A Trump tariff letter is the best news this Southeast Asian junta has had in a while
Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, head of the military that seized power in Myanmar in 2021 after ousting a democratically elected government, said it was he who had the 'honor' of receiving of Trump's letter sent on Monday announcing new tariffs, state media Global New Light of Myanmar reported on Friday.
The letter, which stated the United States would be imposing a new tariff rate of 40 percent on Myanmar's exports to the US starting August 1, was received with 'sincere appreciation,' the newspaper said.
The United States and most Western countries have not recognized the junta as the legitimate government of Myanmar, also known as Burma.
The military's power grab sparked a catastrophic civil war now in its fifth year, with pro-democracy fighters and ethnic rebel groups battling the military across swaths of the country. The United Nations and other rights groups have accused the military of war crimes as it battles to cling to power.
The US, the United Kingdom and the European Union have all sanctioned the military and sought to limit contact with its representatives on the world stage. Washington and most Western capitals no longer station fully accredited ambassadors in Myanmar, a diplomatic snub the ruling generals have long chafed at.
But this week's letter was spun as an 'encouraging invitation to continue participating in the extraordinary Economy of the United States,' Min Aung Hlaing was quoted as saying, adding a high-level negotiation team could be sent 'as quickly as possible to the US to discuss with the relevant authorities,' if needed.
CNN has reached out to the US embassy in Myanmar for details on how the letter was delivered and for comment on whether it signals a change in Washington's stance on the junta.
Min Aung Hlaing also asked that Washington consider lifting and easing economic sanctions on Myanmar, 'as they hinder the shared interests and prosperity of both countries and their peoples,' he was quoted as saying.
The general – who led Myanmar's military in 2017, when the United States said it committed genocide against the Rohingya minority – also took the chance to heap praise on Trump.
He hailed his 'strong leadership in guiding his country towards national prosperity with the spirit of a true patriot, as well as continued efforts to promote peace on the global stage,' the Global New Light said.
Min Aung Hlaing also thanked Trump for 'regulating broadcasting agencies and funds, which have sometimes exacerbated the existing conflicts' – an apparent reference to the Trump administration's funding cuts to US outlets such as Radio Free Asia and Voice of America.
Both outlets have long been popular across Myanmar for their independent reporting, and have become even more vital following the junta's crackdown on the free press.
Min Aung Hlaing sought to appeal to a longstanding Trump grievance – his long-debunked claims of massive election fraud in the 2020 election won by former President Joe Biden.
'Similar to the challenges the President encountered during the 2020 election of the United States, Myanmar also experienced major electoral fraud and significant irregularities,' he was quoted as saying.
The election he was referring to in Myanmar was won resoundingly by Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy party, which won a second term at the expense of the military's proxy party.
International observers at the time concluded the election was largely free and fair but the military soon began making unsubstantiated claims of massive fraud. Weeks later, it launched its coup, ending a 10-year experiment with democracy and plunging Myanmar into turmoil.
Suu Kyi has been in military custody since, and is serving a 27-year jail sentence following a closed-door trial that critics say was a sham and designed to remove the popular leader and longtime foe of the military from political life.
Ross Adkin contributed reporting
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Thing To Do With Your Money Because of the ‘Serious' Tariff Situation, According to Ramit Sethi
Tariffs have been an ongoing topic of discussion since President Donald Trump imposed widespread tariffs on April 2, 2025, calling it 'Liberation Day.' In response to the executive order, the U.S. stock market dropped significantly with the news, although it has rebounded after more adjustments were made. Find Out: Read Next: With the unpredictability surrounding the economy, many have wondered what to do with their money and how to plan for the times ahead. Ramit Sethi, personal finance expert and host of the YouTube channel 'I Will Teach You To Be Rich,' gave his two cents in an Instagram post about the one thing you should be doing right now. Immediately after the drop in the stock market, Sethi said, 'in times like this, this is where people make very bad decisions that have life-altering ramifications. If you get nervous and you see three, four, five days, ten days of bad news, it is very tempting for people, who even think they are disciplined investors, to get too scared and sell.' The chaos that Sethi fears comes when most people and companies face financial uncertainty. With more risk than usual, companies will likely decide to charge customers more and lay off employees to cut costs. Investors may feel intense pressure to respond to falling stock prices by making poor decisions to sell, further deepening the crisis. He cautioned against making any impulsive actions as they could have severe negative consequences. Check Out: To navigate these challenges, Sethi urged people to stay calm, saying, 'I would not sell. I am not selling. I invest in the long term. I recommend you do the same.' However, he does recommend taking one very important measure to keep yourself and your finances safe. 'I'm building a war chest, and I recommend you do the same,' Sethi said. The war chest Sethi is referring to is an emergency fund, which serves as a cash reserve you can use for unexpected expenses. For example, if you have a sudden dental bill, vehicle repairs, a large appliance breakdown or get laid off, you can dip into your emergency fund instead of going into debt. While most personal finance experts recommend saving up three to six months' worth of expenses for this fund, the unpredictability has Sethi reaching for more. 'If you have a three-month one, that's not enough in my opinion. I would recommend a 12-month emergency fund,' Sethi said. Saving up a year's worth of expenses is no small feat, but with the amount of uncertainty surrounding the economy, it's better to be safe than sorry. According to Sethi, creating an emergency fund 'means cutting discretionary spending now before the world forces you to.' If you don't start when you have the ability to do so, you could end up with no money and no ability to spend anyway. You can give yourself less room for error by automating your paycheck routine. Sethi recommended linking the account that receives your paycheck to a savings account, investment account, credit cards and any other bills. Then, automate exactly how much goes to each category the day after you get paid. With your emergency fund goal in mind, you can determine how much you'll automatically send to your savings account each month. This will make it easier to regulate your spending and determine the speed at which you'll reach your goal. More From GOBankingRates 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on 1 Thing To Do With Your Money Because of the 'Serious' Tariff Situation, According to Ramit Sethi Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's law of the jungle means U.S. trade deals aren't worth the paper they're printed on, trade expert warns
