'Nightmare' Squirrels Spotted in US Backyards Spark Concern
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Sightings of squirrels with sores and tumors have sparked concern among users on social media in recent years, with more disturbing-looking squirrels spotted across the U.S. and Canada in recent months, according to the Daily Mail.
Given the strange growths on their bodies, these squirrels have been dubbed "zombie squirrels" by users online and other news outlets.
Like the rabbits with tentacle-like growths that also went viral online recently, these squirrels are likely suffering from a kind of virus.
"I suspect that current reports of this ailment have gotten an unrealistic level of attention due to the grotesque appearance of affected animals and the ease with which isolated cases can be blown up to create fear or anxiety via social media," James Parkhurst, an associate professor of wildlife science and extension wildlife specialist at Virginia Tech, told Newsweek.
A file photo shows a red squirrel with squirrel pox disease.
A file photo shows a red squirrel with squirrel pox disease.
MPF/Wikimedia Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license
Why It Matters
The appearance of the squirrels has drawn significant concern online, with some deeming them a "new nightmare" after strange looking rabbits last week were compared to something out of the TV series The Last of Us—where the world is taken over by a fungal infection.
Experts have advised members of the public not to touch the squirrels, although it is thought that whatever is causing their odd appearance is unlikely to be dangerous to humans.
What To Know
It is not yet clear what is causing the squirrels' disturbing appearance, with some pointing to squirrel pox and others thinking it could be squirrel fibromatosis, which is believed to be the more likely explanation.
Both conditions are caused by viruses closely associated with squirrels, although squirrel pox is more common among red squirrels typically in the United Kingdom.
Cases of squirrel fibromatosis are not common and typically affect only a small number of squirrels—usually less than 10 in most incidents, Parkhurst said.
There have been historical accounts of more severe outbreaks though, such as in the late 1990s, which could affect a hundred squirrels at a time, he added.
Incidents usually occur between late spring through to late summer, with the primary mode of transmission being biting insects, particularly mosquitoes, Parkhurst said.
Midges and ticks can also spread the virus, he added, as well as, less commonly, close physical contact between squirrels.
Squirrels can usually fight off the virus in four to six months, he said, but rodents that are younger, with less developed immune systems, may "be more vulnerable."
There is also added risk to the animal's welfare and safety if the tumors develop to a point where they obstruct the creature's eyes or mouth, affecting their vision or impairing their ability to eat.
The tumors on the squirrels have concerned U.S. residents in recent months, per the Daily Mail report, who have been spotting them in their backyards.
Per the outlet, one Reddit user wrote in July: "At first I thought it was eating something from my front beds, but then I realized it was on its face."
What People Are Saying
James Parkhurst told Newsweek: "Given the limited number of cases each year and the limited amount of direct physical contact most people have with squirrels, there has been no documented transmission of the virus to humans and most experts believe this virus not a significant threat to humans.
"People are advised to scout their property for and eliminate any sources of pooled water that may be harboring mosquitoes as a means to reduce the vector population."
What Happens Next
Members of the public are advised to leave affected squirrels alone to fight off the virus and to avoid touching or catching affected squirrels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Doctors Warn Against 'Unnecessary' Menopause Services
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Menopausal women have been warned against spending time and money on "unnecessary" direct-to-consumer services that might not actually be of benefit. A group of doctors have warned against the risks or benefits of hormone therapy being exaggerated, the over-promotion of supplements and testing and marketing being disguised as advocacy. "We wrote this piece because although we are excited by increasing discussion around menopause care, we are seeing a surge of confusing and sometimes misleading information," Dr. Marie K Christakis of the University of Toronto told Newsweek. "This leaves many women unsure of what to believe and can result in either undertreatment or use of unproven approaches. We wanted to encourage and support healthcare professionals in providing evidence based care." Clinician's hands taking mouth swab of woman. Clinician's hands taking mouth swab of doctors said one of "the most troubling trends" arising from this surge is the promotion of routine hormone panel testing for the evaluation of menopausal symptoms. "Testing can be expensive, misleading and may push women toward unnecessary treatments. Alternatively, it can be used as a justification to withhold treatment from women with debilitating perimenopausal symptoms before they experience a steep, steady drop in their hormone levels," Christakis explained. The menopause experts argue that the sharp rise in these commercial services for women seeking relief for menopausal symptoms raises concerns about the reliability and potential commercial bias of the information being provided. "Commercial bias arises when products or services are marketed under the guise of advocacy or education. This can mislead women into thinking something is evidence-based or endorsed by experts when it isn't backed by guiding medical organisations," Christakis added. The authors have instead urged that symptoms are best assessed by a thorough clinical history with treatment decisions guided by clinical response and patient preferences. "A societal transformation of attitudes and beliefs surrounding menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has outpaced provider education, leaving primary care specialties unprepared to deliver this care," Christakis, Dr. Taylor Roebotham of Sinai Health, Dr. Stephanie Sterry, a UK NHS GP and Dr. Olexandra Koshkina of University of Toronto wrote. Woman in pink shirt taking HRT pills on sofa at home. Woman in pink shirt taking HRT pills on