The truth about Bill Clinton's cozy friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his ‘lovely girls'
The tour was to launch his new nonprofit AIDS initiative, taking in five countries and even spending the day with former South African president Nelson Mandela.
But those aspects of the trip have long been forgotten as the ex-president, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker and others were flying as guests of Jeffrey Epstein about the infamous jet later to be known as The Lolita Express.
11 Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell enjoyed a tour of the White House in 1993.
William J. Clinton Presidential Library
Devious Epstein, later exposed as a pedophile, had staffed the jet with young girls — one of the tactics he is said to have employed to impress and coerce powerful people.
'I felt Epstein put the President at risk with those young girls on board,' said Spacey in an interview with Piers Morgan last year. 'It was disturbing. There were young girls on those flights. I didn't understand at the time who they were or why they were there.'
An eyebrow raising photo which later surfaced from that trip shows Clinton, then 56, reclining in an airport lounge in a yellow shirt while Chauntae Davies, a 22-year-old massage therapist in Epstein's employ, rubs his shoulders.
11 Bill Clinton got a massage while waiting for a refuel in Portugal while flying on the 2002 humanitarian trip to Africa on Epstein's Lolita Express.
MEGA
This week Clinton and his wife, ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, were subpoenaed to testify before the House Oversight Committee about Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
The Committee's letter to Hillary Clinton described a potential 'close relationship' between her family and Epstein and Maxwell, according to reports.
By the time of the 2002 trip, Clinton had been linked to mysterious Manhattan financier Epstein for at least a decade.
11 Jeffrey Epstein owned a sprawling compound on Little Saint James in the Caribbean where sex slave Virginia Giuffre wrote that she remembered seeing Bill Clinton with two 'lovely' young women.
Shutterstock for NY Post
11 Bill Clinton and Ghislaine Maxwell posing together as they prepared to board the Lolita Express in an undate photograph. The ex-president is said to have flown on Epstein's jet 26 times.
MEGA
11 Jeffrey Epstein's so-called 'Lolita Express' is now rusting in a Georgia plane graveyard.
MB / MEGA
Epstein donated $1,000 to Clinton's election campaign in 1992, and later gave his wife $20,000 for her US Senate campaign in 1999, according to public records.
In between, both Epstein and Maxwell visited the White House 17 times during Clinton's two terms in office, starting in 1993.
Epstein also later visited Clinton at the Harlem office of the Clinton Foundation in 2002, according to reports.
11 Both Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton have been subpoenaed in a House of Representatives probe into Jeffrey Epstein.
Getty Images
The African trip was the second of Clinton's estimated 26 trips on Epstein's 'Lolita Express,' on which he occasionally traveled without the Secret Service, according to flight logs — a breach of presidential protection protocol.
Now federal lawmakers are re-examining those trips and the former president's relationship with Epstein amid a widening probe into the financier. The move comes after the Justice Department interviewed Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for recruiting underage girls for her and Epstein to abuse. She is said to have given her lawyers 100 names associated with Epstein.
After the September 2002 Africa trip, Clinton's former close aide Doug Band claimed to Vanity Fair that he tried for years to keep Epstein at a distance, but Clinton just couldn't stay away.
Band said in early 2003, the former president visited Epstein's private Caribbean retreat, Little St. James — now known as 'Pedophile Island.'
The Clinton camp has many times insisted the former president never set foot on the island.
However, according to late Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Clinton was spotted sitting across the dinner table with 'two lovely girls' on Epstein's private Caribbean Island.
11 Bill Clinton poses with two members of Jeffrey Epstein's household staff at his lavish Upper East Side mansion.
11 Jeffrey Epstein with Bill Clinton in an undated photo. The pair were first associated in 1992, but Clinton claims he was never aware of Epstein's prosecutions or charges and he cut off his
11 Bill Clinton with his arm around Chauntae Davies in another photo from the archive.
MEGA
Giuffre, who also said she was parceled out as a sex slave to Prince Andrew, made the claim in a fictionalized 'memoir' she wrote that was included in a legal complaint against Maxwell, who she sued for defamation in 2015.
