DRC conflict: Is the peace deal with M23 faltering? – DW – 08/20/2025
On July 19th, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Rwanda-backed M23 rebels signed the Doha Declaration of Principlesbrokered by Qatar. This was significant as it built on a peace deal the DRC and Rwanda signed in Washington on June 27. In it, the two rivals vowed to reach a peace deal no later than Monday, August 18.
Yet early this week, M23 representatives were nowhere to be found at the negotiating table in Qatar. In a statement on Sunday, the M23 movement claimed that only the full implementation of the Doha Declaration of Principles, including the release of prisoners, would allow them to participate in the next round of talks.
Currently, M23 largely controls the two eastern provinces of North and South Kivu.
To further complicate matters, new reports by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International allege that M23 rebels killed nearly 140 people in July. The two reports also accuse M23 and other militia groups of committing widespread sexual abuses in eastern Congo.
Major demands by conflicting parties are jeopardizing the Democratic Republic of Congo's chance at peace. A lack of trust seems to be hanging over peace negotiations brokered by multiple mediators.
"Nobody is meeting the demands of the other. One would have expected a great deal of flexibility on the Congolese side in trying to respond to the demands of the M23," Nkere Ntanda, a political scientist from the University of Kinshasa, told DW.
The Kinshasa government is demanding total withdrawal of the AFC/M23 rebels and an end to external support, while the latter wants political and security guarantees before any disarmament. The opposing sides remain highly skeptical of each other.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"The demands from both sides reflect legitimate concerns. This is a normal situation in any kind of negotiation, but these demands also highlight how far apart the parties remain," said Yvon Muya, a researcher at the School of Conflict Studies at Saint Paul University in Ottawa, Canada.
Kinshasa stresses the importance of implementing a monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance with commitments.
"We need a neutral mechanism on the ground to verify the withdrawal and disarmament, because peace will not come from unilateral surrender or total impunity, but from a well-monitored and well-balanced compromise between the two parties," says Christian Lumu Lukusa, a notable political activist and youth leader in the ruling Union for Democracy and Social Progress (UDPS), the party of Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi.
The failure to reach an agreement could result in continued conflict and rebel advancements, say analysts. Currently, both sides accuse each other of violating the ceasefire. Reagen Miviri, a conflict analyst at the Congolese Institute Ebuteli, fears violence will escalate dramatically if a deal is not reached.
"The mediation needs to be proactive. Otherwise, there is a risk of escalation, especially since extremists on all sides have resumed their rhetoric," Miviri told DW.
Various African leaders, including Nigeria's former president, Olusegun Obasanjo, and Angolan President Joao Lourenco, have also attempted to mediate between the two sides. Yet no attempts by African leaders have seen success.
"Africa is very weak and does not have the power to exert pressure. This is why it is necessary to go where pressure can be used to make nations abide by the resolutions," said political science expert Nkere Ntanda.
Countries with major economic power and influence are most likely to succeed in mediating a peace deal, says Nanda, referencing the US and Qatar.
Both have taken on roles in negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo, in part to pressure Rwanda, a close ally of the US and Qatar.
The DRC, the United Nations, and several Western governments have accused Rwanda of backing the M23 rebels, allegations Rwanda has repeatedly denied. Instead, Rwanda accuses the Congolese government of using Kigali as a scapegoat to cover up for the DRC's governance and security challenges.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The conflict has killed thousands and forced hundreds of thousands of people from their homes, according to the UN.
While peace negotiations are ongoing between the Kinshasa government and the M23, other smaller rebel groups have continued attacks in eastern DR Congo. The M23 is merely one of around 100 or so armed groups fighting in the mineral-rich eastern Congo region.