By dismantling the mechanism that settles international trade disputes, there is no way for countries negotiating with the Trump administration to enforce any bilateral trade agreements. With little incentive to play by the rules, he could simply change the terms of any deal down the road. The best solution would be kicking the U.S. out of the World Trade Organization, argues trade expert Kristen Hopewell from the University of British Columbia, and re-establish the WTO's Appellate Body, the supreme court for global trade. When President Trump threatened Brazil with punishing tariffs on Wednesday, there was no fancy mathematical equation trotted out this time as justification. The 50% levy on goods was retribution for a perceived 'witch hunt' against his political ally, Jair Bolsanaro, whose supporters attempted a coup two years ago. This administration is bringing back the law of the jungle to international trade, according to trade expert Kristen Hopewell, and time is running out to salvage the remains of a post-war system of commerce that promoted stability and prosperity across the world. 'Trump is a totally unreliable negotiating partner,' she tells Fortune. 'Any deal you strike with the administration is not worth the paper it's written on.' As if to hammer home that point, news began to emerge on Thursday that Vietnam had been caught off guard when Trump prematurely announced a 20% duty on all goods entering the U.S. from the southeast Asian country. Vietnamese officials were reportedly still hoping for a number closer to half that. Nor is there any apparent rhyme or reason to his tariffs. Brazil, for example, doesn't even run a trade surplus with the United States—it imported $28.6 billion more goods and services from the U.S. last year than it exported. On Wednesday, when asked how he calculated his various import duties, the president answered that he uses 'a formula based on common sense,' one that reflects 'how we've been treated.' Hopewell, a professor at the University of British Columbia, argues this erratic and fickle approach to international negotiations is symptomatic of a Trump deal: 'He can simply come back later demanding more. There's no guarantee it will actually be upheld.' That's because the president already removed a cornerstone underpinning global commerce during his first administration six years ago when he blocked all appointments to what is essentially the supreme court of the World Trade Organization (WTO) — its Appellate Body. 'The WTO is unique amongst international organizations in that its rules are actually legally binding on states. It has teeth,' Hopewell said. Or rather it had teeth. Since the Biden administration continued its policy of blocking appointments to fill its vacancies, there is now no quorum to adjudicate trade disputes, leaving countries little incentive to abide by the rules anymore. Quite the contrary, they can break them with near impunity. The United States didn't always favor dismantling these guardrails. Over a decade ago, the country led a number of key partners, including Japan and the European Union, to press their rights against China when it attempted to restrict the export of critical minerals, including rare earths. In 2015, they later won in front of the Appellate Body, forcing Beijing to relent. Thanks to Trump, this enforcement mechanism no longer works. In January 2020, just weeks after the WTO's Appellate Body was decommissioned, Indonesia moved to impose a ban on the export of raw nickel. Since it has one of the largest remaining deposits of this element vital for electric vehicle batteries and stainless steel, it reckoned it could compel the creation of a domestic downstream industry for processing and refining the ore. Other countries argued in front of the WTO that it violated the rules and won—or at least they thought they had. Indonesia exercised its right to lodge a formal appeal to the Appellate Body, knowing full well that a ruling that settles the dispute was impossible. 'By appealing into the void, it could continue these WTO illegal export restrictions of nickel and is actually expanding them to other commodities,' Hopewell says. 'Other countries are now mimicking Indonesia and introducing similar bans on mineral exports.' Hopewell believes the moment for bold action has arrived. In a column for Politico this week, she argued the international community should consider expelling the United States from the World Trade Organization in order to revive its paralyzed Appellate Body. 'The stakes are really high, so it's worth considering more radical solutions,' she told Fortune. That attitude, Hopewell says, is no accident. Trump has long sought to undermine the WTO in favor of bilateral deals, where the U.S. holds more leverage. 'Trump is pursuing a divide-and-conquer strategy,' she said. 'He knows the U.S. is strongest when it negotiates one-on-one.' By agreeing to bilateral talks, she argues, foreign governments hoping to protect domestic industries are undermining themselves. 'They're playing right into Trump's hands.' Contacted by Fortune, the WTO Secretariat said it does not comment on the conduct of member states. The White House declined to respond. To many Americans, Trump's aggressive trade stance may appear cost-free. But the fallout has yet to reach consumers, in part because industries like autos stockpiled inventory ahead of new duties. 'It will take some time before the effects of the tariffs are felt in higher prices,' Hopewell said. 'But when that hits, it's going to be a profound economic shock for the U.S.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs: Why some countries will try hard to reach a deal
President Trump's tariffs have roiled markets since being announced in April. Trump now says he has an August 1 deadline to get deals done. Some countries may have no choice but to make a new agreement. Matthew Goodman, director of the Geoeconomics Center at the Council on Foreign Relations, explains why in the video above. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here.