'Teasing the girls on either side of him with playful pokes and brassy comments, there was no modesty between any of them,' Giuffre wrote in the never-published manuscript, 'The Billionaire's Playboy Club.'
'We all finished our meals and scattered in our own different directions. Strolling into the darkness with two beautiful girls around either arm, Bill seemed content to retire for the evening.'
Clinton has sought to downplay his relationship with Epstein over the years, saying that he cut off their friendship well before either of his arrests — in 2007 and 2019 — and he was unaware of his crimes.
In 2019, a spokesman for Clinton said he 'knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York.'
A representative for Clinton did not return a request for comment Wednesday and Clinton has not been accused of any sexual misconduct regarding Epstein's victims.
11 Epstein had a bizarre painting of Bill Clinton, wearing a blue dress, in his Upper East Side mansion.
Petrina Ryan-Kleid
11 Ghislaine Maxwell, circled in red, at Chelsea Clinton's wedding, with Bill Clinton walking her down the aisle.
AP
Spencer Kuvin, a Florida lawyer who represented some of the first victims of Epstein to come forward in 2007, said during his investigations he didn't find any evidence of Clinton engaging in 'inappropriate behavior' but said that he had 'a pattern of socializing' with Epstein.
'He was seeking influence from all sides,' said Kuvin, referring to Epstein. 'He wanted to befriend as many high-profile people and have them in his orbit. If they were stuck on a plane with him for a long time, they had to speak to him and he could build a relationship that way.'
While Bill sought to distance himself from Epstein, the financier liked to remind his acquaintances of the association. A reporter who met Epstein a year before he died noted how he kept a picture of himself with Clinton on display.
After his death, when the FBI raided his mansion, they uncovered a large painting of Clinton in a brightly colored blue dress — resembling the one worn by Monica Lewinsky, whom Clinton was embroiled in his own sex scandal with — from the property.
Although Bill Clinton distanced himself from Epstein, the family remained in contact with Ghislaine, who attended daughter Chelsea Clinton's 2010 wedding.
Congressional questioning will begin August 18 with former Attorney General William Barr appearing before the House committee. Hillary Clinton has been asked to give a deposition on Oct. 9, while her husband's has been scheduled for Oct. 14.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ghislaine Maxwell Banned From Service Dog Training
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted sex trafficker, is reportedly barred from training service dogs at the minimum-security prison camp she was transferred to last week. Why It Matters The federal Bureau of Prisons confirmed on Friday that Maxwell had been transferred to the minimum security Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Bryan, Texas, but did not explain the circumstances. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls and was sentenced to 20 years in prison. She was serving her sentence at a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida, until her transfer to the prison camp. Epstein, a convicted sex offender, died behind bars in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Her case has been the subject of heightened scrutiny since an outcry over the Justice Department's announcement last month that it would not be releasing any additional records from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. Ghislaine Maxwell attends the 4th Annual WIE Symposium at Center 548 on September 20, 2013 in New York City. Ghislaine Maxwell attends the 4th Annual WIE Symposium at Center 548 on September 20, 2013 in New York City. Paul Zimmerman/WireImage What To Know Canine Companions, a nonprofit that trains and provides service dogs, runs training programs at the prison camp where Maxwell is located. But Paige Mazzoni, the organization's chief executive officer, told NBC News that inmates like Maxwell are not permitted to get involved. "We do not allow anyone whose crime involves abuse toward minors or animals—including any crime of a sexual nature," Mazzoni said. "That's a hard policy we have, so she will not be able to." Newsweek has contacted Canine Companions for further comment via a contact form on its website. Maxwell's transfer came days after she was interviewed over two days by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche amid pressure on President Donald Trump to release more information about the investigations of Maxwell and Epstein. The Department of Justice is reportedly weighing whether to release a transcript of the interview. It would come at the direction of Trump, who has ordered the disclosure of "all credible evidence" in the Epstein case. Maxwell is appealing to the Supreme Court to have her conviction overturned. Meanwhile, Trump has repeatedly refused to rule out granting Maxwell a pardon, saying he is "allowed" to do it. What People Are Saying Asked if he had approved Maxwell's transfer, Trump told reporters on Tuesday: "I didn't know about it