Trees axed without approval? NGT serves notice to agencies in Haryana
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
While the tribunal has listed the matter for further consideration on Oct 16, the replies have been sought from the authorities as well as the sarpanch, Mukesh, a week before that.
The petitioner — local resident Arun Kumar — had said that despite complaints filed with both the forest department and the Chhainsa police station on March 27, and an ensuing inspection by forest officials, "no action was reportedly taken to address the illegal activity".
Petitioner Arun Kumar, appearing in person via videoconference, submitted the forest department's inspection report, which confirmed illegal tree felling in the area. Photographs substantiating the claims were also placed on record.
In the backdrop of this, the principal bench of NGT, led by chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava and expert member Dr A Senthil Vel, directed that notices be issued to the member secretary of Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Faridabad district Magistrate, divisional forest officer of Faridabad and the sarpanch, asking them to file their replies by way of affidavit at least a week before the next hearing.
Taking a serious view of the matter, the tribunal noted the application raises substantial questions regarding compliance with environmental norms.
"Applicant appearing virtually submits that in the report of the forest department it has come to light illegal felling of trees took place but in spite of that no action has been taken by the authorities. In support of the plea, the applicant has placed on record certain photographs along with the letter petition. OA raises substantial questions relating to compliance with environmental norms," the order said.
The applicant has been instructed to serve the notices to the respondents and submit proof of service prior to the upcoming hearing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 hours ago
- Business Standard
NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) issued notice on a plea from The Citizens Foundation, which alleges widespread non-compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, by manufacturers of gutkha, pan masala, and tobacco products. The petition claims that banned plastic packaging materials are still being used and calls for strict enforcement of existing regulations. This includes the closure of units violating the rules and the recovery of environmental compensation. A judicial bench led by Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Expert Member Dr. A. Senthil Vel has issued notices to relevant authorities, including the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), seeking their responses. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, despite the CPCB's earlier directives, issued on October 22, 2021, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to 25 manufacturers to halt operations unless they adopted eco-friendly packaging, these directives remain unimplemented. The CPCB had instructed the defaulting companies to submit a timeline for switching to sustainable materials and to pay Environmental Compensation (EC) with interest for any delays. The plea highlights violations of Rules 4(f) and 4(i) of the 2016 Rules, which prohibit the use of plastic sachets and specific polymers in packaging gutkha and related products. CPCB's previous reports suggested that such non-compliance could result in stern penalties, including seizure of goods, shutting down of factories, and levies of Rs 5,000 per ton of plastic used. Repeat offences could attract additional fines of up to Rs 20,000 per ton. The applicant also cited a CPCB report from January 2021, which outlines enforcement under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime. According to this, delayed EC payments could be penalised with annual interest ranging from 12 per cent to 24 per cent. Delays exceeding three months could lead to factory closures and criminal prosecution under Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act. Recognising the gravity of the environmental concerns raised, the NGT has scheduled the next hearing for September 26, 2025. The applicant must serve notices on the remaining respondents and file an affidavit of service one week prior to the scheduled date, as stated by the Tribunal.
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
34 per cent of TN groundwater overexploited; delay in introducing water pricing policy blamed
CHENNAI: Tamil Nadu is among the states worst affected by groundwater overexploitation, with 106 assessment units—33.87% of the total of 313—classified as over-exploited, according to a comprehensive report of the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) submitted before the principal bench of the National Green Tribunal. The CGWA report, which was based on the data provided by every State last month in a specific format, says that, in Tamil Nadu, while No Objection Certificates (NOCs) for drawing groundwater in over-exploited and critical areas are restricted to domestic use, infrastructure development, and non-water-intensive industries, the enforcement of these norms has been inconsistent. A total of 492 illegal groundwater extraction units were sealed in the state based on orders from the Madras High Court. However, unlike other states such as Punjab and Haryana, Tamil Nadu has yet to introduce provisions for pricing or environmental compensation for illegal groundwater extraction. 'There is no provision for collecting Environmental Compensation under existing regulations in Tamil Nadu,' the CGWA noted. 'NOCs have only been issued to water-based industries located in safe and semi-critical areas, not in over-exploited ones.' Within the State, Chennai, Salem, Coimbatore, Dindigul, Mayiladuthurai, Vellore, and Tirupattur districts are the worst affected. For instance, out of 16 groundwater assessment units in Chennai, 13 are over-exploited, which is 81.25%.
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
TNPCB levies ₹3.15 crore fine on Tiruppur Corporation for dumping wastes in abandoned quarry at Pongupalayam village
The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) has assessed payment of fine to the extent of ₹3.15 crore by the Tiruppur Corporation for failing to adhere to the directive of the National Green Tribunal (Southern Zone) to stop dumping of untreated municipal wastes at an abandoned quarry at Kalamapalayam in Pongupalayam village in Tiruppur North Taluk. A petition submitted to the NGT (SZ) by Satishkumar R., environmental activist of Pongupalayam, held the District Collector, the TNPCB, Tiruppur Corporation and Srinivas Waste Management Services (P) Ltd. responsible for the dumping of unsegregated wastes in the abandoned quarry, by flouting an earlier order of the NGT (SZ). Based on an inspection carried out on July 4, District Environmental Engineer, Tiruppur North, S. Bharathiraja, in his report submitted before Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, Judicial Member, and Satyagopal Korlapati, Expert Member, on July 16, said the Tiruppur Corporation and the private entity had been directed to remove the wastes dumped, and undertake comprehensive clean up and remediation. The TNPCB report also directed the respondents to identify a legally compliant site for establishment of a municipal solid waste management-cum-disposal facility, and dispose wastes in strict compliance with the law. According to the report, the Tiruppur Corporation had continued dumping of unsegregated municipal solid waste in the quarry in Survey 206 against the order of NGT SZ dated January 31, 2025. As the quarry had got filled, the local body capped the dumped quarry with a layer of sand. The civic body was subsequently continuing the dumping / firing of the wastes at another abandoned quarry on south-eastern side of the capped quarry. During inspection, smoke was also observed emanating from the dump site, the report said. The Corporation had not obtained necessary authorisation under SWM Rules 2016, and the violation required the local body to pay compensation of ₹5 lakh per month, from April, 2021, which amounts to ₹3.15 crore till June 30, the TNPCB report said.
