logo
Shayne Elliott's legacy after ASX: ANZ scandals as new CEO Nuno Matos takes over

Shayne Elliott's legacy after ASX: ANZ scandals as new CEO Nuno Matos takes over

The Australian08-05-2025

ANZ chief executive Shayne Elliott delivers half year results in Melbourne on Thursday. Picture: Arsineh Houspian.
Elliott has certainly left a cleaner bank and importantly a far less risky one that delivers fewer financial shocks, but Australia's perennial number four bank is still a long way from meeting its potential.
Former HSBC top executive and Santander banker Nuno Matos takes charge on Monday. It's by no means a broken business, however, where Elliot has unfinished work getting ANZ into shape, Matos' mandate will be all about execution.
When he took charge at the start of 2016, Elliott set himself four strategic priorities: creating a simpler bank; focusing ANZ on businesses where it can win; driving a cultural transformation; and building a digital platform to get the bank's aging technology in shape.
Elliott, the former institutional banker, moved quickly on the first two. He sold 30 businesses, mostly across Asia, and exited ANZ's problematic wealth management operations.
In doing so, he raised about $8bn for shareholders. This started the journey of ANZ becoming a transaction led bank in Asia, processing currency flows. Importantly, it ripped risk out of ANZ's accident-prone balance sheet.
'The one that I wouldn't give myself a perfect score on was the digitisation of the business. I think we've made progress. I think in hindsight, what I was a bit naive about was how hard that would be,' Elliott tells The Australian.
ANZ is today a lower risk bank than the one Shayne Elliott inherited. Picture:Getty Images
He is talking about the massive rebuild of ANZ's tech network, a project that has cost billions and was years late.
Only now Elliott's ANZ-Plus project is being switched on with nearly a million retail banking customers and all their banking data gradually being moved onto the new cloud-based platform. So the benefits of having a lower cost to serve is yet to be seen. A digital platform for business customers has also being built and is also being rolled out.
Elliott says 'life got in the way' for ANZ with events like the 2018 banking royal commission and Covid pandemic which each caused major distraction for the bank.
'I'm not making excuses, but I'm just saying if you'd asked me in 2016 where I would hope to be in 2025 we would have hoped to be further down that track. Some of it's environmental and some of it is just a lot harder than it looks'.
Elliot was speaking as ANZ posted a March half cash profit of $3.57bn, flat on the same time last year. The result was struck on record revenue and boosted by the first-time contribution of regional lender Suncorp bank, acquired by Elliott for $4.9bn. Stripping that contribution out, the headline result would have gone slightly backwards. The bank is generating record revenue and credit losses remain grounded near historic lows despite the interest rates hitting a cyclical high.
ANZ trading scandal
There's no doubt Elliott's legacy has been tarnished by the past year, when a bond scandal in his Sydney dealing room has attracted the attention of regulators. Several traders have since been sacked for behaviour issues, while market regulator ASIC has an investigation underway into more serious allegations of pricing manipulation in Australian government bond issues. ANZ has investigated the claims forensically and is expected to defend its position. However, it is waiting until ASIC finalises its investigation, expected next month.
The bank regulator APRA has now told ANZ to set aside $1bn in additional capital for now due to concerns about persistent risk governance and culture. This is more than any other bank, and would be funds otherwise that could be converted into loans.
A separate review into culture has made, and chairman Paul O'Sullivan has taken charge of non-financial risk.
Incoming ANZ CEO Nuno Matos (right) with chairman Paul O'Sullivan. Picture: Aaron Francis
Elliot says where ANZ has turned financial risk management into a strength, moving from a position of having the highest provisions and volatile credit exposures to the lowest there is work on non-financial risks. 'I'm also confident in the team's ability to get on top of that (non-financial risk) pretty quickly,' he says.
ANZ v Westpac, CBA
In many ways, the lack of acute regulatory shocks over the past decade has worked against ANZ. Both Commonwealth Bank and Westpac were shaken to the core by their respective hits from financial crimes regulator Austrac and forced to get their cultural houses in order. Then National Australia Bank went through the fire when its top management and board was singled out for criticism coming out of the Hayne financial commission.
By comparison, ANZ sailed through, allowing a degree of complacency to set in around non-financial risks. ANZ's federated structure of managing risk at a business level rather than a group-wide level, may have served it through targeted issues like anti-money laundering and the banking royal commission, but it still allowed cracks for non-financial risks and poor behaviour. ANZ is now reverting to a group-wide risk management, allowing it to join the dots.
The 61-year-old Elliott acknowledges he could have moved faster in some areas, this echoes the reflections both public and private company leaders have often told him.
'When people look back they never say, 'In hindsight, I was far too bold, and I was too fast'. They always say, 'I should have gone faster, and I should have had more courage' And I would say the same thing'.
johnstone@theaustralian.com.au
Read related topics: Anz Bank

