logo
Bought gold in India? Data shows why you have been winning all along

Bought gold in India? Data shows why you have been winning all along

Gold hasn't had a single negative-return decade in Indian Rupee (INR) terms — a claim the U.S. dollar can't match, said a new report by Capitalmind Financial Services Pvt. Ltd
While the world watches gold push towards $3,300 an ounce in 2025, driven by fears of US economic slowdown, trade wars, and ballooning deficits, Indian investors may already be holding a golden ticket.
Gold has delivered reliable returns when measured in Indian Rupees (INR) — even over long timeframes, which means it has consistently appreciated in value for Indian investors.
These INR returns have actually been better than gold's returns in U.S. Dollars (USD) — meaning, if you bought gold in India and held it over the long term, your gains would likely be higher than someone who bought the same gold in the U.S.
Why the difference? It's largely due to the depreciation of the rupee against the dollar. As the rupee weakens (which it has steadily over decades), the local price of gold in INR goes up, even if the international (USD) price stays flat or falls.
Implication for Indian investors: Gold not only acts as a hedge against inflation and economic shocks, but it also benefits from currency depreciation, making it a more rewarding asset for Indians over time.
Also Read
'Gold's history reveals its dual nature: an enduring store of value and a volatile investment prone to long drawdowns. in spite of its volatility in USD, Gold has been a relatively safer asset for Indian investors on account of the Rupee's depreciation versus the USD. While it won't generate cash flows or compound like equities over decades, its low correlation with other assets makes it invaluable for diversification. The best way to include gold in your portfolio is through systematic rebalancing—not as a reactionary move driven by FOMO but as part of a long-term strategy designed to weather market cycles," said Anoop Vijaykumar, Head of Research, Capitalmind Financial Services.
As per the study, gold is expected to approach $3,300 per ounce in 2025, driven by fears of slowing U.S. growth, geopolitical tensions, and rising fiscal deficits. This surge has coincided with a correction in equity markets, sparking renewed interest in gold as a portfolio diversifier.
Why 2025 Could Be Gold's Next Big Year
This year's rally toward $3,300/oz is fueled by a perfect storm:
Trade War Escalation: U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports hit 145%, with China retaliating at 125%. This reignited demand for gold as a safe-haven asset.
Yuan Weakness: A 19-month low against trade-weighted currencies triggered defensive gold buying by central banks and investors.
Equity Market Correction: Tumbling equity valuations have made gold a go-to diversifier.
Portfolios with just a 5–10% allocation to gold often achieve better risk-adjusted returns than equity-only portfolios.
Capitalmind tested a 50:50 portfolio split between gold and the Nifty 50, rebalanced annually. The result? It outperformed investments in either asset alone over more than 20 years — a surprising revelation given gold's reputation for underperformance versus equities.
This is a textbook example of the Lindy Effect, where strategies that survive over time are more likely to continue succeeding.
Historical Lessons: Gold's Whiplash Decades
Gold investors have experienced wild swings. In the 1970s, gold soared +1359%, only to languish with two decades of negative returns in USD. But INR investors were shielded. After the 1991 reforms liberalized India's economy and decontrolled the rupee, the stage was set for divergence.
From 1990–2002, gold in USD terms struggled, often posting negative five-year rolling returns. Yet INR returns stayed mostly positive, thanks to a steadily weakening rupee.
"As shown in above table, in early 1980, Investors inspired by the stellar returns of the 1970s (+1359%) would have faced two decades of negative returns. Whereas, in Early 2000, after dismissing gold during the poor-performing 1980s and 1990s, investors would have missed its massive rally in the 2000s (+293%)," noted the report.
Missed the 2000s? Y ou missed a +293% rally. That unpredictability is exactly why Capitalmind advocates systematic rebalancing, not emotion-driven decisions.
How about the Indian Investor in Gold?
The report highlights that it took only 8 INR to buy 1 USD in 1973, whereas by 2025 it will take more than 10 times that amount. The returns on gold in INR and USD were fairly similar up until 1990, largely due to India's capital controls and protectionist policies. However, the post-1991 reforms, including trade liberalization and currency decontrol, entrenched a more market-driven exchange rate.
This institutionalized the rupee's sensitivity to external shocks, sustaining the post-1990 divergence in gold returns. As mentioned below, the USD return on gold experienced negative movement between 1990 and 2002, while the INR return remained positive for the most part. On a five-year rolling return basis, the USD return on gold frequently slipped into negative territory, especially between 1990 and 2002. Whereas the five-year INR return mostly stayed positive and has remained ahead of the USD return for the majority of the period.
What should investors do?
A 5–10% allocation can dramatically improve your risk-adjusted returns. And for Indian investors, the rupee's long-term trajectory continues to enhance those gains.
So next time you consider where to park your long-term savings, remember: gold might not shine every year—but in INR, it never dims for long.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"No agreements that would go against the farmers": Shivraj Singh Chouhan on US's demand amid tariff talks
"No agreements that would go against the farmers": Shivraj Singh Chouhan on US's demand amid tariff talks

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

"No agreements that would go against the farmers": Shivraj Singh Chouhan on US's demand amid tariff talks

