor's discretionary powers under Article 200 of the Constitution, Mehta told the bench: 'It is not an asylum for retired politicians but has its own sanctity which was debated in the Constituent Assembly.' He said the Governor, though unelected, represents the President and is not just a 'postman' to mechanically approve Bills. 'A person who is not directly elected is not a lesser person,' he said. Addressing the bench which included Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar, Mehta said the Governor has the option to grant assent to a Bill referred by the state legislature, withhold assent, refer it to the President in case of repugnancy with any Central law or return it to the state legislature for reconsideration. He said withholding is not a temporary act, and that 5-judge and 7-judge benches of the Supreme Court have interpreted it to mean that the Bill 'falls through'. Illustrating this, he said, 'Suppose a border state passes a Bill dealing with our external affairs, that we will permit a particular country's people to enter or not, then he cannot assent, he cannot refer it to President because it's not a repugnancy issue, and he cannot resend it to the House because if it is again passed, he cannot say no to it. So he will have to withhold.' He said the power 'has to be used rarely, sparingly, but that is the way the situation is'. The CJI then asked, 'If he doesn't exercise the option of resending the Bill for reconsideration, he can withhold it for time immemorial?' 'It dies,' Mehta said, reiterating that 'it (the power) is to be used rarely but power is conferred.' He said, 'The very language in which Article 200 is couched, it gives him options.' He said 'neither textually nor contextually, it is possible to conclude that the term withhold will have to be read as a temporary suspension of powers of granting assent till first proviso works out. There is no concept of temporary withholding of any Bill. If the framers of the Constitution wanted to link the term withhold in the main part of Article 200 to read only in the context of first proviso, two things would have been provided: (a) term withhold in the main part would have been qualified with the term subject to first proviso mentioned therein, (b) the first proviso would have mentioned that the Bill so withheld shall be reconsidered by the House, which is not there.' Justice Narasimha said the options must remain open-ended so that the political process has the chance to resolve the deadlock over a Bill. 'The way the political process occurs is not adjudicatory. Even assuming the Governor says I withhold, the political process can knock his doors and he can still open it and say, I will send it back to you, you consider and send it back. But to say… the first time he says, I withhold, the matter comes to an end… It can't be like that. It is counterproductive to the power of the Governor and counterproductive to the legislative process also. It has to be in a situation where it is open-ended,' he said. He was quick to add that the court understood that the Solicitor General was referring to Bills on subjects in the Union List. On the debate over the discretionary powers of the Governor, Justice Narasimha said, 'At that time we did not have impact assessment of a statute … Now, you see the amount of litigation it has thrown up by having provisions of this nature. Perhaps that could tell us whether the vision was right or not. Because the validity or correctness of a thought will come from its performance.' Mehta said he was 'not arguing that the Governor has unlimited discretion'. CJI Gavai said, 'We have some experience as to how some honourable Governors have exercised their discretion leading to so many litigations, but we are not going by that.' Mehta said, 'Indian democracy is a matured democracy. There may be aberrations on an individual level. But by and large, the democracy under this very Constitution has worked very effectively. And I personally experienced it during Covid times, how the Centre-state federal balance envisaged was on display. So it would be really hazardous to assess on the basis of some aberrations.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Meet on outer ring road ends without breakthrough
Thiruvananthapuram: A high-level meeting on the outer ring road project from Vizhinjam to Navaikulam, chaired by principal secretary to the chief minister K M Abraham on Wednesday, ended without a breakthrough, leaving thousands of affected families in continued uncertainty. The meeting, which brought together the NHAI regional officer, project director and district collector, was expected to resolve long-pending compensation disbursal to landowners who surrendered land for the project. Sources confirmed that NHAI regional officer A K Janbaz informed the state govt that the Centre's recommended alignment change can only be finalized in Dec 2025, further delaying the project. This comes on top of existing setbacks, frustrating more than 6,000 families across 24 villages who have been waiting for compensation. Despite the state transferring Rs 700 crore to NHAI nearly a month ago, not a single rupee has reached landowners. District collector Anu Kumari urged NHAI to release compensation at least in areas that had received a 3D notification, but the agency expressed dissent. Meanwhile, landowner representatives, angered by repeated delays, warned of intensified protests. In July, they had threatened hunger strikes to press for action. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You Reportingly Undo "The state govt and NHAI are doing nothing. We will intensify our protests," said action council convener S Chandramohan Nair, pointing out that the delay has left many families in deep distress. Delays are rooted in environmental and procedural roadblocks. A Supreme Court ruling in May 2025 invalidated post-facto environmental clearances, while the state environment impact assessment authority (SEIAA) lapsed in March, transferring approval responsibilities to the Union ministry. As a result, the northern stretch, from Thekkada to Navaikulam, remains without clearance, though the southern segment received approval in 2023. An RTI filed by landowner and legal expert K Raveendran Nair revealed no progress on the project's detailed project report (DPR) for the past two years. A 2023 RTI had disclosed the same status, raising questions about transparency and accountability. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
