Ex-finance chief at crisis-hit university says he ‘could have done a lot better'
Peter Fotheringham spoke out the day after the Scottish Government stepped in and used special powers to award £40 million directly to the university – whose interim principal quit last week after a report criticised him and others.
The university is currently seeking to cut up to 300 jobs as it seeks to deal with a £35 million deficit.
Professor Shane O'Neill, who up until last week was the interim principal and vice-chancellor there, has previously told MSPs on Holyrood's Education Committee that the scale of the financial problems only 'crystallised' in November last year.
He quit that post however after a report by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies criticised senior figures at the university.
Members of the university executive group (UEG), which included the 'triumvirate' of Prof O'Neill, his predecessor former principal Professor Iain Gillespie and ex-chief operating officer Dr Jim McGeorge, were found to have 'failed' to 'properly respond to the worsening situation' and disclose the looming crisis to other university officials.
Dr McGeorge, appearing before the committee on Wednesday, said he was 'deeply and unreservedly sorry' for the situation at Dundee University.
He spent 16 years at the university, saying he had 'championed what it does through good times and through challenging times, including some previous financial difficulties'.
He added: 'Through the period covered by the report I tried to do my very best for the university, in good conscience, and on the basis of the information that was available to me.
'Where I have been found wanting or fallen short, either personally or collectively, I am deeply and unreservedly sorry for that.
'It would never have been my intention to do anything other than my very best for a university that I love and that I have served for over half my career.'
However he told the committee that leading figures at the university 'did not spot early enough the fact that the university as heading towards this crisis'.
He added: 'We should have done. I am hugely regretful and sorry that we did not.'
Committee convener Douglas Ross insisted that Dr McGeorge holds 'a significant amount of blame' for the university's situation.
The former chief operating officer however claimed he was 'equally as responsible as others' – although he said he wished decisions on cost-saving measures had been made earlier in March of last year.
'I think about that every single day at the moment and have done for some considerable period of time,' he told the committee.
But he insisted: 'I am not trying to shirk blame in any shape or form, I accept my share of responsibility for what happened to the university and the position it finds itself in.'
Mr Fotheringham meanwhile told the committee that the institution had 'not been in a strong financial position' for 'well over 10 years'.
But asked when the situation started to give him sleepless nights, he said that only happened 'as late' as September 2024.
Joe FitzPatrick, the SNP MSP for Dundee City West, told him: 'The fact that you didn't realise till September is the thing that folk who are watching – students, lecturers, staff – they will find that incredible that folk in your position have not realised how bad things were until that late. It is incredible.'
Mr Fotheringham responded: 'Absolutely and that has given me sleepless nights ever since September, if I'm honest with you.'
He left the university in October 2024, and is currently unemployed, telling the committee: 'I absolutely understand I could have done a lot better.'
And he said he took his 'share of responsibility in terms of the current position of the university'.
Mr Fotheringham added: 'The position that it now finds itself in is obviously deeply upsetting for all of us and I am very sorry for any part I played in that.'
But he also insisted: 'I thought it was very clear to everybody, the whole leadership team, that we did need to reduce costs. We had those discussions in late 2023 and early 2024.'
However SNP MSP George Adam accused the men of having 'tanked' the university.
He said there had been a 'systematic failure at every single point' at Dundee, including 'poor financial judgment, failure to act in real time on clear warning signs' as well as 'overly optimistic budget assumptions' and 'weak internal controls'.
Mr Adam described the problems as a 'perfect storm' as he told the witnesses: 'You nearly tanked the university. You nearly tanked one of the oldest universities in Scotland.'
