
What to know about the $1,000-per-child ‘Trump accounts'
(NEXSTAR) – Among the 1,000-plus pages of President Trump's tax bill is a proposal that would put federal money into accounts for babies born during his second term.
Initially dubbed 'Money Accounts for Growth and Advancement' (MAGA), the savings proposal was recently renamed 'Trump account.'
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who is credited with coming up with the idea, calls the $1,000 investments 'transformative' for future generations.
'There are many Americans who don't own stocks or bonds, are not invested in the market, and may not feel particularly invested in the American free enterprise system. This will give everyone a stake,' Cruz told Semafor.
The idea itself, to give babies a financial head start when it comes to education, homeownership and financial success, is not new, however. A similar plan has been implemented in Connecticut and another proposed by Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ).
Under Trump's 'big beautiful' bill, qualifying babies born between Jan. 1, 2025 and Jan. 1, 2029 would receive $1,000 in a Trump account opened by their parents or the Treasury.
To be eligible, the newborns would have to be U.S. citizens and have a Social Security number. A parent must also provide a Social Security number to show they are eligible to work, according to the bill.
'If the Secretary of Treasury determines that an eligible individual does not have an accountopened for them by the first tax return where the child is claimed as a qualifying child, theSecretary shall establish an account on the child's behalf, taking into account, to the extentpossible, the parents preferred custodian and investment fund,' the bill reads. 'Parents will be provided the option to opt out of the account.'
Families would have the option to add up to $5,000 a year, with the account holder unable to take distributions before age 18. Contributions from tax-exempt entities, such as private-foundations, aren't subject to the $5,000 cap.
At the age of 18, additional investments would be capped, but the named account holder would be able to access up to 50% of the money to pay for higher education, training and first-time home purchases.
At age 30, account holders would have access to the full balance for any purpose.
The money would be invested in a U.S. equity index fund and taxed as capital gains if spent on qualified expenses, according to retirement publication Plan Adviser. Withdrawal of the money for non-qualified purchases would be penalized and taxed as ordinary income.
Michael Piwowar and Robert Shapiro, of the Milken Institute, published a paper analyzing the growth prospects of such an account and found that, on average, the $1,000 investment would grow to $8,000 after 20 years, $69,000 after 40 years and $574,000 after 60 years.
A number of experts reacted favorably to the creation of the accounts, but questioned the structure.
'The MAGA accounts proposal is an encouraging step—but it misses a critical piece,' Zach Buchwald, CEO of Russell Investments, told Plan Adviser in a statement earlier this month. 'If we want true financial security, we need long-term solutions that include retirement. Let's give every young American a chance to build real wealth—not just a starter fund.'
Others asked why families would put money that has already been taxed into an account that doesn't allow you to take it out tax-free, when there are options such as the 529 college savings plan, or Roth IRA that would allow them to do just that.
'The giving kids money aspect is generally good,' Zach Teutsch, a managing partner at Values Added Financial, told Yahoo Finance, but called the account structure 'ill-considered' since families who choose to fund a Trump account over a tax-advantaged 529 plan would seemingly be 'shockingly sure' their child wouldn't be going to college.
Meantime, Trump accounts will only become a reality if the administration's 'big, beautiful bill' makes it through the Senate, which could involve a rewriting process in order for the package to garner 51 votes.
Should the bill pass without changes to Trump accounts, financial writer Jim Wang has this advice: 'You might as well take the free $1,000 that comes with automatic enrollment of a Trump Account but there's little reason to contribute more toward the account as the child ages. For education expenses, you're better off contributing into a 529 plan.'
