Poland's new president hopes for good relations with Hungary's Orban
WARSAW (Reuters) -Hungary is an important partner for Poland, newly elected Polish president, Karol Nawrocki, told a Hungarian magazine in his first foreign interview, adding he would be building cooperation within the regional Visegrad Group.
The Visegrad Group, comprising Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, took a back seat after Prime Minister Donald Tusk's liberal coalition took power in 2023 from the nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) party, which had close relations with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
Eurosceptic Karol Nawrocki narrowly won the Polish presidential election this month, delivering a big blow to the efforts of Donald Tusk's centrist government to cement Warsaw's pro-European orientation.
Orban on Friday said Nawrocki's victory was "fantastically good," hailing the success of an ally of U.S. President Donald Trump.
"Hungary is a very important partner for Poland... We are facing serious tasks, such as building the Visegrad Group, which will be an important format for me, as well as strengthening (military alliance) NATO's eastern flank and the Bucharest Nine," Nawrocki told Hungarian news outlet Mandiner in the interview.
"I certainly wish to meet Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is a very effective politician, as proven by his repeated election results in Hungary. And I count on good cooperation with him, just as with other countries, in the interest of the region."
It was not yet clear what Nawrocki's policy on Ukraine would be, but he reiterated that he opposed Kyiv's plans to join the European Union.
Poland supports Ukraine strategically, because "the greatest threat to me, as an anti-communist, and in my opinion to the entire region, is the Russian Federation," he said.
He added that "Ukraine must also understand that other countries – including Poland, Hungary, and other European nations – have interests of their own."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
14 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Government must release Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil, but has until Friday to appeal, judge says
NEWARK, N.J. — A federal judge has ruled that the government must release Mahmoud Khalil, the former Columbia University graduate student whom the Trump administration is trying to deport over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. But Khalil, a legal U.S. resident, will remain in custody until at least Friday, giving the government time to appeal, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said Wednesday. 'The court's decision is the most significant vindication yet of Mahmoud's rights,' said Ramzi Kassem, co-director of CLEAR, a legal nonprofit and clinic at the City University of New York that represents Khalil. 'But we aren't out of the woods until Mahmoud is free and back home with his wife and child.' Lawyers and spokespersons for the Justice Department, which is handling the case, didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under President Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against the war in Gaza. He was then flown across the country and taken to an immigration detention center in Louisiana, thousands of miles from his attorneys and wife, a U.S. citizen who gave birth to their first child while he was in custody. Khalil's lawyers challenged the legality of his detention, accusing the Trump administration of trying to suppress free speech. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has the power to deport Khalil because his presence in the U.S. could harm foreign policy. Farbiarz had ruled earlier that expelling Khalil from the U.S. on those grounds was likely unconstitutional. In his new ruling Wednesday, the judge said that Khalil had shown that his continued detention is causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his free speech rights. However, the judge put his order on hold until 9:30 a.m. Friday to allow the government time to appeal. In his ruling, Farbiarz cited Khalil's statement to the court last week that the revocation of his green card has damaged his career prospects, including a decision by Oxfam International to rescind a job offer to serve as a policy adviser. The judge also noted that the decision deterred Khalil from engaging in constitutionally protected protests and free speech-related activities. 'The Court finds as a matter of fact that the Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled — and this adds up to irreparable harm,' the judge wrote. Farbiarz noted in his ruling that the government has also argued it is detaining and deporting Khalil in part because of alleged omissions on his green card application. But the judge said evidence presented by his attorneys showed lawful permanent residents are virtually never detained for such a thing. Khalil, in his statement to the court last week, also disputed that he wasn't forthcoming on the application. For example, he said he was never employed by or served as an 'officer' of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, as the administration claims, but completed an internship approved by the university as part of his graduate studies. The judge's decision comes after several other legal residents targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another Palestinian student at Columbia, Mohsen Mahdawi; a Tufts University student, Rumeysa Ozturk; and a Georgetown University scholar, Badar Khan Suri. Rubio has cited a rarely used statute to justify the deportation of Khalil and others, which gives him power to deport those who pose 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.' Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The government, however, has said that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country for expressing views that the administration considers to be antisemitic and 'pro-Hamas,' referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Khalil, then an international affairs graduate student, had served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists at Columbia who took over a campus lawn last spring to protest Israel's military campaign in Gaza. The university brought police in to dismantle the encampment after a small group of protesters seized an administration building. Khalil is not accused of participating in the building occupation and wasn't among the people arrested in connection with the demonstrations. But images of his maskless face at protests, along with his willingness to share his name with reporters, made him an object of scorn among those who saw the protesters and their demands as antisemitic. The White House accused Khalil of 'siding with terrorists,' but has yet to give any evidence for the claim. Offenhartz and Marcelo write for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge says Columbia University activist facing deportation should be freed
