logo
Pennsylvania House Democrat on Fetterman: ‘If you don't want to be here, leave'

Pennsylvania House Democrat on Fetterman: ‘If you don't want to be here, leave'

Politico7 hours ago
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) drew friendly fire from within his state's congressional delegation, with Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) slamming him for his comments about missing his family's 'entire trip to the beach' during the megabill vote-a-rama.
'If you are here, you are damned lucky and privileged to be here. You should want to be here, and if you don't want to be here, leave,' Boyle said in an interview with The Bulwark posted on Tuesday.
Boyle said he does not minimize the sacrifices made by lawmakers, but that he sat down with his young daughter this week to explain that 'this week will determine whether or not millions and millions of Americans get to keep their health care.'
'She's only 11, she got that,' he said.
The Senate passed the package Tuesday afternoon after pulling an all-nighter during a historic slew of amendments and votes on the floor. In the day before the Senate passed the bill, which ended in a 51-50 tie-break by Vice President JD Vance, Fetterman said he was 'going to vote no.'
'Oh my god, I just want to go home,' he said to reporters Monday, saying it was clear the bill would pass.
Fetterman has increasingly faced criticism from Democrats for loudly breaking from party lines, as President Donald Trump called him 'the most sensible' Democratic senator Friday.
'To me, I think this is one of the most important things I will ever do, full stop. There is no place I would rather be than right here, right now, and if I can make a difference and stop this bill from happening, I will do whatever it takes,' Boyle said in The Bulwark interview. 'That should be the attitude, frankly, of every Democratic member of the House and Senate.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lindsey Graham gets GOP primary challenge from André Bauer, South Carolina's former lieutenant gov
Lindsey Graham gets GOP primary challenge from André Bauer, South Carolina's former lieutenant gov

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Lindsey Graham gets GOP primary challenge from André Bauer, South Carolina's former lieutenant gov

CHAPIN, S.C. (AP) — Former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer is mounting a GOP primary challenge to Sen. Lindsey Graham, arguing the incumbent isn't conservative enough to represent the state. Bauer, a wealthy developer, is a longtime backer of President Donald Trump . His candidacy sets up a midterm grudge match with Graham, a four-term senator whose relationship with Trump has undulated through the years, but who has Trump's endorsement for reelection. Bauer has described himself as 'a real, America First conservative' intent on representing what he sees as South Carolina conservatives' true values. 'I think Graham's been there too long, and he votes like it,' Bauer told The Associated Press Tuesday night. 'I'm guaranteed, I'm conservative, and I don't think he is.' Republicans dominate South Carolina's statewide-elected positions, meaning that the most intense political competition takes place in GOP primaries. Graham has faced previous primary challenges from the right, with opponents accusing him of kowtowing to Democrats on issues from immigration to climate change. But he also hews to Republican priorities on national security; ahead of last month's U.S. strike on Iranian facilities, Graham called for Trump to 'go all-in' in backing Israel and destroying Iran's nuclear program. Graham kicked off his reelection campaign in February, and at least one other Republican has also announced a primary challenge. He has already secured Trump's endorsement. This week, Graham's campaign announced that Chris LaCivita, a co-campaign manager of Trump's 2024 bid, would serve as a senior adviser. On Tuesday, Abby Zilch, spokeswoman for Graham's campaign, noted that the senator had earned Trump's 'complete and total endorsement,' adding that Bauer 'has spent his career chasing titles to feed his ego.' Bauer said he understood Trump's need to use Capitol Hill relationships to advance his legislative priorities, like the tax cuts and spending bill that came before the Senate Budget Committee — which Graham chairs — before passing the chamber earlier Tuesday. 'Trump's got to work and get his bills passed,' Bauer said. 'Lindsey's chairman of a major committee. ... I get what you have to do.' Bauer has backed Trump since before his win in South Carolina's 2016 GOP primary. At his 2024 campaign's South Carolina launch event, Trump called Bauer — who served on his state leadership committee — 'a friend of mine, somebody that could I think run for almost any office and win.' Bauer served in the South Carolina legislature before, at 33, he was elected the youngest lieutenant governor in the country in 2002. After two terms, he mounted an unsuccessful 2010 gubernatorial bid, finishing last in a four-way GOP primary ultimately won by Nikki Haley. Two years later, Bauer ran for Congress, losing a GOP runoff to eventual Rep. Tom Rice in South Carolina's newly created 7th District. Asked how much of his own money he would commit, Bauer declined to give a figure, saying he would 'put skin in the campaign' and looked forward to returning to the trail. 'I'm going to cover this state like the dew covers Dixie,' Bauer said. 'I think you're going to see a movement.' ___ Kinnard can be reached at Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

