logo
Medicare Update: Trump Admin Launching Pilot Program to Cover Ozempic

Medicare Update: Trump Admin Launching Pilot Program to Cover Ozempic

Newsweek6 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Trump administration is preparing a five-year pilot program that would allow Medicare and Medicaid to cover some of the most in-demand weight-loss drugs, a move that could transform obesity treatment for millions of Americans.
The plan, which includes medications such as Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and Zepbound, represents a reversal in federal policy and signals a broader willingness to use public insurance to address the nation's obesity epidemic.
Why It Matters
The drugs, known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, were initially developed to treat Type 2 diabetes but have become a cultural phenomenon for their ability to suppress appetite and help patients lose as much as 20 percent of their body weight in clinical trials.
The pilot builds on a proposal introduced in the final months of the Biden administration but shelved earlier this year when officials under President Donald Trump announced Medicare and Medicaid would not cover weight-loss medications.
What To Know
According to documents obtained by The Washington Post, the program would allow state Medicaid programs and Medicare Part D plans to voluntarily cover GLP-1 drugs for weight management.
The initiative is scheduled to begin in April 2026 for Medicaid and January 2027 for Medicare and will be administered through the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which tests new payment models designed to reduce costs and improve care.
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, who led the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under former President Joe Biden, told the Post the experiment would be a "game changer" if it expands access to obesity treatments. "Increased coverage of anti-obesity medications in Medicare and Medicaid was a priority during my tenure because scientists and clinicians increasingly believe obesity is a serious health condition that should be treated accordingly," she said.
A pharmacy owner displays an Ozempic package in Pristina, Kosovo, on March 27.
A pharmacy owner displays an Ozempic package in Pristina, Kosovo, on March 27.
Photo by ARMEND NIMANI/AFP via Getty Images
The program faces a major hurdle: price. GLP-1 drugs typically cost from $5,000 to $7,000 a year, raising questions about whether widespread coverage is sustainable. "The short-term cost is still huge," Dr. Cynthia Cox, vice president at KFF (formerly Kaiser Family Foundation), told Newsweek. "$1,000 a month per person is a massive outlay."
A KFF analysis found that Ozempic's U.S. list price is $936 a month—more than five times the cost in Japan, where it sells for $169. Wegovy, which contains the same active ingredient, costs roughly $1,349 a month in the U.S., compared to $328 in Germany.
At the moment, 13 state Medicaid programs cover GLP-1 drugs for obesity. Medicare limits coverage to patients with related conditions such as diabetes or heart disease. With about 70 million people enrolled in Medicaid and 65 million in Medicare, even partial expansion could affect a significant share of the population.
Ethicists warn of the potential economic fallout. "These drugs help over 50 percent of people lose up to 25 percent of their body weight," said Dr. Robert Klitzman, a Columbia University bioethicist, in an interview with Newsweek. "But they cost around $12,000 a year. If two-thirds of Americans needed them, it would bankrupt the health care system."
Despite the financial concerns, GLP-1 medications are generating enthusiasm among doctors for their ability to improve multiple health markers beyond weight loss. Clinical trials show they can reduce blood sugar, lower blood pressure and improve cardiovascular outcomes.
"Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs are changing how we approach obesity, both in the doctor's office and for society in general," Dr. Raj Dasgupta, chief medical adviser for Garage Gym Reviews, told Newsweek. "They're helping shift the conversation from 'this is a personal failure' to 'this is a medical condition that deserves real treatment.'"
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that adding obesity coverage could cost Medicare $35 billion from 2026 to 2034.
What People Are Saying
A spokesperson for Novo Nordisk, which manufactures Ozempic and Wegovy, told The Washington Post: "We believe that comprehensive coverage through government and commercial insurance plans is critical to affordable health care and treatment options."
Klitzman also said in the interview with Newsweek: "Insurance doesn't always cover it, especially for people who don't have diabetes or heart disease. Initially, the drugs were approved for diabetes-related obesity, but doctors have been prescribing them to people who are just overweight, without those conditions."
What Happens Next
With more than 100 million U.S. adults classified as obese and 22 million considered severely obese, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the program's potential impact is vast. The proposal is not final and could undergo a formal public comment period before implementation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eli Lilly Sinks After Obesity Pill Shows Mixed Results
Eli Lilly Sinks After Obesity Pill Shows Mixed Results

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Eli Lilly Sinks After Obesity Pill Shows Mixed Results

The market wasn't happy with Eli Lilly's (LLY, Financials) highly anticipated weight-loss medication trial findings that recently came out. The drug, which was taken once a day, helped people lose roughly 12% of their body weight over the course of 72 weeks. That's good, but not as good as the 15% some experts had Thursday, shares fell 13% as investors took in the news. Some people said the drug would transform the game, while others couldn't get past the adverse effects. More than 10% of those on the highest dose dropped out, largely because they were sick and threw up. This is more than with other injectable GLP-1 medicines like the appeal is clear: a needle-free solution that is easy to use in a market with high demand and low supply. David Ricks, the CEO, didn't care about the selloff and said the results were "right on thesis." Lilly wants to get the drug approved by the end of the year and have it on the market by next summer at the are different opinions among doctors. Some people think it's a big step forward for people who are afraid of needles. Others say that excitement should be kept in check because it won't matter how easy it is to take if too many people are now waiting for the deeper data dive in September, which could change their minds. For now, it's a promising drug, but it's not the huge hit that bulls were hoping for. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Trump admin eyes insurance cuts to hospitals offering trans care for youth
Trump admin eyes insurance cuts to hospitals offering trans care for youth

