Global fin giant reviews UP's skill development efforts
skill development
and take the state's economy to trillion-dollar target, minister for
vocational education
and skill development, Kapil Dev Agarwal, on Wednesday met representatives from
Deloitte India
.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Reviewing progress of various skill development schemes and discussing future initiatives, Agarwal said govt's focus was on quality training and making youth employable. According to Agarwal, govt planned to combine local needs with modern technology while training youths.
Additionally, govt is working with industrial training institutes and Skill Development Mission to launch job-oriented courses that will help young people find employment easily.
The minister urged Deloitte representatives to participate in regular meetings for next two years and come up with progress report. Agarwal instructed his team to provide quality training to youth to help them get jobs and earn livelihood.
During the meeting, Agarwal said promoting apprenticeships is one of the top priorities and all stakeholders must have effective communication with each other so that there was no dearth of opportunities for youth.
He also asked officials to review schemes based on feedback from students, including random calls and field inspections to engage directly with students. The minister suggested that organising programmes and meetings at divisional level will expedite implementation of schemes.
For effective monitoring, data on training given to youths, including their trade and mobile numbers, should be recorded on the Skill Mitra portal, he said.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
During the meeting, some of the youths who underwent training were contacted by phone and positive feedback was received about the schemes.
Principal secretary, vocational education and skill development, Hariom and director, Skill Development Mission, Pulkit Khare, participated in the meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
How safe are women workers in their daily commute?
In recent years, conversations around women's economic empowerment in India have rightly centred around deeper enablers such as safety and mobility highlighting the need for greater infrastructural support and investments to allow women to participate freely in the workforce. Several of the discussions around the topic emphasises the need to build robust road and transport infrastructures – however, these infrastructures need to inbuilt the women's safety aspects, perceptions of which lead women in their workforce participation decision. Female commuters (Manish/HT) According to the PLFS 2023-24, the women's labour force participation rate has increased over the past six years from 23.3% in 2017-18 to 41.7% in 2023-24. Irrespective of the caveats on what drives the increase, the imperative to create safe public infrastructures for mobility and workplaces becomes even more dire. Data clearly indicates that for every additional crime per 1,000 women in a district, roughly 32 women are deterred from joining the workforce. The Deloitte Women@Work 2024 Report states that 46% of Indian women worry about their safety either at the workplace or during commutes, whether to work or for other purposes. Studies have repeatedly emphasised the need for improved safety mechanisms within urban transport and planning. The concerns get reflected in lived realities of women workers. Across India, women are opting out of economic opportunities not only due to lack of ambition or skills, but because the ecosystem does not guarantee their basic safety at workplaces, organisation of workplaces and during all their commutes. The idea of safety to become a systemic principle requires a transformational approach. For women to feel safe at all times in public sphere, the notion of prevention needs to transcend the boundaries of women protecting themselves using several self-censoring mechanisms and encompass an approach where cities and public infrastructure is planned in keeping with specific safety norms. Measures like better-lit streets, women-only transport options, and improved surveillance tactics using digital mechanisms and so on. These would be more effective if the broader planning framework prioritises and integrates women's needs for safe mobility and spaces. At the workplace, safety must extend beyond legal compliances. A 10-year review of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, conducted by the FICCI-EY, found that only one in four Indian companies are fully compliant with the laws. The IC at local levels often does not register any complaints year after year. These trends emphasise the need for organisational awareness building and integration of women's safety perceptions to foster safe spaces, rather than relying solely on formal mechanisms. Women are unsafe even in the digital spaces. A UN Women report of 2021 revealed that one in three women in India had faced online harassment, constraining them from accessing digital platforms and devices, their ability to learn, network, or work online. As the digital economy grows, safety interventions must ensure that women's needs and perceptions are well-addressed. Clearly, safety is also a perception in addition to all the physical safeguards and mechanisms – in fact perception is a positive function of mechanisms, especially their effectiveness. Thus, while it is about prevention, it is also about bridging the gaps towards a well-functioning physical infrastructure and a social ideal of trust. Women's perception of safety in public transport, at the workplace, on digital platforms, and within communities depend heavily on the effectiveness and the well-functioning systems of safety. Safety is not only a women's issue to be addressed through piecemeal interventions, but as a systemic enabler of social, political and economic prosperity. It needs political will and collaborative efforts by think tanks, policymakers, and civil society to integrate safety into the fabric of conscience, governance, and physical and social design. Systems of gender audits for urban infrastructure and transport systems as well as spot checks and random scrutiny of safety systems across public infrastructures in all geographies, within formal and informal set ups are necessary to build that trust for changing safety perceptions leading to greater freedom of women in public spaces. Transformative ideas such as these need to be embedded towards building a Viksit Bharat 2047 and thus non-negotiable. This article is authored by Sona Mitra, principal economist, IWWAGE.