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anthony Albanese ‘open' to defence funding boost
Anthony Albanese ‘open' to defence funding boost

The Australian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Australian

Anthony Albanese ‘open' to defence funding boost

You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback. You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Anthony Albanese is opening the door to lifting defence spending ahead of his potential meeting with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 next week, while declining to confirm publicly whether he considers China a national security threat to Australia. The Prime Minister has for weeks stood firm on his position that he would not blindly tick off on the call from US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent, but on Tuesday left the door open to increasing funding for defence more broadly. 'Arbitrary figures lead to a cul-de-sac and we want to make sure as well that every single dollar that defence spends results in actual assets,' he told the National Press Club ahead of travelling to the G7 this week. When asked if defence spending as a portion of GDP could feasibly increase as investment in such assets and capabilities went up, Mr Albanese said: 'Of course, we'll always provide for capability that's needed. I've made it very clear – we will support the capability that Australia needs. 'I think that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence. Simple as that.' It follows senior ministers such as Richard Marles and Pat Conroy indicating a similar willingness to boost spending on defence, with Mr Conroy confirming last week the government was 'open to having a ­conversation about increasing ­defence funding'. Former Defence Department deputy secretary Peter Jennings said the critical question for Mr ­Albanese was whether the current defence spend was adequate to the strategic challenge, arguing that the answer was a resounding 'no'. 'He's got a little bit of wriggle room now, if he finds that he's under pressure from Trump or other allies or the calls for increasing spending just get too great, too loud domestically, well, then he does have a way out of it,' Mr Jennings said. 'What he's doing is just describing a process; when he's pressed on this issue, all he says is, 'well, what we do is that we consider our needs based on proposals that are put in cabinet'. 'He's not locking himself out of doing more, but clearly, I think he's reluctant to, because they haven't so far.' Strategic Analysis Australia head of research Marcus Hellyer said he was sceptical over Mr Albanese's language, arguing that for more investment to be made in specific capabilities, the government had to tick off on an increase in defence spending, rather than the process occurring the other way around. 'We have had review after review … and assessment after assessment, which have determined the capabilities we need, yet the current investment program doesn't include them, why?' he said. 'Because the current investment program was designed around a certain funding envelope. 'That's why it's ludicrous when people pompously say 'we will acquire the capabilities we need' when governments are the ones setting a funding envelope.' While giving himself room to move on the issue of defence spending, Mr Albanese also sought to dodge direct questions over whether China posed a national security threat to Australia and argued that simplifying what was a 'complex set of relationships' was neither 'diplomatic' nor 'mature'. 'We engage constructively in the region, including with China, and including with ASEAN nations and what we say is that it is in Australia's interests and indeed, the world's interest for there to be peace and security in our region,' he said. 'That's our position. That's the mature way in which we are able as a middle power to exercise influence in the region.' It follows a Chinese flotilla circumnavigating Australia ahead of the election, with Mr Marles confirming Australia engaged in an 'unprecedented level of surveillance' of the ships that he said were conducting exercises and 'seeking to … demonstrate' capabilities. 'We are very aware of what that task group was doing, the exercises that it was engaging in, what it was seeking to be able to demonstrate,' he told Sky. Despite the expected meeting with Mr Trump being just days away, Mr Albanese once more made veiled inferences over the danger of 'copying' policies from overseas – or more specifically the US – that would leave Australia 'narrower, less generous and more divided'. It followed Labor accusing the Coalition of importing policies from overseas numerous times ­during the election, arguing the opposition would 'Americanise Medicare' if it won office. Mr Albanese also confirmed that other policies on top of the question of defence spending, such as the news media bargaining code and the under-16s social media ban, were also not 'on the table' when it came to speaking to Mr Trump about lifting the tariffs imposed on Australian products by the US.