The MSP added: 'I don't understand how people like yourselves can get yourselves into that position.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
16 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
UK energy and steel to be classed as ‘nationally important' in procurement shift
Britain's steel and energy sectors could be classed as 'nationally important' to UK security under new procurement rules aimed at giving homegrown industry an edge over foreign firms. Public sector buyers would be able to avoid normal requirements to consider overseas bidders and instead give priority to domestic firms under the plans set out in a consultation launching on Wednesday. Ministers would be allowed to designate sectors such as steel, energy and cyber nationally important in order to help grant them more of the £400 billion spent on procurement each year, the Government said. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said the proposals would ensure British industry was supported and 'boost growth'. 'The new rules being considered will give us the power to protect our national industries, ensuring more money goes to them as we buy goods and services in Government,' he said. The Government said the new rules will also ensure buyers exclude companies that cannot provide evidence of a good record of paying companies in their supply chains promptly and on time in a move to protect small businesses. New guidance will also require Government departments to consider British steel products for the £725 billion of UK infrastructure spending over the next 10 years announced in the industrial strategy on Monday. UK Steel welcomed the proposals, describing them as 'unequivocally positive news' that would help safeguard jobs in the industry. Director general of UK Steel, Gareth Stace, said: 'These changes rightly recognise the strategic importance of steelmaking to national security and the vital role of resilient domestic supply chains.' It comes as the industry faces uncertainty over the US-UK trade deal finalised this month, which slashed tariffs on aerospace and auto sectors but left levies on steel standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed.
Glasgow Times
25 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
PM ‘confident' on assisted dying law despite Streeting's ‘no budget' warning
The Prime Minister insisted the correct preparation has been done to ensure the Bill is 'workable in all its aspects'. Sir Keir supported the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in a historic vote on Friday which saw the proposed legislation clear the Commons. The Government is neutral on the topic and MPs had a free vote, meaning they made their own decisions rather than following party lines. Mr Streeting was one of the most senior Government ministers to vote against the Bill, alongside Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner. At the weekend, Mr Streeting warned that legalising assisted dying would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the health service. He said better end-of-life care was needed to prevent terminally ill people feeling they had no alternative but to end their own life. Health Secretary Wes Streeting voted against the assisted dying Bill (Lucy North/PA) Writing on his Facebook page, Mr Streeting said: 'Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service – and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest – setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. 'There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one.' Sir Keir was asked by reporters if the will of Parliament must be implemented and a budget found for assisted dying. He said: 'It is my responsibility to make sure the Bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects. 'I'm confident we've done that preparation.' The Bill cleared the Commons on Friday, but with a narrower majority of 23 votes, compared with a majority of 55 in November. It will next come before the House of Lords for further debate and votes. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, has said she hopes peers will not try to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. Speaking in the aftermath of the Commons vote, she said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Ministers in talks over welfare concessions as Labour rebellion grows
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and Government were 'ongoing' on Thursday night as Downing Street seeks to head off what would be Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat. It came as six more Labour MPs added their names to an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks, arguing disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names takes the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the so-called 'reasoned amendment,' tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hiller, to 126. The Prime Minister has insisted the reforms are set for a Commons vote on Tuesday as planned, but ministers are locked in talks with backbenchers about the possibility of making changes to soften the impact of the Bill as a major revolt looms. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Government, Ms Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers that they would not be expected to betray the party's traditional values. 'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.' She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. 'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.' The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' According to the Government's impact assessment, the welfare reforms as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty. Asked whether she thought there were hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits who were not disabled, Ms Rayner said: 'No, what we're saying though is that the welfare system has to be able to have longevity.' Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'. At a press conference at the Nato summit in The Hague, the Prime Minister said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be. 'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.' Later on Wednesday, armed forces minister Luke Pollard echoed the Deputy Prime Minister, telling Sky News's Politics Hub show that 'of course' the Government was in talks about possibly making changes. 'Of course we are, and I think there's a concern that's very valid and real for lots of my colleagues. They're not doing this to cause trouble or be argumentative,' he said. 'They're doing it because they have a genuine, heartfelt concern about some of the impacts. ' He said some of the reforms would be supported across the party but 'where there is concerns… those discussions will continue until the vote and beyond.' Speaking to BBC Newsnight, Mr Pollard said the Government had 'between now and Tuesday to listen to those concerns' and 'to address them' before making the case for reform in the Commons debate next week. Asked whether the Government would listen to calls for it to change course over planned cuts to Pip, he said: 'I think that's for many colleagues where the real concern is.' Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
