US Capitol Police detain man with guns, bow and arrow
"USCP officers saw an unusual vehicle on Pennsylvania Avenue with tri-cycle strapped to the roof. Upon looking closer, officers saw a bow and arrow and empty gun holster in plain view," they wrote, adding that questioned the owner, who "admitted to having guns in the vehicle, along with the bow and arrow."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Police officers detained after smacking son win appeal after ‘unlawful' arrests
Two married police officers who were arrested after one of them smacked their teenage son have won a High Court battle over claims they were unlawfully detained. The officers, who both serve with the Metropolitan Police, were arrested by Surrey Police in March 2019 after the wife gave her son what she described as a 'light smack on the left cheek' after he misbehaved. They sued Surrey Police after being told they would face no further action, claiming their detention was unlawful as it was unnecessary. The couple, who have three children, had their claims dismissed following a trial last year and appealed against the decision at the High Court earlier this month. In a ruling on Monday, Mr Justice Bourne overturned the decision. He said: 'In my judgment, on a proper analysis of the evidence at trial, the police did not show that there was an objective basis for the belief that it was necessary to arrest either claimant.' The judge said in a 30-page ruling that at the time of the incident, the couple's son, referred to as ABD, had 'an unfortunate history of challenging behaviour' and had begun attending a youth centre to access mental health services. The couple cancelled ABD's birthday party in March 2019 after he misbehaved, causing him to go to his room, where he 'kicked things around'. This led his mother to smack her son while his father was asleep, which she said 'was not hard and did not cause any injury or leave any mark'. ABD attended the youth centre the following day and told staff that he had been assaulted by his mother and that his father had done nothing to stop it. Despite offering to be interviewed voluntarily, both parents were arrested and detained for more than seven hours. ABD returned to the family home the following day, with police deeming that the children were not at risk of harm and telling the couple that they would face no further action three days after their arrest. Following a five-day trial at Guildford County Court, a judge dismissed their legal claims, finding that police 'reasonably believed' that their arrests were necessary 'to protect a child or children from the person in question and to enable a prompt and effective investigation'. The judge also ordered the couple to pay 70 per cent of the force's legal costs. At a hearing in London on July 2, barristers for the couple told the High Court that the judge 'erred' by finding that the arrests were 'objectively reasonable' as both parents had offered to give voluntary interviews. In his ruling, Mr Justice Bourne said he was 'unable to agree' with the trial judge's finding that there was a 'rational basis' for officers to conclude that voluntary interviews were not an option. He said: 'In the present case, no reason has been identified which actually explains why voluntary interviews were not a viable alternative.' He continued: 'None of this means that police officers are entitled to special treatment when they find themselves suspected of an offence. 'But the police must assess the circumstances and make rational decisions as to whether coercive measures are needed or not.' He added: 'Merely referring to the need to protect children and to protect the integrity of the investigation was not and is not enough. 'It follows that the arrests were unlawful and the claims should have succeeded.'
