logo
Wood Mackenzie sees extended ‘sunset' for costly coal power

Wood Mackenzie sees extended ‘sunset' for costly coal power

Yahoo13 hours ago
This story was originally published on Utility Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Utility Dive newsletter.
Dive Brief:
Rising electricity demand and a slowdown in the buildout of alternative sources of power generation could extend the use of coal globally and displace 2,100 GW of gas and renewables by 2050, Wood Mackenzie said in a report earlier this month.
Under a high demand scenario, coal-fired power generation could peak in 2030, four years later than the analysis' 'base case' forecast.
The economics and politics of coal are strongest in Asia. In the United States, coal is more expensive than gas or solar and storage, but the cost of building new gas power plants has nearly doubled and long-duration energy storage technology is not yet mature enough to convert solar and wind into true 'baseload' resources, the report said.
Dive Insight:
In Asia, national security concerns and economics favor coal for now, said Anthony Knutson, global head of thermal coal markets at Wood Mackenzie, although when it comes to just levelized cost, hybrid solar and storage remain cheaper than coal or gas.
'While the long-term trajectory towards renewables remains intact, the path is proving far more complex than many anticipated as countries grapple with energy security and affordability concerns,' Knutson said in a statement.
Wood Mackenzie expects the levelized cost of unabated coal-fired power in the Asia and Pacific region to remain below $100/MWh in 2030, lower than the expected levelized cost of gas-fired power there.
Coal-fueled power in the United States will cost about $230/MWh in the United States and about $270/MWh in Europe in 2030, according to the report. By then, gas-fired power will cost about $100/MWh in the United States and about $150/MWh in Europe, it said.
Hybrid solar and storage will undercut coal and gas in all three regions, coming in around $60/MWh in Asia, $70/MWh in Europe and $80/MWh in the United States.
Though the economics of gas-fired generation are more favorable in the U.S. than in Asian and European countries that rely on liquefied natural gas imports, its ability to match surging AI load growth forecasts is limited, the report said. While long-duration energy storage technology has advanced significantly in recent years, it cannot provide baseload power yet, it said.
It's also becoming more expensive to replace aging coal plants with gas and renewables, causing 'sticker shock' for power producers looking to make the switch, the report said. It blamed tariffs, reshoring of production and infrastructure delays for pushing up the cost of new solar while noting a near-doubling of U.S. costs for new gas power plant builds.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold loses lustre as US-Japan deal curbs safe-haven demand
Gold loses lustre as US-Japan deal curbs safe-haven demand

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gold loses lustre as US-Japan deal curbs safe-haven demand

Gold (GC=F) Gold prices were lower in early European trading, as safe-haven demand took a hit after US president Donald Trump announced a trade deal with Japan ahead of an impending tariff deadline. Gold futures were down 0.3% to $3,434.50 per ounce, at the time of writing, while spot gold was muted at $3,422.89 per ounce. Trump struck a trade deal with Japan that lowers tariffs on car imports and saves Tokyo from punishing new levies on other goods in exchange for a $550bn (£406.5bn) package of US-bound investment and loans. The deal includes reduced 15% tariffs for car exports to the US, down from the previous 25%. Read more: FTSE 100 LIVE: Stocks surge as Trump strikes trade deals with Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia "If further trade deals are signed ahead of 1 August, this could further boost general risk appetite and reduce the demand for gold," CM Trade chief market analyst Tim Waterer said. "But if the USD remains pressured this will keep a return to $3,500 a viable near-term prospect for the precious metal." Oil (BZ=F, CL=F) Oil prices were lower this Wednesday morning, making it the fourth consecutive session of losses for crude, although the US tariff deal with Japan improved global trade sentiment and limited further sliding. Brent (BZ=F) crude futures slipped 0.1% to trade at $68.49 per barrel, at the time of writing, while West Texas Intermediate (CL=F) futures retreated 0.2% to $65.20 a barrel. "The slide of the past three sessions appears to have abated but I don't expect much of an upward impetus from news of the US-Japan trade deal as the hurdles and delays being reported in talks with the EU and China will remain a drag on sentiment," Vandana Hari, founder of oil market analysis provider Vanda Insights, told Reuters. Read more: Which Mag 7 stocks will be the top performers this earnings season? Separately, US crude and gasoline stocks fell last week, market sources said, citing American Petroleum Institute figures on Tuesday. Distillate stocks rose by 3.48 million barrels, they added. "This will offer some relief to the middle distillate market, which has been looking increasingly tight," ING analysts wrote in a note, adding that low crude inventories will offer some support to prices even as a large surplus is expected to hit the market later in the year. Pound (GBPUSD=X, GBPEUR=X) The pound was steady against the dollar, up 0.1% to trade at $1.3546, with fear of tax rises in the autumn capping further gains. The latest UK government borrowing figures has increased concerns over tax hikes in the autumn as well as unsettling the bond market which has hit the pound in global markets. "That GBP risk premium is partly because of the euro's idiosyncratic strength (due to its appeal as a reserve currency) but may also embed some UK budget concerns. Those were fuelled further this morning as the UK unveiled larger borrowing for June than expected by the UK fiscal watchdog," analysts at ING wrote. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio Capital Economics UK economist Alex Kerr, said: 'The government's U-turns on spending cuts and potential upward revisions to the OBR's borrowing forecasts means the chancellor will probably need to raise £15-25bn at the autumn budget to maintain the £9.9bn of headroom against her fiscal mandate.' The US dollar index ( which measures the greenback against a basket of six currencies, was muted at 97.40. Elsewhere in currencies, the pound pushed higher against the euro. Sterling was up 0.2% against the single currency to trade at €1.1538 at the time of writing. In equities, the FTSE 100 (^FTSE) hit a new record high of 9,057.61 this morning. For more details, on market movements check our live coverage here.

