Bilawal urges Afghan govt to fulfil commitments under Doha Agreement
Bilawal also urged the Indian government to abandon its confrontational posture and engage in meaningful dialogue for peace and to jointly fight against terrorism for development and prosperity for the people.
While addressing at the opening session of an international conference on 'Pakistan Fighting War for the World Against Terrorism,' he said, 'Pakistan supported the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, but instead faced a surge in cross-border terror attacks. Taliban regime was greeted as an inevitable fact.
They promised the world stability, they delivered a 40 percent surge in militant attacks on Pakistani soil, and a sanctuary for the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), and others. We saved Kabul. Sovereignty confers duty. Stop the exodus of fighters, choke the traffic of arms, and honour the blood price of the Doha accord or be judged by the company you keep.'
Bilawal said, 'The broken promises of the Taliban regime are destabilising the region. The Afghan interim government should uphold its obligations.'
He said, 'Over the past two decades, Pakistan's military force backed by iron-willed citizens have broken the backs of Al-Qaeda networks, dismantled so-called caliphates such as Daesh, and driven the TTP from the fortress to the fox hills.'
Bilawal further said that Pakistan military's operation 'Zarb-e-Azab' drained the northern swamp, 'Raddul Fassad' uprooted the sleeper cells in our cities and elsewhere. Today operations in Balochistan sever the connection between separatism and foreign funded terror, he said.
He said that Pakistan sacrificed in the war on terror and paid a heavy price in both lives and economic losses, but remained resolute. He also highlighted the rise in militant violence over the past year, saying '2024 was the deadliest year in a decade in which 685 service members embraced martyrdom in 444 separate attacks.'
'Our economy has forfeited more than $150 billion in lost growth, shattered infrastructure, and displaced livelihoods. And still, we fight because the alternative is surrender, and surrender is not a word in the Pakistani dictionary,' he said.
He asserted that Pakistan would continue its fight against terrorism to ensure a secure future for coming generations.
The PPP chairman also called on India to engage in dialogue for lasting peace, emphasising the need to resolve the issue of Kashmir in line with the aspirations of its people and to end the use of water as a weapon.
He called on the international community to learn from Pakistan's experience in combating terrorism and reiterated that extremists have no religion, nationality, or ideology and pose a global threat.
The PPP chairman said, 'We asked for structured investment in counter terrorism and counter violent extremism, modern technology and weaponry. No counter insurgency has achieved victory without first winning hearts and minds.'
'Terrorism recognises no law, borders or beliefs,' he added, advocating for united global efforts to eliminate the threat.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
India set to allow its private firms to mine and import uranium to help nuclear expansion
NEW DELHI: India aims to allow private firms to mine, import and process uranium as part of plans to end a decades-old state monopoly over the nuclear sector and bring in billions of dollars to boost the industry, two government sources said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government plans to expand nuclear power production capacity by 12 times by 2047 and it is also relaxing requirements to allow foreign players to take a minority stake in power plants, Reuters reported in April. If it meets its expansion goal, nuclear will provide 5% of India's total power needs, according to government estimates. Until now, the state has maintained control over the mining, import and processing of uranium fuel because of concerns over the possible misuse of nuclear material, radiation safety and strategic security. It will retain its grip on reprocessing spent uranium fuel and managing plutonium waste, in line with global practice. But to help meet a surge in demand for nuclear fuel as it expands nuclear power production, the government plans to draw up a regulatory framework that would allow private Indian firms to mine, import and process uranium, the two government sources told Reuters. They asked not to be named because the plans are not yet public. India shuts unit at country's largest nuclear power plant for maintenance The proposed policy, which the sources said was likely to be made public in the current fiscal year, will also permit private players to supply critical control system equipment for nuclear power plants, they said. The Finance Ministry, Department of Atomic Energy and Prime Minister's Office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Outside India, countries including Canada, South Africa and the United States allow private firms to mine and process uranium. Domestic supply is not enough India has an estimated 76,000 tonnes of uranium enough to fuel 10,000 megawatts of nuclear power for 30 years, according to government data. But the sources said domestic resources would only be able to meet about 25% of the projected increase. The rest would have to be imported and India would need to increase its processing capacity. In announcing its budget on February 1, the government made public its plans to open up the sector without giving details. Some of India's big conglomerates subsequently began drawing up investment plans. But analysts said amending the legislation could be complex. 'It's a major and bold initiative by the Indian Government which is critical for achieving the target,' said Charudatta Palekar, independent power sector consultant. 'The challenge will be to define quickly the rules of engagement with private sector.' New Delhi will have to change five laws, including the ones regulating mining and electricity sectors and India's foreign direct investment policy to enable private participation in many identified activities, the sources said.
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
What falling out with the US means for India?