Supporters of Mahmoud Khalil rally outside the federal courthouse in Newark on March 28, 2025. (Reena Rose Sibayan for New Jersey Monitor) A federal judge ruled Wednesday that a Columbia University activist detained for partaking in pro-Palestinian protests cannot be held by the federal government over allegations that his presence in the United States undermines the nation's foreign policy interests. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz issued the order Wednesday but gave federal prosecutors until Friday at 9:30 a.m. to ask the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals to step in. It's unclear if the activist, Mahmoud Khalil, will be released Friday if the government does indeed appeal. 'This is the news we've been waiting over three months for. Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen,' Noor Abdalla, Khalil's wife, said in a statement from the American Civil Liberties Union of New York. 'True justice would mean Mahmoud was never taken away from us in the first place, that no Palestinian father, from New York to Gaza, would have to endure the painful separation of prison walls like Mahmoud has.' If it stands, Farbiarz's ruling, which comes on the heels of a previous decision that said the government's push to deport Khalil was likely unconstitutional, could deal a blow to the Trump administration's efforts to deport dissidents. Khalil was arrested by immigration authorities in March and has been held in Louisiana since. He's fighting two cases to fend off his deportation — one in Louisiana and one in New Jersey, because he was being transferred through Elizabeth Detention Center when his attorneys first filed a petition for his release. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed Khalil supports terrorist group Hamas and called his presence in the country a national security risk. Rubio has cited a rarely used provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's deportation. Farbiarz noted in his Wednesday ruling that the government could argue that Khalil would have been detained anyway because he inaccurately filled out his lawful permanent resident application, which can be a basis for removal under very rare circumstances. But that argument won't work, he said. 'Lawful permanent residents are virtually never detained pending removal for the sort of alleged omission' Khalil is accused of, the judge wrote in the 14-page filing. Khalil, whose wife and newborn son are American citizens, has not been charged with any crime. He was among the first university students who were picked up by immigration authorities targeting pro-Palestine activists. Some students who were detained under similar circumstances have been released but still face deportation. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jesse Watters, who said Comey's ‘86' post was a ‘hit' on Trump, celebrates that ABC ‘86'd Terry Moran'
Last month, Fox News star Jesse Watters melted down over James Comey's '8647' social media post, insisting that it proved the former FBI director 'obviously was trying to put out a hit on' President Donald Trump. Three weeks later, the MAGA host let slip that his outrage over Comey was all a performative show when he reacted to the firing of Terry Moran by celebrating that the ABC News correspondent had been '86'd' by the network. MAGA world absolutely erupted in mid-May when Comey, a vocal critic of the president who was fired by Trump as FBI chief in 2017, posted an image of seashells on the beach that were arranged to spell out the numbers 8647. Based on '86' being a restaurant-based slang term meaning to 'get rid of' or 'throw out,' Trump immediately claimed that the image 'meant assassination,' as he is the 47th president. The Secret Service would soon launch an investigation into Comey, who claimed there was no 'dark intention' and that it was 'crazy' to suggest he was trying to get the president killed. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard would tell Watters that the ex-FBI director should be 'put behind bars' over the since-deleted post, while FBI deputy director Dan Bongino fumed that Comey 'brought shame to the FBI again' with the image. Of course, many of the conservatives who were apoplectic about Comey's Instagram pic had previously used similar terms in reference to other politicians or impeaching former President Joe Biden, and pro-Trump retailers are still selling '8646' merchandise. Matt Gaetz, the former GOP congressman who now hosts a show on far-right conspiracy channel One America News, once boasted that he had '86'd' several prominent Republicans from leadership roles. 'I was speaking in the past tense about things that had already happened,' Gaetz told The Independent last month. 'Comey was putting out a call for future action. These are distinct.' Watters, meanwhile, was one of the loudest voices in pro-Trump media condemning the former FBI director and calling for action to be taken over the 'death threat' against the president. 'He obviously was trying to put out a hit on Trump, got caught, and deleted it,' Watters grumbled on the May 16 broadcast of The Five, adding: 'Anybody with common sense knows what this guy meant.' He would go on to complain that Comey was 'calling for [Trump's] head' and that he hoped the Secret Service would soon pay him a visit 'because this can't stand.' During his primetime show later that evening, Watters aired a lengthy segment about the Comey post and even went so far as to call for the feds to check for 'sand under [Comey's] fingernails' to see if he was the one who arranged the seashells on the beach. He also took issue with mainstream and liberal media outlets not taking the 'threat' against Trump seriously. 'The media pretending not to know what 8647 means, the same way they pretended not to know that MS-13 was on an American dad's knuckles,' Watters fumed. 'Suddenly, it is legal to threaten the president's life.' Fast forward a few weeks, though, and it appears that the Fox News host has now learned that '86' could have a more ambiguous meaning. 'ABC just 86'd Terry Moran for calling Stephen Miller a hateful bigot,' he declared on Tuesday night, referencing Moran's termination following a late-night tweet criticizing Trump and Miller. 'This was probably the easiest thing that ABC ever had to do.' As he spoke with fellow Fox News host Julie Banderas about ABC parting ways with its longtime correspondent and gaining 'credibility with the White House,' an on-air graphic blared 'TERRY MORAN 86'D BY ABC' across the screen. Meanwhile, Watters' sudden realization that the term '86' doesn't necessarily mean murder was not lost on his critics, who were more than happy to point out his hypocrisy and faux indignation on the Comey situation. 'The entire '86'd' thing was basically a litmus test for who is an honest broker and who is not,' American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick reacted. 'Those who seriously claimed it was a death threat simply should not be trusted to make honest arguments.' 'Starting to think these guys may not be entirely on the level,' Media Matters writer Matt Gertz flatly stated, sharing screenshots of Watters' segments from last month and Tuesday night.