Exit bans in China: What are they and why are they causing friction with US?
Exit bans in China: What are they and why are they causing friction with US?

CNN

time6 minutes ago

  • CNN

Exit bans in China: What are they and why are they causing friction with US?

Asia China JapanFacebookTweetLink Follow China recently banned a foreign Wells Fargo executive and a United States government employee from leaving its territory, spotlighting its opaque judicial and security system and rekindling concerns over the risks facing foreign companies and nationals operating there. Exit bans are a common practice employed by the Chinese authorities to prevent individuals under suspicion from leaving the country – sometimes on legitimate grounds, but other times for political reasons, experts said. The latest bans come as the world's second-largest economy seeks to court foreign investment, and inject fresh uncertainties to ongoing US-China trade talks ahead of an August 12 tariff deadline. Here's what you need to know about the bans and their implications for bilateral relations with the US. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed on Monday the exit ban imposed on Wells Fargo banker Mao Chenyue, saying she had been 'involved in a criminal case' and is obligated to cooperate with the investigation, without providing further details. Meanwhile, the US State Department said on Monday that China blocked an employee of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, under the Commerce Department, from leaving the country. A State Department spokesperson told CNN that it 'has no higher priority than the safety and security of American citizens.' 'We are tracking this case very closely and are engaged with Chinese officials to resolve the situation as quickly as possible,' the spokesperson said. The New York Times reported, citing a State Department document it obtained, that the Commerce Department employee has been prevented from leaving the country since mid-April, and questioned primarily about his US Army background. The State Department did not disclose to CNN the identity of the US citizen facing an exit ban. Asked about the Wells Fargo banker banned from leaving China, the State Department spokesperson said: 'Due to privacy and other considerations, we have no further comment at this time.' The US Embassy in China said it has raised concerns with Chinese authorities about the 'impact arbitrary exit bans have on our bilateral relations.' 'The Chinese government has, for many years, imposed exit bans on US citizens and other foreign nationals in China, often without a clear and transparent process for resolution,' a spokesperson for the embassy told CNN. James Zimmerman, a lawyer based in Beijing and former chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, said the government's use of exit bans is 'nothing new,' and they have often been used in investigations to prevent witnesses or suspects viewed as flight risks from leaving China. 'Most of the time, there is a legitimate legal basis for the exit ban, while there are indeed instances of misuse of the process by the government authorities, including for political reasons,' he said. While there are procedures for having an exit ban lifted, he added, 'the lack of transparency and absence of a workable bail system make lifting an exit ban a time-consuming and challenging process.' China does not provide numbers of people who are subject to exit bans, though the practice has been employed against its citizens much more frequently than against foreigners. Many human rights lawyers, activists and their families have been placed under such restrictions. Last year the Dui Hua Foundation, a human rights organization, estimated that more than 30 Americans were under exit bans. Beyond targeting subjects of criminal investigations, Beijing has imposed exit bans on people who are not directly involved in the legal proceedings. As early as 2019, the US issued a travel advisory urging Americans to 'exercise increased caution' when traveling to China because of its use of exit bans 'coercively.' The advisory said the restrictions are used to 'compel US citizens to participate in Chinese government investigations, to lure individuals back to China from abroad, and to aid Chinese authorities in resolving civil disputes in favor of Chinese parties.' In one notable example in 2018, China blocked Victor and Cynthia Liu, two Americans then aged 19 and 27, from leaving the country in order to pressure their father Liu Changming, a high-profile Chinese fugitive, into returning to China, where he was wanted for financial crimes. Only three years later were they allowed to return home. Zimmerman also noted that foreigners working with China's state-owned enterprises (SOE) could also be subject to exit bans. The Central Commission on Discipline Inspection, the ruling Communist Party's top anti-graft agency, has initiated more investigations in recent years, and used exit bans to force foreigners to assist in investigations targeting government officials and SOEs, he said. 