
Listen to Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch. You'll hear Nigel Farage
The Conservatives' 'opponents' under Blair reflected Thatcher's own politics more than they did their own predecessors.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon predicts that UK will 'no longer exist' in 20 years
This was proven true when Jeremy Corbyn won leadership of the party – only to find that the same socialist policies that MPs like Wes Streeting gloat about as Labour achievements are now utterly unpalatable to them.
But while that shift is now baked in stone, another is happening before our eyes. The entirety of UK politics is being dragged ever further to the right, with Nigel Farage steering the tow.
We could look at the now-commonplace far-right-backed protests against immigration south of the Border. Or we could look at a media all too willing to excuse them.
Take the BBC, for example, who opened their report on the growing pattern with a quote saying: "We fear for our children. If that makes me far-right then so be it." Or take Sky News, who used a picture of a Reform councillor holding a sign saying: 'I'm not far right. I'm worried about my kids.'
(Image: Sussex News and Pictures) This nebulous 'fear for children' appears again and again – without any mention of children barricaded inside hotels due to violent anti-immigration protests outside, of course, let alone those radicalised into actually joining the protests.
As excuses are made for the rhetoric, it continues to worsen. And as it worsens, it spreads.
Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, has posted on Twitter three times in the last 24 hours. Every post includes some variation on the words: 'If you're an immigrant, I will deport you.' Some go further, and appear to threaten tourists as well.
If you come to this country illegally, you will face detention and return.
If you come to this country and commit a crime, we will deport you as soon as possible. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) August 11, 2025
Before that, Starmer was threatening delivery riders 'working illegally" with arrest. Before that, it was people arriving on small boats. Before that, he wrote: 'No gimmicks, just results. If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back.'
These messages aren't for the people actually coming to the UK. They are meant to be read by the far-right activists that populate Twitter.
And Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is going even further. Not content with deportations, she has said she would consider placing people into camps so that they do not bring 'hassle into communities'.
These are the extremist mutterings of a far-right activist, not the serious policy proposals of a Conservative leader. And they are normalised to the point that no one is even really batting an eye.
The UK is not heading into a rabbit hole, we are already so far down it that the world of 2007 seems like a foreign land.
If you can remember back then, Tory candidate Nigel Hastilow was reprimanded by his own party leadership for writing that Enoch Powell 'was right'.
In 2025, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is dropping not-very-subtle references to Powell apparently of his own (speechwriter's) volition.
In the not-too-distant future, if you hear Nigel Farage asked to name his greatest achievement, don't be surprised if the reply comes: 'Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Palestine Action ban reveals Labour's dangerously authoritarian instincts
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... 'Why can you not just be Labour?' It is a question I have been asked since I was a teenager, often by Labour friends in an exasperated tone. It is not an entirely unreasonable question. In many areas of policy on health, education, transport etc, Labour and Liberal Democrats seek broadly similar outcomes and, the argument goes, our electoral system punishes the centre left for splitting. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The question, however, ignores the fact that sometimes what matters in politics is the first principles from which you start. For all the similarities between Liberal Democrats and Labour, the differences matter too. Labour has centralising instincts that will always be anathema to liberals who champion community empowerment. Then there is the freedom thing. READ MORE: Why Palestinians in Gaza are protesting with photos of Israeli children killed by Hamas Police and protesters confront each other during a demonstration in support of Palestine Action outside the High Court in London (Picture: Dan Kitwood) | Getty Images Labour's socialist roots remain Scratch any Labour government and you will find a deep authoritarian streak. It is increasingly apparent that this is every bit as true of Yvette Cooper's Home Office as it was of those headed by David Blunkett, John Reid and Jack Straw. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We hear talk of introducing digital ID cards (with no consideration of how to protect the data held). Now live facial-recognition technology is to be rolled out on our streets with no thought given to how it is to be used and against whom. Labour may no longer style themselves as socialists but their roots in a politics that expects government to control the people are there for all to see. For liberals, protecting freedoms of speech, assembly and protest is a given. It runs to the heart of how we see the relationship between the citizen and the state. For Labour, these freedoms are rarely more than 'nice to have' when circumstances allow. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So it was that last weekend we saw the Metropolitan Police's finest in hand-to-hand combat with the serried ranks of retired teachers, social workers and academics armed with placards proclaiming their opposition to genocide – something that would be uncontroversial in most normal times – and their support for Palestine Action (which seems to be the sticking point). Palestine Action's unacceptable tactics Let me make a few things clear at this point. I am not a supporter of Palestine Action. The tactics that they employ in protesting against government policy on Palestine are wrong-headed and counter-productive. Targeting military installations for acts of vandalism is not an acceptable tactic to promote the Palestinian cause. It does not, however, make you a terrorist organisation and the decision to proscribe Palestinian Action was disproportionate and a mistake. That proscription would lead to the sort of scenes that we witnessed at the weekend was inevitable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Using anti-terror legislation to arrest peaceful protestors is not just illiberal and oppressive. We give government extra power to tackle terrorism and trust them to use it for that. Anti-terrorism laws should be used to deal with terrorists, not our own citizens who wish to demonstrate their disagreements with their government. Ultimately the biggest threat to our safety could turn out to be Labour's authoritarian instincts.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's ‘one in, one out' migrant deal has already failed, evidence suggests