sofa at home. Zinkevych/Getty images With regards to hormone panel testing, the doctors wrote: "These tests can cost hundreds of dollars and are marketed to patients and clinicians as necessary for 'individualizing' hormone therapy. "Many women who access this type of testing are unaware of the limited supporting evidence and are influenced by trust in their healthcare provider. "In reality, these tests are of limited clinical use because there is no clearly defined therapeutic window for MHT, and some testing techniques do not offer accurate or precise assessment of hormone levels." For perimenopause and menopause, hormone testing offers no reliable way to determine who will benefit from treatment, when the final menstrual period will occur, or whether it is safe to discontinue contraception, the experts explained. Clinical guidelines from the British Menopause Society, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, The Menopause Society and Endocrine Society all agree: in women over age 45 presenting with validated symptoms of menopause, including menstrual irregularity, menopause is a clinical diagnosis and hormone testing is unnecessary. Despite this, the experts have warned, many women now purchase detailed hormone panels from wellness providers or online services that are often used to justify taking custom-made hormone preparations or supplements based on marginal deviations from hormone thresholds not grounded in evidence. "Most supplements marketed for menopause have little or no high-quality evidence to support their effectiveness. They are often costly and may delay women from seeking proven therapies that could help them," Christakis explained. The custom-made hormone preparations (known as compounded hormone regimens) are not regulated in the same way as standard menopausal hormone therapy. "There is concern that inconsistencies in the quantities of estrogen or progestogen in compounded bioidentical hormone therapy regimens can result in endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma, particularly in women with an intact uterus who are receiving inadequate progestogen," the authors warned. Until we can establish individualized target hormone levels, there is no role for commercial hormonal panel testing to guide therapy, they argued. In the meantime, testing in this way offers only a false sense of precision. The authors acknowledge that innovation is needed but suggest the normalization of hormone panel testing could be a symptom of a larger problem: the commercialisation of women's health and a movement away from evidence based practice. "For midlife women, effective treatment begins not with numbers, but with listening," they concluded. Christakis emphasized they do agree personalised care is essential. "This means taking time to listen to each woman's symptoms, medical history, and preferences, then tailoring care accordingly. We hope to encourage primary care providers to engage in shared decision-making with women and to integrate best available evidence," she explained. "Lab results don't capture the full experience of menopause. Listening allows clinicians to understand the impact symptoms are having on a woman's daily life and wellbeing. Effective treatment starts with that conversation, then uses evidence-based options to support her needs." Christakis has recommended women seek information from trusted health professionals and reliable sources, such as national health guidelines or medical organizations. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about menopause? Let us know via health@ Reference Christakis, M. K., Roebotham, T., Sterry, S., & Koshkina, O. (2025). Menopause misinformation is harming care. BMJ, 390.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Doing Your Hair May Expose You to as Much Pollution as Standing in Traffic
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Blow-drying, straightening, or curling your hair in the morning might seem harmless—but it could be filling your lungs with as much pollution as standing on a busy highway, scientists warn. A research team led by professor Nusrat Jung and Ph.D. student Jianghui Liu of Purdue University, Indiana, found that a 10–20-minute heat-based hair routine can release more than 10 billion tiny particles into the air—which may then be inhaled into the lungs. These can cause health problems like breathing difficulties, lung inflammation and even cognitive decline. "This is really quite concerning," Jung said in a statement. "The number of nanoparticles inhaled from using typical, store-bought hair-care products was far greater than we ever anticipated." A stock image of a woman applying hair product to her curls. A stock image of a woman applying hair product to her curls. PeopleImages/iStock / Getty Images Plus What Counts as a "Typical" Hair Routine? "A typical 10-to-15-minute hair care routine, like the ones in our study, involved using one or more hair care products combined with heated styling tools such as flat irons, and curling wands," Jung told Newsweek. "In controlled experiments, volunteers performed realistic styling routines using five different hair products (hair cream, hair serum, hair lotion, and hair spray) and three types of appliances conditions that mirror what many people do in everyday life." During these hair-care routines, Jung explained, volatile and semi-volatile ingredients like so-called cyclic siloxanes are released into the air. When they encounter the hot surfaces of styling tools—which can exceed 300 degrees Fahrenheit—these compounds evaporate and form ultrafine nanoparticles. "We measured airborne concentrations reaching upward of 10 billion nanoparticles per cubic centimeter in the breathing zone, which is comparable to what one might encounter while standing in dense highway traffic," Jung continued. "It is important to note that the figure represents airborne concentration, not the total number inhaled. Inhalation depends on factors such as breathing rate, proximity, ventilation, styling temperature, type of product and routine duration. "However, because styling typically happens close to the face and in less ventilated spaces like bathrooms, the potential for meaningful inhalation exposure is substantial." A stock image of a woman styling her long at home with a modern hair curler. A stock image of a woman styling her long at home with a modern hair curler. Sergii Kolesnikov Hidden Chemicals In earlier research, Jung's team found that heat makes hair products release even more harmful chemicals. A notable example is