BM Finance Fundas: Same day or within hours, cheque clearance process to be overhauled
In a bid to speed up the cheque processing time from the current T+1 settlement period,has announced that starting October 1, 2025, cheque handling will move away from the existing batch clearing method to continuous clearing with settlement on realisation.This will be implemented in 2 phases. 'It has been decided to transition CTS to continuous clearing and settlement on realisation in two phases.Phase 1 shall be implemented on October 4, 2025 and Phase 2 on January 3, 2026,' the directive noted.Currently, banks use the CTS, or Cheque Truncation system to process cheques. This system eliminates the need to physically transfer paper cheques between banks, which can take a lot of time. Instead, on the same day, it captures an electronic image along with other important details of the cheque and sends it to the drawee bank, the one responsible for paying the amount specified on the cheque.The return cycle is completed the next day, after which the settlement takes place. Once the settlement process is done, the customer receives their funds. In other words, all this takes place within a day or two after the cheque is deposited.There will be a single presentation session from 10 am to 4 pm, but the confirmation session will run from 10 am to 7 pm. This is an internal process for banks to handle and confirm cheques.'Cheques received by the branches shall be scanned and sent to the clearing house by the banks immediately and continuously during the presentation session', the circular added. The clearing house will release the cheque images to drawee banks on a continuous basis.Once they get the cheque image, the drawee banks will then be required to process the cheques continually and in real-time. They also will have to let the clearing house know if the cheque was honoured or dishonored immediatelyafter processing. So for every cheque presented, the drawee bank will either provide a positive confirmation for honoured cheques, or negative confirmation for dishonoured ones.'Each cheque will contain the 'Item Expiry Time' which indicates the latest time by which confirmation for the presented instrument needs to be provided by the drawee bank', it added. During phase 1, this time has been set at 7 pm.As explained in the directive, 'During phase 1 (From October 4 to January 2, 2026), drawee banks shall be required to confirm (positively / negatively) cheques presented on them latest by end of confirmation session (i.e. 7:00 PM)'.It also adds that in the absence of any confirmation, the cheque will be 'deemed to have been approved and included for settlement'.During phase 2, 'settlement will be arrived every hour till the end of confirmation session, based on the positive confirmations received from drawee banks and cheques considered deemed approved', adds the circular.Effective January 2026, the item expiry time of cheques will also change from 7 pm to T+3 hours. This means that any cheque that has been presented for clearing at 11 am and 12 noon on a given day, will have to be confirmed eitherpositively or negatively by 3 pm i.e. 3 hours from 12 noon If the drawee bank does not provide confirmation for any cheque within these 3 hours, they will be deemed to have been positively confirmed for settlement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Make In India Need Not Become Make All That India Needs": RBI Ex-Governor
New Delhi: Sounding a note of caution, former RBI Governor D Subbarao on Monday said that 'Make in India' should not transform into 'Make all that India needs' as it would hurt investments in the country and impact productivity. Subbarao further said the punitive 50 per cent tariffs on Indian exports imposed by the US will raise the costs of Indian goods in the most important overseas market, which is America. "If 'Make in India' degenerates into 'Make all that India needs', we risk losing the chance to attract investment away from China. "The tariffs remind us that openness, not isolation, is the path to sustainable growth," he told PTI in an interview. Subbarao said the success of 'Make in India' hinges on competitiveness, not protectionism. "Atmanirbhar Bharat, an aspiration that the Prime Minister reiterated in his Independence Day speech, must mean strategic self-reliance in sensitive areas like defence and energy, not blanket self-sufficiency," he said. According to him, 'Make in India' was conceived as positioning the country as an export-driven manufacturing hub-making in India, not just for India, but for the world. "Punitive US tariffs cut directly into this ambition by raising the cost of Indian goods in our most important overseas market," Subbarao said, adding that investors considering India as an alternative to China in their China+1 diversification strategy will hesitate to lock into an India that is saddled with the highest tariffs in Asia. