'Appreciate anti-terror effort': US secretary of state Marco Rubio wishes Pakistan on Independence; hails 'trade ties'
United States secretary of state
Marco Rubio
on Thursday congratulated Pakistan on its Independence Day, "appreciating Islamabad's engagement on counterterrorism and trade".
Rubio also reiterated US President Donald Trump's ambition to "explore new areas of economic cooperation in critical minerals and hydrocarbons" between the US and Pakistan.
"On behalf of the United States, I extend our warm congratulations to the people of Pakistan as they celebrate their Independence Day on August 14," Rubio said in a statement.
He further said: "The United States deeply appreciates Pakistan's engagement on counterterrorism and trade. We look forward to exploring new areas of economic cooperation, including critical minerals and hydrocarbons, and fostering dynamic business partnerships which will promote a prosperous future for Americans and Pakistanis."
Rubio's wish for Pakistan
Rubio's remarks come amid what observers describe as a noticeable warming in Washington–Islamabad ties under Trump, a shift drawing close attention in New Delhi.
Over the past year, the US and Pakistan have expanded their engagement beyond "counterterrorism" and trade to include cryptocurrency ventures, crude oil shipments, and cooperation on rare earth minerals.
The renewed camaraderie between both nations follows heightened tensions between India and Pakistan after New Delhi's retaliation for a Pakistan-backed terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This TV Box, We Explain!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
Indian forces, acting against cross-border terrorism, destroyed multiple terror infrastructure in Pakistan, including the hotbeds like Bahalwalpur and Muridke.
As the tension escalated, the Indian forces stepped up the retaliation -- bombing the Rahim Yar Khan Pakistani Air Force (PAF) base in Pakistan's southern Punjab region and Nur Khan air base in Rawalpindi, which prompted the US to intervene.
Notably, the US has also used Nur Khan air base during the the Afghanitan war.
Later, Trump, without credible evidence, repeatedly credited himself with easing potential conflict between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, while publicly praising Pakistan's military leadership and advancing trade deals, including Islamabad's first-ever imports of US crude oil.
Experts suggest the renewed focus is 'less about oil than access to minerals and rare earths,' which are crucial to the US economy and defence industries. The timing, alongside deeper military cooperation and high-level diplomatic praise, signals that strategic, economic, and geopolitical factors are all in play.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Israel says it struck Houthi 'energy infrastructure site' in Yemen
JERUSALEM: Israel's military said Sunday it struck an "energy infrastructure site" in Yemen used by the Houthi rebels, the latest action against the Iran-backed group which has launched attacks at Israel throughout the Gaza war. A military statement said Israeli forces "struck... deep inside Yemen, targeting an energy infrastructure site that served the Houthi terrorist regime" in the area of Yemen's rebel-held capital Sanaa, without naming the site. The Houthis' Al-Masirah TV, citing a civil defence source, reported "an aggression targeting the Haziz power plant" south of Sanaa. There were no immediate reports of casualties. Since the October 2023 start of the war in the Gaza Strip, the Houthis have repeatedly fired missiles and drones at Israel, act in solidarity with the Palestinians. Most Houthi attacks have been intercepted, but have prompted Israeli air strikes on rebel targets in Yemen. The military said its latest "strikes were conducted in response to repeated attacks" by the Houthis. On Thursday Israel said it intercepted a missile fired from Yemen, with the Houthis later claiming responsibility for it. Beyond attacks on Israel, the Houthis have also targeted alleged Israeli-linked ships in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden off Yemen. The Iran-backed group broadened its campaign to target ships tied to the United States and Britain after the two countries began military strikes aimed at securing the waterway in January 2024. In May, the rebels cemented a ceasefire with the United States that ended weeks of intense US strikes, but vowed to continue targeting Israeli ships.