D5 siloxane—a common ingredient in sprays, creams, and serums. "When we first studied the emissions from hair care products during heat surges, we focused on the volatile chemicals that were released, and what we found was already quite concerning," Jung said. "But when we took an even closer discovered that these chemicals were generating bursts of anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 nanoparticles per cubic centimeter." D5 siloxane is widely used because it makes products smooth and stable. But the European Chemicals Agency has called it "very persistent, very bio-accumulative." Europe has already restricted its use in some cosmetics. "D5 siloxane has been found to lead to adverse effects on the respiratory tract, liver and nervous system of laboratory animals," Jung said. When heated, these ingredients can form huge numbers of nanoparticles that travel deep into the lungs—posing health risks that are still poorly understood. "And now it appears that the airborne hazards of these products—particularly 'leave-on' formulations designed to be heat-resistant, such as hair sprays, creams and gels—are even greater than we expected," Liu said. According to them, the deepest parts of the lungs get the highest dose of these nanoparticles when inhaled. The team concluded that heat-based hair styling is a major indoor source of these particles, which have been underestimated until now. How to Reduce the Risk The best advice, according to Jung and Liu, is to avoid using hair products with heating tools altogether. If that's not realistic, make sure to improve ventilation. "If you must use hair care products, limit their use and ensure the space is well ventilated," Liu said. "Even without heating appliances, better ventilation can reduce exposure to volatile chemicals, such as D5 siloxane, in these products." Jung added that future studies should look even more closely at how these particles form and what they're made of. "By addressing these research gaps, future studies can provide a more holistic understanding of the emissions and exposures associated with heat-based hair styling, contributing to improved indoor air pollution assessments and mitigation strategies," she said. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about air pollution? Let us know via health@ Reference Liu, J., Jiang, J., Patra, S. S., Ding, X., Huang, C., Cross, J. N., Magnuson, B. H., & Jung, N. (2025). Indoor Nanoparticle Emissions and Exposures during Heat-Based Hair Styling Activities. Environmental Science & Technology, 59(32), 17103–17115.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
'Nightmare' Squirrels Spotted in US Backyards Spark Concern
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Sightings of squirrels with sores and tumors have sparked concern among users on social media in recent years, with more disturbing-looking squirrels spotted across the U.S. and Canada in recent months, according to the Daily Mail. Given the strange growths on their bodies, these squirrels have been dubbed "zombie squirrels" by users online and other news outlets. Like the rabbits with tentacle-like growths that also went viral online recently, these squirrels are likely suffering from a kind of virus. "I suspect that current reports of this ailment have gotten an unrealistic level of attention due to the grotesque appearance of affected animals and the ease with which isolated cases can be blown up to create fear or anxiety via social media," James Parkhurst, an associate professor of wildlife science and extension wildlife specialist at Virginia Tech, told Newsweek. A file photo shows a red squirrel with squirrel pox disease. A file photo shows a red squirrel with squirrel pox disease. MPF/Wikimedia Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license Why It Matters The appearance of the squirrels has drawn significant concern online, with some deeming them a "new nightmare" after strange looking rabbits last week were compared to something out of the TV series The Last of Us—where the world is taken over by a fungal infection. Experts have advised members of the public not to touch the squirrels, although it is thought that whatever is causing their odd appearance is unlikely to be dangerous to humans. What To Know It is not yet clear what is causing the squirrels' disturbing appearance, with some pointing to squirrel pox and others thinking it could be squirrel fibromatosis, which is believed to be the more likely explanation. Both conditions are caused by viruses closely associated with squirrels, although squirrel pox is more common among red squirrels typically in the United Kingdom. Cases of squirrel fibromatosis are not common and typically affect only a small number of squirrels—usually less than 10 in most incidents, Parkhurst said. There have been historical accounts of more severe outbreaks though, such as in the late 1990s, which could affect a hundred squirrels at a time, he added. Incidents usually occur between late spring through to late summer, with the primary mode of transmission being biting insects, particularly mosquitoes, Parkhurst said. Midges and ticks can also spread the virus, he added, as well as, less commonly, close physical contact between squirrels. Squirrels can usually fight off the virus in four to six months, he said, but rodents that are younger, with less developed immune systems, may "be more vulnerable." There is also added risk to the animal's welfare and safety if the tumors develop to a point where they obstruct the creature's eyes or mouth, affecting their vision or impairing their ability to eat. The tumors on the squirrels have concerned U.S. residents in recent months, per the Daily Mail report, who have been spotting them in their backyards. Per the outlet, one Reddit user wrote in July: "At first I thought it was eating something from my front beds, but then I realized it was on its face." What People Are Saying James Parkhurst told Newsweek: "Given the limited number of cases each year and the limited amount of direct physical contact most people have with squirrels, there has been no documented transmission of the virus to humans and most experts believe this virus not a significant threat to humans. "People are advised to scout their property for and eliminate any sources of pooled water that may be harboring mosquitoes as a means to reduce the vector population." What Happens Next Members of the public are advised to leave affected squirrels alone to fight off the virus and to avoid touching or catching affected squirrels.