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
Energy dept's 3.2k MW thermal power tender not required, says CEA report
Jaipur: The fate of Rajasthan's proposed 3,200 MW thermal power plant hangs in the balance following a revised Resource Adequacy Report by the Central Electricity Authority (CEA), which said the state does not require any additional coal-powered plants to meet its demand over the next decade. A joint tender for 3,200 MW thermal and 8,000 MW solar was cancelled in Sept last year. However, Rajasthan Urja Vikas and IT services Ltd (RUVITL) floated 3,200 MW tender for thermal plants this year based on the power demand projection made earlier by the CEA. In its updated report, the CEA reduced Rajasthan's thermal power requirement for the period FY26 to FY36 from 20,532 MW to 16,561 MW, comprising 15,960 MW coal and 601 MW gas. This revision renders the proposed 3,200 MW tender and other projects unnecessary and excessive, resulting in a surplus of 830 MW beyond the state's projected needs by 2031-32. A major point of contention has been the demand estimation underpinning this procurement. Rajasthan Urja Vikas and IT Services Ltd relied on CEA's previous Resource Adequacy Report, based on the power situation in 2022-2023, which projected a need for 20,532 MW of contracted capacity by FY 2031-32 (comprising 19,710 MW coal and 822 MW gas). Based on this, distribution companies (discoms) submitted a petition indicating a requirement for an additional 6,897 MW, of which 3,756 MW was already secured through joint ventures with Central Public Sector Undertakings (CPSUs), CGS allocations, and other arrangements. The remaining 3,141 MW was to be addressed through the 3,200 MW tender, which the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission is currently evaluating. Anshuman Gowthal of the Centre for Energy, Environment and People (CEEP) said, "This overestimation of demand may lead to over-investment, which not only burdens the public exchequer but also locks the already distressed state utilities into long-term financial obligations with stranded assets, with direct cost implications for consumers." Citing the projects not factored into the estimate of CEA, Gothwal said RUVITL has also overlooked several recent procurement arrangements and existing surplus capacities, further deepening concerns about excess procurement. Director, Samta Power, an NGO in the power sector, DD Agarwal, raised the issue at various forums, including during the meetings at RERC. "The state power corporations are already in the process of adding 3,655 MW through various contracts and tenders. This capacity has not been included in the existing capacity category of the revised CEA report," Agarwal said. Both said that besides demand concerns, there is a noticeable absence of cost comparisons between thermal power and emerging alternatives such as Firm Dis-patchable Renewable Energy (FDRE), which includes solar power bundled with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS). These newer technologies, widely seen as the future of reliable power supply, are gaining traction globally for their lower lifecycle costs and environmental benefits.
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
How quantum computing could upend bitcoin
Two of this century's breakthrough technologies are on a collision course. Investors in Bitcoin should pay attention. Experts say that ultrapowerful quantum computers could eventually crack the security codes of blockchain, the underlying technology for Bitcoin. That would be a hacker's dream. And it could deal a severe blow to investors' trust in the $2 trillion-plus market for the leading cryptocurrency. Roughly a quarter of all Bitcoins are now protected with algorithms that could be cracked by quantum computers in five or 10 years, Gartner analyst Avivah Litan tells Barron's. Those are mostly older Bitcoins housed in digital vaults, or wallets, that date back as far as 15 years. As quantum computing keeps advancing, the damage could spread to newer wallets, and then to the market's broader structure. The computers 'might eventually become so fast that they will undermine the Bitcoin transaction process," experts at Deloitte have written. Conceivably, hackers could start rewriting the history of trades. The crypto industry knows about these risks and is quietly preparing to defend itself. 'There are very strong incentives to protect the value in Bitcoin's network and drive the development of quantum-resistant technology," Litan says. Ultimately, the industry's best weapon for the fight could prove to be quantum computing itself. Some firms are already working on that. The big, unanswerable question is how quickly quantum develops. That is, how soon might the security features of blockchain meet their match? Will the industry finish its preparations in time? Of the two technologies, blockchain is the easier to understand. It is essentially a digital record-keeping system consisting of 'blocks," each containing details on validated transactions. Each time an entry is created and authenticated, a block is added. It is the beating heart of the Bitcoin market. The concept of a blockchain has existed since the 1990s, when computer scientists Stuart Haber and W. Scott Stornetta proposed the first system to timestamp data using cryptography. In October 2008, a mysterious, faceless developer (or developers) going by the name Satoshi Nakamoto published a white paper detailing a 'peer-to-peer electronic cash system" that would become the prototype for the blockchain network. As it happens, Nakamato's holdings—which the most bombastic estimates place at 1.1 million Bitcoins, or some $128 billion—could be vulnerable to the first wave of any quantum-based attacks. That's because the assets are believed to have been tucked away since 2010 in the kind of older, digital vaults considered to be most at risk. Quantum computing, under development since the 1980s, is derived from quantum mechanics. And what is that, exactly? The pioneering physicist Richard Feynman may have put it best: 'I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics." The remark, part of a lecture at Cornell University in 1964, drew chuckles from the audience, but the sentiment still rings true today, even as hype about the technology explodes on Wall Street. A collection of small, volatile quantum-computing stocks have become some of investors' favorite speculative playthings. In general, quantum computing aims to take traditional computing to an entirely new level. It seeks to solve big, complex statistical problems by examining large numbers of variables at the same time. A typical quantum system consists of a bulky, refrigerator-like shell encasing a nest of hardware. At its core sits a quantum processor, usually no bigger than a thumbnail. Information is encoded by quantum bits, or 'qubits," which are created by manipulating and measuring subatomic particles like electrons, photons, and ions. Because qubits allow these particles to exist in multiple states at once, quantum computers can perform calculations outside the reach of traditional machines. Theoretically, they can be used for everything from unsnarling a city's traffic jams to discovering new treatments for cancer. And for cracking cryptographic algorithms. 