The outsider advantage: 5 times when working with an agency partner can be a game changer
Why? Because internal teams are often too close to the work, too bogged down by day-to-day demands, or too intertwined in legacy thinking to step back and see the big picture.
The good news is, you don't have to do it alone. Whether it's tagging in specialists for high-profile projects, seeking out fresh thinking for regular projects, or outsourcing when bandwidth is scarce, organizations of all kinds are using external agency partners to supplement their internal marketing efforts.
In fact, of the 82% of Association of National Advertisers (ANA) member brands that have in-house marketing teams, 92% report engaging external partners for certain projects.
Subscribe to the Daily newsletter.
Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day
Privacy Policy
| Fast Company Newsletters
When the work shapes your company's trajectory for years to come, bringing in the right outside perspective at the right moment might be the most important investment you can make.
So, when does it make strategic sense to call in outside reinforcements? Let's take a look at five times when outsourcing makes strategic sense.
1. YOU NEED A BRAND REFRESH OR REPOSITIONING
Leaders and brand teams who have grown with the company often have emotional attachments to the current brand. Your logo, tagline, or messaging might feel sacred—even if they no longer serve a strategic purpose—making it difficult to push bold changes or challenge current ways of thinking.
Internal politics aside, a brand that doesn't reflect your business creates a disconnect with your audience and undermines credibility and growth.
Agencies bring objectivity, fresh energy, challenge assumptions, and distill complexity into clarity, transforming your core values and differentiators into a clear, modern brand that resonates in your market.
2. YOU'RE ENTERING A NEW MARKET OR LAUNCHING A NEW PRODUCT
Your people know your existing customer base inside and out, but expanding into new markets means catering to new audiences that have their own set of needs and expectations. If your marketing and sales departments are already stretched thin or focused on current customer priorities, they may be tempted to stick with what they know.
But product launches are high-stakes, and applying old frameworks to new markets puts you at risk for missing the mark at a critical moment.
Agencies often have broader experience across industries and audiences, which allows them to spot trends, gaps, and positioning opportunities that may be missed internally. They can help tailor messaging frameworks and launch strategies to unfamiliar audiences, providing a valuable point of view as your company grows.
3. YOU NEED CONSENSUS ACROSS DIVERSE STAKEHOLDERS
When marketing, sales, product, and executive teams have different visions, it's nearly impossible for internal leaders to accommodate them all without stepping on any toes. Dealing with complex personalities and organizational silos can compound the problem.
This kind of misalignment can stall initiatives, muddy up your messaging, and damage internal morale. Worse, it sends mixed signals to your customers, which ultimately erodes trust.
Agencies can often say the 'unsayable,' making them excellent facilitators. As a neutral third party, agencies are positioned to gather all stakeholder input and build consensus by translating competing priorities into a unifying strategy without being tied to internal dynamics.
4. THE PROJECT REQUIRES SPECIALIZED EXPERTISE
advertisement
Even the best internal marketing and brand teams can't do everything. For many organizations, it's not realistic to expect in-house capabilities to incorporate niche skill sets like strategic naming, identity systems, user experience, or persona development.
When companies attempt to do it all—especially when they don't have the right staff in place—they're more likely to see subpar results, slower timelines, and team burnout.
Working with an external partner gives you immediate access to a collection of seasoned experts: Strategists, designers, writers, and project managers who have all done the work before, at scale. These specialized skill sets allow foundational projects to progress efficiently without sacrificing quality or depth.
5. YOU'RE FACING TIGHT TIMELINES OR LIMITED RESOURCES
When your marketing resources are already maxed out, finding time for foundational work becomes impossible. Strategic projects get sidelined, fall behind, or launch half-baked due to a lack of time or focus.
The result? You're missing critical windows to launch and leaving revenue on the table. And let's not forget the overhead cost of dragging out a six-week project for six months.
Agencies have dedicated resources and focused timelines, so they can get quality, insightful work done within a faster timeline. They're built to scale and prioritize specific initiatives, allowing you to meet critical deadlines without overburdening your internal staff or sacrificing other priorities.
OPEN THE DOOR TO A SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIP
Once you recognize that your team may not be best positioned to take the lead on certain projects—whether due to lack of capacity, objectivity, or specific expertise—the next step is to start laying the groundwork for an effective agency partnership.
Before you start exploring potential partners, take a moment to internally align on the scope of your needs and what success looks like.
When you're ready to engage, keep these tips in mind:
• Clearly define what kind of help you need so you can communicate the project and the type of support you're looking for.
• Look for an agency whose experience aligns with your challenge. Also consider those with diverse portfolios, as they often bring useful perspectives from other industries.
• Prioritize fit. Beyond credentials, look for cultural compatibility and communication styles that mesh well with your team.