Fifty per cent more migrants have crossed the Channel since Sir Keir Starmer agreed his 'one in, one out' deal with France than in the same period last year, analysis shows. The deal, struck with Emmanuel Macron, the French president, last month means Britain will detain illegal migrants and send them back to France in return for taking a similar number of asylum seekers from France. The agreement is meant to deter migrants from making the Channel crossing because those who reach Britain are likely to be sent back. Sir Keir unveiled the scheme at a joint press conference with Mr Macron on July 10, four weeks before the scheme began, and said it would 'show others trying to make the same journey that it will be in vain'. The Prime Minister wrote on X last month: 'For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France in short order. This Government is breaking the business model of criminal smuggling gangs and securing our borders.' But analysis by The Telegraph suggests the announcement did not have a deterrent effect. It has found that, between July 10 and last Sunday, the most recent day for which the Home Office has published figures, 5,438 migrants crossed the Channel in small boats. This is more than 50 per cent higher than the 3,581 who made the journey over the same period last year, which was the first month of the Government's Border Security Command. It is also 78 per cent greater than the 3,055 arrivals under Rishi Sunak in the summer of 2023, and narrowly beats the previous record of 5,360, set in 2022 when Boris Johnson was prime minister. It is believed that the trial scheme, which began on Wednesday, will return about 50 migrants a week to France, which will mean about 800 over the course of a year. The weather is a significant factor in the number of people crossing the Channel, with conditions good so far this year. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'These figures show that the Government's so-called deal is no deterrent at all. 'I saw this with my own eyes on the Channel last week. If only 6 per cent of the illegal immigrants are removed and 94 per cent can stay in the UK, that is no deterrent at all. We need every single illegal immigrant to be removed upon arrival. That would be a real deterrent.' He added that he believed the Government was 'too weak to do it, and as a result, this year so far has been the worst in history' for migrant crossings. The Government hopes that the number of returns to France will quickly increase after the trial period of the scheme is over. The Home Office released footage of migrants being detained on the first day that the scheme was running, with the first men arrested at Dover harbour. The number of migrants to cross the English Channel since Labour came to power last summer is expected to hit 50,000 this week. Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservatives, has claimed that she would reduce the number to zero 'quickly' if she entered No 10. A Home Office spokesman said: 'This analysis does not represent the effectiveness of our ground-breaking pilot scheme to detain and return migrants to France, which was implemented just last week. 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security, and break the business model of vile people-smuggling gangs. 'So far this year, 15,000 crossing attempts have been stopped, and we know more needs to be done to build on this. 'Alongside our pilot scheme, the French authorities are also working to amend their operational policy to allow maritime forces to intervene at sea.'


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Rise in no-fault evictions despite Labour's pledge to ban them
Thousands of people have had their homes seized after receiving controversial 'no-fault' eviction notices despite Labour pledging to abolish them, new data shows. Labour said in its election manifesto it would abolish Section 21 eviction notices 'immediately' after winning the election. A year on, and the relevant legislation still progressing through parliament means that the ban is still not in effect. According to Ministry of Justice figures released on Thursday, 11,400 households received no-fault evictions by bailiffs in the year to June. The number of bailiff evictions is an eight per cent rise on the previous year, continuing a trend of a heightened use of the notices. Housing charity Shelter said it is 'unconscionable' that renters 'continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs' a year after Labour 's election victory. It warned that nearly 1,000 households could be evicted from their homes by bailiffs every month until the ban on the notices is finally put in place. Section 21 notices grant landlords the power to evict tenants from their properties at two months' notice without needing to give any reason. Former prime minister Theresa May first announced the Conservatives' intention to abolish Section 21 notices in April 2019. Shelter described no-fault evictions as one of the leading causes of homelessness. Mairi MacRae, its director of campaigns and policy, said: "It is unconscionable that more than a year after the government came to power, thousands of renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the government said would be scrapped immediately. 'For far too long, tenants' lives have been thrown into turmoil by the rank injustice of 'no-fault' evictions. At the whim of private landlords, thousands of tenants are being left with just two months to find a new home, plunging them into a ruthless rental market and leaving many exposed to the riptide of homelessness.' The government's Renters' Rights Bill, sponsored by the Ministry of Housing, is currently in its final stages. It is expected to pass before the end of the year, or early 2026 at the latest. Alongside abolishing Section 21 notices, it would give tenants a 12-month protected period at the beginning of their tenancy, alongside increasing the notice requirement for landlords to evict on other grounds from two to four months. The bill would also provide protection against 'backdoor eviction ', where tenants are effectively pushed out by above-market rent increases, by giving them greater powers to challenge them. Housing charity Crisis has called on the government to bring forward the legislation and name a date when it will be implemented. Matt Downie, chief executive at Crisis, said: 'Despite good intentions from the Westminster government, thousands of people are still being unjustly evicted from their homes and threatened with – or even forced into – homelessness.' The new data comes after Labour MP Rushanara Ali recently resigned her role as homelessness minister following reports she gave tenants in a property she owned four months' notice to leave, before relisting the property with a £700 rent increase just weeks later. Such a move would likely not be allowed under the Renters' Rights Bill, which is set to introduce new protections for tenants, including banning landlords who evict tenants in order to sell their property from relisting it for rent for six months. A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'No one should live in fear of a Section 21 eviction and these new figures show exactly why we will abolish them through our Renters' Rights Bill, which is a manifesto commitment and legislative priority for this government. 'We're determined to level the playing field by providing tenants with greater security, rights and protections in their homes and our landmark reforms will be implemented swiftly after the bill becomes law.'