logo
Forum: Use up SkillsFuture credits, but be selective about courses

Forum: Use up SkillsFuture credits, but be selective about courses

Straits Times02-07-2025
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
As a Gen Z Singaporean actively learning new skills, I'd like to share my thoughts on SkillsFuture Credits after reading the article '
More than 70% of Singaporeans have yet to use SkillsFuture Credit top-up expiring end-2025 ' (June 10) and following online discussions.
While SkillsFuture is a good initiative, many Singaporeans feel some courses lack depth or practical value.
On Reddit, users have described certain offerings as outdated or too superficial, resulting in certificates with little real benefit.
From my experience, SkillsFuture can be useful – but only with careful course selection. The quality of providers varies widely. I was fortunate to attend a programme that broadened my understanding of AI innovation and design thinking.
For those looking to switch careers or improve their employability, longer, job-focused programmes like the SkillsFuture Career Transition Programme are worth considering.
It's worrying that over 70 per cent of Singaporeans haven't used their $500 top-up, which expires on Dec 31. I hope more people will make full use of it – for meaningful upskilling, not just hobby courses.
Ultimately, SkillsFuture is a tool, not a magic key, to a new job. It still takes personal effort and market-relevant skills.
Amos Lau Lip Hui
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German breweries are forced to adapt as Gen Z goes alcohol-free
German breweries are forced to adapt as Gen Z goes alcohol-free

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

German breweries are forced to adapt as Gen Z goes alcohol-free

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Some German breweries have begun to adapt by introducing alcohol-free beer, of which more than 800 varieties are now available in the country. Over the course of its 172-year-history, the Lang-Bräu brewery in the north of Bavaria has weathered two world wars and the fall of the Iron Curtain, whose defences once stood less than thirty minutes away. But money troubles in recent years proved more than the small operation could handle. Facing €12 million (S$18 million) in costs for much-needed upgrades, the owners decided last summer to shut everything down. 'Breweries are capable of incredible suffering,' said Mr Richard Hopf, who led the family business and is now overseeing its closure. 'But when sales fall and costs keep going up, it leaves little room for long-term considerations.' Lang-Bräu is in a situation that's familiar to many German brewers. Between inflation and higher energy prices, financial pressures on beermakers are mounting. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse World Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Life These cats may have disabilities, but they are resilient and capable of being affectionate Singapore PM Wong's National Day Rally speech to begin at 6.45pm on Aug 17 Singapore Motorcyclist dies after multi-vehicle collision on TPE Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Adding to this uncertainty is another sobering development: in a country long defined by its beer culture, fewer young people want to consume alcohol. For many Germans in Gen Z – which includes anybody born between 1997 and 2012 – beer is no longer a daily ritual but a rare indulgence. And when they do enjoy the occasional wheat beer or pilsner, they're increasingly likely to choose an alcohol-free option. Some breweries have made moves to adapt – more than 800 varieties of alcohol-free beer are now available in Germany – but this hasn't offset a broader decline. The average German now consumes 88 litres of beer in a year, down from 126 in 2000. And in the first half of 2025, the nation's statistics office registered a 6.3 per cent drop in beer production, a new low. 