Super tax open to manipulation through property valuations: ASF Audits
Super tax open to manipulation through property valuations: ASF Audits

The Australian

time7 hours ago

  • The Australian

Super tax open to manipulation through property valuations: ASF Audits

You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback. You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Australia's biggest auditor of self-managed super funds, ASF Audits, has raised concerns about the manipulation of property and farm valuations in preparation for avoiding Labor's unrealised capital gains tax that would dent Treasury's estimates of revenue. Labor wants to introduce an unrealised gains tax on superannuation accounts of $3m or more without indexation while the Greens want the threshold to be $2m with indexation. The Australian Taxation Office is monitoring changes in behaviour of those who have such accounts, partly to check whether such changes might dampen the $2.3bn in revenue Jim Chalmers expects to collect in the first full year of implementation and $40bn over the next decade. As many as 1.8 million Australians could be caught by unrealised gains tax by the time they reach retirement. ASF Audits head of technical Shelley Banton, who oversees 50,000 self-managed super funds, said superannuants would be looking to avoid tax by securing valuations on properties, including farms, that helped them reduce the impact from the tax. 'As of June 2025, those who are above the $3m mark will want a valuation as high as possible, and then for the 2026 year, they will want a valuation as low as possible so that they're actually making an unrealised loss instead of an unrealised gain, and therefore they don't have to pay tax,' Ms Banton said. For those with accounts just below $3m as of June this year, 'they will want valuations which will obviously keep below $3m – that's where the valuations are going to be manipulated effectively, and we need to make sure that the methodology used in those valuations stacks up, so that we as auditors can actually sign off on our audit report'. Even tax returns for the 2024 financial year, where SMSFs can file late, may be incorporating such valuation manipulation. 'Maybe you don't want to start getting a higher valuation in 2025, maybe you want to start doing that in 2024, so then the valuation you get in 2025 doesn't look as suspect,' Ms Banton said. She added that, while there was always pressure on valuations around tax time, the unrealised capital gains tax 'amps up that pressure considerably … it's a big one'. Commercial property and farms will be in the firing line, especially where there have been no clear, comparable sales. Depending on what's possible with valuations, it might also lead some people to withdraw super, and 'if we've looked at what's happened to evidence in other countries when they've imposed this sort of tax regime, we've seen a lot of money not only exit the industry, but also exit the country', Ms Banton said. Auditor concerns have been raised about possible manipulation of property and farm valuations. Picture: Zoe Phillips One particular area of concern she raised was who would do the valuations. While licensed valuers have their code of conduct, some real estate agents may not. 'The valuations that probably won't be as difficult to manipulate are what's called 'kerbside valuations' that come from real estate agents,' she said. Australia's biggest valuations company, Herron Todd White, conducts about 550,000 property valuations every year. The company's managing director of commercial, agriculture and government valuations, Gavin Hulcombe, said valuations are going to be watched very closely. 'One of the big question marks will be whether they will be full valuations or desktop valuations,' he said. 'We think it should be full valuations because of the scrutiny they are going to get.' He said there had been substantial gains across property, particularly farms, which Labor had considered exempting. The latest annual valuation increases recorded by the Australian Property Institute show agriculture recorded the highest average annual return over two decades at 12.8 per cent, while industrial land returned 8.2 per cent, residential 7.7 per cent, and commercial 7.2 per cent. Mr Hulcombe is expecting a ramp-up in valuations after the new tax is introduced into the parliament. 'We have seen a big increase in inquiries, but not instructions yet, as most clients affected by this are waiting to see what the actual legislation looks like,' Mr Hulcombe said. Valuations can range from as low as $900 to more than $7000, depending on the size of the property, and some superannuants have asked who should bear the cost. Matthew Cranston Economics Correspondent Matthew Cranston is The Australian's Economics Correspondent based in Parliament House. He is an award winning journalist who previously covered the Trump and Biden administrations as White House Correspondent in Washington.

