
Trump trade wars could tank foreign tourism in the U.S., report finds
President Trump's trade policies and aggressive rhetoric threatens to hurt the American tourism sector by discouraging foreign travelers from visiting the U.S., according to a recent analysis.
The White House's escalating trade war with Canada, China, Mexico and the European Union, combined with other factors, could weigh heavily on foreign tourism in the U.S. this year, the
report from Tourism Economics
found. Canada accounts for the sharpest projected decline in travelers to the U.S., with the firm forecasting a 15% drop in the number of visits from the U.S.' northern neighbor in 2025.
Overall, international travel from all foreign countries to the U.S. is expected to drop by just over 5%, according to the report. Factoring in diminished spending by Americans traveling domestically this year, overall travel spending in the U.S. could drop up to $64 billion in 2025, according to Tourism Economics, a unit of investment advisory firm Oxford Economics.
"The negative effects of an expanded trade war scenario will reach U.S. hotel room demand in 2025," Tourism Economics said in the report. "Domestic travel will be negatively affected by slower income growth and higher prices while international travel to the U.S. will be hit by a trifecta of slower economies, a stronger dollar and antipathy towards the U.S."
The group's forecast assumes the U.S. moves ahead with an additional 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum from all countries, and additional levies on Europe, Taiwan and other nations, along with retaliatory trade restrictions.
President Trump has affirmed that the tariffs on Canada and Mexico, which were paused earlier this month, are
set to take effect on April 2
. That same day, the U.S. has also vowed to impose matching tariffs on other countries equal to their levies on American imports.
In February, air travel from Canada to the U.S. fell a modest 2%, presumably because fliers had already booked and paid for their trips before tensions between the two nations surged, Tourism Economics said. But cross-border trips from Canada by car fell 24% the same month, the group found.
Canadians made more than 20 million visits to the U.S. in 2024, accounting for $20.5 billion in spending, according to the
U.S. Travel Association
.
Instead of heading south, more Canadians are likely to travel within the country or head to locales in the Caribbean and Latin America, Tourism Economics President Adam Sacks told CBS MoneyWatch.
In a speech last month, former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau urged residents to "choose Canada" and travel domestically. "It might mean changing your summer vacation plans to stay here in Canada and explore the many national and provincial parks, historical sites and tourist destinations our great country has to offer," he said.
Other factors are dampening travel to the U.S., according to Tourism Economics. That includes the U.S. threatening
200% tariffs on European wine
and Mr. Trump's fierce criticism of the EU's trade policies, along with the White House's handling of Russia's war on Ukraine, Sacks said.
"You get the perception that the U.S. is sympathetic to Russia in a conflict where they are the clear aggressor, and Western Europe is advocating for Ukraine," he said. "So there are three different levels, including recent tensions around handling Ukraine, that could affect European sentiment toward the U.S. and therefore their interest in traveling to the U.S."
Americans contribute substantially to domestic tourism, and they, too, are expected to pull back on travel spending this year amid signs of slowing economic growth. Citing the potential hit from U.S. tariffs, the Federal Reserve on Wednesday
lowered its outlook
for economic growth this year to 1.7%, while forecasting a rise in inflation.
U.S. airlines including Delta, Southwest and United have all recently cut their 2025 earnings forecasts because of lower consumer demand stemming from rising economic uncertainty.
"With weaker job and income growth and greater uncertainty, households and businesses will pull back on travel spending," Tourism Economics said. "Tariffs are expected to raise the prices paid by U.S. consumers, having a negative impact to lower-income households in particular and applying further pressure on performance at hotels in lower tier chain scales."
Tourism Economics projects a 1.4% overall decline in domestic U.S. travel, which it attributed to weaker economic growth and consumers' reduced purchasing power.