'It's frankly worrying,' said Mr Holger Eichele, who leads Germany's brewer association. 'The conditions aren't good. Even those who've run their business for many centuries might be forced to give it up now.' Gen Z's abstention from alcohol isn't only happening in Germany, which produces the most beer on the continent. Young people are also drinking less across Europe and in the US. There are various reasons for this: younger people have less disposable income than previous generations, wellness movements are on the rise, and there is greater awareness of the health risks associated with drinking. 'I'd never order it,' Ms Carla Schüßler, a student in southwestern Germany, said of beer. In her generation, 'it's clear to everyone that alcohol isn't good for your body.' Beer's high calorie content also doesn't sit well with image-conscious Gen Zers. Fitness influencers routinely post about alcohol's adverse effects, warning that it hampers fat burning and muscle building. 'It's just hard to improve your fitness level while drinking,' said Mr Luke Heiler, a 22-year-old who works in a chemical laboratory and exercises regularly. As these views become more common, Germany's roughly 1,500 breweries are having to adapt. And not all have been able to: between 2023 and 2024, 52 breweries closed across the country – the largest decline in at least three decades. Those who can are rethinking their product range to include more beers mixed with soda, known as radlers, and sparkling juice drinks. Billboards at train stations and ads on TV now promote alcohol-free fun – a once unthinkable development in a country known for Oktoberfest, and which still upholds a 500-year-old law mandating that beer contain no more than four essential ingredients. Amid all these changes, perhaps the biggest is the boom in alcohol-free beer. While nine out of 10 beers sold in Germany still contain booze, production of non-alcoholic beer – defined as anything containing less than 0.50 per cent alcohol by volume – has nearly doubled over the past decade. 'We don't think our flagship beer, which contains alcohol, will achieve major growth in the coming decades in Germany,' acknowledged Mr Peter Lemm, a spokesperson for Krombacher, one of the nation's largest beermakers. 'Clearly, the growth area is low- or non-alcoholic beer.' For brewers, developing alcohol-free versions of their beer isn't a problem. The challenge is getting them to taste like the real thing. Those who can afford to will often opt for a process in which beer is brewed normally, with the alcohol removed in an extra step once fermentation is finished. At Krombacher's plant in the Western German city of Kreuztal – where beer flows through pipes across different parts of the building – this is integrated into a weeks-long process. That level of precision manufacturing, however, isn't available to everybody. 'Small breweries usually can't afford to take out the alcohol after,' said Munich-area professor Thomas Becker, who specialises in beermaking. The equipment alone, he added, requires 'an investment in the region of €1 million.' Instead, small breweries often resort to an easier method, which involves stopping the fermentation process before it's completed. While it doesn't require additional investment, in most cases, drinkers do notice the difference as the result is usually sweeter than normal. Entering the alcohol-free market as a smaller brewer also presents other challenges. It's tough to break into a field that's already saturated, especially when bigger players are better positioned to release new drinks quickly and buy up the trademarks of established brands. To local breweries like Lang-Bräu, which are already under heavy financial stress after years of dwindling sales, these obstacles can be fatal. The brewery never attempted to make its own alcohol-free beer, Mr Hopf said. But given how many options are already on the market, he added, he doesn't think it would have made much of a difference. BLOOMBERG

