logo
Britain risks following France into a terrifying debt crisis

Britain risks following France into a terrifying debt crisis

Telegraph27-07-2025
Last week brought more bad news about the UK's public finances.
June's figures for public sector borrowing came in at £20.7bn, well above the OBR's forecast and City expectations.
What's more, £16.4bn of this was accounted for by debt interest payments.
Yes, that's right: £16.4bn in one month. We are borrowing enormous sums to pay the interest on past borrowings of enormous sums. We are getting dangerously close to what economists call 'the debt trap'.
This is when, under the pressure of rising debt interest payments, the debt ratio starts to explode. It goes without saying that it is good to avoid this, if you can. But can we?
Be warned, you may need a ready supply of hot towels for this next bit.
The key players in the debt drama are: the budget deficit, the debt ratio, the growth rate of the economy in money terms (which is equal to the real growth rate plus the rate of inflation) and the rate at which the Government can borrow.
If the rate at which the Government borrows exceeds the growth of the economy (in nominal terms), then debt interest payments and the overall debt will rise as a share of GDP.
In order to stop this process from leading to an ever-higher debt ratio, the Government must run a primary budget surplus (meaning a surplus on its budget without interest payments), requiring higher taxes and/or cuts in government spending. And the higher the initial debt ratio, the larger the surplus needs to be to stabilise the debt ratio.
The debt dynamics are merciless. When emerging market countries become stuck in the debt trap, the result is usually default or much higher inflation, or both.
Remarkably, given our pitifully low to non-existent real growth rate, the nominal growth of GDP (i.e. expressed in money terms), exceeds the average rate at which the Government borrows by a small margin. Phew!
But this is somewhat misleading because the average cost of government debt is heavily influenced by past borrowing, some of which was at lower interest rates. When this debt matures, there is a risk that it will be refinanced at higher interest rates.
So we are currently just avoiding the debt trap, but with the deficit so large, the debt ratio is still rising.
In these circumstances, it is hardly surprising that the gloom is still gathering about the fiscal prospects that the Chancellor faces in the Budget this autumn. It hardly makes our position any better, but we are not alone. Amid all this domestic pessimism, few people have noticed what is happening to our close neighbour across the channel.
France is facing a fiscal predicament every bit as serious as ours. For a start, France's ratio of government debt to GDP is higher than ours – 113pc of GDP compared with our 100pc. And its deficit is higher too – 5.8pc last year compared to our 5.1pc.
And ours is set to be just under 4pc this year. In both countries, GDP growth has been weak, and prospects are clouded with uncertainty.
The one area where France is better positioned is the cost of borrowing, and this really does show the weakness of the UK's position. Whereas 10-year bond yields here are 4.6pc, in France they stand at about 3.5pc, similar to other euro-zone members.
In this regard, however, something extraordinary has been happening. French yields have been converging on Italy's.
The gap between them is now only 0.18pc, the lowest for almost 20 years. It doesn't seem too fanciful to imagine that French yields will soon surpass Italy's.
Admittedly, after a recent period of comparatively strong growth, it looks as though Italian economic growth is set to be slower than growth in France, returning to the long-established norm.
That certainly does not make the job of stabilising the public finances any easier. And, at 135pc of GDP, Italy's debt ratio is a good deal higher than in France.
But Italy possesses two striking advantages. First, its fiscal deficit is only 3.4pc of GDP, compared to France's 5.8pc. And excluding interest payments (the so-called primary budget), it is in a surplus of 0.5pc, compared to France's deficit of 3.7pc.
The result is that to stabilise the debt ratio, Italy needs to tighten the budget deficit (through a mixture of higher taxes and expenditure cuts) by only 0.5pc of GDP. By contrast, to stabilise her debt ratio, France needs to tighten fiscal policy by over 3pc of GDP by 2027.
Italy's second advantage is surprising to anyone who has followed Italian politics over the past 80 years. She seems to be more politically stable than France.
Giorgia Meloni looks likely to be Italy's first post-war prime minister to complete their term. In France, there have been six prime ministers since 2020, and the current incumbent, Francois Bayrou, who heads a minority government, could be ousted any time soon.
He recently announced a plan to tighten French fiscal policy by 1.5pc of GDP. By comparison, Rachel Reeves' Budget last October increased taxes by 1.2pc of GDP, but this was more than offset by increases in public expenditure.
There is little chance of the proposed French tightening getting through parliament unscathed. The failure to pass a budget for next year, leading to the fall of the present government, could cause French bond yields to flare up.
And then there is the presidential election in 2027. On voting intentions in the first round, Jordan Bardella, the likely candidate of Marine Le Pen's National Rally, is well ahead of the other candidates.
Obviously, there's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip. But if the markets were to view a victory for the National Rally as likely, then they would surely send French bond yields much higher, thereby putting France in a dangerous fiscal position.
We cannot gloat. There but for the grace of God go all of us.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bruno Fernandes blames laziness for Manchester United draw with Everton
Bruno Fernandes blames laziness for Manchester United draw with Everton

Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Bruno Fernandes blames laziness for Manchester United draw with Everton

Bruno Fernandes accused Manchester United of being 'lazy' off the ball against Everton as the club's captain called for more signings before the close of the transfer window. Bryan Mbeumo made his first appearance for United since signing from Brentford in a £71 million deal and looked lively during a 45-minute run-out. But United twice threw ahead the lead, as Everton claimed a 2-2 draw in the teams' final match of the Premier League Summer Series and Fernandes was unhappy with elements of their display. 'Our performance wasn't the best off the ball, we were a little bit lazy, and we have to avoid that because the laziness you can pay at any moment,' the Portugal midfielder told NBC. United manager Ruben Amorim backed Fernandes' criticism by saying he was happy to see his players call out any drop in standards. 'I think I'm happy for the players to have that feeling,' said Amorim, whose side beat West Ham and Bournemouth in their first two games of their US pre-season tour. 'It's saying that they understand the situation. So it's a good feeling. I think the momentum of the tour was perfect. 'We had the weeks to work with a good environment, good feeling and then we go back to Carrington and we are near to start the season. We are going with the feeling that we need to do a lot of things [better].' Omar Berrada, the United chief executive, said the director of football Jason Wilcox and his recruitment team were working 'around the clock' to make further additions to the squad. United are competing with Newcastle for RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko although Amorim would also like reinforcements in central midfielder and goalkeeper. 'We have a team back home led by Jason - the recruitment team - that is working around the clock to ensure that we continue to find opportunities to strengthen our squad. There are lots of late calls and early morning meetings to make sure that we stay on top of it.' United have spent £140m this summer on Mbeumo, fellow forward Matheus Cunha and left back Diego Leon, but Fernandes believes more arrivals are needed. 'It's improving, it's not where we want it to be,' he said. 'I don't want to have a dig at anyone but I think the club is doing the best they can in terms of all the financial situations they talk about. 'I don't know about it, I'm not involved in that, but obviously it was crystal clear we needed more competition for the players that were here. 'We needed more quality to get everyone to step up a bit more to have more to do to get into the starting XI and I think that's what the club and the manager are trying to do and hopefully we can get one or two players more to help with that.' Fernandes said United's players had a duty to atone for last season, when they finished 15th in the Premier League, and that the standards had to be higher. 'It's every detail, every small detail matters,' said the Portuguese, who is one of a new six-strong leadership group. 'At this football club you can't do anything wrong on the pitch and off the pitch because it's too big worldwide and you get punished by that. 'You get the attention of the media and your fans and you have to be aware of that. At this club the culture here was winning and we need to bring that back. 'Not only the winning mentality that we need, and I think that's always been there, but obviously if you don't win you don't show it. 'The club is trying to improve other things, the facilities have improved, we tried to improve the team, the staff, a lot of things. 'A lot of people have suffered from this, a lot of people who had been working at the club for many many years had to go. The fans are paying more for tickets and we appreciate all the effort they put in for us so now it's up to us to pay it back on the pitch.' United in urgent need of defensive midfielder United may be competing with Newcastle to sign Benjamin Sesko, but the need to recruit a mobile defensive midfielder is arguably as pressing, if not more pressing, than a new centre-forward. The Everton game merely reaffirmed that. Mbeumo impressed on his first appearance for United and dovetailed well with Cunha, Fernandes and Amad Diallo before the Cameroon international was substituted at half-time. Yet this was a bruising run-out for Manuel Ugarte, who was responsible for losing the ball cheaply in the lead up to Everton's first equaliser and generally looked short of what United require. The Uruguay midfielder was excellent in the 2-1 win over West Ham in New Jersey a week earlier, but many of his familiar flaws were back on show against Everton in Atlanta. Amorim's 3-4-2-1 system demands his two holding midfielders to cover a lot of ground, but Kobbie Mainoo, for all his talent on the ball, is not the quickest of players and Ugarte has struggled with the pace and physicality of the Premier League as well as being error prone and sometimes careless in possession. Fernandes' criticism of United's work-rate off the ball told its own story. Ugarte was at fault for Everton's first goal trying to run out with the ball only to be dispossessed by Vitalii Mykolenko, before Idrissa Gueye whipped a delicious inswinging ball to the far post that was coolly dispatched by Iliman Ndiaye. A poor headed clearance in the second half almost resulted in another Everton goal, but Michael Keane was offside as he received the ball from James Tarkowski after Ugarte's fumble. When Ugarte slipped and lost possession in another moment, he briefly paused on the ground before realising he had better get up and run back. No one needed a repeat of that scene against West Ham in May when Ugarte fell weakly to the ground after losing possession cheaply under nominal pressure from Aaron Wan-Bissaka and then made no attempt to race back to atone. Fernandes dropped from No. 10 into a deeper midfield role in the second half against Everton, and Amorim may find he has no choice but to play the Portuguese there if United fail to strengthen in the position.