The Wire
12 minutes ago
- The Wire
Gandhi's Religion and the RSS
As people like Ram Madhav speak half-truths, let's recall the fundamental difference between Gandhi's Hinduism and the RSS's Hindutva. A half-truth is as bad as a lie, perhaps worse, because it helps the propagandist weave a false narrative that looks like the truth. We have over the past few years seen how half-truths are used as raw material to wrap lies in the tempting colours of legitimacy. Ram Madhav, a more refined Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) ideologue than the typical apologists, said this Independence Day that Mahatma Gandhi's concept of 'Ram Rajya' was abandoned in favour of Jawaharlal Nehru's European vision of a modern nation-state. Unlike other propagandists, Madhav sugar-coated the message, saying, 'Gandhi wanted independent India to be a Ram Rajya, which was the true democracy for him. Writing in Young Indian in 1929, he explained, 'By Ram Rajya I do not mean Hindu Raj. I mean Ram Raj, the kingdom of God … I acknowledge no other God than the one God of Truth and righteousness. Whether Ram of my imagination ever lived on this earth, the ancient ideal of the Ramayana is undoubtedly one of true democracy in which the meanest citizen could be sure of swift justice without an elaborate and costly procedure.' Madhav argued that Nehru gave up these ideals and what we got in place of a 'resurgent nation' is Nehru's ambition of a 'nation in the making'. He concluded his article by saying, 'A decade of Modi has seen efforts at building Atmanirbhar Bharat … a self-confident, self-respecting and self-made Bharat, true self-rule.' Therein lies the rub; and the bane of half-truth. 'A regime where the meanest citizen could be sure of swift justice…' Where did the RSS see this sacred principle of democracy under the Modi-Shah duopoly? 'Truth and righteousness…' Ram Madhav, are you serious? Gandhi said truth is the sovereign principle. Please don't take Gandhi's name while extolling lesser mortals. Gandhi could take bullets on his chest but could not digest lies. Let's not drift into the discourse about the kind of politics that was responsible for the birth of his assassin. Let's not debate today what Gandhi would have done in the face of vicious divisive politics. But let's remind ourselves of the fundamental difference between Gandhi's Hinduism and the RSS's Hindutva. Gandhi said, 'Nothing in the religious scriptures which is manifestly contrary to universal truths and morals can stand.' When asked about the flaws and infirmities in religious doctrines, he unambiguously declared, 'All that is printed in the name of scriptures need not be taken as the word of God or the inspired word.' What's the message? That a bigoted mind is not allowed to discuss Gandhi! Muddled narratives Can the biggest democratic nation be afraid of the weak and vulnerable individuals who seek refuge in other countries for survival? Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort on Independence Day that India was facing a sinister conspiracy to change the country's demography. He described it as 'a serious concern and a challenge' and said, ' Ek naye sankat ke beej boye ja rahe hain ('Seeds of a new crisis are being sown').' How can a nation aspiring to be ' Vishwaguru ' express fears of infiltrators on such an important occasion as its Independence Day? Are we so fragile that the prime minister, not a sub-inspector, is so worried about the ghuspaithiya? What's new about infiltrators? This has been the Sangh parivar 's plank for decades. What's new is that the problem has apparently become so big in this regime that the prime minister is alerting the nation to the lurking peril of demographic change. If the menace has indeed acquired dreadful proportions, the first logical step is to sack defence minister Rajnath Singh and home minister Amit Shah. These two ministers have obviously failed. What a slide! Shah used to tell people and parliament that 'Aliya, Maliya and Jamaliya' crossed India's border at will and beheaded our citizens during the Manmohan Singh regime. Now, he boasted, no such ghuspaithiya dared to enter Indian territory. The reality is entirely different. The ghuspaithiya are giving nightmares to the Vishwaguru. The prime minister himself said infiltrators are posing a huge threat to our women and snatching jobs from our youth. What sissies! China must be chuckling to itself. Tharoor, a mirage A simplistic analysis of an enigma like Shashi Tharoor will always lead political observers to the wrong conclusions. While many in the Congress view his political stance with deep suspicion, some in the BJP look at it with hope. The intellectually challenged TV anchors have already started seeing him as a Modi bhakt. But Tharoor is too much of a Nehruvian to digest the Sangh parivar worldview. It is difficult to accept that he is itching to join the Modi government. That's simplistic. What Tharoor might be doing is to carve out an image of himself as a statesman who is not a blind follower of any leader and is not bound by lesser