Rupinder Brar's Barkly International College shuts its website, office lights off
Rupinder Brar's Barkly International College shuts its website, office lights off

The Australian

time7 hours ago

  • The Australian

Rupinder Brar's Barkly International College shuts its website, office lights off

You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback. You can now listen to The Australian's articles. A dodgy international college run by a Rolls Royce-driving businessman who sat next to Anthony Albanese at a suspected Labor fundraising event has 'permanently' shut its website. Barkly International College — owned and operated by Indian-Australian property developer Rupinder Brar, who recently lauded the PM as a leader of 'vision, integrity and courage' — was stripped of its registration by a federal watchdog three months ago. BIC's website now only displays a message stating 'our website is permanently closed' and when The Australian visited its Lonsdale St headquarters on Tuesday the lights were out and the office appeared closed. Despite the 'permanent' closure of BIC's website, Mr Brar has maintained he intends pushing ahead with an appeal to overturn the deregistration of the college, which mainly caters to Indian students. 'We have shut the website down so there is no suggestion we are trading or advertising or otherwise breaching ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) requirements while we pursue our appeal against the cancellation,' Mr Brar told The Australian. 'I feel like a broken record, but as advised to you previously (and as you have reported previously), the matter is still before the (Administrative Review Tribunal) so I cannot comment any further.' Melbourne-based Australian-Indian businessman and entrepreneur Rupinder Brar. Mr Brar dined with Mr Albanese and former Victorian Labor premier Daniel Andrews in a four-hour dinner at Toorak mansion last November and has actively promoted his association with the PM on social media. Mr Albanese, Mr Andrews and Mr Brar have all failed to deny the event was an election campaign fund raiser for the ALP. In the days after Mr Albanese's emphatic May 3 federal election victory, Mr Brar described the win as a 'well deserved victory' in a social media post and hailed the PM as a 'true leader with vision, integrity, and the courage to rise above the noise'. Rupinder Brar (seated beside the PM), Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Daniel Andrews (seated to the other side of the PM) at a function held in Toorak on November 12, 2024. 'Despite all the attempts to distract and discredit, the people stood with truth and truth won,' Mr Brar posted. 'I'm proud to have supported a man who leads with purpose and heart. This victory is not just his, but for all who believe in honest leadership and a brighter future. Myself and my community are very much looking forward to working with him in building a better future and contributing to the continued progress of our great nation.' Three months ago the Administrative Review Tribunal rejected an application by BIC to continue teaching foreign students pending an appeal against its deregistration over what the watchdog found were serious noncompliance issues. ASQA cancelled BIC's registration after an investigation found it had breached 30 regulations covering training, ­assessment, enrolment, marketing and governance systems, ­including a lack of training for students, insufficient trainers and educational support services and facilities to support students. Mr Brar has made a fortune out of property investments, in one case pocketing a $22m profit when a company associated with him bought a Craigieburn block for $11m and sold it a year later for $33m. Four months after paying $11m, the Victorian government announced Amazon was locating to a nearby industrial estate. Mr Brar has told The Australian the business had 'no knowledge' that Amazon was moving nearby when it bought the block. Mr Brar's company sold the block for $33m to property investment firm Cadence in November 2022 which, in turn, sold the land to Amazon for $79m. Do you know more? Email Read related topics: Anthony Albanese Damon Johnston Melbourne Bureau Chief Damon Johnston has been a journalist for more than 35 years. Before joining The Australian as Victoria Editor in February 2020, Johnston was the editor of the Herald Sun - Australia's biggest selling daily newspaper - from 2012 to 2019. From 2008 to 2012, Johnston was the editor of the Sunday Herald Sun. During his editorship of the Herald Sun, the newspaper broke the story of Lawyer X, Australia's biggest police corruption scandal, which was recognised with major journalism awards in 2019. Between 2003 and 2008, Johnston held several senior editorial roles on the Herald Sun, including Chief-of-Staff and Deputy Editor. From 2000 to 2003, Johnston was the New York correspondent for News Corporation and covered major international events including the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the city. After joining the Herald Sun in 1992, Johnston covered several rounds including industrial relations, transport and state politics. @damonTheOz Damon Johnston

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store