at all, no. I read about it just like you did." The President said in an interview with Newsmax on Friday that no one has asked him about pardoning Maxwell. He said: "I'm allowed to do it but nobody's asked me to do it." Blanche wrote on X on July 24: "Today, I met with Ghislaine Maxwell, and I will continue my interview of her tomorrow. The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time." The family of Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's most well-known accusers, has urged Trump not to pardon Maxwell, saying in a statement: "The government and the President should never consider giving Ghislaine Maxwell any leniency. Ghislaine Maxwell is a monster who deserves to rot in prison for the rest of her life for the extraordinary violence and abuse she put not just our sister Virginia through, but many other survivors, who may number in the thousands." What's Next Maxwell had been scheduled to speak before the House Oversight Committee on August 11. But Representative James Comer, the committee's chair, said in a letter to Maxwell on Friday that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.
USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
From Bibles to prayer groups: What Trump's new religion memo for federal workers means
The memo provides guidance on religious expression for federal workers. Backers say it mirrors Clinton-era policies. But to others, the overtly Christian language raises First Amendment concerns. President Donald Trump is again making sure his supporters know he is doing his part to bring 'religion back to our country.' Most recently, his administration issued a memo in late July outlining to federal employees the types of religious expression allowed in the workplace. Bibles on desks. Groups joining together for prayer. An employee engaging with 'another in polite discussion of why his faith is correct and why the non-adherent should re-think his religious beliefs.' To many, it had overtly Christian-centric language, raising concerns about the rights of other religious groups. But backers say the memo reinforces existing policies for federal workers, including similar guidance during the Clinton administration. The memo, which Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor issued to all federal agencies, is 'very much in line' with Trump's previous actions on religious liberty, according to University of Houston law professor James Nelson. On the campaign trail and elsewhere, Trump has often told religious audiences he would bring religion back and since his second term began has highlighted efforts that appeal to his conservative Christian supporters. Trump issued an executive order calling for federal agencies to assist in 'Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias' in February, which was followed by the establishment of the White House Faith Office and the Religious Liberty Commission. In the commission's first public meeting in June, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said religious liberty had 'come under attack' in the country and vowed to protect religious freedom from 'emerging threats.' A spokesperson for the Office of Personnel Management said the July 28 memo 'reiterates existing policy' but also updates it in light of U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have upheld religious liberty. It now references, for example, a 2023 ruling in favor of a Christian U.S. Postal Service worker who objected to working on Sundays. Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal organization, called the new memo a 'critical step in restoring a workplace culture that respects and promotes religious freedom for every American.' 'No American should have to check their faith at the door when they walk into the workplace,' the organization's legal counsel, Michael Ross, said. But experts, including Nelson, said the memo is less attentive to the potential for religious coercion and harassment in the workplace than previous guidance. What the memo says The five-page memo starts by describing Trump as a champion of religious liberty and goes on to say that the First Amendment, federal statutes and Supreme Court rulings protect federal employees' rights to religious expression in the workplace. It then describes acceptable forms of religious expression by individual workers and groups of federal workers, including in conversations between federal employees, in interactions with the public and through expressions in areas open to the public. The examples of acceptable forms of religious expression the memo cites are from Christian and Jewish traditions. They include: It also says employees may 'engage another in polite discussion of why his faith is correct and why the non-adherent should re-think his religious beliefs.' It notes, however, that the religious employee should honor any request to end such discussion. Trump administration praised Clinton-era guidance on religious expression But these aren't new policies. Former President Bill Clinton's administration issued similar guidance in 1997. Like the more recent memo, the Clinton-era guidance also permits '(engaging) another in a polite discussion of why his faith should be embraced' and says that, if the speaker is not requested to stop, agencies 'should not restrict or interfere with such speech.' 