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
11 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Defying Trump, National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet is still at work
President Donald Trump's latest attempt to assert control over an elite American cultural institution has turned into a high-stakes Washington stand-off. In defiance of Trump's announcement last Friday that he was firing her, Kim Sajet — the director of the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery — has continued to report for work, conducting meetings and handling other museum business as she did before, according to several people familiar with her activities who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter. Writing on Truth Social, Trump had declared he is firing Sajet because she 'is a highly partisan person' and because she is a 'strong supporter of DEI,' a reference to diversity, equity and inclusion. He said her replacement would be named shortly. Trump has not provided a legal reasoning to support his authority to fire Sajet. Two top congressional Democrats have asserted the president does not have legal authority for the firing. In a joint statement, House Administration Committee ranking Democrat Joe Morelle of New York and House Appropriations Committee ranking Democrat Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut said: 'President Trump has no authority to fire employees of the Smithsonian Institution — including the Director of the National Portrait Gallery. The dismissal of Director Sajet is unacceptable and has the same legal weight as the President's prior attempts to undermine the Smithsonian's independence: absolutely none. Should the White House require a copy of the Constitution, we would be more than happy to provide one.' Sajet's refusal to abide by Trump's decision sets up a test of the bounds of presidential authority over the Smithsonian, a sprawling complex of 21 museums, 14 education and research centers and the National Zoo. It is not a traditional government agency nor part of the executive branch, and hiring and firing decisions have historically been handled by the Smithsonian's secretary, rather than its Board of Regents. The Smithsonian's current secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch III, is widely expected to discuss the president's attempt to oust Sajet when regents meet next Monday. In an only-in-Washington twist, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. — who has been presented with major questions at the Supreme Court regarding the limits of presidential authority since Trump took office — is the chancellor of the Smithsonian and a member of its board. A Trump White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Smithsonian spokesperson declined to comment. In February, Trump made another foray into American arts when he took over control of the Kennedy Center, dismissing his predecessor's appointees to its board, who then installed him as chairman and replaced the institution's director with a political ally with scant experience in the arts. The Smithsonian differs from the Kennedy Center because presidents don't appoint members to its board, which is composed of a mix of officials from all three branches of government and members of the public. But Trump is not without allies on the Smithsonian board, including Vice President JD Vance who, like Roberts, is an ex-officio member. Trump's move against Sajet follows an executive order he issued on March 27 titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which aims to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' A 35-year-old special assistant and senior associate staff secretary, Lindsey Halligan, was among the order's architects — instigated, in part, by her early-2025 visit to the show 'The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,' an exhibition at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, which shares a building with the Portrait Gallery. The order calls for Halligan and Vice President JD Vance to 'remove improper ideology' from the Smithsonian and 'prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race.' 'President Trump's attempt to fire the National Portrait Gallery Director is outrageous and represents yet another disturbing example of his relentless effort to control American art and culture,' said Rep. Chellie Pingree (Maine), ranking Democrat of the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, which oversees the Smithsonian, in a statement. 'Despite what the President may think, America's cultural institutions are not run by dictatorial impulses.' On Tuesday a White House official provided The Post a list of 17 instances in which, the White House argued, Sajet was critical of Trump or outspoken about her support for diversity, equity and inclusion. The list included her donations to Democratic politicians and advocacy groups; a social media post praising Anthony Fauci; the caption for the museum's presidential portrait of Trump mentioning his two impeachments and 'incitement of insurrection' for the events of Jan. 6, 2021; and numerous quotes from interviews in a variety of publications about her efforts to represent a broad swath of Americans within the gallery's walls. One item on the list was a quote in a 2019 USA Today story about Black artists demanding representation in American artistic institutions: 'We owe it to Americans to reflect them because we owe it to accurate history,' Sajet says. 'I'm not interested in only having a museum for some people.' The list additionally took issue with remarks Sajet has made in support of the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements, and criticism of Columbus Day and her rejection of one artist's 2016 portrait of Trump as 'too political.' It notes that Sajet has commissioned artworks about Mexican immigration and 'the complications of ancestral and racial history.' It was critical of her 2013 decision to use '50 percent of all money spent on art' to 'support diverse artists and portrait subjects.' Since its founding 179 years ago, the Smithsonian, which receives about 60 percent of its budget from federal appropriations and grants, has generally operated independently, although there have been several controversies in which museums have altered exhibitions in response to outside criticisms, including from politicians. Museum directors, such as Sajet — holders of some of the most prestigious positions in American arts — are not paid with federal funds, instead drawing their salaries from the Smithsonian's trust fund. Hours after Trump's post, Bunch told Smithsonian staff in an email obtained by The Washington Post that the White House also sent new details of proposed cuts to the institution's budget, slashing it by 12 percent and excluding funding for its Anacostia Community Museum and its forthcoming National Museum of the American Latino, Bunch said. On Saturday, at the Portrait Gallery and SAAM's joint family Pride celebration, a trio of visitors strolled the central courtyard in neon vests emblazoned with 'Hands off the arts' on the back — closely watched by a Smithsonian staff member, who hovered nearby. 'I'm outraged' by Sajet's firing, said Karen Nussbaum, 75, of Washington. 'There's a place for a political expression in art, but not political control of art.' 'I think the next step is controlling what artists think and do,' said Cynthia Cain, 60, of Washington, 'and that's not acceptable.' Sophia Nguyen and Janay Kingsberry contributed to this report.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California woman thought she'd left a $5 tip until she saw it was $5,000 — and was told it couldn't be voided