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day address, had said that for a nation, the biggest basis for self-respect ('atmasamman') is still 'atmanirbharta' (self-reliance). "And, the basis for 'Viksit Bharat' is also 'Atmanirbhar Bharat'". Responding to a question on impact on the impact of 50 per cent tariffs on India's exports and competitiveness, Subbarao said America is India's single largest export market, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of our total exports and over 2 per cent of GDP. "A 50 per cent tariff - even after exempting pharma and electronics - would hit at least half of our exports, especially in labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, gems & jewellery, and leather," he said. Subbarao also pointed out that the current exemptions on pharma and electronics are not permanent; ongoing reviews could bring them under tariff in the future "More worrying is that India now faces the highest tariff in Asia, far above Bangladesh (20 per cent), Vietnam (20 per cent), and Indonesia (19 per cent). This undermines our China+1 aspiration at a critical moment," he said. The former RBI Governor noted that the joint pledge by Modi and Trump at their February meeting to more than triple bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 now looks unrealistic. "While assessing the potential impact on our exports, we must also reckon with the possibility of China dumping in world markets to offset the loss of its US market. "To the extent these are markets where we compete, our exports to destinations outside of the US will also be hit," he said. Asked if it is at all possible for India to yield a little in giving access to the US in the agriculture and dairy sector, Subbarao said agriculture and dairy are politically sensitive sectors in India, providing livelihoods to millions, and tied closely to the country's food security. "A blanket opening to US imports is neither feasible nor desirable. "However, some calibrated flexibility could help unlock the impasse in negotiations," he said. According to him, this might mean limited tariff-rate quotas, selective product lines, and sanitary and phytosanitary alignment in exchange for significant gains in US market access for India's exports. Noting that any such opening should be phased, targetted, and paired with a strong backstop for farmers - investment in cold chains, productivity upgrades, and rural support programs, Subbarao said," India must protect its red lines but should not reject pragmatic compromises that deliver broader trade benefits." Asked if it is possible to pare down Russian oil imports, he said if India were to suddenly pivot from Russia to the Gulf, global oil prices would spike because neither US shale nor OPEC can ramp up supply quickly. "The effect would be to raise the global crude price, hurting India's current account, weakening the rupee, and fuelling inflation pressures," Subbarao said, adding that, in short, moving away is not a simple solution. He observed that the pragmatic course is gradual diversification - adding Middle Eastern and African barrels over time - while retaining flexibility to protect national energy security. "Currently, we import about 1.7 million barrels a day of Russian oil. There is an argument that since the Russian discount has fallen to USD 5 per barrel, the cost of switching away is less than 0.1 per cent of GDP," he added. On the impasse on India-US trade talks and what should be India's negotiating strategy going forward, Subbarao said a balanced agreement is possible if both sides focus on comparative advantages rather than deficits. "Our strategy should be pragmatic: resist emotional reactions, identify win-win sectors, and push for preferential access in labour-intensive industries, while offering selective concessions where feasible," he said. For India, America is the largest partner and one of the few countries with which it enjoys a trade surplus.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Modi meets key ministers, economists to discuss 100-day reform agenda
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday huddled with senior ministers, top bureaucrats and economists to draw up a 100-day roadmap for 'next-generation reforms' aimed at sustaining India's growth momentum and insulating the economy from fresh US tariffs on exports, three persons familiar with the development said on condition of not being named. The meeting was attended by home minister Amit Shah, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal, Railways minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, secretaries of key departments, and select economists. 'Chaired a meeting to discuss the roadmap for next-generation reforms. We are committed to speedy reforms across all sectors, which will boost ease of living, ease of doing business and prosperity,' the Prime Minister said in a social media post. Individual ministries have been urged to come up with tailored measures towards the 100-day agenda to accelerate India's economic growth, one of the persons quoted above said. Another issue that was deliberated was the impact of tariffs that the US has imposed on Indian exports, said the second person. Notably, the 25% reciprocal tariffs on Indian exports that US President Donald Trump imposed came into effect on 7 August. This may double to 50% on 27 August after additional tariffs imposed for New Delhi's oil trade with Russia kick in. Given that such high tariffs could impact Indian exporters' competitiveness in their largest export market, policy makers are keen to step up domestic consumption demand and, thus, capacity utilisation in factories, which will ensure jobs are protected. Modi had highlighted the need for faster economic growth in his Independence Day speech on Friday. 