Kataib Hezbollah: All about Iran-aligned Iraqi armed group that has threatened U.S bases in Middle East
is a group with weapons from Iraq that supports Iran. It started after the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003. It is part of Iran's "proxy network", which includes armed groups in several countries.
On Sunday, Kataib Hezbollah warned the U.S. not to join the
Israel-Iran conflict
. Its leader,
Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi
, said they are watching U.S. troop moves and will attack U.S. bases if America joins the war, according to Reuters.
Group threatens U.S.
He said, 'If America intervenes in the war, we will act directly against its interests and bases without hesitation.' The group has taken credit for many missile and drone attacks on Israel and U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria. In early 2023, Kataib Hezbollah stopped attacks on U.S. troops after the Iraqi government asked them to, according to reports.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens
Tips and Tricks
Undo
The group is part of a larger alliance called the 'Axis of Resistance,' made up of Shi'ite armed groups backed by Iran. This group, called the Axis, has carried out more than 150 attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria since the Gaza war started about 20 months ago, according to Reuters.
Iraq is in a difficult situation as the U.S. and Iran both are friends. It wants to stay neutral to keep peace. The Iraqi government is working on fixing the country after many years of war, according to reports.
Live Events
FAQs
Q1. Who is Kataib Hezbollah?
Kataib Hezbollah is an Iraqi armed group that supports Iran.
Q2. Why is Kataib Hezbollah warning the U.S.?
They don't want the U.S. to join the Israel-Iran conflict.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Appreciate anti-terror effort': US secretary of state Marco Rubio wishes Pakistan on Independence; hails 'trade ties'
Secretary of state Marco Rubio (File photo) United States secretary of state Marco Rubio on Thursday congratulated Pakistan on its Independence Day, "appreciating Islamabad's engagement on counterterrorism and trade". Rubio also reiterated US President Donald Trump's ambition to "explore new areas of economic cooperation in critical minerals and hydrocarbons" between the US and Pakistan. "On behalf of the United States, I extend our warm congratulations to the people of Pakistan as they celebrate their Independence Day on August 14," Rubio said in a statement. He further said: "The United States deeply appreciates Pakistan's engagement on counterterrorism and trade. We look forward to exploring new areas of economic cooperation, including critical minerals and hydrocarbons, and fostering dynamic business partnerships which will promote a prosperous future for Americans and Pakistanis." Rubio's wish for Pakistan Rubio's remarks come amid what observers describe as a noticeable warming in Washington–Islamabad ties under Trump, a shift drawing close attention in New Delhi. Over the past year, the US and Pakistan have expanded their engagement beyond "counterterrorism" and trade to include cryptocurrency ventures, crude oil shipments, and cooperation on rare earth minerals. The renewed camaraderie between both nations follows heightened tensions between India and Pakistan after New Delhi's retaliation for a Pakistan-backed terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This TV Box, We Explain! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Indian forces, acting against cross-border terrorism, destroyed multiple terror infrastructure in Pakistan, including the hotbeds like Bahalwalpur and Muridke. As the tension escalated, the Indian forces stepped up the retaliation -- bombing the Rahim Yar Khan Pakistani Air Force (PAF) base in Pakistan's southern Punjab region and Nur Khan air base in Rawalpindi, which prompted the US to intervene. Notably, the US has also used Nur Khan air base during the the Afghanitan war. Later, Trump, without credible evidence, repeatedly credited himself with easing potential conflict between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, while publicly praising Pakistan's military leadership and advancing trade deals, including Islamabad's first-ever imports of US crude oil. Experts suggest the renewed focus is 'less about oil than access to minerals and rare earths,' which are crucial to the US economy and defence industries. The timing, alongside deeper military cooperation and high-level diplomatic praise, signals that strategic, economic, and geopolitical factors are all in play.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump vs. Putin: Whose educational journey is more inspiring?