'In a country where freedom of speech and religion are guaranteed, citizens should expect to be exposed to ideas with which they disagree,' the 1997 memo says. Trump's first administration also issued a memo on religious liberty in 2017. It called for federal agencies to "ensure that they are following' the Clinton-era guidance and referred to it as a 'useful' resource for private employers in accommodating religious expression. In other words, there's 'nothing new' about the guidance, Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow Thomas Jipping said. But he said the enforcement of laws protecting religious liberty have been 'inconsistent' across presidential administrations. Jipping referenced a 2015 Supreme Court ruling in favor of religious nonprofits that objected to the contraception mandate in President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act. In his view, the issue is not an oversaturation of religion in public life but rather some 'very aggressive efforts' to remove it. Jipping applauded what he described as the Trump administration's corrective actions. 'Let's face it – there's a lot of folks out there who want religious people to just shut up and go to church,' he said. 'That's never been, to quote a phrase, 'the American way.' That's not freedom.' Others are more skeptical of the Trump administration's actions. The most recent memo is 'very tilted in the direction of recognizing rights of religious expression and very unconcerned or quiet about the problems that might create,' according to George Washington University professor emeritus of law Ira Lupu. He contrasted it with the Clinton-era guidance, which he called 'balanced and fair-minded" in its acknowledgment of both the religious rights of federal employees and the associated risk of religious harassment in the workplace. The memo says, for example, that federal agencies can't refuse to hire Buddhists or 'impose more onerous requirements' on Buddhist job applicants, that an employee can have a Koran on their desk and read it during breaks, that employees can wear religious apparel like crucifixes or hijabs, and that employers may not force a Jehovah's Witness to take an oath that conflicts with their religious beliefs. Lupu noted that the new Trump administration memo does not mention Muslims, Buddhists or other minority religious groups. The Office of Personnel Management spokesperson, however, said the guidance is equally applicable to members of those and other faiths. When asked about the potential for religious coercion, the spokesperson said the memo "makes clear that declining such an invitation should not be a basis for discipline." First Amendment brings 'real tension,' expert says Nelson said he views a 'real tension' between some of the memo's tenets. It cites a 2015 Supreme Court ruling, for example, that found Title VII – a section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that bans employment discrimination – gives religious practices 'favored treatment' under the law. But the memo then goes on to say employees should "be allowed to engage in private religious expression in work areas to the same extent that they may engage in nonreligious private expression." 'I do think that ... courts may need to deal with that in the years to come,' Nelson said. Though he acknowledged some may 'raise concerns' about the guidance, Princeton University law professor Robert George said he sees 'no such tension or conflict' between the Establishment Clause, which bans the government from favoring religion over non-religion, and the right to free exercise of religion. The Supreme Court's shift away from "strict separationism" has, in his view, protected Americans' right to express their religious beliefs while also making clear that such expression cannot be presented as the viewpoint of the U.S. government or interfere with others' rights. 'So, just as government employees may freely advocate or display symbols of secular causes – think of rainbow buttons or banners, Black Lives Matter insignia and so forth – they may freely express their religious opinions and display religious symbols – subject, as the memo makes clear, to reasonable and viewpoint-neutral time, place and manner regulations,' George said. BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
Los Angeles Times
34 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
A proposed California bill aims to protect coverage for HIV prevention despite federal threats