• Collaborate early. Bring agency partners in while the challenge is still taking shape—they can often help frame the problem (and solution) more clearly.
Whether you're preparing for a rebrand, gearing up for a product launch, or simply acknowledging that your team needs extra support, don't wait until you're in over your head to reach out. Proactive relationship-building gives you a bench of ready partners that you can call when the moment strikes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Michael Saylor Amps Up Bitcoin War Chest With $2.8 Billion Sale
(Bloomberg) -- Michael Saylor's one-of-a-kind capital markets machine just got bigger. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom As crypto prices continue to boom, Saylor's Bitcoin holding company, Strategy launched a new kind of preferred stock, and then promptly upsized the deal from $500 million to $2.8 billion, according to a person familiar with the transaction who asked not to be identified. The security that priced on Thursday, which the company is calling Stretch, promises buyers a hefty 9% annual payout, with no end date attached — unusual in the arcane world of preferred stock offerings. The deal offered the latest demonstration of Saylor's Wall Street wizardry as he continues his years-long effort to transform a middling software firm, which used to be known as MicroStrategy, into a financial juggernaut obsessed with one goal: raising as much money as possible to acquire as many Bitcoin as possible. Some 600,000 coins, or around $70 billion worth at last count. Since Strategy's first purchase in 2020, Saylor has sold equity, issued various types of debt and layered stacks of preferred shares on top. In the process, he has encouraged a fleet of imitators and spurred a new industry of public companies following a so-called treasury strategy dedicated to buying and holding cryptocurrencies. Many of the previous financial instruments that have fueled Strategy's rise have ended up being more popular than expected, but even against that backdrop the demand for Stretch was notable. The company's common shares rose 0.5% on Wednesday, and are up 43% for the year. In Strategy's complicated and unusual capital structure, the new shares sit above the company's common stock and its other preferred shares — which carry names like 'Strike' and 'Stride' — but remain subordinate to its convertible bonds and a preferred stock known as 'Strife.' Unlike those earlier offerings, Stretch allows Strategy to tweak the dividend. Each month, the firm will set a new payout rate aimed at keeping the share price near $100, raising or lowering the level as needed. It's part pricing model, part trust exercise, and a clear reminder that Strategy creates its own rules. That flexibility may appeal to Saylor's large fan base of retail investors, but it also adds a fresh layer of uncertainty to an already complex capital structure. And there are signs that Saylor's tactics may be hitting up against somewhat diminishing returns. The value of the company, relative to the Bitcoin it owns, has gone down. In its latest offering, Strategy offered the Stretch shares at a discount to win over investors. The shares, which are set to carry an initial dividend of 9%, are being sold for $90 each, the bottom of a marketed range and a discount to their face value of $100, according to the person familiar with the deal. But the outsized demand for the deal provides the latest sign of both Saylor's avid following and the continued speculative fervor running through the markets. Morgan Stanley, Barclays Plc, Moelis & Co. and TD Securities worked on the deal, Bloomberg previously reported. --With assistance from Dave Liedtka and Yiqin Shen. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
U.S. drops to lowest ranking yet on index of most powerful passports
The U.S. has dropped to its lowest ranking yet on the index that tracks the most powerful passports among countries, according to a new quarterly report released this week. The Henley Passport Index, which was formed by London-based consulting firm Henley & Partners, revealed in a Tuesday update that the U.S. has gone down by one spot in the world rankings, and now has the 10th most powerful passport worldwide. The report is compiled using data from the International Air Transport Association. The U.S. was first on the list in 2014. The U.S. passport allows Americans to enter 182 countries without a visa. Tied with the U.S. are Lithuania and Iceland. 'The consolidation we're seeing at the top underscores that access is earned — and must be maintained — through active and strategic diplomacy. Nations that proactively negotiate visa waivers and nurture reciprocal agreements continue to rise, while the opposite applies to those that are less engaged in such efforts,' said Christian H. Kaelinm, the inventor of the passport index concept. Singapore is still in first place, allowing its citizens visa-free access to 193 destination spots. South Korea and Japan share second place, granting 190 visa-free destinations to their citizens. Seven European Union (EU) countries — Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and Spain — are in the third spot. Seven other EU nations — Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Sweden — are in fourth place, while Greece, Switzerland and New Zealand are tied in fifth place, according to the report. Afghanistan is at the bottom of the list with allowing visa-free access to 25 destinations. 'While international passport rankings may vary based on methodology, our focus remains on facilitating secure, efficient, and reciprocal travel for American citizens and foreign nationals alike,' a State Department spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News.