"Whatever one might think of these policies, their merits and longer term goals, the immediate effects are categorically negative," Sacks said of the Trump administration's tariffs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
34 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's military parade was a 'beautiful celebration of America': Lara Trump
All times eastern Legends & Lies: The Real West Legends & Lies: The Real West Legends & Lies: The Real West Legends & Lies: The Real West FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump participates in G7 session with world leaders

Miami Herald
38 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Jean Chatzky sends strong message on 401(k), Social Security
As many Americans are aware, planning for retirement inevitably involves assessing several critical financial checkpoints regarding one's age to ensure long-term financial stability and to uphold one's desired lifestyle. Daily living expenses - including essentials such as food, utilities, phones and transportation - shape U.S. workers' budgets and influence how much they can save and invest. Evaluating Social Security benefits and reliance on personal savings, such as 401(k) plans, is equally crucial. Key challenges also include managing rising health care costs, countering inflation's impact on fixed income, and ensuring that one's assets are set to last throughout retirement. Jean Chatzky, former NBC "Today Show" financial editor and current AARP (American Association of Retired Persons) understands these concerns - and steps in to help Americans make some sense out of ways to maximize monthly Social Security paychecks and employee-sponsored 401(k) plans. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Chatzky advises people to carefully consider when to claim Social Security, cautioning that early withdrawals lead to reduced monthly benefits. For those expecting a long retirement, she emphasizes the advantages of waiting until age 70 to maximize Social Security payments. In the case of couples, she recommends that the higher-earning spouse delay distributions if one partner anticipates a longer lifespan, ensuring greater financial security. She also points to the benefits of working while receiving Social Security, noting that some people do so out of financial necessity, while others value the engagement and sense of purpose employment provides in retirement. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary warns Americans on 401(k)s In addition to Social Security, Chatzky warns about the risks and rewards associated with retirement savings accounts such as 401(k) plans. She stresses the fact that Americans face a significant possibility of exhausting their funds during retirement. To address this concern, she offers strategies designed to improve financial longevity and reduce the likelihood of running out of money. Because Social Security monthly paychecks alone are not enough to provide retired people with enough income on which to live, it is of vital importance that, during their working years, Americans put money away in retirement savings accounts. Employer-sponsored 401(k) plans are a great place to start, especially if one's company matches employee contributions - as those funds are essentially free money. More on retirement: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has blunt words on 401(k) plansDave Ramsey strongly cautions U.S. workers on Social Security Chatzky emphasizes the benefits of automated 401(k) contributions and of gradually increasing the percentage with each pay raise to accelerate retirement savings. She advises that those new to saving and facing financial constraints start with 3% of their income, while individuals in a better financial position begin at a higher rate. Chatzky suggests raising contributions by 2% annually until reaching the maximum limit. Her goal is for people to save 10% yearly if they begin before their mid-thirties, including employer matches, or 15% if they start later. Chatzky explains her view that simply enrolling in a workplace retirement plan reduces the likelihood of depleting funds in retirement to 20%. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Chatzky emphasizes the point that saving money consistently is the key to freeing up more of one's income to contribute to a 401(k) plan. "When I hear people suggest that you 'live on what you make,' I always shake my head," Chatzky wrote in "Money Rules," her book on personal finance tips. "If you're living on what you make, you're spending every dime. The key is to live on less than you make," she added. "This is non-negotiable. Why? Because if you do it consistently, you're automatically saving consistently." Chatzky advises Americans to be proud of their step-by-step achievements in planning financially for their future. "With the same enthusiasm you brought to watching your lima bean plant take root in grade school - watch that stash start to grow," Chatzky wrote. "Take pride in it. You're accomplishing something very few people can. And that will inspire you to set aside more." The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
Here's what's in the Senate GOP's version of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