State lawmakers are considering a bill meant to protect access to HIV prevention drugs for insured Californians as threats from the federal government continue. Assembly Bill 554 would require health plans and insurers to cover all antiretroviral drugs used for PrEP and PEP regimens. The drugs just have to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and would not require prior authorization. The bill would also prevent health plans from forcing patients to first try a less expensive drug before choosing a more expensive, specialty option. The bill requires insurance providers to cover these drugs without cost-sharing with patients, and it limits the ability of insurers and employers to review treatments to determine medical necessity. To streamline reimbursements and expand the range of PrEP medications doctors can pick for their patients, the legislation allows providers to directly bill insured patients' pharmaceutical benefit plans. LGBTQ+ public health advocates worry that the Trump administration's recent attempt to slash $1.5 billion in HIV prevention funding from the federal budget — along with its decisions to stop offering suicide-prevention counseling for LGBTQ+ individuals through the national 988 lifeline and to restrict gender-affirming care for transgender Americans — amounts to an assault on the queer community. The state bill would act 'as a shield against this administration's cruelty,' said California Assemblymember Mark González (D-Los Angeles) who co-sponsored AB 554 with Assemblymember Matt Haney (D-San Francisco). A recent cause for alarm among LGBTQ+ health advocates, first reported in the Wall Street Journal, is news that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. plans to replace the entire U.S. Preventive Services Task Force because its 16 appointed members are too 'woke,' according to unnamed individuals cited by the Journal. At a news conference Monday, Kennedy confirmed that he is reviewing the makeup of the panel, adding that he hasn't made a final decision. The bill was introduced earlier in the year out of fear that Kennedy's skepticism about vaccines might spill over into HIV/PrEP drug coverage and because of worries that President Trump would dismantle the task force, González said. The task force wields immense influence, making recommendations about which cancer screenings, tests for chronic diseases and preventive medications are beneficial for Americans and therefore should be covered by insurers — including drugs for HIV/AIDS prevention. Drugs prescribed in a PrEP regimen — short for pre-exposure prophylaxis — block the virus that causes AIDS from multiplying in a person's body. They can be taken in either pill or injection form on an ongoing basis. PEP refers to post-exposure prophylaxis and involves taking medication within 72 hours of potential exposure and for a short period of time, in order to prevent infection and transmission of the virus. Both regimens are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as effective ways to reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS when used correctly. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force was created in 1984 by congressional authorization to issue evidence-based advice to physicians on which screenings and preventive medicines are worth considering for their healthy patients. The panel's recommendations are closely watched by professional societies when adopting guidelines for their clinician members. In many cases, when insurers are on the fence about whether to cover a given screening or diagnostic test, they'll turn to the panel's recommendations. The panel, made up of doctors, nurses, health psychologists, epidemiologists and statisticians who are experts in primary care and preventive medicine and who serve four-year terms on a voluntary basis, is meant to be free from conflicts of interest and outside influences. Some of its past recommendations, however, such as its advice on prostate cancer screenings, have been met with criticism. When it comes to HIV prevention, the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to back up the task force with its July 11 ruling in Kennedy vs. Braidwood Management, which upheld a key mandate in the Affordable Care Act requiring insurers to cover preventive care, including for HIV. However, in the same ruling, the court also declared that the Secretary of Health and Human Services has the power to review decisions made by the task force, and to remove members at his or her discretion. Kennedy abruptly postponed the task force's July meeting, sparking concern among public health advocates and Democratic leaders. 'The task force has done very little over the past five years,' Kennedy said at Monday's news conference. 'We want to make sure that it is performing, that it is approving interventions that are actually going to prevent the health decline of the American public.' González said he worries that the Supreme Court gave the administration a new way to meddle in the healthcare decisions of LGBTQ+ people. 'The Braidwood decision was both a relief and a wake-up call,' González said. 'While it upheld the Preventive Services Task Force's existing recommendations — keeping protections for PrEP, cancer screenings, and vaccines intact — it handed unprecedented authority to RFK Jr. to reshape that very task force and place existing protections under direct threat once again.' González described AB 554 as 'a measure to protect LGBTQ+ Californians and ensure we never return to the neglect and devastation of the HIV/AIDS crisis.' The state Senate Appropriations Committee is expected to vote on whether to advance the bill on Aug. 29. 'These attacks aren't isolated,' the lawmaker said. 'They are coordinated, deliberate, and aimed squarely at our most vulnerable communities.'