At the start of this year, relations between India and the United States appeared to be on an upward trajectory. In February, just a month after Donald Trump's return to the White House, Prime Minister Narendra Modi stood alongside his long-time friend at the White House, pledging to raise bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 and signalling the possibility of a comprehensive trade agreement. This bonhomie wasn't restricted to just trade – it reflected on defence cooperation, energy trade, and the Indo-Pacific security framework. Modi invited Trump to India for the planned Quad leaders' summit later this year, a gesture intended to cement the personal rapport between the two leaders. That optimism began to unravel in May when tensions between India and Pakistan flared dangerously. In a brief but intense escalation, Pakistan claimed to have shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed a BrahMos missile storage facility in Indian-Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Both sides came perilously close to wider conflict before agreeing to a ceasefire on May 10. Trump publicly took credit for brokering the deal, calling it a personal diplomatic success. India, however, disputed that narrative, insisting it was a mutually agreed arrangement without US mediation. This disagreement planted the first seeds of mistrust. In June, the unease deepened when Trump invited Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir to the White House for a high-profile lunch. The meeting, followed by announcements of a favourable US-Pakistan trade arrangement, an oil reserve development deal, new cooperation on cryptocurrency regulation, and Washington's acceptance of Pakistan's long-standing demand to designate the Balochistan Liberation Army and its Majeed Brigade as terrorist organisations, signalled a strategic warming between Washington and Islamabad. Days before the Trump-Munir meeting, Modi and Trump held a tense phone call on June 17. According to reports, the conversation further soured their relationship, unravelling years of carefully built goodwill. The economic blow By August, the rupture had translated into hard measures. Trump slapped 25% tariffs on Indian imports, accusing New Delhi of maintaining 'strenuous and obnoxious' trade barriers. Days later, he doubled the rate to 50%, the highest for any Asian partner, citing India's continued purchases of Russian crude as undermining the US sanctions regime against Moscow. He ruled out further negotiations until India cut its Russian oil imports. This escalation came despite five rounds of talks toward an interim trade deal, in which India had shown willingness to increase US energy and defence purchases and lower tariffs on American industrial goods. Political miscalculations and disagreements over agricultural norms and quotas ultimately doomed the talks, leaving $190 billion in annual trade and a $46 billion deficit unresolved. The tariff hike threatens India's $87 billion export engine to the US, 18% of its total exports and over 2% of its GDP. Industry experts warn of a 40-50% drop in shipments, especially in labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, jewellery, and automobiles. Small and medium-sized enterprises face a severe loss of competitiveness, while economists have trimmed GDP growth forecasts by as much as 1%. Market reaction has been swift: a weaker rupee, the risk of imported inflation, capital flight by foreign portfolio investors, and higher borrowing costs for foreign-currency debt. Strategic fallout The dispute undermines New Delhi's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific. While the foreign ministers of Australia, Japan, the US, and India recently met in Washington, the Quad leaders' summit now looks unlikely. Instead, India risks drifting closer to Russia, its long-time defence partner, and even exploring limited engagement with China, which Modi is set to visit later this month. For Washington, this marks a reversal of a 25-year strategy of building up India as a counterweight to China's rise. For New Delhi, it is a reminder of the volatility of personal diplomacy: the same leader who embraced Modi in Ahmedabad in 2020, before 100,000 cheering spectators, is now wielding tariffs as leverage. Political setback for Modi Domestically, the rupture is damaging for Modi. His image as a global statesman, reinforced by his perceived closeness to Trump, has been a key part of his appeal to India's middle class. The opposition Congress party has seized the moment, branding him 'Narendra Surrender' for failing to protect Indian trade interests. Even Hindu nationalist groups in the US, once among Trump's staunch supporters, feel abandoned by Washington's turn. With his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) having lost its parliamentary majority in the last election, Modi now faces questions about his handling of both foreign and economic policy. His perceived inability to counter China's assertiveness while losing favour in Washington could become a central vulnerability. The stakes At stake is more than just a trade dispute. The episode jeopardises three decades of India's economic ascent and its strategic positioning as an emerging power backed by a US partnership. Whether this moment leads to strategic drift, realignment toward other powers or eventual rapprochement with Washington will shape India's trajectory for years to come. The above article was contributed by Syed Ahmed Raza Rizvi, Senior Sub-Editor at Business Recorder (Digital).
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pak-China conference to target $1.2b momentum
The 2nd Pakistan-China Business Conference will be held in Beijing on September 4, coinciding with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's visit for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Tianjin. Pakistan's Ambassador to China, Khalil Hashmi, said the conference aims to expand trade and investment ties. Organised by the Pakistan Embassy in Beijing with the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), Board of Investment, ministries, and provincial departments, preparations include answering Chinese investors' queries and showcasing opportunities. "We are finalising the list of companies and scheduling matchmaking sessions in advance for better outcomes," Hashmi said. Chinese firms will be briefed on incentives such as land acquisition, tax breaks, duty exemptions, wage structures, and energy supply. Pakistani delegates will get sector-specific guides on opportunities in China. Hashmi called China "the New Land of Opportunities" and urged Pakistan to boost production capacity and exports. Twenty-one priority sectors, including manufacturing, petrochemicals, minerals, pharmaceuticals, textiles, leather, and medical equipment, have been identified for deeper cooperation. The first conference in Shenzhen last year hosted 105 Pakistani and 250 Chinese companies, resulting in 30 MOUs, 17 now contracts worth over $100 million. Further matchmaking since then produced 45 MOUs worth $600 million, plus deals from expos in Karachi and Lahore, bringing total agreements in the past year to over $1.2 billion.