Americans have long grumbled about tipping culture — but now digital checkout screens are turning that frustration into full-blown financial disasters. Sometimes, the issue isn't just pressure to tip — it's how easy it is to make a costly mistake. One in five Americans say they've accidentally tipped more than intended on digital checkout screens, according to an exclusive Opinium poll for on tipping culture. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) That's exactly what happened to Linda Mathiesen. While buying CBD pain relief gel at a store in San Bruno, California, she accidentally tipped $5,000 on a $129.28 purchase. Mathiesen said she meant to leave a $5 tip, but the payment terminal didn't show a decimal point, so when she entered '5000,' the system took it — literally. At first, the clerk at San Bruno Exotic told her the charge couldn't be reversed. Then the story shifted — he claimed the shop never received the money. But Mathiesen's bank statement showed otherwise. 'I'm just livid because I'm like I'm not going to pay $5,000 for something I never intended to happen,' Mathiesen told ABC 7 News. For Mathiesen, a $5,000 tipping mistake wasn't just a moment of panic — it became a financial crisis. As a special education teacher living on a fixed income, she didn't have the cushion to absorb the hit. With no emergency savings to fall back on, the charge was devastating. And she's not alone. According to the U.S. News survey, 42% of Americans have no emergency savings, despite experts recommending three to six months' worth of expenses. Mathiesen contacted Wells Fargo within five minutes of the transaction, but says the bank has done little to help, despite its promise of 'zero liability protection' for promptly reported fraud. The bank's website says its 'built-in protection features ensure that you won't be held responsible for unauthorized transactions, as long as they're reported promptly.' Yet, a year later, Mathiesen is still fighting to get the charge reversed. "I busted out in tears,' she told ABC 7 News. "My son is graduating college next week ... and I can't even buy anything for him because I have $5,000 outstanding ... now it's $5,500!" Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it Digital checkout screens may speed things up, but one wrong tap can turn a routine purchase into a nightmare. It happened to Vera Conner, too. The Georgia woman was ordering her usual No. 4 Italian sandwich at Subway — priced at $7.54 — when she accidentally left a $7,112.98 tip. Conner said she was entering her phone number for loyalty points when the screen suddenly flipped to the tipping prompt. Before she realized what had happened, the charge went through. After hours of calls with Subway and Bank of America, she eventually got the charge reversed — but not without major stress. If you ever find yourself in a similar situation, there are steps you can take: Act fast. Contact your bank or card provider as soon as the transaction posts. The faster you report it, the stronger your case. Most banks allow 60 days to dispute a charge, but don't wait that long. Document everything. Screenshot the receipt, the payment screen if you can and keep records of any communication with the merchant. These details help prove the error wasn't intentional. Know the fine print. Many banks offer protection against unauthorized transactions, but not all mistakes qualify. If you technically authorized the payment, even by accident, you may be out of luck unless the merchant agrees to reverse it. Build an emergency fund. It's not just for layoffs or medical bills. Sometimes it's for the unexpected stuff — like tipping $5,000 for a $129 product. Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This is how American car dealers use the '4-square method' to make big profits off you — and how you can ensure you pay a fair price for all your vehicle costs Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
James Altucher: 'America Just Hit the AI Reset Button'
New briefing reveals how Trump and Musk are quietly building the most powerful artificial intelligence system in U.S. history — and why July 1 could mark a major turning point BALTIMORE, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In a new briefing, tech entrepreneur and bestselling author James Altucher reveals a development he says will 'change America forever.' At the center of it is Project Colossus — a classified supercomputer initiative led by Elon Musk's xAI — and backed by sweeping support from President Donald Trump. A Presidential Reversal with Massive Implications Altucher says the shift began with one of Trump's first presidential actions in 2025. 'In one of his FIRST acts as President… Donald Trump overturned Executive Order #14110.' This decision reversed Biden-era restrictions on AI research, which Altucher claims had 'prevented us from unleashing its true power.' 'Trump also announced the LARGEST AI investment in history… Stargate… a massive, AI data center and infrastructure project.' Hidden Inside a Warehouse in Memphis Altucher's report reveals a facility in Tennessee that, until now, has gone largely unnoticed. 'Right here, inside this warehouse in Memphis, Tennessee… lies a massive supercomputer Musk calls 'Project Colossus.'' 'It contains not just one or two… but 200,000 units of Nvidia's all-powerful AI chips… making it the most advanced AI facility known to man.' 'The fastest supercomputer on the planet.' — Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO July 1: 'When It All Changes' According to Altucher, time is short. A critical update to Colossus is imminent. 'That's when I predict Elon could announce a major update to this new AI project. One that some say will essentially 10X its power – overnight.' Altucher refers to this moment as a 'second wave' of AI — what he calls: 'Artificial Superintelligence.' 'This second wave… will rival all of the great innovations of the past. Electricity… the wheel… even the discovery of fire.' A Warning… and a Milestone Altucher closes his briefing with a quote from Vladimir Putin to stress the stakes: 'Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world.' — Vladimir Putin He believes Project Colossus may determine whether America leads — or falls behind — in the AI race. About James Altucher James Altucher is a computer scientist, entrepreneur, and bestselling author. A pioneer in AI since the 1980s, he previously worked on IBM's Deep Blue supercomputer and developed early AI trading systems on Wall Street. His latest research uncovers critical breakthroughs in AI infrastructure and the political forces accelerating its rise. Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press GroupEmail: dwarren@