Islamic State-backed ADF rebels killed at least 52 civilians in the Beni and Lubero areas of eastern DRC in recent days, UN and local officials reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Germany, Japan boost defense ties amid China's growing clout – DW – 08/20/2025
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul says Berlin wants to take on more responsibility together with Tokyo — diplomatically, economically, and militarily. When German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul stood in front of warships at the Japanese naval base in Yokosuka on Tuesday and spoke about China's growing dominance in the region, he knew where it would be viewed particularly critically. China hasn't still forgotten the German-Japanese alliance during World War II. So, a day before, when Wadephul accused China of "aggressive actions" in the region, Beijing reacted angrily and warned against "inciting confrontation and tensions." But the German foreign minister appeared to have no intention of backing down. "Neither in Europe, nor in the Indo-Pacific, nor anywhere else in the world, should borders be shifted by force," Wadephul said at the military base in Yokosuka. It is a clear message with regard to Taiwan — officially known as the "Republic of China." Beijing claims sovereignty over the self-ruled democratic island and vows to seize control, even by force if necessary. Germany is committed to the "one China policy," under which Berlin recognizes the government of the People's Republic of China in Beijing as the sole legal government of China. Although Germany does not maintain official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, it has economic, cultural and research ties with the island, and advocates for peaceful reunification based on mutual agreement. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Jürgen Hardt, a German politician from Chancellor Friedrich Merz's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), told DW that Berlin needed to send a clear signal to Beijing as Europe continues to fight for the future of Ukraine. "We have often asked representatives of the Chinese government whether they support Russia against Ukraine, and they have denied it. But we have a clear impression that this is not true," said Hardt, who is accompanying Wadephul on his Asia trip. That is why it is right to speak candidly with China, he added. German troops are currently stationed at the Yokosuka base, where they are part of a international military mission monitoring the enforcement of UN sanctions against North Korea. "Germany wants to take on more responsibility," Wadephul said in Tokyo, stressing that "systemic rivalry is playing an increasingly important role in our relations." The German foreign minister described Japan as Germany's "premium partner" in Asia. "We consider it necessary to take on more responsibility together in terms of security policy," he said. A business delegation also accompanied Wadephul on his trip. Arnd Franz, CEO of automotive supplier Mahle in Stuttgart, highlighted the need to diversify supply chains and reduce critical dependencies. "Our question is: How do we deal with dependencies on raw materials and rare earths?" he asked, pointing out that there are only a few suppliers in the world for some products. "China plays a very dominant role in this, which it exploits." Mahle produces eight million electric motors a year. "The Japanese are better prepared for this situation thanks to their risk management, and we are learning from that here," said Franz. Japan is also much further ahead in its goal of reducing its strategic dependence on China. The country now imports only about 60% of its rare earths from China, while Germany relies on China for 90% of its rare earths. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Japan's ties to Germany over the past few years have also been bolstered by Tokyo's strong support for Ukraine. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Tokyo has provided around €12 billion in aid and slapped sanctions on Moscow. Beijing, on the other hand, supports "Russia's war machine," Wadephul said, adding Germany will "defend the international rules-based order in this region as well," referring to the Taiwan Strait — a major maritime route that is of great strategic importance to trade-reliant economies like Germany and Japan. "Any escalation in the Taiwan Strait would have serious consequences for global security and the economy," warned the minister. Germany and Japan have deepened their security cooperation since both sides inked a confidentiality agreement in 2021, allowing their intelligence agencies to share information. To demonstrate its commitment to the Indo-Pacific, Berlin is also increasingly dispatching German warships on visits to Japanese ports and deploying German Eurofighter jets to Japanese military bases for joint exercises. The defense industries of both countries are also mulling closer cooperation. "Germany and Japan are spending much more on defense today, which creates potential," said Hardt, the CDU politician. "Even though companies from both countries are sometimes competitors — as was recently the case when Australia ordered Japanese ships instead of German ones — we will soon be working more closely together." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Countries in Southeast Asia are paying close attention to events in Europe, with many in the region fearing that a bad deal for Ukraine could encourage Beijing to take a more aggressive stance toward Taiwan or in the South China Sea. "In the case of Ukraine, we had to revise our assessment of the security situation in Europe," said Hardt, pointing out that German politicians hadn't taken warnings from Eastern Europe and elsewhere about the threat posed by Russia seriously enough. "We should not make the same mistake twice," he underlined.
DW
5 hours ago
- DW
Israel approves controversial West Bank settlement plan – DW – 08/20/2025
The plan aims to enlarge an Israeli settlement by building thousands of new apartments in the West Bank. Critics say this would essentially split the Palestinian territory and make any two-state solution untenable. An Israeli planning committee on Wednesday gave final approval to a controversial plan allowing new settlements in the occupied West Bank. The plan calls for development in an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, known as E1. Israel's government would build nearly 3,500 new apartments to enlarge the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, which lies next to E1. "I am pleased to announce that just a short while ago, the civil administration approved the planning for the construction of the E1 neighborhood," the mayor of Maale Adumim, Guy Yifrach, said in a statement. Plans for new Israeli settlements in the West Bank have been widely condemned and are considered illegal under international law. The UN and Palestinian rights groups have warned that the plan would essentially divide the Palestinian territory and make any two-state solution untenable. The plans apply to an area of only 12 square kilometers (4.6 square miles). Due to its location, however, the expansion would make it impossible to ever create a contiguous Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital. Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher at the Ir Amim organization, which opposes Israel's expansion of West Bank settlements, told DW last week that the plan would make a Palestinian state "not possible." "It breaks up the West Bank into a northern part and the southern part," he said. Speaking during a visit to Indonesia, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said Wednesday that "such plans, if implemented, would be contrary to international law and would make a two-state solution impossible." Last week, the German Foreign Ministry called on the Israeli government to "stop settlement construction," adding that Germany would "only recognize changes to the borders of June 4, 1967, that have been agreed upon by the parties to the conflict." "The settlement construction violates international law and relevant UN Security Council resolutions," the spokesperson added. "It complicates a negotiated two-state solution and an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, as demanded by the International Court of Justice." Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who announced the plan last week, said Wednesday the approval was "historic," and framed it as a rebuke of Western countries like France and the UK, who recently announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state in September. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "The Palestinian state is being erased from the table not with slogans but with actions," Smotrich said on Wednesday. Smotrich's office had previously said in a statement that the settlements were "burying the idea of a Palestinian state." Israel has criticized countries pledging to recognize a Palestinian state, calling such recognition a "reward for Hamas" following the October 7, 2023, terror attacks.