The Democratic party we knew died the same way it lived – with fear and hate
The Democratic party we knew died the same way it lived – with fear and hate

New York Post

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Post

The Democratic party we knew died the same way it lived – with fear and hate

Zohran Mamdani's primary win marks the end of the Democratic Party as we once knew it. Truth is, it was already dead. Democrats spent 10 years going to war on Donald Trump while also using him to scare their voters to the polls with endless crises. Advertisement With the media behind them, they didn't have to offer the people much of anything — they would vote blue no matter who, as long as Trump was on the other side. Now, as Trump rounds the bases of an extraordinary couple of weeks, with major wins at home and abroad, it should be starting to sink in that the Democrats have lost this war. Trump defeated them in the courts, on the border, in schools and in the minds and hearts of Americans. But Trump didn't destroy the Democratic Party. They did it all on their own by never offering voters something better, or anything at all but Trump hate. No apology Advertisement Mamdani stood apart by doing the unthinkable: He ran as an unapologetic Democratic Socialist. He seemed to arrive almost magically to sell Gen Z the dream. A showbiz nepo baby and former rapper, he was a whole lotta charisma waiting for his ticket to ride. Has the Democratic Party found its new leader? It's not really his policies that brought him victory so much as his revolutionary spirit — he's the living embodiment of the Summer of 2020. Advertisement The demographic he appeals to might herald a real revolution, considering it's the same one that backed Obama in 2008: upper-middle-class white college kids. Like Obama, Mamdani is cut from their same cloth. He hung out with them. He went to college with them. He was indoctrinated alongside them. He speaks their language. He knows their world. They'll follow him anywhere. Note the viral songs already hitting TikTok, where young women shake that groove thing as they chant his name. Advertisement Mamdani tapped into Indoctrination Nation, the Evergreen generation that believes America is a corrupt, 'white supremacist' empire crippled by capitalism — but could you please hand me my iPhone so I can make a TikTok? This generation came of age in a convenience culture that gave them everything they wanted when they wanted it — Uber, Netflix, abortion, DoorDash, Tinder, TikTok, ChatGPT. Why can't they have democratic socialism if they want it? No more playing it safe Because they don't really know what it means, and they don't care. This is a generation ready for the big moves, no more playing it safe. The Democrats should have listened to David Hogg, a harbinger of things to come. But Democrats old enough to know the history must be in a panic. They know why Hillary had to crush the Bernie Sanders movement like a bug. Party elders recall the bad old days, when they were undone by the Eugene McCarthy faction of the party, perceived as too extreme for the silent majority. They remember the catastrophic loss of George McGovern. They recall Jimmy Carter's malaise and how Uncle Teddy primaried him, ushering in 12 years of Reagan and Bush. Advertisement Playing it safe worked until it didn't. Now they'll have to play it bold with an army at the ready, the same army they funded and praised all through the Summer of 2020 to tank Trump. The Democratic Party has fallen, but not because it's been overrun by Islamic extremism. Republicans who take that easy bait will only help make Mamdani an even bigger star. No, it's because of all of us, a generation of helicopter moms who coddled the American mind and raised our kids to be overly fragile. We've given them high self-esteem on the oppressor/oppressed Girl Boss scale. We've allowed them to believe not in hard work or long hours or merit, but that we should be ranked on our race or our gender identity. Created a monster Advertisement What did we think that filling their heads with critical race and gender theory would do to their perceptions of themselves and their country? They've been raised to be intolerant, judgmental and totalitarian toward anyone who isn't fully on board with their fundamentalism. The Democrats will realize all too late what they helped build. They were only watching Trump and it's cost them everything — even their own survival. Sasha Stone is a writer, publisher and former Democrat. Adapted from the Sasha Stone Substack.

Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review

timean hour ago

Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review

WASHINGTON -- Day camp providers and schools are warning that a Trump administration funding freeze could wreck summer for low-income American families and wipe out some after-school programming next year. The administration is withholding more than $6 billion in federal grants for after-school and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more as part of a review to ensure grants align with President Donald Trump's priorities. The move leaves states and schools in limbo as they budget for programs this summer and in the upcoming school year, introducing new uncertainty about when — or if — they will receive the money. It also sets the stage for a clash with Democrats, who say the administration is flouting the law by holding back money Congress appropriated. Without the money, schools say they won't be able to provide free or affordable after-school care for low-income kids while their parents work, and they may not be able to hire staff to teach children who are learning English. Even classes or camps underway this summer could be in jeopardy. For instance, the Boys and Girls Clubs of America depend on some of the withheld money to run camps and other summer programming for low-income students. If funding isn't restored soon, the programming may end mid-season, said Boys and Girls Club President Jim Clark. After-school programming in the fall could also take a hit. 'If these funds are blocked, the fallout will be swift and devastating,' Clark said. As many as 926 Boys and Girls Clubs could close, affecting more than 220,000 kids, the group said. Programs that rely on the money were expecting it to be distributed July 1, but an Education Department notice issued Monday announced the money would not be released while the programs are under review. The department did not provide a timeline and warned that 'decisions have not yet been made' on grants for the upcoming school year. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities,' Education Department officials wrote in the notice, which was obtained by The Associated Press. The department referred questions to the Office of Management and Budget, which did not respond to a request for comment. In Gadsden City Schools in Alabama, officials say they'll have no choice but to shutter their after-school program serving more than 1,200 low-income students if federal funds aren't released. There's no other way to make up for the frozen federal money, said Janie Browning, who directs the program. Families who rely on after-school programs would lose an important source of child care that keeps children safe and engaged while their parents work. The roughly 75 employees of the district's after-school programs may lose their jobs. 'Those hours between after school and 6 o'clock really are the hours in the day when students are at the most risk for things that may not produce great outcomes,' Browning said. 'It would be devastating if we lost the lifeline of afterschool for our students and our families.' Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, said withholding the money could cause lasting damage to the economy. Some advocates fear the grants are being targeted for elimination, which could force schools to cut programs and teachers. Trump's 2026 budget proposal called for Congress to zero out all of the programs under review, signaling the administration sees them as unnecessary. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., pressed the administration to spend the money as Congress intended. 'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on afterschool programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Murray said in a statement. The six grant programs under review include one known as 21st Century Community Learning Centers. It's the primary federal funding source for after-school and summer learning programs and supports more than 10,000 local programs nationwide, according to the Afterschool Alliance. Every state runs its own competition to distribute the grants, which totaled $1.3 billion this fiscal year. Also under review are $2 billion in grants for teachers' professional development and efforts to reduce class size; $1 billion for academic enrichment grants, often used for science and math education and accelerated learning; $890 million for students who are learning English; $376 million to educate the children of migrant workers; and $715 million to teach adults how to read. These programs account for over 20% of the federal money the District of Columbia receives for K-12 education, according to an analysis by the Learning Policy Institute, a think tank. California alone has over $800,000 in limbo, while Texas has over $660,000. 'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year," said Tony Thurmond, California's state superintendent, in a statement. 'The Administration is punishing children when states refuse to cater to Trump's political ideology. The loss of funds could 'put several more school districts in extreme financial distress,' said Chris Reykdal, superintendent of public instruction in Washington state. Districts have already adopted budgets, planned programming and hired staff, assuming they'd receive the money, Reykdal said. If the funding freeze remains, children learning English and their parents would be especially affected. Some districts use the money to pay for summer programming designed for English learners, family engagement specialists who can communicate with parents and professional development training for staff. Rural districts would be hit the hardest. 'They're trying to send a message,' said Amaya Garcia, who oversees education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank. 'They don't believe that taxpayer funding should be used for these children.' Umatilla School District in rural eastern Oregon — with a sizable population of migrant families and students learning English — relies heavily on federal funding for its after-school and summer school programs. Superintendent Heidi Sipe says she is meeting with state officials soon to find out if the district will have to plan an early end to summer school, an option 20% of students are using. Come this fall, if federal money stays frozen, she'll have to lay off staff and eliminate after-school programs attended by around half the district's students. 'It's an essential service in our community because we don't have any licensed child care centers for school-age children,' she said. Sipe said it's particularly frustrating to deal with these funds being put into limbo because the school district was in the middle of a five-year grant period. 'It feels preventable,' she said, 'and it feels as though we could have done a better job planning for America's children.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store