Don't merely enrol students, but equip them with skills
A gap that needs attention
According to data released by the Ministry of Statistics, the unemployment rate in India tends to increase with higher education levels. This paradox reveals a critical gap between academic achievement and employability — a gap that requires urgent attention.
This challenge is particularly acute in India's vast network of non-elite institutions in Tier 2 and tier 3 colleges, where most students pursue BA, BCom, or BSc degrees and their corresponding master's programmes. These institutions often face resource constraints and limited industry connections, operating with curricula that have not kept pace with the evolving job market. While elite colleges make headlines for placement challenges, the gradual erosion of employability in everyday colleges often goes unnoticed.
In many such institutions, instruction remains largely theoretical, with limited emphasis on real-world skills. For example, an English literature student might study Shakespearean tragedy yet miss out on learning practical skills such as writing professional emails. Similarly, an economics graduate may understand complex theories but struggle with everyday tools such as Excel. This disconnect means millions of educated young people find it difficult to translate their degrees into career opportunities.
This situation stems partly from a deeply entrenched academic culture that values scholarship and abstraction over practical application. Within many academic circles — even prestigious ones — higher education is often celebrated as an end in itself, while immediate employment is sometimes subtly undervalued. Postgraduate degrees and PhDs are frequently pursued not just for intellectual fulfilment but as a refuge from the job market, creating a cycle where many graduates end up teaching in the very colleges that perpetuate the same system.
It is important to recognise that successive governments have acknowledged this issue. Initiatives such as Skill India, Start-Up India, and the National Education Policy have pushed for skill development, vocational training, and entrepreneurship. However, the transformation remains incomplete. Many undergraduate and postgraduate programmes continue to emphasise rote learning over practical skills. While new courses in AI or entrepreneurship are being introduced, they often lack depth, and integration into the broader curriculum.
A broader societal challenge
Countries such as China and Japan have successfully aligned education with economic strategies by elevating technical and vocational education to a central role in workforce development. In India, vocational training is still often perceived as a fallback option, both within academia and society. This stigma limits the appeal and effectiveness of skill-based education, despite its vital role in economic empowerment.
This contradiction highlights a broader societal challenge: degrees are highly valued as symbols of upward mobility, but they increasingly fail to guarantee it. This is not a call to abandon liberal education or abstract learning — they remain essential for critical thinking and creativity. However, education must also provide tangible economic benefits. Degrees should offer pathways to agency and dignity, especially for students from smaller towns and under-resourced institutions.
A way forward lies in integrating practical skill modules — communication, digital literacy, budgeting, data analysis, hospitality, tailoring, and health services — into general degree programmes as core elements, not optional extras. Doctoral education should be diversified to prepare candidates for policy, analytics, consulting, development, and industry roles, not solely academia. Research remains vital, but it must be pursued by those inclined towards it.
Finally, the widespread aspiration for government jobs reflects the limited opportunities graduates currently perceive. While these roles remain important, expanding private sector and entrepreneurial pathways through improved employability will offer youth a broader range of options. Enhancing skills and opportunities can reduce the over-dependence on competitive exams. India's growing economy demands an education system that not just enrols students, but equips students with skills. Viewing education as a social contract that guarantees a meaningful connection between learning and livelihood is essential.
Gourishankar S. Hiremath teaches Economics at IIT Kharagpur. Views are personal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
NGO data flows upwards to donors, not down to people: Study
In some villages in Odisha, women's self-help groups gather for "sense-making sessions". Here, they track their savings and income levels through simple charts. When women from villages with lower savings see these comparative numbers, they feel motivated to visit their high-income counterparts, going on to adopt new farming methods and collectively bargain with banks for better credit terms. Turns out such powerful instances of sharing information with communities is the exception rather than the rule across India's development sector. A new study titled 'Measuring What Matters, Learning What Works' reveals a stark disconnect: while NGOs in India collect mountains of information each month about the communities they serve, it is rarely used to benefit those same communities. The survey, which interviewed 175 organizations and 15 grassroots leaders across the country, found that over 70% of collected data—including basic information like demographics, household size, rising family incomes, women's participation in local committees and children's school attendance—flows upward to donors, while only 6% reaches the people it's meant for. This is a massive missed opportunity, according to Rajib Nandi, deputy vice president at Sambodhi, the research firm that conducted the study alongside Mumbai-based non-profit Dasra. "NGOs gather basic community information and program results that could provide powerful insights for communities, yet much is collected only to meet donor or government reporting requirements," says Nandi. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai | Gold Rates Today in Mumbai | Silver Rates Today in Mumbai The irony is hard to miss: despite this information coming directly from communities, people are often left in the dark about why it's collected or how it's used. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find your car's value online in minutes. Spinny Click Here Undo The study reveals several interconnected challenges that prevent NGOs from realizing the power of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning or MEL, as it is called. Nearly 60% of organizations spend less than 5% of their program budgets on tracking progress and learning from their work, leaving little room to build systems that could meaningfully engage communities with their own information. Most organizations operate with small teams where tracking responsibilities are shared informally across program staff. Only 21.8% have dedicated staff for monitoring and evaluation, while 42.5% rely entirely on program teams to assess their work. As one leader noted: "Our staff wear multiple hats. They are simplementers, data collectors and analysts, all at once." While 68% of organizations use tools like Excel and Google Forms, field workers and community members without literacy, language skills, or reliable internet access are increasingly left behind as systems become more digital. Only 10% are trying AI tools like ChatGPT for report writing. Basic challenges like unstable internet connections, paper-based tools, and limited access to devices make learning from work difficult, particularly in remote areas. The cost of reaching one village in the North East region, for instance, can equal the cost of visiting ten villages in mainland India in rest of the country, yet standard budgets fail to account for such regional differences. Rukmini Banerji, CEO of Pratham and leader of initiatives like the Annual Status of Education Report--which has utilized data to cause policy changes--emphasizes the need for balance. With India's corporate responsibility spendingcrossing Rs 25,000 crorein 2022-23, the need for more effective, community-centred information systems has never been greater, emphasizes the report. One study participant wondered: "Who sees it?" Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Hiring horror story': Indian entrepreneur shares how employee's fake salary slips fooled her company
An Indian entrepreneur recently took to Instagram to narrate what she described as a 'hiring horror' story, one that, in her words, proved that 'every time she feels like nothing can be worse than this, someone surprises her.' Sharing her experience, Arshia Kaur said she had recruited someone for a senior role, Head of Marketing, in 2024. On paper, the candidate seemed like the perfect fit. 'He walked us through his CV, highlighted how he contributed to the growth of previous organisations, and everything looked extremely legit because we actually saw the backend. So, we ended up hiring him,' she explained. A post shared by Arshia Kaur (@ After giving him multiple chances, Kaur finally let him go around two and a half months later. However, her curiosity about his repeated failures led her team to re-check his documents – and that's when the real shock came. According to Kaur, the man had submitted forged salary slips and recommendations. 'As per the slips, he worked 31 out of 31 days without any leaves. They had no company stamp, no signature, zero tax deduction, and the worst of it all, the salary slips were made on an Excel sheet,' she revealed. A post shared by Arshia Kaur (@ When confronted and asked to show his bank statement to prove he had actually received that salary, his excuse was that his previous employer had paid him 'a lot of amount in cash.' Calling the incident a major lesson, Kaur said, 'Honestly, as founders, this was such a huge wake-up call, and it's so important to do your due diligence and make sure that if something seems fishy, you need to ask questions early.' She also urged entrepreneurs to be careful with finances. 'When you're bootstrapped, every single penny matters; it's shed-earned money. You cannot pay people whatever they ask for – founders, please don't do this. It's your right to have the correct information about anyone you've decided to hire!' Her two-part video quickly went viral, sparking debate online about how careless hiring can drain not just money but also energy, morale, and overall productivity. A social media user suggested, 'You need to fire whoever did the background verification, major major fail (Yes i run my own business and I've been in recruitment for 11 years prior).' Another user wrote, 'So how was he able to crack the interview even if his salary slips were fake .. what that guy did was unethical but you need to look at your hiring process as to how he was able to crack the interview .. or did you guys hire him just based on his cv and not interviewed him?' A third person suggested, 'That guy should be hired because he's smart enough to get this job.' A fourth user asked, 'How does past salary matter ?? If you have budget and he has done well in interview then the only thing to measure salary is interview performance not past payslip.'
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Explained: The rise of fake productivity at work; how employees are ‘task-masking' to look busy
If your calendar looks like a Mumbai local at rush hour and Teams pings like a Diwali bazaar, you're not alone; that bustle may not be real productivity. But it may not be real productivity. A new workplace habit is spreading: Fake productivity, the theatre of looking busy while sidestepping high-impact work. One recent clue: A Workhuman poll found more than a third of UK employees (36%) admit to 'pretend productivity', driven by pressure to appear constantly active and to protect work–life balance. In parallel, leaders are wrestling with 'productivity paranoia': Microsoft's Work Trend Index reports 85% of managers say hybrid work makes it hard to trust productivity, even as employees themselves report feeling productive—an optics paradox tailor-made for performative busyness. The conditions are ideal for what social and workplace commentators now call task-masking—performative micro-tasks (reply-all, calendar clutter, meeting hopscotch) that signal effort without moving outcomes. Media analyses link the behaviour to return-to-office pressures and the surveillance vibe of 'bossware,' which nudge people to show activity over achievement. Meanwhile, collaboration load has ballooned: Microsoft shows people attend roughly three times more Teams meetings than in February 2020, while investigative summaries of Atlassian's State of Teams suggest tens of billions of work hours are lost yearly to pings, low-value meetings and duplicated effort. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Add the cognitive drain of video calls—Stanford's validated Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue scale has tied specific design factors (mirror anxiety, close-up eye contact) to depleted energy—and you get a recipe for surface-level work that 'looks' productive but isn't. This is not simply a moral failing; it is a systems problem. Always-on messaging fuels telepressure—the compulsive urge to respond—which research in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology connects to poorer sleep, higher burnout and worse work–life balance. People learn to survive the signal-choked day by doing visible tasks that keep the Slack dot green. The result: energy burns on the appearance of work, outcomes lag, and trust erodes. Understanding why task-masking thrives—and how to replace it with outcome-first habits—is now a core career skill. What exactly is 'task-masking' (and how is it different from simple busyness)? Task-masking is performative busyness: Behaviours that signal industriousness (typing loudly, darting between meetings, carrying a laptop everywhere) while avoiding deep, outcome-bearing work. The label has spread through Gen-Z-heavy social feeds and newsrooms. Analysts describe it as a productivity theatre tuned for the open-plan and the activity dashboard. The underlying prevalence is plausible given Workhuman's finding that 36% of UK workers confess to 'pretend productivity,' often to escape burnout or unrealistic expectations. The psychology and systems that fuel fake productivity Fake productivity doesn't emerge in a vacuum—it's shaped by systems that reward responsiveness, visibility and performative hustle. At the centre is telepressure: the compulsive need to answer messages instantly, regardless of urgency. Multiple studies in occupational psychology link this behaviour to poor sleep, elevated burnout and fractured work–life boundaries. But the pressure isn't confined to pings and emails. According to Microsoft's 2023 Work Trend Index, employees now attend nearly three times as many Teams meetings as they did before the pandemic. That explosion in meeting load may aim to increase coordination, but it comes at the cost of cognitive fragmentation and depleted focus time. The problem is compounded by the medium itself. Stanford's research on Zoom fatigue finds that constant video calls introduce non-verbal stressors—close-up eye contact, mirror anxiety, and reduced mobility—that accelerate exhaustion across the day. Layered on top is the rise of digital presenteeism—the compulsion to appear online and 'active' even when unwell or mentally drained. According to the CIPD & Simplyhealth Health and Wellbeing at Work survey (2022), 81% of UK organisations reported presenteeism among remote workers, compared to 65% in physical workplaces. The numbers expose a system where visibility trumps well-being—and where looking busy matters more than being effective. Together, these factors fuel task-masking: a survival strategy in a workplace architecture built for appearances. Why Gen Z is over-indexed on task-masking Gen Z did not invent pretend work, but they are operating in a post-pandemic labour market where visibility is often misread as value. Return-to-office rules, legacy KPIs and leader distrust make 'being seen' a protective strategy. Coverage of task-masking consistently spotlights younger workers navigating visibility politics while fearing job loss or AI displacement. At the same time, values have shifted: Deloitte's 2025 global survey finds Gen Z prioritises well-being, balance and learning ; they will comply with optics if outcomes and boundaries are unclear, but they are quick to disengage from rituals that feel meaningless. Several surveys show that many Gen Z workers resist full-time office returns, increasing the temptation to 'signal' productivity when present rather than to refactor the work itself. Task-masking and quiet quitting: Cousins, not twins Quiet quitting is disengagement to the contractual minimum; task-masking is disengagement disguised as hustle. According to Gallup's State of the Global Workplace 2024 report, only 21% of employees worldwide were actively engaged at work. The majority were either disengaged or quietly quitting, creating ideal conditions for fake productivity to flourish. In such environments, workers are more likely to adopt surface-level behaviours that signal busyness, such as excessive meetings or constant online presence, rather than contributing to meaningful outcomes. When trust is low and objectives are fuzzy, people hedge: They keep the lights blinking, attend everything, and avoid risk. In that sense, task-masking can be the performative arm of quiet quitting—a way to stay safe while mentally stepping back. How managers create (or crush) faux productivity Leaders can unintentionally train teams to optimise for optics: Obsessing over green dots, input metrics and time online. Microsoft's 2022–2025 data calls this 'productivity paranoia,' visible when managers track activity rather than outcomes and calendars swell to compensate. A related body of research, Atlassian's State of Teams report, highlights the enormous time sink caused by pings, meetings, and duplicated effort. It estimates that billions of work hours are lost annually to ineffective collaboration. The fix is not more dashboards; it is clarity (what is the outcome, who owns it), cadence (fewer, sharper meetings) and evidence (show progress with artefacts, not attendance). Bottom line Fake productivity isn't laziness—it's a symptom of misaligned systems. In today's workplace, visibility has become a proxy for value. When calendars are packed and Slack is never silent, activity becomes the performance, not the means to an end. Employees aren't defying work; they're adapting to cultures where being seen outweighs producing results. Task-masking emerges as the rational response to environments that reward optics over output. Quiet quitting and fake productivity aren't opposites—they're parallel forms of disengagement. One retreats quietly, the other performs loudly. Both thrive when trust is low, goals are vague, and measurement skews toward motion instead of meaning. In this landscape, the green dot—the little status indicator once meant to show availability—has evolved into a badge of allegiance, a digital placeholder for presence. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