'That is one of the cases where the features of quantum mechanics are used to do things that are very hard or too time-intensive—and basically impossible—otherwise," says Thomas Ehmer, co-founder of the Quantum Interest Group at Merck KGaA. To attackers, it's the 'holy grail," Ehmer says. Quantum computers, he adds, could work in a 'hyper-efficient" way to peel away the layers of numbers that form the core of blockchain encryption. For most cryptocurrencies, that core is based on pairs of keys—a public key and a private key, which are mathematically linked. The public key is used for encryption, or scrambling data to safeguard it from prying eyes, while the private key is used for decryption, or converting it back into a readable format. Think of a public key like an email address or a username. Anyone can view and share it, and anyone can use it to encrypt data. However, only the holders of the corresponding private key can decrypt the data. The security of encryption relies on the difficulty of factoring large numbers, or breaking a number into smaller prime numbers that, when multiplied together, equal the larger number. Current technology is unable to do that, but a fully realized quantum computer theoretically could, and in surprisingly short time. 'It's like having a superpower that lets you quickly pick a lock that would take a normal person millions of years to even attempt," Ehmer says. There have already been attempts to crack the code. In a 2024 paper, Chinese scientists claimed they had used a system from D-Wave Quantum to break RSA encryptions, which are used in online banking transactions and VPN connections. The experiment, however, was conducted on a relatively small scale and wasn't considered a major advance. Still, fear is clearly seeping into the crypto industry's consciousness. BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, warned of the advent of more powerful computers when it prepared to launch a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund in 2024. The firm noted in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that 'quantum computing could result in the cryptography underlying the Bitcoin network becoming ineffective, which, if realized, could compromise the security of the Bitcoin network" and lead to losses for shareholders. Similar language appears in BlackRock's filings as far back as 2023. Just how real is the risk? Some three-quarters of Bitcoins have an additional layer of cryptography that keeps them out of imminent danger. However, the threat is nothing to scoff at, according to Michael Osborne, chief technology officer at IBM Quantum Safe. 'Assets can be stolen from existing wallets if fairly simple actions are not taken to protect them," Osborne says. The most immediate fix may be to move funds from old or reused addresses to new wallets that don't have their public keys exposed, in anticipation of the day quantum computers gain the ability to determine a private key using a public key. As quantum develops in the coming years, protective measures may well become harder to devise. Hackers could gain the tools to disrupt Bitcoin mining and the basic operations of the market, such as rewriting transaction history. Gartner's Litan says that some experts place the odds of this happening at 50% by 2037. 'There is strong consensus in the Bitcoin community that preparation now is essential to prevent future catastrophe, though some view the threat as overhyped," Litan says. No matter the difference of opinions, developers aren't sitting idly by. Rather, they have kicked off a digital arms race even before the true conflict has begun. 'It's pretty widely known that the bad actors will try to use quantum computers to break classical encryption," Quantinuum CEO Rajeeb Hazra tells Barron's. 'But that same tool can also be used to create better algorithms." The child of Honeywell Quantum Solutions and a United Kingdom–based start-up, Quantinuum was created through a merger in 2021. The firm received an initial investment of $300 million from Honeywell International, and released its first product—a random-number generator with cybersecurity applications—in December of that year. In March 2025, Quantinuum teamed up with researchers at JPMorgan Chase for an experiment demonstrating how a quantum computer could best a classical machine at a random-number-generation problem. As random numbers are used in everything from computer simulations to cryptography, the study had important real-world implications. 'Forever the race will remain, right?" Hazra says with a chuckle. 'We see it in the classical world, and we'll see it taken to the next level with quantum." Researchers at D-Wave Quantum have approached the challenge by developing a blockchain architecture that runs on quantum computers. 'The distributed nature of the Bitcoin network is based on a bunch of miners collaborating and each doing a hard cryptographic puzzle, which requires a lot of classical computational power," explains Trevor Lanting, D-Wave's chief development officer. Blockchains rely on hashing, a mathematical function that acts like a digital fingerprint by converting an input into a string of characters. Hashing is used to encrypt transactions, and 'proof of work" algorithms validate those transactions. D-Wave aims to replace this process with a quantum proof of work, which the company describes as a new way to securely and efficiently create hashes. In a preprint submitted to research-sharing platform arXiv in March, scientists showed how they had tested a prototype blockchain on four D-Wave processors scattered across North America, 'demonstrating stable operation across hundreds of thousands of quantum hashing operations." The race is far from over. Insights from IBM suggest cryptographically relevant quantum computers could arrive in a decade, while some organizations anticipate it may take up to 12 years to become quantum-resistant. There's an expression in the crypto community that might be appropriate here: 'HODL," or hold on for dear life. Write to Mackenzie Tatananni at