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Is India beefing up China, Russia ties amid US friction? – DW – 08/20/2025
New Delhi has been trying to rebuild ties with Beijing, while continuing its close energy and defense partnership with Russia, amid steep US tariffs on Indian goods. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed "steady progress" in relations with China after meeting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Tuesday. "Glad to meet Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Since my meeting with President Xi [Jinping] in Kazan last year, India-China relations have made steady progress guided by respect for each other's interests and sensitivities," Modi said on X. "I look forward to our next meeting in Tianjin on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit. Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity." Relations between India and China soured after a deadly border clash in 2020, triggering a yearslong standoff between the two nuclear-armed Asian giants. But Beijing and New Delhi have been trying to rebuild ties over the past year. In New Delhi, Wang held talks with his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and other senior officials, and the two sides achieved a string of diplomatic breakthroughs. They agreed to resume direct flights, boost trade and investment, facilitate business and cultural exchanges, as well as issue journalist and tourist visas. "This outreach is not directed against any country but is aimed at creating a more peaceful and predictable environment along our border," said Meera Shankar, a former Indian ambassador to the US. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The thaw in relations comes at a time when there's growing friction between India and the US after President Donald Trump slapped steep tariffs on Indian goods, citing New Delhi's imports of Russian energy, among other reasons. India has decried the tariffs as "unjustified and unreasonable," saying the country is being unfairly singled out for buying Russian oil while the US and the EU continue to purchase goods from Russia. Modi's government said it would "take all necessary steps to protect its national interests," and has also not signaled any intention to cut back purchases of Russian crude. Shankar said while the US is an important strategic and economic partner, its actions have introduced an element of uncertainty about the India-US relationship. "The punitive tariffs that the US has imposed on grounds of Russian oil imports by India, appear to us to be unreasonable. China is importing more oil from Russia than India and is Russia's largest fuel purchaser," Shankar told DW. "EU imports from Russia in 2024 were over $67 billion, again more than India's imports. Yet, India has been singled out by the US for imposition of 25% additional tariff, taking total tariffs to 50%," she said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In a flurry of diplomatic activity, Indian Foreign Minister Jaishankar on Tuesday also embarked on a three-day visit to Moscow. "The visit aims to further strengthen the longstanding and time-tested India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic partnership," India's Foreign Ministry said in a statement. And on Wednesday, a Russian embassy official in New Delhi said Moscow will continue to supply oil to India and that Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet Modi in New Delhi by the end of the year. No dates had been finalized for the Putin-Modi meeting yet, Roman Babushkin, the charge d'affaires at the Russian embassy in India, told reporters at a press briefing. He stressed that India's crude oil imports from Russia will remain at the same level, noting that Moscow has a "very, very special mechanism" to continue oil supplies to the South Asian nation. Indian foreign policy experts told DW that New Delhi's efforts to strengthen its ties to both Moscow and Beijing are an attempt at balancing diverse partnerships, protecting strategic autonomy and using multilateral forums to pursue its interests amid widening geopolitical fissures. "Dissuading the Trump administration has been the most challenging and difficult task for India's diplomats. The rising engagement with China need not be seen as a response to this, but India is taking easy steps which were made difficult by its over-reliance or optimism vis-à-vis the US," said Aravind Yelery, a China expert and associate professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Harsh Pant, vice president of Studies and Foreign Policy at Observer Research Foundation, a think-tank, said India engaging with China, or Russia, or the SCO should not be seen primarily through the lens of what is happening between India and the Trump administration. "There is certainly a 'Trump factor' there, but I do not think it is the dominant one. India has always maintained its position of engaging with these countries independently of its engagement with the US," Pant told DW. "Insofar as Russia is concerned, India's relationship with Russia has been longstanding. And despite Ukraine, we did not see any attempt by India to dilute that relationship or to dismiss its partnership with Russia, though the West was at one point very annoyed with India," said Pant. This view is shared by Ajay Bisaria, a former diplomat. India's recent engagements with Russia and China were planned prior to the tariff dispute with the US, but the optics and tactics will likely be recalibrated as a response to US moves, he said. Despite the ongoing friction, Bisaria said it's in India's interest to continue pursuing smooth ties and a trade deal with the Trump administration. "However, at a point when both India's leadership and public are questioning the reliability of the US as a friend, the historical 'hesitations' will likely resurface in its dealings, influencing India's diplomatic approach."