'We want to grow fast,' Modi said in his speech while announcing that a task force will give recommendations in this regard. Current law, practices, procedures, etc, should be aligned to the 21st century and the global environment, and should aid India in becoming a developed country by 2047, Modi had said in his address. The theme of stimulating the economy through reforms was already in motion early this financial year as Sitharaman presented a reform-focused budget in February with big cuts in income tax, welfare targets for inclusive growth, and across-the-board reforms especially in regulatory framework, taxation and the financial sector. Policy makers believe cutting red tape and making it easier to do business can unleash the entrepreneurial spirit of people, which can help to achieve much more than what the government and state-run firms can do directly, the people cited above said. While agriculture and services are performing well, the government wants to increase the share of manufacturing in the economy, which can fetch more and better paid jobs to people. The Centre has also launched several schemes to address the skill gap among the youth that affect their employability. India's GDP is projected by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to grow at 6.5% this financial year. Above normal monsoons, the income tax relief announced in the budget, and a 100-basis points reduction in RBI's repo rate are also expected to support growth this year. On 14 August, Mint reported that the government has asked 37 ministries to submit a detailed report on the key compliance requirements that are creating roadblocks for manufacturers, exporters, investors and small enterprises, and hurting their ability to conduct their businesses smoothly. Subhash Narayan contributed to this story
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Finance Ministry says no proposal to impose fee on UPI transactions
There is no plan currently to impose a fee on Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions, the finance ministry informed the Lok Sabha on Monday, days after comments by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra sparked concerns that these payments may cease to be free for individuals. 'Presently, there is no such proposal to impose transaction charges on UPI,' Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in response to a written question in the Lower House of Parliament asking if the government or the central bank proposed to charge a fee on UPI transactions. Speaking at the Financial Express BFSI Summit in Mumbai on July 25, Sanjay Malhotra had said that UPI being free had 'borne good fruits'. However, for any service to be sustainable, its costs had to be met. 'The important thing is that the UPI, or any other payment system for that matter, is accessible, cheap, secure, and sustainable…and it will be sustainable only if someone bears the costs. So as long as it's the government or someone else — that's not so important — the important thing is that costs of any service should be paid, whether collectively or by the user.' The central bank chief clarified his comments a couple of weeks later on August 6 at the post monetary policy press conference, asserting he had not said that UPI cannot remain free forever. 'I never said that it cannot remain free forever. My sense is that it is not free even now. Someone is paying for it. The government is subsidising it. But somewhere the costs are being paid. The question really is who pays for it. That is the other question. But I never said that the users will have to pay,' Malhotra had said earlier this month. Speculation has been rife for some time now that UPI payments may be slapped with a per transaction fee called the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR). Usually in the range of 1-3 per cent, the MDR is levied on merchants by banks that process debit and credit card payments. Since January 2020, there has been no MDR on RuPay debit cards and UPI transactions to promote the adoption of digital payments across the country. In lieu of the lack of MDR, the government has been subsidising payments of up to Rs 2,000 made to small merchants through its 'Incentive scheme for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low-value BHIM-UPI transactions (P2M)'. The incentive offered is capped at 0.15 per cent of the transaction value. Large merchants are not covered under this scheme. In his answer in the Lok Sabha on Monday, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary also said that under the incentive scheme, the government had paid out around Rs 8,730 crore during the last four years. Chaudhary's answer in the Lok Sabha is the latest instance of the finance ministry rejecting talk of UPI transactions possibly being charged a fee. As recently as June, the ministry had said such talk was 'completely false, baseless, and misleading'. While individuals may not have to pay a fee for making transactions via UPI, banks have already begun to ask payment firms for money. According to media reports, starting August 1, ICICI Bank started charging payment aggregators such as Razorpay, PayU, and Pine Labs a fee of 0.02-0.04 per cent per transaction – up to a limit of Rs 6-10 per transaction – although these aggregators will not have to pay the fee if a UPI transaction is settled directly into an ICICI Bank account held by a merchant. YES Bank and Axis Bank are said to be among the private banks who also charge payment aggregators a similar fee. Over the years, the sheer number of UPI transactions has risen sharply, with latest data showing 19.47 billion UPI transactions worth Rs 25.08 lakh crore were conducted in July. Compared to the same month last year, the transaction volume and value was up 35 per cent and 22 per cent, respectively.