Klarna considers autumn IPO revival
Klarna considers autumn IPO revival

Finextra

time3 hours ago

  • Finextra

Klarna considers autumn IPO revival

After pausing plans for its initial public offering amid market turbulence in the spring, Klarna is looking to revive its listing this autumn. 0 The buy now, pay later giant and its advisers are preparing to go public in September or October, according to a Sky News, citing a memo. However, no firm decision has been made with the move only expected if market conditions are conducive. In April, the Swedish company paused plans to list its ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange amid market turbulence sparked by President Donald Trump's tariffs. The firm had been looking to raise in the region of $1 billion with a market valuation of $15 billion. Having made its name as a BNPL pioneer, Klarna is busy diversifying. Last week it scored an Electronic Money Institution licence from the UK's FCA, paving the way for a full-frontal assault on the retail banking market.

Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation - and how much they'll get
Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation - and how much they'll get

Sky News

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News

Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation - and how much they'll get

Martin Lewis says motorists who were mis-sold car finance are likely to receive "hundreds, not thousands of pounds" - with regulators launching a consultation on a new compensation scheme. The founder of believes it is "very likely" that about 40% of Britons who entered personal contact purchase or hire purchase agreements between 2007 and 2021 will be eligible for payouts. "Discretionary commission arrangements" saw brokers and dealers charge higher levels of interest so they could receive more commission, without telling consumers. Speaking to Sky News Radio's Faye Rowlands, Lewis said: "Very rarely will it be thousands of pounds unless you have more than one car finance deal. "So up to about a maximum of £950 per car finance deal where you are due compensation." Lewis explained that consumers who believe they may have been affected should check whether they had a discretionary commission arrangement by writing to their car finance company. However, the personal finance guru warned against using a claims firm. "They're hardly going to do anything for you and you might get the money paid to you automatically anyway, in which case you're giving them 30% for nothing," he added. 1:13 Yesterday, the Financial Conduct Authority said its review of the past use of motor finance "has shown that many firms were not complying with the law or our disclosure rules that were in force when they sold loans to consumers". The FCA's statement added that those affected "should be appropriately compensated in an orderly, consistent and efficient way". Lewis told Sky News that the consultation will launch in October - and will take six weeks. "We expect payouts to come in 2026, assuming this will happen and it's very likely to happen," he said. "As for exactly how will work, it hasn't decided yet. Firms will have to contact people, although there is an issue about them having destroyed some of the data for older claims." He believes claims will either be paid automatically - or affected consumers will need to opt in and apply to get compensation back. What motorists should do next The FCA says you may be affected if you bought a car under a finance scheme, including hire purchase agreements, before 28 January 2021. Anyone who has already complained does not need to do anything. The authority added: "Consumers concerned that they were not told about commission, and who think they may have paid too much for the finance, should complain now". Its website advises drivers to complain to their finance provider first. If you're unhappy with the response, you can then contact the Financial Ombudsman. Any compensation scheme will be easy to participate in, without drivers needing to use a claims management company or law firm. The FCA has warned motorists that doing so could end up costing you 30% of any compensation in fees. The FCA estimates the cost of any scheme - including compensation and administrative costs - to be no lower than £9bn. But in a video on X, Lewis said that millions of people are likely to be due a share of up to £18bn.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store