The Senate Finance Committee on Monday unveiled its portion of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' containing provisions on Medicaid, taxes and green energy tax credits. The committee's text is the final piece of the upper chamber's version of the bill to be released, and was the most highly anticipated. It contains some of the thorniest provisions that Senate GOP holdouts have expressed concerns about, and the issues that could set the upper chamber on a collision course with the House. The House narrowly passed its version of the legislation last month. Here's what's in the Senate's bill. The bill makes many of the core elements of their 2017 tax cuts permanent but scales back additional cuts from what the House passed. The Senate bill locks in existing federal tax brackets, boosts the standard deduction and maintains the termination of personal exemptions — all without sunsets. In contrast with the House version, the bill sets a lower increase for the child tax credit, raising it to $2,200 per child as opposed to the House's $2,500. The bill creates new deductions for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest — a priority of Trump's that he campaigned on — but doesn't make them fully deductible. Tips are deductible up to $25,000 through 2028. Overtime pay is deductible up to $12,500, or $25,000 for joint filers, through 2028. Auto loan interest is deductible up to $10,000, also through 2028. Senate Republicans are taking a bigger swing at Medicaid in their version of the bill. The legislation would effectively cap provider taxes at 3.5 percent by 2031, down from the current 6 percent, but only for the states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The cap would be phased in by lowering it 0.5 percent annually, starting in 2027. Non-expansion states would be prohibited from imposing new taxes, but as was true in the House-passed version, their rates would be frozen at current levels. The lower cap would not apply to nursing homes or intermediate care facilities. Limiting provider taxes is a long-held conservative goal, as they argue states are gaming the current system and driving up federal Medicaid spending. The policies are designed to inflate Medicaid spending on paper to allow states to receive more federal reimbursement dollars. The Senate bill also cuts certain existing state-directed payments to hospitals, which would be a significant hit to the hospitals' bottom line. The House version in contrast limited future payments but grandfathered existing arrangements. The change in the Senate bill is sure to anger Republicans who were already expressing concerns about the impact of the freeze in the House-passed version, including key holdouts like Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.). Provider taxes have become an important lifeline for hospitals, and rural hospitals would be hit hardest by the cuts. Hawley on Monday night signaled dissatisfaction with the newly unveiled text. Like the House bill, the Senate legislation imposes work requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries beginning at 19 years old. But the Senate version says adults with dependent children older than 14 will also have to prove they work, attend school or perform community service for 80 hours a month, while the House-passed version would exempt all adults with dependent children. The bill includes changes to green energy tax credits that are more flexible than those passed by the House — but would still be a significant rollback. The Senate text appears to eliminate the most stringent provision in the House bill, deleting a measure that would have required climate-friendly energy sources to start construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment to qualify for the credits at all. Instead, things such as solar panels and wind farms would need to begin construction this year in order to receive the full credit amount. Projects that begin construction in 2026 would get 60 percent of the credit, while projects that begin construction in 2027 would receive 20 percent. Projects constructed in 2028 or later would not be eligible for the credit. This, too, appears to be more flexible than the House text, which required projects to not just start construction but actually be producing electricity by the end of 2028 to qualify for the credit. Nevertheless, the Senate provisions are still a major rollback of the tax credits passed by Democrats in their 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Under that law, the credits would have lasted until either 2032 or when U.S. emissions from the electric sector are 25 percent lower than their 2022 levels, whichever came later. The Senate text also adds carve-outs for hydro, nuclear and geothermal power, allowing them to receive the full credit if they begin construction before 2034. The Senate bill as drafted would keep the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions at $10,000 a year, rolling back the deal that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) painstakingly cut with blue state Republicans to raise the limit on SALT deductions to $40,000 a year for households earning less than $500,000 annually. It would permanently extend the $10,000 cap, which is scheduled to expire at the end of this year. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday afternoon that the $10,000 deduction cap is a 'marker' for talks with House Republicans, and that they will find a number in the middle that satisfies both camps. But the House's SALT Caucus Republicans are insisting on the $40,000 number. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), a key member of the group, wrote on the social platform X that the proposal was 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' and warned in a statement that a $40,000 deduction cap 'is the deal and I will not accept a penny less.' The bill would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, instead of the $4 trillion increase adopted by House Republicans. The debt-ceiling language is a major problem for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has told his leadership he won't support the bill if it includes such a large extension of federal borrowing authority. Mychael Schnell and Al Weaver contributed.