Fast Company
10 hours ago
- Fast Company
Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans
Singapore-based solar panel manufacturer Bila Solar is suspending plans to double capacity at its new factory in Indianapolis. Canadian rival Heliene's plans for a solar cell facility in Minnesota are under review. Norwegian solar wafer maker NorSun is evaluating whether to move forward with a planned factory in Tulsa, Oklahoma. And two fully permitted offshore wind farms in the U.S. Northeast may never get built. These are among the major clean energy investments now in question after Republicans agreed earlier this month to quickly end U.S. subsidies for solar and wind power as part of their budget megabill, and as the White House directed agencies to tighten the rules on who can claim the incentives that remain. This marks a policy U-turn since President Donald Trump's return to office that project developers, manufacturers and analysts say will slash installations of renewable energy over the coming decade, kill investment and jobs in the clean energy manufacturing sector supporting them, and worsen a looming U.S. power supply crunch as energy-hungry AI infrastructure expands. Solar and wind installations could be 17% and 20% lower than previously forecast over the next decade because of the moves, according to research firm Wood Mackenzie, which warned that a dearth of new supplies could slow the expansion of data centers needed to support AI technology. Energy researcher Rhodium, meanwhile, said the law puts at risk $263 billion of wind, solar, and storage facilities and $110 billion of announced manufacturing investment supporting them. It will also increase industrial energy costs by up to $11 billion in 2035, it said. 'One of the administration's stated goals was to bring costs down, and as we demonstrated, this bill doesn't do that,' said Ben King, a director in Rhodium's energy and climate practice. He added the policy 'is not a recipe for continued dominance of the U.S. AI industry.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The Trump administration has defended its moves to end support for clean energy by arguing the rapid adoption of solar and wind power has created instability in the grid and raised consumer prices – assertions that are contested by the industry and which do not bear out in renewables-heavy power grids, like Texas' ERCOT. Power industry representatives, however, have said all new generation projects need to be encouraged to meet rising U.S. demand, including both those driven by renewables and fossil fuels. Consulting firm ICF projects that U.S. electricity demand will grow by 25% by 2030, driven by increased AI and cloud computing – a major challenge for the power industry after decades of stagnation. The REPEAT Project, a collaboration between Princeton University and Evolved Energy Research, projects a 2% annual increase in electricity demand. With a restricted pipeline of renewables, tighter electricity supplies stemming from the policy shift could increase household electricity costs by $280 a year in 2035, according to the REPEAT Project. The key provision in the new law is the accelerated phase-out of 30% tax credits for wind and solar projects: it requires projects to begin construction within a year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for the credits. Previously the credits were available through 2032. Now some project developers are scrambling to get projects done while the U.S. incentives are still accessible. But even that strategy has become risky, developers said. Days after signing the law, Trump directed the Treasury Department to review the definition of 'beginning of construction.' A revision to those rules could overturn a long-standing practice giving developers four years to claim tax credits after spending just 5% of project costs. Treasury was given 45 days to draft new rules. 'With so many moving parts, financing of projects, financing of manufacturing is difficult, if not impossible,' said Martin Pochtaruk, CEO of Heliene. 'You are looking to see what is the next baseball bat that's going to hit you on the head.' About face Heliene's planned cell factory, which could cost as much as $350 million, depending on the capacity, and employ more than 600 workers, is also in limbo, Pochtaruk said in an interview earlier this month. The company needs more clarity on both what the new law will mean for U.S. demand, and how Trump's trade policy will impact the solar industry. 'We have a building that is anxiously waiting for us to make a decision,' Pochtaruk said. Similarly, Mick McDaniel, general manager of Bila Solar, said 'a troubling level of uncertainty' has put on hold its $20 million expansion at an Indianapolis factory it opened this year that would create an additional 75 jobs. 'NorSun is still digesting the new legislation and recent executive order to determine the impact to the overall domestic solar manufacturing landscape,' said Todd Templeton, director of the company's U.S. division that is reviewing plans for its $620 million solar wafer facility in Tulsa. Five solar manufacturing companies – T1 Energy, Imperial Star Solar, SEG Solar, Solx and ES Foundry – said they are also concerned about the new law's impact on future demand, but that they have not changed their investment plans. The policy changes have also injected fresh doubt about the fate of the nation's pipeline of offshore wind projects, which depend heavily on tax credits to bring down costs. According to Wood Mackenzie, projects that have yet to start construction or make final investment decisions are unlikely to proceed. Two such projects, which are fully permitted, include a 300-megawatt project by developer US Wind off the coast of Maryland and Iberdrola's 791 MW New England Wind off the coast of Massachusetts. Neither company responded to requests for comment. 'They are effectively ready to begin construction and are now trapped in a timeline that will make it that much harder to be able to take advantage of the remaining days of the tax credits,' said Hillary Bright, executive director of offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward.