US cancels India trade talks scheduled for August, NDTV Profit says
US cancels India trade talks scheduled for August, NDTV Profit says

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US cancels India trade talks scheduled for August, NDTV Profit says

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations. A planned visit by US trade negotiators to New Delhi from Aug 25 to Aug 29 has been cancelled, delaying talks on a proposed bilateral trade agreement, Indian business and financial news network NDTV Profit reported on Aug 16, citing people familiar with the matter. The current round of negotiations for the proposed bilateral trade agreement is now likely to be deferred to another date, the report said, dashing hopes of some relief before the Aug 27 deadline for the additional tariff on Indian goods kicks in. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods , citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil in a move that sharply escalated tensions between the two nations. The new import tax, which will come into effect from Aug 27, will raise duties on some Indian exports to as high as 50 per cent – among the highest levied on any US trading partner. Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases. India's foreign ministry has said the country is being unfairly singled out for buying Russian oil while the United States and European Union continue to purchase goods from Russia. REUTERS

We love our dogs and cats. But are they bad for the environment?
We love our dogs and cats. But are they bad for the environment?

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

We love our dogs and cats. But are they bad for the environment?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Pets come with environmental costs. Cats and dogs eat a lot of meat, for example, and they also kill wildlife. NEW YORK – Our dogs and cats provide all kinds of benefits. They improve physical health, reduce stress and can fend off loneliness. Research shows that interacting with pets can lower blood pressure. Dogs need walks and playtime, which helps people stay active. And both dogs and cats can form deep bonds with humans. Basically, they enrich people's lives. 'There's a whole body of literature supporting that,' said Mr Pieter De Frenne, a bioscience engineer at Ghent University in Belgium. Yet for all the good, pets come with environmental costs. Cats and dogs eat a lot of meat, for example. They also kill wildlife. So, how can you get all those tangible and intangible benefits and keep the environmental, um, pawprint, as low as possible? Here is what the experts have to say. A whole lot of meat Mr Gregory Okin, a geographer at University of California, Los Angeles, calculated in a 2017 study that the estimated 163 million cats and dogs in the United States consume a whopping quarter of the country's animal-derived calories. 'If US dogs and cats were their own country, they would rank fifth in global meat consumption,' he said in an interview. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse World Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Business Manage your household finances like a business for clarity, say entrepreneurs Singapore Minor Issues: Are ghosts real? And other pesky questions kids ask Singapore Singapore congratulates Indonesia on 80th Independence Day Pet food, Mr Okin estimated, accounts for about a quarter of agriculture-related fossil fuel emissions in the US. Globally, another study found that dry pet food was responsible for up to 2.9 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions from agriculture and 1.2 per cent of agricultural land use. Pets fed human-grade meat have greater effects. A 20kg dog on a raw food diet has a higher food-related environmental toll than most meat-eating humans, said Dr John Harvey, a veterinarian and doctoral researcher at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. To reduce these effects, Mr Okin recommends pet food brands that meet dietary requirements but contain less animal-derived protein. Pet food made from chicken is generally better than pork, and both tend to be better than beef. Dry food, on average, has a lower environmental impact than wet food. Vegan pet foods should be approached with caution because of potential nutritional inadequacies. That is especially true for cats. Moreover, in the US, most cats and dogs are overweight. So reducing the amount of food those animals are given would be a boon for both pet health and the environment, Dr Harvey said. And a whole lot of something else The nutrient-rich pet foods people feed their animals come out the other end as nutrient-rich pee and poop. 'It's basically a hyper-fertiliser,' Dr Harvey said of dog and cat waste. High levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in pet waste have been linked to soil contamination and water pollution. In parks and other natural areas where dog walking is popular, this influx of nutrients can even lead to biodiversity loss, Mr De Frenne said. If owners would be more responsible about cleaning up after their dogs, these effects would be lessened, said Ms Kim Maya Yavor, a doctoral candidate in sustainable engineering at the Technical University Berlin. 'With urine, there's not much to do about it, but half of this problem can be reduced by picking up your dog's faeces and throwing it away.' Those hunting instincts Free-roaming pets can also disturb or kill wildlife. 'Dogs just going through an area can have dramatic impacts on biodiversity,' Dr Harvey said. Pet predation can also have knock-on effects for other species. 'When a cat kills a mouse or vole, that animal can't be eaten by a native predator like an owl or marten,' said Professor Arie Trouwborst, a professor of nature conservation law at Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Many of these problems can be solved or mitigated, he added, by keeping cats indoors and leashing dogs. The point here is not that you cannot have a companion animal or two. Being careful about pet food and pet waste, and keeping animals under your control, can help a lot. Adopt, don't shop Finally, if you are considering adding a pet to your home, it is important to consider where you are sourcing that new friend. Of the 5.8 million cats and dogs that went into US shelters and rescue centres in 2024, 607,000 were killed, according to the Shelter Animals Count, a non-profit organisation. The number of unwanted pets presents both environmental and animal welfare concerns. Adopting a pet from a shelter or rescue group, rather than buying from a breeder, can help offset these issues. 'Instead of creating a new thing, you're taking something that's already there,' said Dr Lena DeTar, a veterinarian at Cornell University. And if you are specifically looking for a pet that takes a lower environmental toll, then go for something small, Dr Harvey said. Cats and dogs also are not the only pets available, Mr Okin said. For example, rabbits and guinea pigs wind up at shelters and rescues in high numbers too. And unlike cats and dogs, they are vegetarian. NYTIMES

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store