Axios

time5 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump admin eyes insurance cuts to hospitals offering trans care for youth

Trump health officials are considering a policy that would limit hospitals' ability to participate in Medicare and Medicaid if they perform gender-affirming medical procedures for transgender youth. The big picture: Hospitals are highly dependent on payment from public health insurance. Medicare and Medicaid covers at least two-thirds of inpatient days at more than 80% of hospitals, according to a 2024 report from the American Hospital Association. State of play: The proposed policy change landed at the White House for review on Thursday, according to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs' website. The rule is expected to prevent hospitals that provide gender-affirming procedures for minors from getting paid by Medicare or Medicaid, the National Review reported on Thursday. Stakeholders — including the National Women's Law Center and the Illinois attorney general's office, both which have advocated for gender-affirming care for youth — have scheduled meetings with administration officials to discuss the policy before it is officially proposed. Trump administration health officials didn't respond to questions about which procedures or services would be prohibited for Medicare and Medicaid-participating hospitals. It's not clear when the administration aims to phase in the change. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services told Axios that it doesn't comment on potential future regulations but that future CMS actions will continue to support President Trump's executive order to defund gender-affirming care for minors. That order has been temporarily blocked in court. Zoom out: Many hospitals — even in deep-blue states — have already pulled back from providing transition-related services for minors over fear of losing federal funding based on previous Trump administration actions. 16 states last week sued the administration over the funding threat and other actions, including investigations of hospitals and demands for patient data, saying they amounted to an attempt to enforce a nationwide ban on transgender care. Reality check: Gender-affirming medical care for kids with gender dysphoria is supported by major medical organizations including the American Medical Association.

Ultra-processed foods make up over half of Americans' calories, CDC says
Ultra-processed foods make up over half of Americans' calories, CDC says

Boston Globe

time5 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Ultra-processed foods make up over half of Americans' calories, CDC says

Youths consume more calories from the products than adults do — nearly 62 percent compared with 53 percent, according to the new report. Studies have identified industrially produced foods as risk factors for chronic diseases shortening lifespans in the United States. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The CDC analyzed data collected from August 2021 to August 2023, and compared the results with a 10-year trend. Advertisement For those who criticize ultra-processed foods, there was one hopeful sign: People are beginning to consume fewer calories from them — a decline of 3.7 percent for youth and 3 percent for adults since 2017-2018. Kennedy has repeatedly said the nation's food supply is 'mass poisoning' this generation of children and made overhauling it one of his main priorities. A May report from the Trump administration's 'Make America Healthy Again' commission — which Kennedy chairs — identified the products as a core driver of chronic disease. A second report, aimed at offering detailed strategies for 'appropriately restructuring' the federal government's response to childhood disease, is due next week. Advertisement Ultra-processed foods are made up almost entirely of substances extracted from other foods or 'synthesized in laboratories' and typically contain many additives such as sugar, sodium, emulsifiers, and preservatives. Sandwiches (including burgers), sweet baked goods, savory snacks, and sweetened beverages were four of the top five sources of calories from ultra-processed foods among both youths and adults, according to the CDC report. The food industry has argued the demonization of ultra-processed foods oversimplifies the issue and ignores the reality of consumers' lives and their budgets. The industry has pointed to clear nutritional information as a key to helping people make healthier choices. Some nutritionists have said there's been confusion over the term that has led to the demonizing of ultra-processed products with some healthy nutrients, such as some sliced breads and yogurts. Kennedy's health agencies, along with the US Department of Agriculture, are seeking to refine the definition of 'ultra-processed.' The departments also plan to significantly revamp the nation's dietary guidelines, which are due later this year. While Kennedy's handling of vaccination policy and other issues have been controversial, his food messaging has found broader appeal as Americans struggle with weight and chronic disease. Roughly 20 percent of US children are obese, nearly four times the rate in the 1970s before the proliferation of ultra-processed foods. Among youths studied in the new CDC report, the calories from ultra-processed foods did not significantly differ based on family income. But for adults, those with the highest family income had less of their caloric intake come from such products. Jerold Mande, an adjunct professor of nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said ultra-processed food is clearly making people sick. Advertisement 'The evidence is overwhelming,' said Mande, who previously served in senior food and nutrition policy positions at USDA and the Food and Drug Administration. 'What we don't know is exactly why.' A landmark study published six years ago provided some of the most compelling evidence to date that ultra-processed foods are harmful to Americans' health. Kevin Hall, a National Institutes of Health researcher who led the study, quit earlier this year, concerned about possible political interference by the Trump administration. The Department of Health and Human Services previously called Hall's fears of censorship a 'deliberate distortion of the facts.' Hall was involved in another study to identify the precise mechanisms that make such foods harmful. Meanwhile, the FDA and NIH have announced efforts aimed at accelerating nutrition research. Food companies have been accused of designing their products to be addictive and marketing them to children, including in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit filed last year. A March study by Hall and other researchers suggested ultra-processed foods are not addictive in the same way as certain illicit drugs. While some scientists say more research is needed, some food and addiction researchers are calling for the scientific community to recognize the addictive potential of ultra-processed foods. 'Although questions remain, recognizing addiction to ultra-processed food as a disorder — or, at minimum, as a condition in need of further study — paves the way toward improved prevention, clinical care, and policies,' four researchers, including Nora Volkow, the head of NIH's National Institute on Drug Abuse, wrote last month in Nature Medicine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store