In global leadership, few figures have sparked as much discussion as Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump . While their political paths have been debated extensively, their formative years in education reveal equally compelling stories of ambition, discipline and the foundation for their future careers. Both men took markedly different routes in their studies, shaped by distinct national systems, personal circumstances and career aspirations. Understanding their educational journeys offers insight into the early influences that guided their rise to the highest political offices in Russia and the United States. Vladimir Putin: Law, discipline and academic mentorship Vladimir Putin was born in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) on October 7, 1952. In 1975, he graduated with a degree in law from Leningrad State University, where he studied under Anatoly Sobchak, a reform-minded academic who would later play a key role in Russian politics during the perestroika era. Sobchak's mentorship is widely regarded as instrumental in shaping Putin's understanding of legal frameworks and governance. Putin's education went beyond the classroom. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What Will Happen to Your Body If You Start Eating 3 Eggs Every Day? Undo Shortly after graduating, he was assigned to work in the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti), the Soviet Union's primary security and intelligence agency from 1954 to 1991. He eventually served 15 years as a foreign intelligence officer, including six in Dresden, East Germany. His career in intelligence required mastery of languages, international law and political strategy, effectively extending his education into real-world applications. In 1990, after retiring from active KGB service with the rank of lieutenant colonel, Putin returned to academia as assistant to the rector of Leningrad State University, responsible for international affairs. This role placed him back in an environment where policy and education intersected, reinforcing his network within Russia's intellectual and political circles. His later career trajectory, from advising Sobchak, St. Petersburg's first democratically elected mayor, to holding key national security roles, demonstrates how his legal education underpinned his approach to administration and leadership. Donald Trump: Business training and institutional discipline Donald Trump's educational path began at the New York Military Academy, where he studied from 1959 to 1964. The military boarding school experience instilled a regimented discipline that would later be reflected in his assertive leadership style. Following this, Trump attended Fordham University in the Bronx from 1964 to 1966 before transferring to the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce at the University of Pennsylvania. At Wharton, Trump completed a bachelor's degree in economics in 1968. Wharton's focus on quantitative analysis, finance and business strategy equipped him with skills he would directly apply in his family's real estate business. Immediately after graduating, he joined the Trump Organisation , helping manage a substantial portfolio of rental housing units across New York City. His early exposure to large-scale property management and investment decisions cemented his reputation as a businessman well before he entered politics. Trump's choice to transfer to Wharton reflected a deliberate effort to gain credentials from one of the most prestigious business schools in the United States. This decision marked a turning point in positioning himself for a career that blended business, branding and later political engagement. Two paths, one common outcome While Putin's education was grounded in law, governance and statecraft, Trump's was steeped in economics, finance and corporate strategy. Both trajectories reflect a commitment to acquiring the knowledge and credentials necessary to operate at high levels of influence. Putin's years at Leningrad State University and subsequent academic role kept him closely tied to Russia's evolving political landscape, blending legal expertise with geopolitical awareness. Trump's academic progression from military discipline to Ivy League business training placed him at the intersection of structured leadership and market-driven decision-making. An educational lens on leadership inspiration Determining whose educational journey is 'more inspiring' depends on what qualities one values. Putin's path highlights the power of mentorship, public service and the integration of academic study with national duty. Trump's journey underscores strategic decision-making in education, the value of prestigious credentials and the direct application of academic learning to entrepreneurial ventures. Both men leveraged their education to build careers that reached the pinnacle of political leadership in their respective countries. In that sense, their stories illustrate that while the fields of study may differ, law and governance in Putin's case, business and finance in Trump's, the commitment to learning and applying that knowledge remains a shared driver of their success. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump and Putin could decide others' fates, echoing Yalta summit
1 2 3 The world's superpowers met in 1945 in the Black Sea port of Yalta to divide up Europe after the defeat of Nazi Germany. They drew lines on the map that tore apart countries, effectively delivered Eastern Europe to Soviet occupation and dismembered Poland. And none of those countries were represented. As President Trump prepares to meet President Putin on Friday in Alaska, there is more talk - and anxiety - among Ukrainians and Europeans about a second Yalta. They are not scheduled to be present, and Trump has said he plans to negotiate "land swaps" with Putin over Ukrainian territory. "Yalta is a symbol of everything we fear," said Peter Schneider, who wrote "The Wall Jumper," about the division of Berlin. At Yalta, the world was divided and "countries were handed to Stalin," he said. Yalta, itself in Russian-annexed Crimea, is a symbol for how superpowers can decide the fates of other nations. "It's a linchpin moment, when the European world is divided in two and the fate of Europeans in the East is locked in without any possible say," said Ivan Vejvoda, a Serb political scientist with the Institute for Human Sciences, a research institution in Vienna. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bedong: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Undo "Today's world is different, but decisions are being made on behalf of third countries for whom this is an existential issue," Vejvoda said. Putin's stated aims do not end with Ukraine. As a revisionist, he wants a new "security architecture" in Europe that recognizes the old Soviet sphere of influence. The Yalta meeting of the UK, the Soviet Union and the US, took place in Feb 1945, after France and Belgium had been liberated and the defeat of Germany was inevitable. The summit was followed by a conference in Germany which reconfirmed the division of Europe into Western and Soviet spheres. Franklin D Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were both ailing. Many believed that the two men had been taken in by the promises of Joseph Stalin that he would allow free elections in the countries occupied by the Red Army. "Yalta has gone down in history as many things, but it became a dirty word in Eastern Europe," since a main topic of the conference was its new borders, said Serhii Plokhii, a professor of Ukrainian history at Harvard. Charles de Gaulle, who led the Free French Forces during the World War II, was also not invited to Yalta, Plokhii noted. "Here we see clear parallels between de Gaulle and Europe and Poland and Ukraine," he said. Of course, there are clear differences, Plokhii said. Stalin was troublesome but an ally, who had been instrumental in defeating the Nazis. Roosevelt and Churchill were doing what they could "to better the situation for the territories already occupied by the Red Army. " They were not giving up territories the allies held, as Stalin wanted, he said. Today, Plokhii said, Putin wants Ukraine to hand over territories not occupied by Russia. So that also raises another controversial moment in history, at Munich in 1938, when Neville Chamberlain agreed with Adolf Hitler to dismantle Czechoslovakia, which was not represented at those talks, in a doomed effort to keep peace. Putin's demand for unconquered Ukrainian territory is similar to Hitler's demand for the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia in 1938, Timothy Snyder, a historian of the Cold War, said. "If Ukraine is forced to concede the rest of the Donbas, it would concede defensive lines, which is what Czechs had to do," he said. "Hitler's aim was to destroy Czechoslovakia," Snyder said, "and Putin's goal is to destroy Ukraine."
