Port Klang rep confident columbarium near mosque won't be built
PETALING JAYA : Port Klang assemblyman Azmizam Zaman Huri has expressed confidence that the Klang Royal City Council (MBDK) will reject a proposal to build a four-storey columbarium near the Kampung Raja Uda mosque in Klang.
He said the developer had failed to present or justify the suitability of the project in a Malay-majority area, Bernama reported.
Azmizam said the proposal was clearly unsuitable as the land zoning under the MBDK local plan up to 2035 specifies the proposed project site is meant to be 'a limited commercial area'.
Today, he was present at a public hearing on the project attended by the residents, the developer and the town planning department.
It was chaired by MBDK deputy mayor Zary Affendi Arif at the council's building in Klang.
Azmizam, who led the residents in protesting against the proposal, said that under current laws, only 28 types of limited commercial activities were allowed in the area – none of which include the construction of a memorial or columbarium.
He urged MBDK to give an assurance that no construction would be allowed at the proposed site unless official approval is obtained, in line with Section 19 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 (Act 172).
Kampung Raja Uda mosque nazir (administrator) Ismail Arsat voiced concern that the village's status as part of the royal city could be tarnished by the project.
He said the iconic landmark and main attraction of the village, the Raja Uda mosque, could be marred if the columbarium is built just 83 metres from the mosque.
MBDK said it would consider objections and proposals from both sides before referring the matter to the one-stop centre committee meeting on June 24 for an assessment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Akmal to face charge for ‘disrupting public order' over Facebook content
Dr Akmal Saleh said police had informed him that he would be charged at the magistrates' court in Bukit Mertajam, Penang, on Friday at 8am. PETALING JAYA : The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has decided to charge Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh over statements he made on his Facebook page, 'Akmal Saleh', which were said to disrupt public order. In a statement, the AGC said it would proceed to charge Akmal under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code for making statements conducing to public mischief. However, it did not specify the Facebook content in question. In a Facebook video, Akmal said police had informed him that he would be charged at the magistrates' court in Bukit Mertajam, Penang, on Friday, at 8am. He said he would cut short his trip to Mecca, after arriving there just yesterday, to face the charge against him. Last Friday, it was reported that police had launched a probe into a viral Facebook video featuring Akmal making statements that were considered to be 'hate speech' that could disturb public peace. It was not clear which video is the subject of the investigation. However, in recent days, Akmal has posted videos concerning a Jalur Gemilang mishap at a Penang hardware store, where the national flag was hoisted upside down. In one of Akmal's videos, he said prosecutors had two days to charge the shop owner, failing which he said he would personally 'teach this 'Ah Pek' (uncle) how to correctly put up a flag'. The AGC also confirmed that Bersatu Youth chief Hilman Idham would be charged under the same section over remarks he made in a video posted on the TikTok account ' Earlier, Bersatu Youth information chief Harris Idaham Rashid said the wing's chief is expected to be charged at the magistrates' court in Kuala Lumpur tomorrow over a speech he delivered during a gathering outside the Dang Wangi police headquarters last month. The AGC today said it had also decided to charge a woman named Siti Hajar Aflah Sharuddin under the same section as Akmal and Hilman, and S Chandrasegaran under the Communications and Multimedia Act for posting offensive content online. 'All charges will be brought before the magistrates' court with the appropriate local jurisdiction in due course.'
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun
Former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat warned that the erosion of constitutional boundaries will have consequences that extend beyond the realm of legal doctrine. KUALA LUMPUR : Constitutional adherence plays a critical role in shaping perceptions of Malaysia as a secure and stable environment for economic activity, former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said today. Speaking at a lecture here, Tengku Maimun said there was an intrinsic connection between strong constitutional governance and the broader stability and wellbeing of a nation. Adding that the Federal Constitution clearly defines the roles and limits of each branch of government, she warned that when constitutional boundaries are eroded – whether through legislative overreach, executive interference or the weakening of institutional safeguards – the consequences extend far beyond the realm of legal doctrine. 'They strike at the heart of our constitutional order, which upholds the rule of law, separation of powers and, ultimately, legitimacy of public authority,' she said. 'Investors, businesses and financial institutions base their long-term investments and economic planning on expectations of legal certainty, impartial adjudication and the protection of property and contractual rights. 'A judiciary that is independent and consistent in applying the law reinforces these expectations. Conversely, when laws are applied inconsistently or when institutions appear vulnerable to external pressure, investors' confidence is undermined.' She was speaking at the Allianz Centre for Governance's Distinguished Speaker Series inaugural lecture titled 'The Sanctity of Malaysia's Federal Constitution: Threats, Solutions and Impact on National Governance'. Tengku Maimun said there would be less room for the arbitrary exercise of power when each branch of government operates within its prescribed limits and respects the institutional independence of the others. She said this, in turn, fosters public trust in the government and strengthens the credibility of public institutions. 'When this constitutional framework is disrupted, when one branch seeks to dominate or silence another, the rule of law is placed at risk,' she said. 'In such moments, the judiciary is not merely permitted but obligated to act in accordance with the solemn oath to protect, preserve and defend the Federal Constitution.' Tengku Maimun served as the country's top judge from May 2019 to July 1 this year.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Company wins right to revisit RM17mil land dispute case
Setiakon Engineering Sdn Bhd won its bid for a review of a RM17 million land dispute case after the Federal Court allowed its application under Rule 137 of the Federal Court Rules 1995. PUTRAJAYA : A company that bought a RM17 million plot of land in Mukim Batu, Kuala Lumpur, 10 years ago, has won the right for a review of a Federal Court ruling made last year on the grounds that it suffered procedural injustice. A five-member bench of the Federal Court chaired by Court of Appeal president Justice Abu Bakar Jais today unanimously allowed Setiakon Engineering Sdn Bhd's review application under Rule 137 of the Federal Court Rules 1995. Abu Bakar said the company had crossed the threshold required under the rule. Other judges on the panel were Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim and Justices Zabariah Yusof, Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh and Lee Swee Seng. The ruling today set aside last year's 3-1 Federal Court majority decision in favour of Mak Yan Tai and her brother Mak Kum Phoi. A fresh panel will now rehear the appeal. Lawyer Cyrus Das, representing Setiakon, argued that the company was denied the right to tender rebuttal evidence, as the issue of fraud was raised for the first time at the apex court. Lawyer Winston PC Ng and John Foo assisted Das while Krishna Dallumah represented the siblings. The dispute began when the 0.87ha plot was initially registered under the name of the sibling's mother, Wong Soo, as security for a loan taken by Lim Moy. In 2014, Lim applied to the High Court for a declaration that she was the rightful owner of the land and that it should be transferred back to her from Wong, as the loan had been fully repaid. A default judgment was granted to Lim, resulting in the land being registered under her name. She later sold the land to Paragon Capacity Sdn Bhd for RM15 million. Paragon then sold it to Setiakon for RM17 million in 2015. The siblings succeeded in setting aside the default judgment in November 2017 after neither Lim nor her attorney appeared to contest the matter. The siblings then filed a fresh suit against Lim, Paragon and Setiakon in 2019. Only Setiakon defended the claim. The High Court ruled in favour of Setiakon as a bona fide subsequent purchaser under Section 340(3) of the National Land Code, but this was later overturned by the Court of Appeal. Setiakon then obtained leave to appeal to the Federal Court, but the apex court dismissed the appeal, resulting in the review application.