Live Events New Delhi: Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Friday firmly stated that India will not enter into any agreements that could harm the interests of its farmers, emphasising the paramount importance of safeguarding their rights amidst ongoing trade talks with the US, especially regarding the tariff issues in the country's agricultural and dairy a gathering of farmers in the national capital, the Union Minister noted that there were global voices that had shown concern about India's rapid progress, especially in the context of trade agreements and acknowledged that while India seeks to maintain friendly relations and create fair trade agreements with countries across the world, the spirit of these agreements must be grounded in fairness and equality."In our country, the right of the farmer is paramount, and the right of the citizen is paramount. You know, there are many people in the world who are jealous of our progress. 'What if India makes great progress? Make an agreement with them.' We do make agreements because we see the world as one family. But the spirit of agreement is based on fairness, on equality," he highlighted the agreement made with the UK, where Indian agricultural products would be allowed to enter the UK without tariffs, benefiting Indian farmers . However, he was cautious about any potential trade deals that could jeopardise Indian agriculture."We made an agreement with the UK on equal terms so that the produce of our farmers can go to England without any tax. Many agricultural products will now reach England without tax. But if someone suggests an agreement that allows another country's goods to flood our markets, we cannot compete with them," he Union Minister pointed out the disparity in the scale of farming between India and many foreign countries, stating, "Their farms are massive--10,000, 15,000, or even 20,000 hectares--while our farmers often have just one or two acres, or maybe up to five acres, which is rare. There is no comparison."He also warned that an agreement that allows foreign agricultural products to flood Indian markets could severely harm domestic farmers, driving down prices and depriving them of fair returns."If such an agreement happens, it would kill Indian farmers. Cheap foreign produce will flood the market. If we sell our produce at lower prices, farmers will not get a fair return," he a strong reaffirmation of India's stance, Chouhan echoed the words of Prime Minister Narendra Modi , asserting that no agreement would be signed at the expense of Indian farmers."But PM Modi said there will be no agreements that would go against the farmers. Their rights will be paramount," he Prime Minister Narendra Modi while addressing the nation on the 79th Independence Day, reaffirmed his support to protect farmers, saying that he is "standing tall like a wall against policies which are against farmer interest.""If any policy is against India's farmers, fishermen, cattle rearers, Modi is standing like a wall," PM Modi about standing his ground in the era of 'economic selfishness,' he added, "I say this with great experience. Kisi doosre ki lakeer chhoti karne ke liye, apni oorja hamein nahi khaphai. Hamein poori oorja ke saath hamari lakeer ko lamba karna hai. If we do that, the world will admit our strength."These remarks come during a time when India is actively involved in the discussions on the Bilateral Trade Agreement with the US, which the two sides could not conclude due to the American demand to get comprehensive access to the Indian agriculture and dairy US is pressuring India to open its agricultural market and subsequently imposing a 25 per cent additional tariff, with Washington calling it a 'penalty' for buying Russian oil. (ANI)

'US Thinks They Can Boss Around': Top Economist Jeffrey Sachs Slams Trump Tariffs On India
'US Thinks They Can Boss Around': Top Economist Jeffrey Sachs Slams Trump Tariffs On India

NDTV

time2 hours ago

  • NDTV

'US Thinks They Can Boss Around': Top Economist Jeffrey Sachs Slams Trump Tariffs On India

US economist Jeffrey Sachs has criticised President Donald Trump for slapping hefty tariffs on India, denouncing the policy as both "stupid" and saying it "serves no purpose". Speaking to ANI, Sachs said Trump's move reflects hostility toward the BRICS alliance of India, China, Russia, Brazil and South Africa. "This makes no sense. It's not true. It's failing. Putting the surcharge on India was as stupid as it could be from any norm. It serves no purpose," he remarked. Sachs described Trump as "delusional" and blasted Washington's long-standing habit of exercising global dominance. "The US has exercised its dominant power for so long, they think they can boss every other part of the world around," he said. According to Sachs, the 50% duties slapped on Indian imports, triggered by New Delhi's oil trade with Russia, are not only damaging to America's own economy but also breach global rules. "Everything about the tariffs is wrong. It's destructive for the US economy. It violates international law. It's a breakdown of our political system. Trump's policies are doomed to fail," he warned. The economist also advised India to take a cautious view of Washington, arguing that New Delhi's long-term interests will not be safeguarded by leaning on the US for defence or trade. "US politicians don't care at all about India. Please understand this. India is not going to reap long-term security by siding with the United States in the Quad against China. India is a great power that has an independent standing in the world," Sachs said. Instead, he pointed to China, Russia and Brazil as India's "real partners," cautioning against the belief that India could seamlessly substitute China in global supply chains. Even if India aids in diversifying US sourcing, Sachs said, it should not expect a "great trade relationship" with Washington. He has previously called Trump's tariffs "unconstitutional," arguing they expose deep flaws in America's economic and foreign strategy.