'Foreign persons who have had extensive business relationships with SOEs should be cautious, especially if they become aware that the SOEs they had dealings with are a target of investigations,' he said. China has passed or amended a series of laws in recent years to expand the scope for the use of exit bans, especially on national security grounds. In 2023, it amended its already extensive counterespionage law, allowing exit bans on Chinese and foreigners under investigation if they are deemed a potential national security risk after leaving the country. A 2023 report on China's expanding use of exit bans by Safeguard Defenders, a human rights group, estimated at least tens of thousands of people in China are placed under exit bans at any one time. And that does not include millions of Tibetans, or Uyghurs in China's northwestern Xinjiang region, who have long been targeted with ethnicity-based exit bans, mostly through the confiscation and denial of passports, it said. Other than the counterespionage law amendment, Beijing has in recent years expanded the remit of its national security apparatus through sweeping legislation, giving authorities broader powers to scrutinize foreign nationals and organizations. Some of those laws have ensnared members of the business community. Just last week, a Beijing court sentenced a Japanese executive for Tokyo-based pharmaceutical firm Astellas Pharma to more than three years in prison for espionage. The executive has been detained in China since 2023. The Embassy of Japan in Beijing told CNN that the guilty sentence handed down to the Japanese national is 'deeply regrettable,' as the country has urged the Chinese authorities repeatedly to release them, through various channels including at the leader and foreign minister levels. 'The detention of Japanese nationals in China is one of the biggest obstacles to improving people-to-people exchanges and public sentiment between Japan and China,' it said. An American businessman in Beijing told CNN on condition of anonymity that concerns rise among the foreign business community every time an exit ban or detention of a foreign national is announced, and there are greater concerns for those who travel to China for short-term business trips. 'Denials by the Foreign Ministry of the detentions or lack of clarity as to why the people are detained only makes matters worse. And more importantly, if people are afraid to visit China, investment will fall,' the businessman said. William Yang, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, a think tank, noted that companies from countries like Japan, several of whose citizens have been arbitrarily detained by Chinese authorities on espionage grounds, have already reduced the number of staff based in China. 'At a time when China is trying to boost foreign investors' confidence in the country, these developments would be counterproductive to that goal,' he said. For the first half of 2025, China's Commerce Ministry reported a 15.2% drop in foreign investment in the country, compared with the same period last year, as it continues to grapple with a flurry of economic challenges. Joe Mazur, senior analyst at Trivium China, a research and advisory firm, said the use of exit bans and the lack of clarity around specific cases will make foreign companies extremely nervous about sending staff to China, damaging overall business confidence. 'A lack of faith in the impartiality and due process afforded by China's legal system tends to overshadow any sort of justification the Chinese side is likely to make about the legal basis for exit bans,' he said. But Mazur said the development is unlikely to reverse the positive steps the US and China have taken in recent weeks to dial down their trade war. 'Given what's at stake in the US-China trade relationship, I doubt the US will allow these exit ban cases to derail the slight thaw we've seen in US-China ties in the past few weeks,' he said. Still, Yang believed the bans slapped on the two American citizens cast a shadow over the more positive developments in relations between both countries as they try to arrange a potential leaders' summit and reach a permanent trade deal. 'These cases could make it more complicated for China and the US to negotiate the right terms and conditions for the potential Xi-Trump meeting in China, which the US government seems to be prioritizing,' he said. CNN's Marc Stewart in Beijing and Matt Egan contributed reporting.

China Says It Spoke With Neighbors on Planned Mega-Dam's Impacts
China Says It Spoke With Neighbors on Planned Mega-Dam's Impacts

Bloomberg

time6 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

China Says It Spoke With Neighbors on Planned Mega-Dam's Impacts

China said it has talked with countries downstream about its new dam project in Tibet, a massive undertaking that will affect a key source of water for India and Bangladesh. 'China has carried out cooperation on hydrology reporting, flood prevention and disaster alleviation with relevant downstream countries and has had necessary communication with them,' said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun during a regular press conference on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store