principles such as party discipline. His political and intellectual acrobatics are designed to create a higher pedestal for himself, not for an ideological crossover. Tharoor is neither a Jyotiraditya Scindia, a power-hungry elite, nor an M.J. Akbar, an opportunist who sullied his ideology. But the flamboyant MP from Kerala likes to play his cards with absolute freedom, in the process deepening the confusion about his motives. On August 16, the day of Janamashtami, he posted videos explaining the attributes of a true leader. When he says a true leader should be able to assess the real potential of his team members and empower them, a simplistic analysis will suggest he is taking a jibe at Rahul Gandhi. But he also says in the same message that a true leader must possess moral strength, personal integrity and the capacity to deliver justice. Praise for Modi? Certainly not. He is obviously trying to push for greater space within the Congress, not aspiring to nestle into Modi's lap. A day before, on August 15, he delivered a message for Independence Day, possibly presuming that the nation was eagerly waiting for his guidance. Tharoor's problem is his overweening ambition, not instincts of betrayal. He explained what freedom means today; stressing on the vitality of the liberty to think, speak, dissent and imagine. He sought dignity for every citizen, irrespective of caste, religion and region. He also talked of equality, pluralism and fraternity. These are binding commitments, he insisted. That will certainly leave the Sangh parivar's ears burning. Rubbing the message in, Tharoor contended that independence is more than national pride and India should be a leader not only in ambition, but in conscience as well. The context was clear: Modi's apathy on genocide in Gaza. Patriotism is not conformity, he thundered, sending out a clear message that he can't transform into a mute follower of any autocratic boss. Long ago, in one of his books, India, Tharoor had said, 'The singular thing about India is that you can only speak of it in the plural.' Rejecting the anti-minority philosophy of the Sangh parivar, he wrote, 'An India that denies itself to some Indians could end up being denied to all Indians.' Modi-Shah don't live in an ivory tower. They would know Tharoor inside out. But what's the problem in fishing in troubled waters? A Congress leader whose fierce ambitions make the top leadership uncomfortable should have enough fuel to stay afloat. Isn't an enemy's enemy a friend? Sanjay K. Jha is a political commentator. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
On Ambedkar, Hindutva and more: 10 non-fiction works in contention for NIF Book Prize 2025
Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay NIF Book Prize Longlist: The New India Foundation (NIF) on Saturday released the longlist for the 2025 Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay NIF Book Prize, featuring 10 works of nonfiction on modern and contemporary India. Instituted in 2018, the Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay NIF Book Prize (KCBP) is regarded as India's leading award for nonfiction. It is open to writers of all nationalities for works on any aspect of Indian history since Independence, in English or in translation. The winner will receive a cash award of Rs 15 lakh. The 2025 longlist was selected by a jury comprising N Chandrasekaran, chairman of Tata Sons; entrepreneur Manish Sabharwal; political scientist Niraja Gopal Jayal; historian Srinath Raghavan; lawyer Rahul Matthan; Ambassador Jawed Ashraf; and policy scholar Yamini Aiyar. 📌Savarkar and the Making of Hindutva by Janaki Bakhle 📌 India's Forgotten Country: A View from the Margins by Bela Bhatia 📌 Iru: The Remarkable Life of Irawati Karve by Urmilla Deshpande and Thiago Pinto Barbosa 📌 India's Near East: A New History by Avinash Paliwal 📌Gods, Guns and Missionaries: The Making of the Modern Hindu Identity by Manu Pillai 📌 Engineering a Nation: The Life and Career of M Visvesvaraya by Aparajith Ramnath 📌 The Backstage of Democracy: India's Election Campaigns and the People Who Manage Them by Amogh Dhar Sharma 📌 Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay: The Art of Freedom by Nico Slate 📌 Iconoclast: A Reflective Biography of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar by Anand Teltumbde 📌 The Gujaratis: A Portrait of a Community by Salil Tripathi 'The 8th edition longlist … features works distinguished by their research and craft, and their ability to weave the threads of the past into the challenges and debates of the present,' Jayal said in a statement on behalf of the jury. Named after Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay, a freedom fighter and institution-builder, the prize is intended to encourage rigorous and accessible nonfiction writing on India. Past winners include Ashok Gopal (2024) for A Part Apart: The Life and Thought of B R Ambedkar, Akshaya Mukul (2023) for Writer, Rebel, Soldier, Lover: The Many Lives of Agyeya, and Shekhar Pathak (2022) for The Chipko Movement: A People's History.