ISL clubs sound alarm to AIFF of facing 'real possibility of shutting down entirely' due to ongoing crisis
ISL clubs sound alarm to AIFF of facing 'real possibility of shutting down entirely' due to ongoing crisis

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

ISL clubs sound alarm to AIFF of facing 'real possibility of shutting down entirely' due to ongoing crisis

A total of 11 Indian Super League clubs, including former champions Mumbai City FC and Bengaluru FC, signed a letter to AIFF president Kalyan Chaubey which urged the national federation to quickly resolve the ongoing impasse over the league's Master Rights Agreement with the Football Sports Development Limited. The 2025-26 season of the Indian Super League, India's top-flight competition since 2019, could be called off entirely if the Kalyan Chaubey-led AIFF is not able to arrive at an agreement with the FSDL over the league's rights agreement soon. PTI The crisis that Indian football currently finds itself mired in threatens to take an even darker turn in the coming days, with eleven Indian Super League (ISL) clubs warning the All India Football Federation (AIFF) that they face 'the real possibility of shutting down entirely'. That is unless the AIFF is able to end its ongoing deadlock with the Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL) over the ISL's Master Rights Agreement (MRA) soon. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The clubs wrote a letter to AIFF president Kalyan Chaubey on Friday in which they added that the impasse between the national federation and ISL organisers FSDL over the non-renewal of the MRA has 'paralysed professional football in India'. More from Football 'Over past 11 years, through sustained investment and coordinated effort, clubs have built youth development systems, training infrastructure, community outreach programmes, and professional teams that have elevated India's footballing credibility both domestically and internationally,' read the letter from the 11 clubs. 'This progress is now in imminent danger of collapse. The current standstill has created immediate and severe consequences. With operations suspended and no certainty on league continuity, several clubs face the real possibility of shutting down entirely.' The crisis surfaced after FSDL, the ISL organisers as well as AIFF's commercial partner, put the 2025-26 season 'on hold' on July 11 due to uncertainty over the renewal of the MRA, prompting at least three clubs to either pause first-team operations or suspend player and staff salaries. 'The 2025-26 ISL season is at risk of not taking place at all. This is not merely an administrative deadlock – it is an existential crisis for Indian football. We write to you in the gravest of circumstances,' the clubs wrote. 'The trust painstakingly built with fans, sponsors, investors, international footballing bodies over the past decade will be irreparably damaged if the league remains in limbo.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Mohun Bagan, East Bengal decide against signing letter to AIFF The letter was signed by Bengaluru FC, Hyderabad FC, Odisha FC, Chennaiyin FC, Jamshedpur FC, FC Goa, Kerala Blasters FC, Punjab FC, NorthEast United FC, Mumbai City FC and Mohammedan Sporting. Kolkata heavyweights Mohun Bagan Super Giant and East Bengal did not the sign the letter. Detailing the risk of club closures and livelihood loss, the letter said, 'More than 2000 direct livelihoods – players, coaches, medical staff, analysts, kit managers, groundsmen, administrative staff – hang in the balance, alongside countless indirect livelihoods dependent on the league. 'Clubs face a season where revenue from tickets, merchandise and other avenues will be reduced to zero. Potential sponsors have already started backing out, looking at the scenario that the ISL is in. 'This is a huge financial blow that clubs will not recover from this year and it will affect payout of salaries to players and staff in the immediate future, besides making several stakeholders contemplate a complete and permanent shut-down of their respective clubs.' The clubs said the impasse will also impact India's readiness for international matches, saying 'without a functioning league, our national team will be severely disadvantaged in upcoming AFC and FIFA tournaments'. Why Indian clubs could face ban in continental events They also said that without the ISL, they will not be able to play a minimum number of competitive matches for participation in continental competitions, thereby risking suspension of Indian clubs from AFC tournaments. 'The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) mandates a minimum number of competitive matches for participation in continental competitions. Without ISL, this requirement cannot be met, putting India at risk of suspension from all AFC and FIFA tournaments,' the clubs said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'FIFPRO, the global players' union, has already apprised FIFA of the situation, increasing the likelihood of external scrutiny and possible sanctions.' Also Read | On Thursday, the AIFF had agreed to mention the raging issue concerning the ISL on Monday. The apex court has reserved its judgement in the case relating to the draft constitution of the AIFF. The decision to apprise the SC of the crisis situation was taken after a . In fact, a reliable source said that the AIFF is willing to file a written application if the Supreme Court asks for one. 'We fully appreciate that related matters are before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. However, from the record of recent hearings, it appears that the immediacy and scale of the crisis have not been clearly conveyed to the Hon'ble Court,' the clubs said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The human cost, the threat of clubs folding, the risk of losing our place in AFC/FIFA competitions, and the reputational harm to India's footballing image demand urgent action on our part. 'We therefore respectfully request the AIFF, as the regulator of Indian football, to urgently mention this matter before the Hon'ble Supreme Court on Monday, 18 August 2025, and to append this letter to present the unified concerns of all ISL clubs before the Hon'ble Court.' The clubs said they are ready to support the AIFF in the case through their counsels though they are not parties to the proceedings before the SC. 'Immediate collective action is the only way to preserve Indian football's future, safeguard livelihoods, and protect the country's standing in the global football community. We remain committed to working alongside the AIFF to achieve a resolution.' With PTI inputs

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store