Indian visa holders in US warned of revocation over theft, assault
"Committing assault, theft, or burglary in the United States won't just cause you legal issues — it could lead to your visa being revoked and make you ineligible for future US visas. The United States values law and order and expects foreign visitors to follow all US laws," the embassy said in an official message.
The statement underscores that adherence to US laws is mandatory for all foreign visitors, with violations potentially impacting future travel eligibility.
The advisory comes amid growing concerns over the conduct of some visa holders. In one such recent case, an Indian woman reportedly spent more than seven hours inside a Target store on May 1, collecting items worth USD 1,300 (around Rs1.1 lakh), before allegedly attempting to leave without paying. The incident went viral after a store employee confronted her, and footage of the exchange circulated widely online.
Highlighting the seriousness of its stance, the US Embassy reiterated on Saturday that visa screening continues even after a visa is granted, stressing that criminal behaviour can not only jeopardise an individual's current visa status but also affect their eligibility for future entry into the country.
"US visa screening does not stop after a visa is issued. We continuously check visa holders to ensure they follow all US laws and immigration rules — and we will revoke their visas and deport them if they don't," the Embassy said in a post on X.
The statement underscores the United States' ongoing efforts to ensure compliance with its immigration laws and reinforces that visa holders must adhere strictly to all legal requirements during their stay.
As part of broader efforts to tighten screening, a related announcement was made last month. In a move aimed at strengthening visa screening procedures, the United States has announced that effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are required to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under US law.
In a post on X, the official handle of the US Embassy in India (@USAndIndia) shared the announcement stating, "Every visa adjudication is a national security decision. Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States."
It also reiterated that since 2019, the United States has required visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms.
The post added: "We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to US national security."
Meanwhile, the US government has also unveiled a sweeping new 2025 travel ban, barring nationals from 12 countries entirely and partially limiting visa access from seven others. The move prioritises national security and focuses on countries deemed high-risk for security loopholes and terrorism concerns. Most affected countries are reportedly in the Middle East and Africa.
Citizens from these nations now face a total ban on immigrant and non-immigrant visas, including those for tourism, education, and employment. Simultaneously, seven other countries face partial restrictions, involving tighter screening or limited visa categories.
Amid growing concern in South Asia, the US has clarified that India is not on the list. The US is continuing to process applications for Indian nationals across all categories, including B1/B2 tourist visas, H1B work permits, and F1 student visas.
However, visa applicants from India still face long delays due to high demand and administrative backlog. Most US consulates in India are booking interview slots up to 10-12 months in advance.
So while India remains unaffected by the new travel ban, long processing times may still impact travel plans, education, and employment opportunities for many.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
12 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Barcelona legend Xavi's application for Indian football coaching job was a hoax, AIFF says
The All India Football Federation (AIFF) confirmed on Saturday that a job application attributed to former Barcelona manager and Spain midfielder Xavi Hernandez for the India head coaching role was a hoax. The AIFF's national team director told The Times of India on Thursday that Xavi's name was on the list of applicants. The report also quoted an AIFF technical committee member saying the his candidacy was deemed too expensive to pursue. "The AIFF received an email furnishing the applications from Spanish coaches Pep Guardiola and Xavi Hernandez. The authenticity of their applications could not be confirmed, and it has since emerged that the email applications were not genuine," the AIFF said in a statement. It had not been previously reported that the AIFF had also received an application purporting to be from Manchester City manager Guardiola. The AIFF Technical Committee said it had reviewed 170 applications for the Indian men's head coach role, narrowing the list to 10 before short-listing three candidates. The AIFF sacked former India manger Igor Stimac in June last year before appointing Spaniard Manolo Marquez, who left the job this month and returned to his role as coach of Indian Super League team FC Goa.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Former US soldier tells BBC Israeli troops fired on civilians seeking aid
A former US Army Special Forces officer revealed that he resigned from his role at the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) after witnessing the shelling of aid-seeking civilians in the besieged enclave. Speaking to the BBC in an interview on Friday, Lieutenant-Colonel Anthony Aguilar said he had never seen such "brutality and use of indiscriminate and unnecessary force against a civilian population, an unarmed, starving population". "I've never witnessed that in all the places I've been deployed to war, until I was in Gaza at the hands of the [Israeli forces] and US contractors," he said. "Without question, I witnessed war crimes by the Israeli Defense Forces, without a doubt. Using artillery rounds, mortar rounds, firing tank rounds into unarmed civilians is a war crime." Aguilar, who is a veteran of the US Army's Green Berets, said he saw Israeli troops and US contractors firing live ammunition, artillery, mortar rounds and tank shells at starving, unarmed Palestinians awaiting aid. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters He recalled one incident in which a Merkava tank fired at civilians, destroying a car as it drove away from the aid site. Aguilar added that he witnessed mortar rounds being launched into crowds "to keep them controlled". He described those in charge of the GHF initiative as "amateur, inexperienced, and untrained", noting that they had "no idea of how to conduct operations at this magnitude". 'I witnessed war crimes.' Anthony Aguilar, a former US Green Beret, told the BBC that he witnessed Israeli forces firing artillery shells and mortar rounds into crowds of unarmed, starving Palestinian civilians at aid distribution sites in Gaza — Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) July 26, 2025 More than 100 humanitarian organisations warned on Wednesday that "mass famine" has been spreading across the Gaza Strip since Israel blocked humanitarian aid from entering in early March and began providing inadequate aid through the controversial GHF at the end of May. Middle East Eye reported on Tuesday that renowned famine expert Professor Alex de Waal accused Israel of "genocidal starvation" of Palestinians in Gaza through its ongoing deadly siege on the enclave. With basic food items disappearing from markets and families going days without enough to survive, scenes of people collapsing from hunger and sheer exhaustion have become increasingly common on Gaza's streets. At least 127 Palestinians, including more than 85 children, have died of starvation since Israel's blockade resumed in March, according to the Palestinian health ministry. Meanwhile, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid at distribution sites operated by the GHF, manned by Israeli soldiers and US security contractors.
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE: 9 jailed for posing as detectives, stealing Dh400,000 in Ajman fake currency exchange deal
Nine men have been sentenced to three years in prison after posing as criminal investigators and stealing more than Dh400,000 from a man during a fake currency exchange in Ajman. The Ajman Federal Primary Court also ordered the defendants to repay the stolen amount and ruled that seven of them be deported after serving their sentences. The elaborate robbery unfolded when the victim arranged to exchange over Dh400,000 for US dollars through a group claiming to offer a better rate. At the agreed location, three men, all Arab nationals, approached him and his companions, falsely identifying themselves as officers from the criminal investigations department. According to court records, the suspects ordered the group out of their vehicle and forced them to stand against a wall. While one of the men collected their ID cards and mobile phones, another pretended to speak with the authorities. During the distraction, a third suspect opened the car and took off with a bag containing the cash. The gang fled the scene in a getaway car, prompting the victim to report the incident immediately. Ajman Police launched a swift investigation, and within days, officers tracked down the suspects and recovered most of the stolen money, except for Dh63,000. During interrogations, one of the suspects, identified as the fifth defendant, confessed to planning the crime with the others. Four more gang members admitted their roles, while the remaining suspects denied involvement and challenged the legality of their arrest and search. The court dismissed those claims, stating the evidence was overwhelming. The ruling was based on direct confessions, credible witness statements, and the victim's identification of several defendants during a virtual police lineup. The judge described the act as a premeditated and organised crime, stressing that the defendants intentionally misled the victim by abusing the identity of law enforcement to carry out the theft. The case highlights the dangers of unregulated money exchanges and the importance of verifying identities, especially when large sums are involved.