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump gives update on Ghislaine Maxwell pardon as he issues furious denial about visiting Epstein's island
President Donald Trump told Daily Mail on Monday that no one has asked him about a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell as he went on a rant about Jeffrey Epstein. 'I'm allowed to give her a pardon. Nobody's approached me with it. Nobody's asked me about it. It's in the news about that, that aspect of it. But right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it,' he said. Maxwell, who met with Justice Department officials last week, is serving 20 years in prison for her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's sordid crimes of sex trafficking. She was convicted in 2021 on five counts related to sex trafficking and conspiracy. A growing fringe effort to get Trump to pardon Maxwell has unfolded after the Justice Department rejected her effort to have her conviction on child sex trafficking charges thrown out. Questions about Epstein and queries about his relationship with the notorious financer followed Trump from the United States to his meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland through the weekend. He again denied ever making a controversial doodle for Epstein's 50th birthday and claimed he'd never been to the financier's private island in the Caribbean. 'I don't do drawings,' Trump said when asked about a Wall Street Journal report that had reviewed a typewritten birthday letter bearing Trump´s signature, framed by the seemingly hand-drawn outline of a naked woman. 'Sometimes people say, would you draw a building? And I'll draw four lines and a little roof, you know, for a charity stuff, but, but I'm not a drawing person,' Trump said. The president is suing the Journal and owner Rupert Murdoch for $10 billion in a defamation suit tied to the publication of that article. Trump also offered a new explanation of why he and Epstein – who were pictured together at many social events in the 1990s and 2000s – had a falling out. Trump banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago Club in 2004 but, before that time, both Epstein and Maxwell were photographed partying at the Palm Beach social club, often with Trump and his girlfriend turned wife Melania Knauss. The president said the fallout stemmed from Epstein poaching his staff. 'He stole people that work for me. I said, Don't ever do that again. He did it again, and I threw him out of the place persona non grata, I threw him out, and that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth,' Trump told Daily Mail during a Q&A with reporters on Monday. One of those employees was the late Virginia Giuffre, who Maxwell met when the young Giuffre was working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago. Maxwell saw her reading a book about massage therapy and offered her a position as Epstein's masseuse, Giuffre claimed. Before her death earlier this year, Giuffre was one of the most prominent and vocal accusers of Epstein and Maxwell. It was reported previously Trump and Epstein fell out over an oceanfront Palm Beach property that was being sold out of bankruptcy that each man wanted. Trump also sought to try to turn spotlight on other prominent men who have been spotted with Epstein, including former President Bill Clinton. On Monday he declared he 'never went to the island' – referring to Epstein's private Caribbean island where many young girls claimed they experienced abuse. 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down,' he said. 'But a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. In one of my very good moments, I turned it down.' He did allege: 'Bill Clinton went there, supposedly, 28 times ... And many other people that are very big people. Nobody ever talks about them.' The allegations about Clinton are not new. The former president wrote in his memoir 'Citizen' that he'd never gone to the island and that he wished he'd never even met Epstein in the first place. Clinton made some trips on Epstein's private jet, but that in service to the Clinton Foundation and involved a trip to Africa. Trump's MAGA loyalists have long believed there is a list of rich and powerful people for whom Epstein is alleged to have trafficked young girls and it's fueled their feverish calls for the Department of Justice to release files around the case. Trump also suggested - but offered no proof - that Democrats could have planted his name in files associated with the Epstein investigation. 'They ran the files. I was running against somebody that ran the files,' Trump said. 'If they had something, they would have released it. Now they can easily put something in the files that's a phony.' Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed Trump during a May 2025 meeting that his name was found in the Epstein documents 'multiple times,' according to reports, which have been denied by the president. Even if the president is named in the files, it does not mean he's implicated in any wrongdoing related to Epstein's child sex trafficking. Trump finished his rant on Monday by claiming his poll ratings have increased by 4.5 points since this 'ridiculous Epstein stuff' has been in the news. But a cache of surveys from major outlets show the president's approval rating has largely remained stable or declined slightly in July, with most measuring his approval in the mid-40s. No credible poll has shown him jumping 4.5 percentage points.
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Spy satellite agency says law enforcement probing 'incident' affecting contracting site
WASHINGTON, July 28 (Reuters) - The U.S. spy satellite agency said on Monday authorities are investigating an unspecified incident affecting a website serving prospective intelligence community contractors. The National Reconnaissance Office said in a brief statement that there had been "an incident involving our unclassified Acquisition Research Center website" which was currently being probed "in collaboration with federal law enforcement." The office declined further comment. The statement follows a Washington Times story alleging that hackers had targeted intellectual property and personal information submitted via the Acquisition Research Center website in support of CIA spying programs. The Acquisition Research Center provides a path for businesses to bid for intelligence contracts or pitch spy agencies on their products and services; it markets itself as a "portal for business opportunities for acquisitions across the Intelligence Community." The Times story, which cited people familiar with the activity, said hackers likely obtained details about technologies used in CIA operations, including a program aimed at Chinese spies called "Digital Hammer." The FBI, which typically investigates cyber or counterintelligence matters, didn't immediately return a message seeking comment. The CIA referred questions back to the National Reconnaissance Office.
